Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower can result in many potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.
While it sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther far from antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
what is safe distance from 5g tower overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.