Tutor Plays With College Sophomore Girls

⚡ TOUTES LES INFORMATIONS CLIQUEZ ICI 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻

Tutor Plays With College Sophomore Girls
We'll notify you here with news about
Turn on desktop notifications for breaking stories about interest?
Single mom who paid off $34K of debt empowers other single moms to face their debts
Queen Elizabeth live updates: Queen Elizabeth II set to make final journey to London
'Wheel of Fortune' brings NASA technology to Season 40
Woman whose rape DNA led to her arrest sues San Francisco
How much has US military aid helped Ukraine's stunning offensive?
Cameras capture reactions when a tutor seduces a boy. What would you do?
Oct. 28, 2010— -- In the decade since teacher Mary Kay Letourneau was sent to prison for her affair with a sixth grade boy, countless other "cougar" educators turned predators have made headlines.
Their inappropriate behavior typically takes place behind closed doors, but what if it was played out in public? What if a cougar tutor made flagrant advances to an unwilling young student in a cafe? Would anyone step up and come to the rescue of a young boy in need?
The hidden cameras of ABC News' " What Would You Do? " were cached in Dominick's Bakery & Cafe in Staten Island, N.Y., to find out. With actors Mia Price playing the role of cougar tutor and Zach Meliani portraying an underage student, the cafe was the setting for a steamy math tutoring session.
Click here to watch the latest episode of "What Would You Do?"
Zach was reviewing his textbooks when the cougar tutor entered the restaurant. She took off her blouse, exposing a slinky pink top, and immediately had a captive cafe wide audience. She began the tutoring session by massaging the boy's neck and shoulders and running her fingers through his hair.
Once their food order arrived, she sampled a pastry and told her young charge, "Oh, my God, this is better than sex."
Three women seated at a nearby table looked concerned, but didn't initially step in. However, as soon as the predator headed for the restroom, one of the women, Joanne Felice, turned to the boy and asked him, "Are you OK? "
He shyly replied, "I don't know what to do because I'm supposed to, she's my tutor, like she's going to be my teacher next year and my mom hired her. But, like, she wants me to go back home and study at her house."
Felice told him, "I don't think she's acting right. For an adult, she shouldn't be acting that way."
The cougar returned to the table. When Zach left for the restroom, the women laced into her.
"You're embarrassing him, and he went into the bathroom because he's uncomfortable," said one of the diners, Kathy Zito.
"Oh that explains quite a bit. I can't understand what I possibly could have been doing to embarrass him," the predator replied.
Zito added sarcastically, "Let's take a survey. Then you'll know."
"Excuse me? (I'm) teaching him," the cougar replied.
Felice jumped back in, "You need to touch him like that? I don't think you know what you're doing."
The cougar repeated her defense, saying she was just tutoring her student.
Missy Quest, a registered nurse seated nearby, overheard the heated exchange. She noted that the tutorial session seemed to be less focused on math and more on "sex ed."
The tutor quickly got up and tried to leave with Zach, but the women in the restaurant stood up too and acted as human shields.
Zito grabbed her friend's cell phone and offered to call Zach's mother.
"It'll be a cold day in hell before you drive him home! I'll tell you that right now! We're calling 911, and that's who's taking him home. You have to leave. I'll pay your bill. You have to go. Sit down Zach. I don't know what school you work at, but I am going to tell you right now, I'm going to find out and report everything that went on! I think you should leave," Zito said.
At that point, John Quinones, host of "What Would You Do?" entered the cafe and exposed the experiment. He asked Zito what was going through her mind as she witnessed the cougar's conduct and the young boy's resistance. Zito said, "If that were my son, I would want somebody to stick up for him. She was inappropriate."
The emotional reaction continued to play out all day, especially when one customer, Kristen Cole, turned out to be a teacher herself. Cole said she had seen and heard enough, and decided to school the predator.
"You are an adult and I'm a teacher as well. But I never actually stroke and touch my students. Your behavior is inappropriate. You shouldn't be touching a 15 year old boy in that manner," she lectured the cougar. Cole added that because the tutor was in a position of authority, she should be mindful that her actions have serious impact on young boy.
