Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters away. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower.
While this sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.
But, what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additional reading is the most important organ of the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.