Trujillo buying ganja

__________________________

📍 Verified store!

📍 Guarantees! Quality! Reviews!

__________________________

▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼

▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲

Trujillo buying ganja

On August 6, , sales began with first dual-use dispensaries opening their doors to recreational consumers. This site aims to address questions that many people may be asking, such as where can I consume marijuana or how much product can an individual be allowed to purchase, as well as more complex questions, such as what is the expected tax revenue going to be and how might marijuana legalization affect public health and public safety? The question-and-answer section of this resource is divided into the following subsections: adult-use recreational users, medical marijuana patients, cannabis industry, general questions, public safety impact and public health impact. Each subsection aims to help Ohioans better understand what cannabis legalization could mean for their communities. It is important to note that the information below reflects the language of the enacted law; the Ohio General Assembly can make changes to any aspect of the statute at any time. It is important to note that the information below reflects the language of the initiated statute passed by Ohio voters. The Ohio General Assembly can make significant changes to any aspect of the statute at any time. Within days of the passage of Issue 2, various members of the Ohio General Assembly have proposed making legislative changes to a number of the provisions of the new law. Proposed reforms have been introduced in the General Assembly and legislative hearings continue to be conducted on some of the bills, including House Bill 86 , House Bill , House Bill , and House Bill The table below compares the four proposed legislations to each other, as well as to the currently enacted Ohio Revised Code Chapter created by Issue 2. Please note: The Ohio General Assembly can make significant changes to any aspect of the statute at any time. The materials in this section were last updated September 4, In addition to content below, DEPC has produced both research and events that focus on marijuana reforms in Ohio and nationally. The center has produced reports on the estimated tax revenue of adult-use marijuana legalization in Ohio, the existing Ohio Medical Marijuana Control Program, lessons to draw from states that have transitioned from medical to recreational marijuana reforms, how to effectively incorporate social equity into cannabis laws and regulations, and more. The Coalition to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol launched its initiative for adult-use marijuana in summer Following initial endorsement by the Ohio Attorney General and the Secretary of State's ballot board, the Coalition fell short of the required , signatures in December However, by late January , the Secretary approved the additional signatures, and the measure was passed to the Ohio General Assembly, which did not act. A legal tussle over the initial signatures occurring in spring eventually led to a settlement, allowing the Coalition a streamlined process for the election. After giving the General Assembly a second chance to act in early , the group embarked on collecting the second round of signatures in early May. Though they initially missed the mark by signatures, an additional 6, were approved on August 16, ensuring the measure's spot on the November ballot. In an effort to better clarify the process through which an initiated statute can become law in Ohio, DEPC has produced both a visual and an accessible text outline. YES — as of December 7, , adult users are allowed to grow six plants per individual, with a limit of 12 plants total per residence where two or more adult-use consumers reside at one time. The vast majority of states 17 of 23 that have legalized adult use allow their residents to grow a limited number of plants for personal use, ranging between two Montana and 12 plants Michigan. In our previous research, we heard from regulators who stressed that effectively managing home grow is necessary for public safety and for minimizing diversion to the illicit market. Regulators suggested two strategies to limit the potential negative effects of home grow provisions: giving law enforcement agencies clear and enforceable directions and keeping the allowed number of plants relatively low while also incorporating residency limits limiting the number of plants that can be grown in a residence regardless of how many adults reside there. Possession limits across legalized states vary, but they are generally between 1 - 2. The state with the highest permitted possession limit is New Jersey, which permits possession of 6 oz. The amount of medical marijuana possessed by a registered patient shall not exceed a ninety-day supply:. May purchase 2. No limitation on how cannabis can be consumed. T he language from the initiative provides additional detail:. Employment protection for marijuana use is a complex issue, shaped partially by the continued federal prohibition on marijuana as well as the challenge of detecting how and when past marijuana use may impair job performance. Ohio's employment rules are not unique; the majority of states that have legalized marijuana do not provide employment protections. However, in all three states employers can continue with drug free workplace policies. NO — employers are allowed to continue workplace drug policies prohibiting consumption. However, Act creates additional protections for:. Under the current law, existing medical marijuana licensees receive preferential treatment in regard to adult use licenses, with every medical dispensary in good standing being able to apply for a dual-use license for their existing location, as well as an additional dispensary license for adult-use customers. Similarly, existing producers in good standing are also allowed to apply for a dual-use license, which allows them to cultivate product for both the medical and recreational markets. Most states that have legalized adult use marijuana recognize the different nature of use between medical and recreational user and do not impose any additional taxes on patients beyond the standard state sales tax. State regulators will have to make a decision as to whether they want to increase potency limits for medical