Cole later told ABC that her strong feelings came from experience. "I teach high school. The most interesting thing about it over the 13 years is truthfully, we live in a world where there are so many more dangers. At times, you don't know who to trust and who not to trust. So you can either trust no one, which is scary, or you can be brave enough to try to trust someone. And a lot of times that tends to be a teacher, which is why it's horrible when teachers take advantage of that," she said.
Taking advantage of an underage student hit a sensitive nerve with the female patrons at the café. But what about the men? How would they react? And what if, instead of resisting, the young boy welcomed the cougar's advances? Would anyone step in?
Click here to watch the latest episode of "What Would You Do?"
24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events

Sports | Committing to Play for a College, Then Starting 9th Grade
Committing to Play for a College, Then Starting 9th Grade
More on College Sports Playoff Expansion : The College Football Playoff will triple in size to 12 teams no later than the 2026 season . The move is intended to capitalize on America’s vast appetite for the sport. From Power 5 to Mighty 2 : As the Big Ten and the SEC consolidate power, some fear the rest of college sports could become a muddle . Big Ten Deal: The conference reached the richest-ever television agreement for a college athletic league, selling the rights to its competitions to Fox, NBC and CBS. Here is how student-athletes in the Big Ten greeted the news . A Miserable TV Experience: With inane commentary and lots of ads, college football broadcasts can be awful. They’re hugely lucrative anyway .
As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.
SANFORD, Fla. — Before Haley Berg was done with middle school, she had the numbers for 16 college soccer coaches programmed into the iPhone she protected with a Justin Bieber case.
She was all of 14, but Hales, as her friends call her, was already weighing offers to attend the University of Colorado, Texas A&M and the University of Texas, free of charge.
Haley is not a once-in-a-generation talent like LeBron James. She just happens to be a very good soccer player, and that is now valuable enough to set off a frenzy among college coaches, even when — or especially when — the athlete in question has not attended a day of high school. For Haley, the process ended last summer, a few weeks before ninth grade began, when she called the coach at Texas to accept her offer of a scholarship four years later.
“When I started in seventh grade, I didn’t think they would talk to me that early,” Haley, now 15, said after a tournament late last month in Central Florida, where Texas coaches showed up to watch her juke past defenders, blond ponytail bouncing behind.
“Even the coaches told me, ‘Wow, we’re recruiting an eighth grader,’ ” she said.
In today’s sports world, students are offered full scholarships before they have taken their first College Boards, or even the Preliminary SAT exams. Coaches at colleges large and small flock to watch 13- and 14-year-old girls who they hope will fill out their future rosters. This is happening despite N.C.A.A. rules that appear to explicitly prohibit it.
The heated race to recruit ever younger players has drastically accelerated over the last five years, according to the coaches involved. It is generally traced back to the professionalization of college and youth sports, a shift that has transformed soccer and other recreational sports from after-school activities into regimens requiring strength coaches and managers.
The practice has attracted little public notice, except when it has occasionally happened in football and in basketball. But a review of recruiting data and interviews with coaches indicate that it is actually occurring much more frequently in sports that never make a dime for their colleges.
Early scouting has also become more prevalent in women’s sports than men’s, in part because girls mature sooner than boys. But coaches say it is also an unintended consequence of Title IX, the federal law that requires equal spending on men’s and women’s sports. Colleges have sharply increased the number of women’s sports scholarships they offer, leading to a growing number of coaches chasing talent pools that have not expanded as quickly. In soccer, for instance, there are 322 women’s soccer teams in the highest division, up from 82 in 1990. There are now 204 men’s soccer teams.
“In women’s soccer, there are more scholarships than there are good players,” said Peter Albright, the coach at Richmond and a regular critic of early recruiting. “In men’s sports, it’s the opposite.”
While women’s soccer is generally viewed as having led the way in early recruiting, lacrosse, volleyball and field hockey have been following and occasionally surpassing it, and other women’s and men’s sports are becoming involved each year when coaches realize a possibility of getting an edge.
