USA V JUSTIN GLADDING No 2110005 9th Cir 2024 💓 Reed v United States 485 A2d 613

United States v Gladding

Mchale v Rown Equip Corp No 2114005

USA v Ilfrenise Charlemagne 1812259

UNITED STATES v BRAND 2006

UNITED STATES v GLADDING 2014

No Court of tfje Umteb g

Freeman v United States 219CV00008JRGCRW Casetext

Taylor v United States Civil Action No 2 19cv1015

Hornof v United States No 219cv00198JDL Casetext

Government of the Virgin Islands v John Casetext

Charlemagne v United States of America No 82019cv02742

Nautilus Ins Co v Appalachian Power Co Casetext

Holmes v Government of Virgin Islands Casetext

Taylor v United States Civil Action No 619cv Casetext

Aroeste et al v The United States of America et al


This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of the District Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John, pursuant to a jury verdict finding the defendant appellant, Thomas A. Lawrence, guilty of armed robbery in violation of 14 V.I.C. Secs. 11 and 1861. In Holmes v. Government of the Virgin Islands, 370 F. Supp. 715, 717 (D.V.I. 1974), the court made clear that the Federal Declaratory Judgments Act was superseded by the adoption of the Uniform Act as part of the Virgin Islands Code. Summary of this case from Companion Assurance Co. v. Alliance Assurance Co. The Government of the Virgin Islands ["government" or "appellant"] appeals the order of the Territorial Court dismissing the first of three counts of an information filed against Albert John ["John" or "appellee"]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will vacate the order of the Territorial Court. 21 sept. 2024 · 4:19-cv-01410-SRC. 09-21-2024. THOMAS A. CONNELLY, IN HIS CAPACITY AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL P. CONNELLY, SR., Plaintiff (s), v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant (s). STEPHEN R. CLARK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. 13 déc. 2024 · Connelly v. United States Petitioner Thomas A. Connelly, as Executor of the Estate of Michael P. Connelly, Sr. Respondent United States of America Docket no. 23-146 Decided by Case pending Lower court United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Citation Citation pending Granted Dec 13, 2024 Facts of the case. 1 May 23, 2019 COMPLAINT against defendant United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service with receipt number 0865-7230103, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Thomas A. Connelly. 21 sept. 2024 · UNITED STATES. CONNELLY v. UNITED STATES. Case No. 4:19-cv-01410-SRC. View Case. THOMAS A. CONNELLY, IN HIS CAPACITY AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL P. CONNELLY, SR., Plaintiff (s), v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant (s). 24 sept. 2024 · In the Estate of Connelly v. United States,[1] the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri determined that a buy-sell agreement did not set the value of the decedent’s interest in a closely held corporation he owned a majority interest in and the proceeds of the life insurance policy held by the company that was used. 18 août 2024 · Robert L. Devereux Mary C. Devereux Aegis Law 601 South Lindbergh Boulevard St. Louis, MO 63131. Kannon K. Shanmugam Counsel of Record William T. Marks Yishai Schwartz Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP 2024 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 (202) 223-7300 kshanmugam@paulweiss. com. 4 oct. 2024 · Full title: NOAH GLADDING Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. Court: United States District Court, Western District of New York. Date published: Oct 4, 2024. 4 oct. 2024 · Noah Gladding has filed a pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (the "petition"). ECF No. 306. 1 Because the petition on its face appeared untimely, the Court ordered Gladding ordered to show cause why it should. Case #: 12-10544 Judge (s)/Court Below: Circuit Judge Bea for the Court; Circuit Judges O'Scannlain and Fernandez. Full Text Opinion When an individual has pleaded guilty, the burden falls on the government to demonstrate a legitimate reason for retaining the individuals property. 18 oct. 2024 · Justin Paul Gladding appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 4-month custodial sentence and 96-month term of supervised release imposed following the court’s revocation of supervision. