Vagina Gaping Com

Vagina Gaping Com

*First Published: Jul 24, 2015, 10:05 pm CDT
More stories to check out before you go

Posted on Jul 24, 2015 Updated on May 28, 2021, 7:13 am CDT
Following rigorous competition and more than 130,000 voters, the World’s Most Beautiful Vagina Contest anointed a champion this week. It was a strange, difficult-to-gauge event—but that’s why organizers turned to scientists to tell us what it all means.
U.K. resident Nell, 27, won first place and $5,000 in the pageant with a vulva beauty ranking of 7.7 out of 10. Jenny, 23, of Bavaria, Germany, took second place with a 7.3; and Anita, 20, from Hungary, came in third. They each earned $2,500 and $1,250, respectively.
The contest was sponsored by Brian Sloan, who is also the manufacturer of the Autoblow 2 . It’s known as “the first truly realistic alternative to traditional pleasure products for men,” according to the its website .
These winners will also be flown out to Los Angeles, where their vulvas will be 3D-scanned to later be reproduced for the Autoblow device.
Sloan contracted a group of data scientists to analyze the contest’s findings for their scientific implications. The data was then compiled in “ The Vulva Paper .”
If you’re a visual learner, you can view photo examples of each class here .
The Vulva Paper’s website says scientists “used the contest data to assess the diversity in vulval morphology and voters’ preference for different morphologies.” A total of 182 women participated in the contest; 110 entries were examined for the study (if measurements could not be taken from the photo, the entry was not considered).
The scientists viewed each entry on a 15-inch computer screen, zooming in “until the genitalia were easily measured using a screen ruler,” read the paper .
They measured labia majora length, labia minora length, and clitoral hood length.
Finally, the scientists rated the complexity of the labia minora; they used the three categories of rugosity (smooth, moderate, marked) to do so. To prevent vaginal bias, the same person also conducted all of these measurements. The scientists later used this research to classify the contest’s entries into six different categories of “vulval morphology.”
A chart detailing the six classes is included below:
As far as methodology is concerned, a random assortment of entries was sent to each voter, who was then asked to rate the vulva pictured on a scale from 1 to 10. These voters were only able to rank one photo at a time, but could also vote on an unlimited number of entries. The scientists compiled 2,766,671 ratings from 134,707 contest voters.
“To reduce individual biases, we centered each voter’s ratings using their mean and standard deviation. This allowed us to reflect the preferences of voters on the same scale,” read the study .
According to the paper , each voter rated 21 photos, on average. Each vulva also received 15,285 votes, on average.
The study also found that “roughly 51% of voters preferred the first two classes of non-protruding, simple labia. The other 49% favored the four more complex vulva classes.”
“As expected from the rankings that we saw at the country and local levels, Class 1 vulvas are preferred over the others more often. But the combined percentages of voters who preferred more complex classes of vulvas far outweighed those who preferred the simplest style.”
The winners’ photos, however, were not included in the study—having been among the participants whose photos were not able to be considered. Moreover, the “doggy style” posture featured in these entries made it difficult for the scientists to complete the necessary measurements.
“Indeed, pictures depicting contest entrants in a doggy style position obtained ratings 2 points higher on average (p <0.001) than others. Other features, like piercings in the clitoral hood, didn’t affect the ratings,” read the study .
So basically, the “doggy style” photos generated “influential excitement” among the contest’s voters—an important competitive advantage for all future entrants to consider.
Photo via mislav-marohnic /Flickr (CC BY-ND 2.0)
‘Disney should just pay their employees a living wage’: Travel vlogger says Disney Cruise Line has ‘weird’ tipping policy, sparking debate
‘They limit what people are allowed to tip you’: Chili’s customer calls out kiosk tip limit in PSA
‘You can get chocolate, vanilla, or twist’: Dairy Queen soft serve quart PSA
‘The best food app fr’: McDonald’s app $2 breakfast hack

*First Published: Jul 24, 2015, 10:05 pm CDT
More stories to check out before you go