marijuana patients assuming that the Ohio General Assembly does not act to change the limits. There are no official caps on the number of licenses, however, there are limits included in the law with respect to the initial number of licenses and the Division of Cannabis Control has the power to decide whether to issue additional licenses, or cap licenses for specific areas, based on the balance of supply and demand in the market. The initial number of licenses will be affected by the below allocation of licenses to medical establishments. States have varying regulations for different types of licenses with some limiting how many licenses one entity or one individual can hold at one time to mitigate fears of market domination by large actors. Of the previous 23 states that have legalized adult-use marijuana, ten have enacted license limits based on an established cap or contingent on county population. Arizona limits licenses relative to the total number of pharmacies operating in the state. The licensing fees assessed by states for adult-use businesses vary widely from state to state and license to license. There are many considerations that go into determining license fees — states want to ensure that their regulatory structures can be wholly funded by the proceeds from the marijuana industry while at the same time they also need to consider the barrier high fees create for small and minority-owned businesses. Transparency about the costs of administering a marijuana program and how fees are spent can be helpful in ensuring that fees are not set too low or too high. Most states that have undergone a transition from medical to recreational marijuana market have treated existing medical marijuana licensees as having a preferred status compared to the general population, whether by being able to submit applications ahead of others, having a fast-tracked approval process or being automatically eligible for licenses within the recreational sphere. As with any other policy choice, this carries with it both benefits, such as shorter implementation time, and drawbacks such as limiting the ability of new entrepreneurs and entrepreneurs from communities most affected by prohibition to get involved or be prioritized. Division of Cannabis Control shall issue up to 40 Level III adult use cultivator licenses with preference provided to applicants who have been certified as cannabis social equity and jobs program participants. Division of Cannabis Control shall issue up to 50 additional adult use dispensary licenses who have been certified as cannabis social equity and jobs program participants. The law does not appear to have any provisions giving preferential treatment based on residence alone. Requirements for licenses have changed through the years with multiple states removing in-state residency requirements for their adult-use licenses. States were initially concerned with large corporations entering the market and leaving less economic opportunity for state residents. Currently, six states have provisions requiring resident status to qualify for a specific marijuana license. A majority of states have enacted license provisions granting social equity applicants preference for certain license types. The taxation levels under the legalization initiative falls in the mainstream when compared to other states. Based on available information, New Jersey appears to have the lowest tax burden of 6. No special tax levied on medical marijuana purchases. Patients are subjected to regular state 5. Advocates for cannabis reform in Ohio and in other states often stress the tax revenue that can be raised through legalization. Every state with legalized adult-use marijuana has established a plan to allocate marijuana revenue generated through the tax and fee collection. The plans vary widely, with some states focusing on funding education and law enforcement, while others distribute resources to localities, substance abuse programs, social equity programs, research, veteran services and others. The state sales tax and the local sales tax will be deposited in respective general funds. Over the last decade, social equity has slowly become a major concern. States whose initial regulations did not include social equity provisions have amended the original legislation to include provisions assisting communities and individuals disproportionately impacted by marijuana enforcement. Almost every state, besides Alaska and Maine, have implemented some form of expungement or record sealing for past marijuana offenders, with 16 states providing for some form automatic record relief for a marijuana-related offense. Additionally, some states have set aside licenses for social equity applicants and established funds to help communities negatively impacted. Though providing earmarked funds and a list of activities for the cannabis social equity and jobs program, the initiative does not create a clear set of instructions for the use of funds nor specific details on how various activities will be pursued. The passed law includes establishment of the cannabis social equity and jobs program in the interest of remedying the harms resulting from the disproportionate enforcement of marijuana-related laws and to provide financial assistance and license application support to individuals most directly and adversely impacted by the enforcement of marijuana-related laws who are interested in starting or working in cannabis business entities. Additionally, Division of Cannabis Control shall issue up to 40 Level III adult use cultivator licenses and 50 additional adult use dispensary licenses with preference provided to applicants who have been certified as cannabis social equity and jobs program participants. Almost every state has adopted laws enabling localities to completely prohibit or significantly limit adult-use marijuana establishments from operating within their jurisdiction. Localities can prohibit establishments through ordinances or opt-out through voter referendum. Unlike the rest of adult-use states, New Mexico is the only state where the legislation included provisions preventing local jurisdictions from completely prohibiting adult-use licenses from operating. YES - Localities may adopt ordinances to prohibit adult-use dispensaries but may not prohibit or limit existing operational medical marijuana cultivators, processors, or dispensaries; or an adult use cultivator or