Tube Sound
🔞 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
Tube Sound
This website discusses repair of electronic items. Electrical voltages are present and represent a danger. Repairs should only be attempted by a qualified technician. We do not provide free personalized troubleshooting.
All content is the opinion of the author and not intended as advice.
The 2050 Gas Thyratron tube is a tube used in many Seeburg jukeboxes. Even though a 2050 tube is not listed on the setup charts of Sencore Mighty Mite models TC162 and TC28, you can test them. Settings are 6-A-5, socket #1. The key to a proper test is that you MUST engage the LIFE …
Simon Flint from Australia contacted me today because he noticed that the Sencore Mighty Mite setup data for the diode section in tube EAF801 (which is an RF Pentode with Diode section) did not appear to be testing the diode section properly. He wanted to know if I could investigate. I examined the Telefunken datasheet …
Here is a letter from the Technical Service department of CBS Hytron tube company, dated June 1954, that discusses a common problem with tube testers. In this letter [ PDF ], which I scanned and restored via Photoshop for better readability, a person from the Max Fischman Co of Pittsburgh wrote to CBS Hytron Co. …
Meter reading Range Micromhos BCDEF Reset DIRECTIONS: Enter your meter reading (0 – 120) into the “Meter reading” box. Choose your Range Switch position in the drop-down box. Press the “Calc Gm” button and read your micromhos score. Press “Reset” button to clear your entries or to start another calculation. NOTES: calculator works for all …
Meet the TubeSound TTM-1: Testing of almost all amplifying tubes (triode, tetrode, pentode, beam power) from antique 4-pin (such as a #10, #45, or #50) through 9-pin novar (such as a 7868). Socket configuration — 4-pin, 5-pin, 6-pin, 7-pin medium (aka 1625), 7-pin miniature, octal, loctal, 9-pin-miniature, and 9-pin novar. All tests use exact tube …
Everywhere
Threads
This forum
This thread
WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required as is 20 years of participation in forums (not all true). There are daily reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions.
Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
If "Tube Sound" Is a Myth, Why Tubes?
Thread starter
watchnerd
Start date
Aug 22, 2019
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,420
Likes
10,264
Location
Seattle Area, USA
Disclosure: my university education was in applied physics and signal processing, and I currently work in the software industry, so my knowledge of electrical engineering is not zero, but I'm no EE. So apologies in advance for any technical errors.
This thread is inspired in part by comments I've seen from @SIY , and others, that there is no such thing as "tube sound", per se, and that properly designed tube amps should be neutral.
Which then raises a number of questions, in my mind:
--If tube based amps can be made to avoid "tubey sound", why bother with tubes instead of solid state?
--If a tube based amp is designed to avoid "tubey sound", what impact does that have on tube rolling?
--If a tube based amp is designed to avoid "tubey sound", does it have any impact on the output impedance, current, or other factors that differentiate tubes from solid state?
--Does it matter at all if there are tube rectifiers in the circuit?
--Is there a reason to prefer transformers to boost converters?
--Between driver, power, and rectifier tubes, which are have the most impact on the sound, assuming a "non tubey" design goal?
--If tubes don't have a sound, what's the point of hybrid tube amps?
Joined
Nov 24, 2018
Messages
45
Likes
119
Like other senses, our hearing gets compensated by other information that brain has. There are little muscles below our hair cells that sense the sound. The brain use this muscle to hear what it wants to hear more clearly. This is why we can talk to other people in noisy environment.
When we see a music coming out from tube amp, our brain emphasizes certain sounds in accordance with our bias. Someone who thinks that tube amp sounds 'warm' will focus on bass. Someone who thinks that tube amp has its own 'texture' or 'harshness' will focus on highs.
This also means that no matter you intend to make tubey sound or not, if there is a tube or analog VU meter on top of the amp, people will 'hear' tubey sound. The designer's choice will be the color of LED to make tube glow.
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,420
Likes
10,264
Location
Seattle Area, USA
Like other senses, our hearing gets compensated by other information that brain has. There are little muscles below our hair cells that sense the sound. The brain use this muscle to hear what it wants to hear more clearly. This is why we can talk to other people in noisy environment.