Precise numbers are difficult to come by, but an analysis done for The New York Times by the National Collegiate Scouting Association, a company that consults with families on the recruiting process, shows that while only 5 percent of men’s basketball players and 4 percent of football players who use the company commit to colleges early — before the official recruiting process begins — the numbers are 36 percent in women’s lacrosse and 24 percent in women’s soccer.
At universities with elite teams like North Carolina and Texas, the rosters are almost entirely filled by the time official recruiting begins.
While the fierce competition for good female players encourages the pursuit of younger recruits, men’s soccer has retained a comparably relaxed rhythm — only 8 percent of N.C.S.A.’s male soccer athletes commit early.
For girls and boys, the trend is gaining steam despite the unhappiness of many of the coaches and parents who are most heavily involved, many of whom worry about the psychological and physical toll it is taking on youngsters.
“It’s detrimental to the whole development of the sport, and to the girls,” Haley’s future coach at Texas, Angela Kelly, said at the Florida tournament. 
The difficulty, according to Ms. Kelly and many other coaches, is that if they do not do it, other coaches will, and will snap up all of the best players. Many parents and girls say that committing early ensures they do not miss out on scholarship money.
After the weekend in Florida, the coach at Virginia, Steve Swanson, said, “To me, it’s the singular biggest problem in college athletics.”
The N.C.A.A. rules designed to prevent all of this indicate that coaches cannot call players until July after their junior year of high school. Players are not supposed to commit to a college until signing a letter of intent in the spring of their senior year.
But these rules have enormous and widely understood loopholes. The easiest way for coaches to circumvent the rules is by contacting the students through their high school or club coaches. Once the students are alerted, they can reach out to the college coaches themselves with few limits on what they can talk about or how often they can call.
Haley said she was having phone conversations with college coaches nearly every night during the eighth grade.
The early recruiting machine was on display during the Florida tournament, where Haley played alongside hundreds of other teenage girls at a sprawling complex of perfectly mowed fields.
A Sunday afternoon game between 14-year-olds from Texas and Ohio drew coaches from Miami, Arizona, Texas and U.C.L.A. — the most recent Division I national champion. Milling among them was the most storied coach in women’s soccer, Anson Dorrance of North Carolina, who wore a dark hat and sunglasses that made him look like a poker player as he scanned the field.
Mr. Dorrance, who has won 22 national championships as a coach, said he was spending his entire weekend focusing on the youngest girls at the tournament, those in the eighth and ninth grades. Mr. Dorrance is credited with being one of the first coaches to look at younger players, but he says he is not happy about the way the practice has evolved.
Mr. Dorrance’s biggest complaint is that he is increasingly making early offers to players who do not pan out years later.
“If you can’t make a decision on one or two looks, they go to your competitor, and they make an offer,” he said. “You are under this huge pressure to make a scholarship offer on their first visit.”
The result has been a growing number of girls who come to play for him at North Carolina and end up sitting on the bench.
“It’s killing the kids that go places and don’t play,” he said. “It’s killing the schools that have all the scholarships tied up in kids who can’t play at their level. It’s just, well, it’s actually rather destructive.”
The organizer of the Florida event, the Elite Clubs National League, was set up a few years ago to help bring together the best girls’ soccer teams from around the country, largely for the sake of recruiters. At the recent event, in an Orlando suburb, an estimated 600 college coaches attended as 158 teams played on 17 fields over the course of three days.
Scouts were given a hospitality tent as well as a special area next to the team benches, not accessible to parents, to set up their folding chairs. Nearly every youth club had a pamphlet — handed out by a parent during the games — with a head shot, academic records, soccer achievements and personal contact information for each player. 
While the older teams, for girls in their final two years of high school, drew crowds of recruiters, they were generally from smaller and less competitive universities. Coaches from colleges vying for national championships, like Mr. Dorrance, spent most of their weekend watching the youngest age group.
