Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?


If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.

A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.

The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.

While this sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.

This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. safe distance from 5g tower are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Report Page