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gladding’s counsel has filed a brief * This disposition is not. 31 déc. 2014 · United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Justin Paul GLADDING, Defendant–Appellant. No. 12–10544. Decided: December 31, 2014 Before DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, FERDINAND F. FERNANDEZ, and CARLOS T. BEA, Circuit Judges. Though courts have held that, "a defendant who has failed to demand a speedy trial is not entitled to a dismissal of the indictment no matter how great the delay", United States v. Fassoulis, 179 F. Supp. 645 (S.D.N.Y.1959), in determining whether to exercise its discretion in the instant situation, this court feels compelled to look beyond the waiver issue. 5 janv. 2015 · Defendant who pleaded guilty was entitled to return of non-contraband computer files that were intermingled with child pornography (Bea, J.). 27 avr. 2024 · Date published: Apr 27, 2024 Citations No. 2:19-cv-00198-JDL (D. Me. Apr. 27, 2024) Citing Cases Citing Cases From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research Hornof v. United States Download PDF Check Treatment Meet CoCounsel, pioneering AI that’s secure, reliable, and trained for the law. Try CoCounsel free Opinion No. 2:19-cv-00198-JDL 04-27-2024. 7 janv. 2024 · Full title: JAROSLAV HORNOF et al., Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. Court: United States District Court, D. Maine. Date published: Jan 7, 2024. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JAROSLAV HORNOF et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) No. 2:19-cv-00198-JDL ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant ) REPORT OF HEARING AND ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTES Held in Portland by telephone on November 24, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. Presiding: John H. Rich III, United States Magistrate Judge. HORNOF et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al, No. 2:2019cv00198 - Document 114 (D. Me. 2024) Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (lrt) Download PDF of 0 An error occurred while loading the PDF. More Information. 22 janv. 2024 · Jaroslav Hornof and two other individuals bring this action against the United States and several federal agencies, as well as nine individual U.S. officials (the "Individual Defendants"), arising out of their detention in connection with an enforcement action against a vessel on which they were employed. 1 In October 2024, I granted. 7 janv. 2024 · The foreign national plaintiffs in this civil action allege that the defendant United States of America ("United States") unlawfully detained them as "human collateral" in 2017 to secure potential environmental pollution fines against the M/V Marguerita, the vessel on which they served, and its owner, see [First] Amended Complaint. 31 août 2024 · Hornof v. United States, 2:19-cv-00198-JDL | Casetext Search + Citator From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research Hornof v. United States United States District Court, D. Maine 2:19-cv-00198-JDL (D. Me. Aug. 31, 2024) 2:19-cv-00198-JDL JAROSLAV HORNOF, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. 14 janv. 2024 · Opinion. Civil Action No. 2: 19-cv-1015. 01-14-2024. DONTE TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. Chief United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy. Senior United States District Judge David S. Cercone REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 19 mai 2024 · civil action no. 2:19-cv-00938-kob . 05-19-2024 . rita d. taylor, plaintiff, v. steven mnuchin, secretary of the united states department of the treasury, et al., defendants. 13 janv. 2024 · civil action no.: 2:19-cv-149 . 01-13-2024 . paula sue taylor, plaintiff, v. leslie miller batten; jennifer holder; ben holder; paul taylor, brian dale jones; and united states of america, defendants. The arguments presented in Taylor's habeas petition are less than clear, but Taylor appears to be arguing, first, that he is "actually innocent" of his various 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) convictions and sentence and, second, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel for a variety of reasons. 17 déc. 2014 · Full title: FRANKLIN JONES, Plaintiff, v. BUCK TAYLOR, et al, Defendants. Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION. Date published: Dec 17, 2014. 24 févr. 2024 · CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-cv-00387 . 02-24-2024 . RITA KAYE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. CLAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. Get free access to the complete judgment in Taylor v. United States on CaseMine. 