Despite the rush, there is a growing desire among many coaching groups to push back. At a meeting of women’s lacrosse coaches in December, nearly every group session was dedicated to complaints about how quickly the trend was moving and discussions about how it might be reversed. In 2012, the Intercollegiate Men’s Lacrosse Coaches Association proposed rule changes to the N.C.A.A. to curtail early recruiting. But the N.C.A.A. declined to take them up, pointing to a moratorium on new recruiting rules. (At the same time, though, the N.C.A.A. passed new rules allowing unlimited texting and calls to basketball recruits at an earlier age.)
What we consider before using anonymous sources. Do the sources know the information? What’s their motivation for telling us? Have they proved reliable in the past? Can we corroborate the information? Even with these questions satisfied, The Times uses anonymous sources as a last resort. The reporter and at least one editor know the identity of the source.
“The most frustrating piece is that we haven’t been able to get any traction with the N.C.A.A.,” said Dom Starsia, the men’s lacrosse coach at Virginia. “There’s a sense that the N.C.A.A. doesn’t want to address this topic at all.” 
 In an interview, Steve Mallonee, the managing director of academic and membership affairs for the N.C.A.A., reiterated his organization’s moratorium on new recruiting rules. He said the new rules on texting and calling were allowed because they were a “presidential initiative.”
Mr. Mallonee said the N.C.A.A. did not track early recruiting because it happened outside of official channels. He added that new rules trying to restrict the practice would be hard to enforce because of the unofficial nature of the commitments.
“We are trying to be practical and realistic and not adopt a bunch of rules that are unenforceable and too difficult to monitor,” he said.
The early recruiting system has given significant power to club coaches, who serve as gatekeepers and agents for their players.
One of the most outspoken critics of this process is Rory Dames, the coach of one of the most successful youth club teams, the Chicago Eclipse. In Florida, Mr. Dames kept a watchful eye on his players between games, at the pool at the Marriott where they were staying. As the 14- and 15-year-old girls went down the water slide, he listed the colleges that had called him to express interest in each one.
“Notre Dame, North Carolina and Florida State have called about her,” he said as one ninth grader barreled down the slide.
Another slid down behind her. “U.N.C., U.C.L.A. and I can’t even remember who else called me about her,” he said.
Mr. Dames said that he kept a good relationship with those programs but that he generally refused to connect colleges with girls before their sophomore year in high school, when he thinks they are too young to be making decisions about what college to attend.
Some colleges, though, do not take no for an answer and try to get to his players through team managers or other parents. After one such email was forwarded to him, Mr. Dames shot back his own message to the coach: “How you think this reflects positively on your university I would love to hear.”
He did not hear back. Mr. Dames said that when his players wait, they find scholarship money is still available.
Most club coaches, though, are more cooperative than Mr. Dames and view it as their job to help facilitate the process, even if they think it is happening too early.
Michael O’Neill, the director of coaching at one of the top clubs in New Jersey, Players Development Academy, said that he and his staff helped set up phone calls so his players did not miss out on opportunities. They also tutor the players on handling the process.
“You almost have to,” Mr. O’Neill said. “If you don’t, you can get left behind.”
Once the colleges manage to connect with a player, they have to deal with the prohibition on making a formal scholarship offer before a player’s final year of high school. But there is now a well-evolved process that is informal but considered essentially binding by all sides. Most sports have popular websites where commitments are tallied, and coaches can keep up with who is on and off the market.
Either side can make a different decision after an informal commitment, but this happens infrequently because players are expected to stop talking with coaches from other programs and can lose offers if they are spotted shopping around. For their part, coaches usually stop recruiting other players.
“You play this goofy game of musical chairs,” said Alfred Yen, a law professor at Boston College who has written a scholarly article on the topic and also saw it up close when his son was being recruited to play soccer. “Only in this game, if you are sitting in a chair, someone can pull it out from under you.”
Mr. Yen said that colleges withdrew their offers to two boys his son played with, one of whom ended up in junior college and the other at a significantly less prestigious university. Other players who made early decisions went to colleges where they were unhappy, leading them to transfer.
The process can be particularly tricky for universities with high academic standards. 
Ivy League colleges, which generally have the toughest standards for admission, generally avoid recru
Nympho aux gros seins enculée
Domestic Na Kanojo 9 Vostfr
Je retrouve ma pute après deux mois à l’étranger