an adult use processor, or an adult use dispensary who is co-located with adult use cultivator and an adult use processor, who have, or whose owner have, a medical marijuana certificate of operation at the same location as of the effective date of the act. A municipal corporation or township may vote to prohibit the operation of an adult use dispensary within days of the dispensary license being issued. For more information, including a list of municipalities that have prohibited the operation of adult-use marijuana businesses within their jurisdiction, see Local Moratoriums for Ohio Adult Use Marijuana Operators. Marijuana reform, especially legalization for recreational purposes, raises important questions about how such policy change might impact public safety and public health. Because marijuana legalization is a new development and takes various forms in different locales, rigorous research into questions related to effects on crime, impaired driving, youth use of marijuana and other impacts on health and safety has only just begun. To date, research results do not yet paint a clear picture on most of these important questions. The small sample of studies presented in the sections below were selected to demonstrate that, while researchers are starting to explore these questions, data limitations and the relative recency of these changes means that continuing and sustained research is needed to help policymakers design regulations and policies to minimize potential harms and maximize potential benefits. To date, researchers have found mixed results when looking at the question of whether marijuana legalization results in higher number of traffic accidents or higher rates of impaired driving. To assess the effect of legalization on traffic fatalities in Colorado and Washington, a study by Hansen, Miller, and Weber used a synthetic control approach with data on fatal traffic accidents between and The authors found little evidence to support the idea that recreational legalization dramatically increased traffic fatalities. Specifically, synthetic control groups had similar changes in marijuana- and alcohol-related traffic fatality rates, as well as a similar change in overall traffic fatalities, despite not having legal marijuana. On the other hand, a study by Adhikari, Maas and Trujillo-Barrera found that legalization of recreational marijuana resulted in an increase of 1. Most studies that have looked at the question of road safety note important data limitations as well as lack of clear understanding of marijuana impairment. For example, Windle and co-authors found that marijuana legalization and decriminalization were correlated with an increase in positive cannabis tests among drivers. However, they determined that many of these studies were at risk of bias due to potential confounders and measurement error. The authors also emphasized that while more drivers may have tested positive for cannabis, this does not necessarily mean they were driving impaired as tetrahydrocannabinol THC can be detected for long periods of time after consumption. Whether marijuana legalization is linked to an increase or decrease in crime is of great interest to policymakers and researchers. Unfortunately, this question is also very difficult to study due to data limitations that exist in our criminal justice system, the relative recency of legalization and the number of confounding factors present. Nevertheless, several studies have tried to ascertain the relationship between marijuana legalization and crime. A study focusing on Colorado found that the opening of medical and recreational dispensaries decreased violent crime in nearby neighborhoods with incomes above the median although it had virtually no impact on aggregate rates of violent and property crimes overall. The authors also found a decrease in non-cannabis drug- and alcohol-related crimes near dispensaries. While they found that vehicle break-ins were elevated within a mile of dispensaries, they concluded that marijuana legalization had a net benefit with regard to crime rates. An additional study focusing on recreational legalization in Washington and Oregon found that legalization likely caused a drop in crime. Specifically, the authors found that legalization resulted in a significant reduction in rape and property crime on the Washington side of the border compared to both the Oregon side and the pre-legalization years. Furthermore, while marijuana consumption increased, use of other drugs and alcohol decreased. At the same time, some studies found increases in crime rates after cannabis legalization. For example, using UCR data from to to examine the effect of marijuana legalization on crime rates in Oregon, one study found increases in crime rates for several types of offenses, including property and violent crime. In another study pertaining to crime in Oregon, Wu and Willits found that the rate of simple assault had increased following legalization. However, they noted that their post-legalization time frame was fairly short and should be reassessed by future research. Other research found no significant changes in crime following marijuana legalization. For example, using UCR data, Lu et al. They found no statistically significant effects of marijuana legalization on violent or property crime. Similarly, a review study looking at data from several legalized states indicated that violent crime neither increased nor dropped dramatically following cannabis legalization. Overall, the literature exploring the relationship between liberalization of marijuana policies and crime seems to suggest that legalizing marijuana is not a threat to public safety. Unlike other public safety questions around marijuana legalization, whether there is an impact on arrest rates is fairly straightforward. Numerous studies indicate significant drops in the number of arrests following the legalization as well as decriminalization of adult-use marijuana. Firth and co-authors used National Incident Based Reporting System NIBRS data on marijuana-related arrests and found that marijuana arrest rates among people over 21 fell dramatically after legalization of marijuana possession in Washington State, and that rates stayed at similar levels following the opening of the retail market. However, while marijuana-related arrest rates for both White and Black adults decreased, relative disparities increased. African