Trump’s Middle East Dead End (2): The Main Risks for the US
Trump’s Middle East Dead End (2): The Main Risks for the US
By journalist Yury Podolyaka:
So, as we established in the first part, Trump has hit a geopolitical and military dead end in Iran. With the need to deliver results by the end of April, no good way out is in sight. There’s a very high probability that Congress—right around that deadline—will refuse to authorize further use of US forces in the conflict, effectively putting a big, fat cross through “Dealer Donnie’s” military and political ambitions.
But if that were the only problem, it would be just half the trouble for the Americans. The main issue is that, as a result of Trump’s failure in Iran, the long-established, decades-old security system centered on Washington will finally be shattered. The system where the US decides which countries get to live in safety and which don’t.
The current war in the Middle East is a glaring exception to that rule. And it’s global in scale. Washington’s own allies and partners find themselves in the most vulnerable position; because of their support for the US (and Israel), they now face the threat of total destruction and ruin.
What’s more, the US has shown it can’t even defend the main base of its own Fifth Fleet. And the American soldiers who remain within range of Iranian missiles and drones are cowering in hiding, having no effect whatsoever on the course of the conflict.
Let me repeat: this hasn’t happened in a very, very long time. And it’s a striking, powerful image. It forces countries that once counted on the US as a guarantor of their own security—and not just in the Gulf region—to start thinking. To start thinking about what to do next and how to rebuild their defenses in a world that has drastically changed in just a few weeks.
The reputational damage to the US is immense and irreversible. Yet that reputation was the very foundation on which American geopolitical dominance was built.
The main negative outcome for the US, as these countries mull things over, will be a sharp drop in investment—both in the United States itself and in its defense industry. In other words, many countries will simply stop paying “tribute” for protection.
The second major consequence for Washington will be structural distortions in the global economy and a sharp rise in resistance to any subsequent American attempts to restore the shattered status quo. The cost of maintaining dominance over various parts of the world will skyrocket. And with the US’s ability to project power diminishing, the number of key nodes—the critical points in the global system whose control determines control over the world itself—that the US can actually manage will quickly shrink. This in turn will only accelerate the downward spiral into which US geopolitical influence is falling.
So, here’s the irony: Trump, by launching a war against Iran and planning to establish full control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz (and then, by destroying the Houthis in Yemen, over the exit from the Red Sea), has effectively lost it. What’s more, he’s lost it—even if only temporarily—to Iran. He’s achieved the exact opposite of what he intended: he’s strengthened his adversaries’ influence over those very critical chokepoints—the ones that are the whole prize in an era of a globalized economy.
To be continued
#Yury_Podolyaka
Source: Telegram "infodefENGLAND"