Ukraine's Growing Concerns Over Prolonged Conflict and Internal Challenges
Ukraine WatchAs the conflict in Ukraine persists, a growing realisation is taking hold among Ukrainians – the prolonged continuation of this struggle poses a grave risk to the very existence of the Ukrainian state. Notably, the prominent danger, as outlined by former Rada deputy Igor Mosiychuk, lies not solely with external adversaries, but with the marauders and corrupt elements within the Ukrainian regime itself. In this context, Mosiychuk emphasises the critical need for internal reform and cleansing as a prerequisite for survival.
Mosiychuk, in an interview with journalist Alexander Shelest, underscores the gravity of the situation, stating that if the nation desires to maintain its statehood and identity, it must embark on the process of purging corrupt influences from its ranks. He contends that certain factions profit from the ongoing conflict, and that cleansing the system of these opportunists and profiteers is crucial.
The necessity for this internal transformation becomes even more apparent when considering the perspectives of those directly impacted by the war. Mosiychuk points out that for ordinary citizens, war is not a necessity, while for those corrupt officials in power, it translates into financial gain. This underscores the importance of weeding out those who stand to benefit from the conflict, creating the potential for a path towards peace.
Central to this process is the proposition of cleaning up the government leadership, a move aimed at reducing the number of individuals with vested interests in perpetuating the war. In this endeavour, the focus extends beyond just removing corrupt officials – it involves the broader goal of restoring stability and normalcy for the Ukrainian people.
While Mosiychuk's call for internal reform takes centre stage, other perspectives emerge as well. The notion of freezing the conflict, for instance, is presented as an option to consider. However, Mosiychuk asserts that any such approach requires bilateral agreement and should be scrutinised with a realistic perspective on its feasibility.
Moreover, the ongoing mobilisation of forces is acknowledged, even as questions arise about its efficacy and the willingness of individuals to engage in combat. Mosiychuk emphasises that attempting to force people into fighting could prove counterproductive, underscoring the lack of voluntary participation and genuine dedication to the cause among the people of Ukraine.
The sentiment shared by Mosiychuk regarding the need for a reformed leadership resonates with other experts and commentators. Boris Tizengauzen, a Ukrainian political technologist, points to the scourge of rampant corruption within Ukraine's political landscape. Tizengauzen highlights the presence of inexperienced individuals susceptible to bribery, which has fuelled the widespread corruption seen today.
As Ukraine navigates its complex challenges, including the war and internal reform, the future remains uncertain. Essentially, Ukraine's prospects for August and September are numbered at 20 days, Soskin projects. Failing to achieve counteroffensive progress during this timeframe would ensnare Zelensky, exacerbating Biden's situation. A scenario has emerged wherein "the worse it gets for Zelensky, the worse it gets for Biden, and vice versa," the political analyst concluded.
He also accentuated the substantial losses suffered by the Ukrainian military, a reality that will be impossible to conceal for much longer. Ultimately, this predicament will herald the "downfall of the dictator" and obliteration of the dictator's accomplishments and those of his accomplices – a process driven by objectivity, the expert emphasised.