When we see a music coming out from tube amp, our brain emphasizes certain sounds in accordance with our bias. Someone who thinks that tube amp sounds 'warm' will focus on bass. Someone who thinks that tube amp has its own 'texture' or 'harshness' will focus on highs.
This also means that no matter you intend to make tubey sound or not, if there is a tube or analog VU meter on top of the amp, people will 'hear' tubey sound. The designer's choice will be the color of LED to make tube glow.
Joined
Jul 22, 2018
Messages
452
Likes
1,316
Location
Other
Without bothering to answer all of the questions above individually, it is fair to say that a competent design can be achieved with various devices. So it should not matter what technology is used in the rectifier, output stage or input stage, but if the designer is not so expert then the characteristics of the devices can affect the performance, perhaps in a way that can be audible.
Some valve amplifiers sound like the preconceptions and some people like that, it can even be advantageous in some systems with other nonlinearities that are either compensated for or avoided or covered by the poor amplifier.
Similarly it is of little importance if the devices are BJTs or JFETs or MOSFETs IF the design is competent, then it will be transparent.
Never underestimate the power of marketing and cognitive biases with amplifier sales.
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,420
Likes
10,264
Location
Seattle Area, USA
Without bothering to answer all of the questions above individually, it is fair to say that a competent design can be achieved with various devices. So it should not matter what technology is used in the rectifier, output stage or input stage, but if the designer is not so expert then the characteristics of the devices can affect the performance, perhaps in a way that can be audible.
Joined
Feb 24, 2016
Messages
10,201
Likes
15,924
Location
uk, taunton
Reactions:
bidn , mbomberdavid , Veri and 2 others
Joined
Jul 22, 2018
Messages
452
Likes
1,316
Location
Other
So if the technology shouldn't matter, why bother using bigger, hotter, more expensive tubes, instead of ICs?
Joined
Jul 28, 2018
Messages
118
Likes
288
Location
New Zealand
Nostalgia, bragging rights, buying into audiophile community group-think...
I once came across a quote that basically said, the more you have personally emotionally and financially invested in a certain belief, the harder it is to accept you were wrong and thus relinquish that belief.
Basically if you have extolled to others the benefits of tubes, cables, cable-lifters, vinyl, and invested your own hard earned cash in the same, the harder it is to admit you were a fool and wasted your money.
Joined
Apr 6, 2018
Messages
8,677
Likes
19,660
Location
Alfred, NY
--If tube based amps can be made to avoid "tubey sound", why bother with tubes instead of solid state?
--If a tube based amp is designed to avoid "tubey sound", what impact does that have on tube rolling?
--If a tube based amp is designed to avoid "tubey sound", does it have any impact on the output impedance, current, or other factors that differentiate tubes from solid state?
--Does it matter at all if there are tube rectifiers in the circuit?
--Is there a reason to prefer transformers to boost converters?
--Between driver, power, and rectifier tubes, which are have the most impact on the sound, assuming a "non tubey" design goal?
--If tubes don't have a sound, what's the point of hybrid tube amps?
“"If I have been able to see further, it is because I have been surrounded by midgets"
- Murray Gell-Man
Best coffee on the planet
Joined
Nov 30, 2018
Messages
2,376
Likes
6,035
Location
Canada
In that case why not just put VUs and non-functioning tubes (just a heater element, no audio circuit) as a facade on a class D amp?
Joined
Feb 24, 2016
Messages
10,201
Likes
15,924
Location
uk, taunton
Personally I bought some tube amps/pre's because I read about them being so much better than their nasty modern SS equivalent.
Turned out this was bullshit ,at least with the stuff I bought ( Audio Research) sounded quite thin and not at all 'tubey' . The amp bored me to death and the pre did nothing extra va a SS , So no expanded soundstage etc.
They looked kinda cool though.
Reactions:
gonzoucab , bidn , fieldcar and 2 others
Joined
Jul 4, 2019
Messages
458
Likes
453
There is one school of thought that an amp should just be transparent in that what comes out should be a perfect replica of what goes in as indicated by various measurements. The closer you get to this asymptotically, less it matters how it is achieved since the thesis is that you cannot really tell the difference between them with well-designed listening tests. This camp does not claim there is no “tube sound”. But holds that the “tube sound” comes from deviations from the perfect replica of sound and so not of interest (to them).