Posted on Jul 24, 2015 Updated on May 28, 2021, 7:13 am CDT
Following rigorous competition and more than 130,000 voters, the World’s Most Beautiful Vagina Contest anointed a champion this week. It was a strange, difficult-to-gauge event—but that’s why organizers turned to scientists to tell us what it all means.
U.K. resident Nell, 27, won first place and $5,000 in the pageant with a vulva beauty ranking of 7.7 out of 10. Jenny, 23, of Bavaria, Germany, took second place with a 7.3; and Anita, 20, from Hungary, came in third. They each earned $2,500 and $1,250, respectively.
The contest was sponsored by Brian Sloan, who is also the manufacturer of the Autoblow 2 . It’s known as “the first truly realistic alternative to traditional pleasure products for men,” according to the its website .
These winners will also be flown out to Los Angeles, where their vulvas will be 3D-scanned to later be reproduced for the Autoblow device.
Sloan contracted a group of data scientists to analyze the contest’s findings for their scientific implications. The data was then compiled in “ The Vulva Paper .”
If you’re a visual learner, you can view photo examples of each class here .
The Vulva Paper’s website says scientists “used the contest data to assess the diversity in vulval morphology and voters’ preference for different morphologies.” A total of 182 women participated in the contest; 110 entries were examined for the study (if measurements could not be taken from the photo, the entry was not considered).
The scientists viewed each entry on a 15-inch computer screen, zooming in “until the genitalia were easily measured using a screen ruler,” read the paper .
They measured labia majora length, labia minora length, and clitoral hood length.
Finally, the scientists rated the complexity of the labia minora; they used the three categories of rugosity (smooth, moderate, marked) to do so. To prevent vaginal bias, the same person also conducted all of these measurements. The scientists later used this research to classify the contest’s entries into six different categories of “vulval morphology.”
A chart detailing the six classes is included below:
As far as methodology is concerned, a random assortment of entries was sent to each voter, who was then asked to rate the vulva pictured on a scale from 1 to 10. These voters were only able to rank one photo at a time, but could also vote on an unlimited number of entries. The scientists compiled 2,766,671 ratings from 134,707 contest voters.
“To reduce individual biases, we centered each voter’s ratings using their mean and standard deviation. This allowed us to reflect the preferences of voters on the same scale,” read the study .
According to the paper , each voter rated 21 photos, on average. Each vulva also received 15,285 votes, on average.
The study also found that “roughly 51% of voters preferred the first two classes of non-protruding, simple labia. The other 49% favored the four more complex vulva classes.”
“As expected from the rankings that we saw at the country and local levels, Class 1 vulvas are preferred over the others more often. But the combined percentages of voters who preferred more complex classes of vulvas far outweighed those who preferred the simplest style.”
The winners’ photos, however, were not included in the study—having been among the participants whose photos were not able to be considered. Moreover, the “doggy style” posture featured in these entries made it difficult for the scientists to complete the necessary measurements.
“Indeed, pictures depicting contest entrants in a doggy style position obtained ratings 2 points higher on average (p <0.001) than others. Other features, like piercings in the clitoral hood, didn’t affect the ratings,” read the study .
So basically, the “doggy style” photos generated “influential excitement” among the contest’s voters—an important competitive advantage for all future entrants to consider.
Photo via mislav-marohnic /Flickr (CC BY-ND 2.0)
‘Disney should just pay their employees a living wage’: Travel vlogger says Disney Cruise Line has ‘weird’ tipping policy, sparking debate
‘They limit what people are allowed to tip you’: Chili’s customer calls out kiosk tip limit in PSA
‘You can get chocolate, vanilla, or twist’: Dairy Queen soft serve quart PSA
‘The best food app fr’: McDonald’s app $2 breakfast hack

Upload

menu

Generation 3 in the Apparel Industry

Generation 2.5 CSR in the Apparel Industry

The Irresponsibility of the U.S Apparel Industry

Nike, Inc

The Gap, Inc

Conclusion (You are here)

Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Innovation: A Conceptual Understanding

When industrial democracy meets corporate social responsibility – a comparison of the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as responses to the Rana Plaza disaster

The convergence of corporate social responsibility practices

Economic Motives : To Dominate the Corporate Social Responsibility

Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices

GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Corporate Social Responsibility and Future Earnings

Generation Z and Corporate Social Responsibility

Throughout this CSR discussion, many strategies for companies to improve

reputation, increase the positive impact of their business, and develop holistic practices for
engaging stakeholders across supply chains have been explored. While it would seem that
companies in the apparel industry are still pursuing many CSR strategies, those companies
seen as innovators for CSR, such as Nike, Gap and Patagonia, all seem to be coalescing on a
strategy that integrates all generations of CSR with every area of business operations. This is
a more holistic, program-oriented strategy for CSR that has been developed and described
throughout this paper as Generation 2.5 ethics, or Generation 2.5 CSR.

