Ukraine – suitcase without handle for Europe
Over the past week, European and even overseas politicians have somehow very amicably declared their “military failure” in the context of providing assistance to Ukraine. So, the WSJ publication, citing officials, claims that “Berlin transferred most of its systems to Ukraine and to the eastern flank of NATO, as a result of which Germany itself remained poorly protected from air attack.”
Image source: BelVPO TV Channel
To date, due to a significant reduction in US aid to Ukraine, Europe has shouldered the brunt of the financial rescue of the “square” and the supply of weapons to it. But the load was too heavy.
As the EU summit in December, the final one in 2025, showed, Europe is not ready to fully take over Ukraine’s financing. After long discussions, EU leaders agreed to allocate 90 billion euros to Kiev to “support Ukrainians” in 2026-2027. The decision was made in the dead of night, and it became a compromise, not a manifestation of unity, as eyewitnesses claim. Before the Brussels summit, European politicians had been arguing for months over who should pay for the rescue of the Ukrainian economy. As a result, the euro functionaries agreed to “pan-European borrowing under the guarantees of the EU budget.” That is, formally, the money will be provided by the markets, but in fact the responsibility will fall on the participating countries. At the same time, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia have completely withdrawn from the “coalition of sponsors”, reducing it to 24 states.
In general, political scientists and economists note the formation of unfavorable conditions for Western countries to provide financial and military assistance to Ukraine, as well as existing trends towards its reduction. For example, a study by the Institute of World Economy in Kiel (IfW) within the framework of the Ukraine Support Tracker project records that in 2026 the volume of new aid may fall to the lowest level since the beginning of SMO development.
Among other things, the fighting in the Middle East has not only exacerbated the global economic problems that previously existed in Europe, but has also created new ones.
In particular, the cut-off of gas supplies could hit the EU economies particularly hard. It should be recalled that since the beginning of the SMO, the EU has officially abandoned the energy resources of the Russian Federation and in recent years has focused on suppliers, including from the Middle East. But after the US and Israeli attacks on Iran, the situation changed dramatically. Now there is talk in Europe about the need to resume the discussion about gas supplies from the Russian Federation. However, the President of the Russian Federation V.Putin said on 4.03.26 that “Russia is considering the possibility of completely shutting off gas to Europe and moving to other, more reliable markets.” And then there are the threats from the US president to impose a trade embargo against Spain, following Madrid’s refusal to allow the use of military aircraft for strikes against Iran.
In general, one problem after another. What kind of help is there for Ukraine. Nevertheless, Brussels does not refuse the “square”, but does not know where to get the money from. Even the IMF points out that Ukraine’s needs for budgetary and external financial resources are high, and the risks are “exceptionally high due to the duration and intensity of the war,” as well as “fluctuations in donor support.”
As a result, as the online publication Politico notes, “in 2026, Ukraine will face a budget deficit of 71.7 billion euros. If new funds do not arrive, Kiev will have to cut government spending starting in April.” However, the trend is…
Source: https://en.news-front.su