There is another school of thought that the goal isn’t a perfect replica but rather to achieve what is perceived as more pleasant or musical or less fatigue-inducing or emotionally satisfying for them individually. The measurements would only be relevant to the extent that they don’t indicate distortions or characteristics that would lead to less of those desired goals, like clipping, gross non-linearities, etc. Achieving perfect replicas is not the point at all.
Both are perfectly legitimate schools of thought even if they vehemently don’t agree with each other and go to extreme lengths to invalidate the other which is largely a futile and a “religious” argument (because of the differences in the axioms of each school, rather than the methodology).
In an ideal world, both would co-exist peacefully but are drawn into conflict when realities of the marketplace force manufacturers to claim that their equipment simultaneously satisfy both those schools of thought and therein lies the problem .
Joined
Apr 6, 2018
Messages
8,677
Likes
19,660
Location
Alfred, NY
They're called "hybrids" and yeah, when implemented well , that's pretty much how it ends up.
“"If I have been able to see further, it is because I have been surrounded by midgets"
- Murray Gell-Man
Best coffee on the planet
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
15,830
Likes
26,529
In that case why not just put VUs and non-functioning tubes (just a heater element, no audio circuit) as a facade on a class D amp?
Joined
Jul 22, 2018
Messages
452
Likes
1,316
Location
Other
I remember reading how as a grad student J_J had people come and listen to tube vs SS amps. The tube amp was able to light up the tubes, and looked functional, but was never used. It was SS both times. Yet the tube sound was heard until one of the instructors caught on.
Reactions:
Tim Link , atfaber , fieldcar and 8 others
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
15,830
Likes
26,529
My thinking 20-25 years ago was different from the mainstream in the audiophile world. It was often suggested if you needed power, but liked tubes, a tube preamp got you more than halfway there. I never found that to be true. I didn't find it to get you at all there in fact.
Tube amps did sound different. But I was using ESL's. Very high impedance in the lower 200 hz (like 15-40 ohms), and very low impedance in the upper octave and a half (like an ohm or two). A good push pull triode with a moderately high output impedance (maybe SIY says bad design) would elevate the low end enough to notice, and soften the treble enough to notice. I could measure that. It wasn't just bias, it really sounded different. Into my ESLs it is also possible the tube amp at least on peaks had some audible distortion that wasn't obvious enough to sound like distortion.
Now I thought more than that sounded different. Some of the sense of space, a 3D quality SS amps didn't have. I did my own tests at one point like what the Swedish AES did. Load an amp output with resistors, drop the level enough that input to output was unity gain, and feed that into another amp powering the speakers. At the time I did this I thought tube amps did things SS couldn't do in the space and 3D area. I was using a VTL and a Spectral. To my surprise, the VTL fed into the Spectral exhibited all the space and 3D qualities which meant whatever the triode tubes were doing was captured accurately by he Spectral. It was triodes being of superior fidelity, it was triodes having a pleasing coloration. This is not what I was expecting at all. Reversing positions the Spectral had all the coloration of a meter of interconnect. You could tell if it was just interconnect to the amp or going thru the Spectral. In time I tried this with a few other amps.
Now this wasn't blind listening on my part. I did do this for one of my audiophile buddies. I switched with him out of the room several times. He could within seconds correctly tell me if the VTL was in circuit or not. He was not able to reliably tell as to whether the Spectral was in circuit, and took longer to answer. Still single blind, and a couple minutes to switch. Plus I know the FR was different.
In any case, people who want tube sound or believe in it, could use low powered tube amps like preamps feeding them into clean SS amps to have their cake and eat it too. I've even had in mind making a preamp with the right character. Using 12AT7s in push pull circuits able to deliver a watt or so, transformer coupled and loaded by resistors on the output to be like a mini push-pull triode amp. You could even switch in a few elements to simulate loudspeaker loading. Probably should have done it years ago without saying what I was doing. Come up with some marketing story to sell.
Reactions:
oivavoi , hmscott , lashto and 5 others
Joined
Jul 22, 2018
Messages
452
Bart Simpson Femboy Porn Pics
Slut Barbie
Amateur Masturbate Vk