Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further your location from the tower.
While it sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.
But, safe distance from cell tower revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
Visit this website for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.