Today, there are still many barriers to effective CSR practices in the apparel

industry. Fast fashion makes it difficult for apparel companies to keep up with their business
goals while maintaining responsible supply chain management and environmentally and
socially responsible practices. One important example of this is that there is still no

definitive roadmap or timeline to implementing a living wage across global apparel supply
chains. However, many companies are at least claiming to attempt to reach an effective
strategy for defining and implementing a living wage while also improving the quality of
life for stakeholders along extended apparel supply chains.

Further, while small and private companies may have a clearer path towards social
responsibility than larger, public counterparts, due to their ability to determine their own
values and the fact that their legal status allows them to pursue long term goals even with
short-term losses in earnings, larger companies have much more capital and influence in the
global apparel supply chain and therefore have a greater potential impact on the environment

and on communities in which they operate. Fortunately, small and large, private and public
companies have come together to form organizations that encourage responsible behavior in
order to combine the strengths of each member company to reach as many goals as possible.

Critiques discussed in this paper might suggest that apparel companies are merely
developing strategies to appear to be addressing social responsibility issues. Instances of
child labor and even slavery are still abundant in global supply chains. Factory disasters
claim hundreds and even thousands of lives due to a lack of health and safety standards.
However, the progress that has been made in the last two decades illustrates the potential to
reach CSR goals and transform business practices to meet the needs of all stakeholders.
Particularly, the move towards adopting Generation 2.5 ethics, which transforms operations
across a company to include second generation and third generation ethics in every day
business decisions, is a move in the direction of comprehensive CSR practices that address
many of the current criticism of CSR today. With this in mind it is possible to remain
hopeful that many social ills associated with apparel supply chains can be mitigated and are
not inevitable.

1. Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh 2013. Retrieved from:
.
2. Adcock, Kimberly. (2013). Globalization, Women’s Empowerment, & Sustainable

Growth: Development Theory with a Vagina. Global Societies Journal, 1(1).
Retrieved from: .

3. Ahamed, Ferdous. (2013). Improving Social compliance in Bangladesh’s Ready-
made Garment Industry. Retrieved from:

.
4. Akter, Aleya & Khanam, Aklima. (3 April 2014). Bangladesh Garment Workers

Speak Out Against Sweatshops. United Students Against Sweatshops with support
form UAW. University of California, Santa Barbara.

5. Anner, Mark. (2012). Social responsibility and Global Workers’ Rights:
Corporations’ Precarious Quest for Legitimacy with Labor Control. Politics &

Society. XX (X) p. 1. Sage Publications.

6. Auger, Pat. Burke, Paul. Devinney, Timothy. & Louviere, Jordan. (2003). What will
consumers Pay for Social Product Features? Journal of Business Ethics 42: 281-304.
7. BBC News. (April 2014). Dhaka collapse survivors still waiting for compensation.

BBC News Asia. Retrieved from: . Viewed 28
April 2014.

9. Berle, Adolf A., & Means, Gardiner C. (2009). The Modern Corporation and Private
Property. Transaction Publishers. 10th edition. United States of America. Print.
10. Bhasin, Kim. (June 2014). Gap Is Starting To Make Clothes In Myanmar, Where

Workers Are Horribly Mistreated. Retrieved from:

.
Viewed 11 August 2014.

11. Chouinard, Yvon. & Stanley, Vincent. (2012). The Responsible Company: What

We’ve Learned From Patagonia’s First 40 Years. New York: Princeton

12. Clean Clothes Campaign (2012). Indian Garment Industry to Receive Human Rights
Trial. Retrieved from: Viewed 18 April 2014.

13. Daily Mail. (13 July 2011). Nike workers ‘kicked, slapped and verbally abused’ at
factories making converse. Daily Mail. Retrieved from:

.

14. David, F. Viederman, D. Plant, R. McQuade, A. Batstone, D. Bales, K. & Costello,
T. (Dec 2012). Harnessing the power of business to eliminate modern slavery.
Retrieved from: . Viewed 10
September 2013.

15. Davies, R. B., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2013). A race to the bottom in labour
standards? An empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics (103) 1-
14.

16. DeWinter, Rebecca. (2001). The Anti-Sweatship Movement: Constructing Corporate
Moral Agency in the Global Apparel Industry.” Ethics & International Affairs. Vol.
15, 2.

17. Distelhorst, Greg. Hainmueller, Jens. & Locke, Richard M. (2014). Does Lean
Improve Labor Standards? Capability Building a
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Arcade Attack
Seks Transsexuals
Nylons Feet Toes

Vagina Gaping Com

Report Page