Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell System?
If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, like the development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.
Although this may sound like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were far from antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
safe distance from 5g tower for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.