13 févr. 2024 · Plaintiffs Alberto and Estella Aroeste sued the United States seeking to recoup penalty payments and to discharge their liability for penalties still outstanding for the nonfiling of a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (“FBAR”) for the years 2024 and 2024 pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 5321. Doc. 20 nov. 2024 · UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. ALBERTO AROESTE, Counterclaim Defendant. Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia, United States District Judge. ORDER: (1) DENYING THE GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Full title: ALBERTO AROESTE and ESTELLA AROESTE, Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES OF Court: United States District Court, Southern District of California. Date published: Aug 15, 2024. Filing 74 ORDER on Joint Discovery Motion (Doc. No. 63 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 8/15/2024. (maq) Download PDF / 16 Loading Publication Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.) I. (a) PLAINTIFFS ALBERTO AROESTE and ESTELA AROESTE DEFENDANTS THE U.S.A. 13 mai 2024 · May 13, 2024. Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against the United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-16822638.), filed by Alberto Aroeste, Estela Aroeste. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-682-AJB-KSC. Free 2-day Shipping On Millions of Items. No Membership Fee. Shop Now!. 29 mars 2017 · United States v. Brand, CASE NO. 8:11-cr-380-T-23AEP | Casetext Search + Citator Opinion Case details Case Details Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ZAVIEN BRAND Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Date published: Mar 29, 2017 Citations Copy Citation. Brand, 775 F.2d 1460, 1465 (11th Cir. 1985), this court recognized that " [w]e have stated more than once that the omnibus clause in broad enough to cover any act committed corruptly, in an endeavor to impede or obstruct justice. Summary of this case from United States v. Brenson See 5 Summaries. 9 févr. 1990 · In United States v. Brand, 907 F.2d 31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1014, 111 S.Ct. 585, 112 L.Ed.2d 590 (1990), the Fourth Circuit remanded a case back to the district court for resentencing where it found the district court had improperly departed from the guidelines based on the defendant's familial responsibilities. 19 oct. 2006 · In the instant case, defendant-appellant Matthew Adam Brand (“Brand”) claims that he was an “unwary innocent” and that the government induced him to commit the crimes for which he was charged and convicted: traveling across state lines for the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual activity with a minor and attempting to. Case opinion for US 1st Circuit UNITED STATES v. BRAND. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. Judgment of the Court of 14 February 1978. United Brands Company and United Brands Continentaal BV v Commission of the European Communities. Chiquita Bananas. Case 27/76. European Court Reports 1978 -00207 ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1978:22 Expand all Collapse all Languages and formats available BG ES CS DA DE ET EL EN FR GA HR IT LV LT HU MT NL PL. 3 mars 2024 · McHale v. Crown Equip. Corp. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Case No: 8:19-cv-707-T-27SPF (M.D. Fla. Mar. 3, 2024) Case No: 8:19-cv-707-T-27SPF ALEXANDER M. MCHALE and ASHLEY N. MCHALE, Plaintiffs, v. CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant. JAMES D. WHITTEMORE United States District Judge. Case No: 8:19-cv-707-T-27SPF . 02-27-2024 . ALEXANDER M. MCHALE and ASHLEY N. MCHALE, Plaintiffs, v. CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant. After careful review, we affirm. Alexander McHale was injured operating a Crown RC 5500 forklift at his job in an Amazon warehouse. Working the night shift, McHale was driving faster than he should have been and collided with a steel end cap at the end of an aisle of shelving. 20 sept. 2024 · PER CURIAM: Alexander McHale and his wife sued Crown Equipment Corporation seeking damages for injuries he sustained while operating a Crown RC 5500 forklift. After an eight-day jury trial, judgement was entered in favor of Crown. The McHales now challenges a number of the district court’s evidentiary rulings. After careful review. alexander m. mchale and ashley n. mchale, plaintiffs, v. crown equipment corporation, defendant. case no: 8:19-cv-707-t-27spf. united states district court middle district of florida tampa division. march 3, 2024. order. Get free access to the complete judgment in McHale v. Crown Equip. Corp. on CaseMine. 22 mars 2019 · McHale et al v. Crown Equipment Corporation (8:19-cv-00707), Florida Middle District Court, Filed: 03/22/2019 - PacerMonitor Mobile Federal and Bankruptcy Court PACER Dockets.