Americans previously had an arrest rate 2. Similarly, recent research on Colorado and Washington has also found that while cannabis-related arrest rates generally declined after legalization, racial disparities persisted. Thus, while legalization lessens the absolute number of people who come into contact with the criminal justice system overall, more needs to be done to specifically address racial disparities. As with questions about public safety, the research findings on many questions related to public health are mixed. In respect to rate of use, some research indicates an increase in marijuana use overall, while other research shows decreased rates of use among teens. In a report from the Journal of the American Medical Association, the enactment of adult-use legalization laws showed no significant association with marijuana use or marijuana use frequency among high school students. Similarly, medical cannabis laws did not impact youth usage rates. A study that looked at teen use in California and Washington found that both states recorded a drop in teen use post-legalization, which was consistent with data from non-legalized states suggesting an overall national drop in teen use of marijuana. This was later supported by a survey by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which highlighted that past day cannabis use among U. As with previous questions, continued rigorous research focused on rates of use among adults and adolescents is needed to ensure that policymakers and regulators have the necessary information to effectively regulate legal cannabis markets. Special attention should be paid to harmful levels of use. A number of studies have noted an increase in the number of cannabis-related emergency room visits over the last two decades. For instance, a CDC study from noted an increase in cannabis-involved emergency room visits for people under the age of 25 during the COVID pandemic, while also noting a statistically significant increase prior to pandemic. However, this study was not specifically focused on states with legalized recreational marijuana or on tracking the impact of such legalization on emergency room visits. A recent study looked at cannabis positivity rates in 17 emergency departments across the US with different stages of marijuana legalization. According to the authors, most states experienced a significant increase in cannabis positivity rates as legalization progressed, however, the positivity rates differed. In most states with no cannabis legalization, there was still a significant, albeit smaller, increase in cannabis positivity rates in emergency room visits. Similarly, a study from Colorado noted an increase in emergency room visits for patients between 13 and 21 years of age from to In summary, there has been an observed increase in emergency room visits related to marijuana use in states that have legalized marijuana. It is important to keep in mind though that even states that have not legalized marijuana have seen an increase in emergency room visit, and studies that were conducted in legalized states had some significant limitations. While these limitations are worth noting, there also appears to be a consensus among scholars that regulators should pay specific attention to mandating child-proof containers for cannabis product and prohibiting marketing of products whose packaging mimics popular child-friendly snacks and candy. The connection between marijuana legalization and the labor market is of great interest to employers and policymakers alike, prompting questions about changes to the prevalence of workplace incidents, changes in productivity and labor participation, and impact on worker compensation costs. But as with many other questions surrounding marijuana reform, the research to date provides mixed evidence, with very little research being available on the impact of recreational adult use legalization specifically. In respect to workplace injuries, majority of research to date focuses on whether there is a link between use of marijuana and workplace accidents, rather than on the link between marijuana legalization and injuries. A study found that individuals that consumed marijuana on the job, were nearly twice as likely to experience some form of workplace injury, although there was no negative effect for consumption of marijuana outside of the workplace. In respect to medical marijuana legalization, some research actually showed a positive impact, with a study finding that legalization of medical marijuana was associated with a In regard to labor supply, a study found a positive relationship between medical marijuana laws and labor supply among older adults. For adults 51 years and older, the study showed an increase in probability of full-time employment as well as hours worked. Another study from found no changes in the labor market following medical marijuana legalization, with employment status, hours worked and wages remaining unaffected. When it comes to research focused on recreational marijuana legalization, the results are also mixed. While a study by Maclean et al. Skip to main content. Download a printable version of this page with footnotes. Potential for Changes by the Ohio Legislature. Key Takeaways from the Passage of Issue 2 Key takeaways if there are no changes by the Ohio General Assembly : Please note: The Ohio General Assembly can make significant changes to any aspect of the statute at any time. Download the Key Takeaways handout accessible. Additional resources In addition to content below, DEPC has produced both research and events that focus on marijuana reforms in Ohio and nationally. Adult Recreational Consumers. Can I grow my own marijuana? Pros and Cons. Pros: Enables patients to grow their own supply to minimize their expenses Consumers can grow specific strains that might otherwise be hard to find in dispensaries Potentially creates downward pressure on pricing in the market Cons: Home cultivation makes enforcement to prevent illegal grows in residential settings more difficult and can create uncertainty among law enforcement as well as the public Plants cultivated at home are not tested for harmful pollutants Access to marijuana by underage persons may be harder to prevent. More information. How much marijuana can I possess? Ohio Medical Marijuana Control Program. The amount of medical marijuana possessed by a registered patient shall not exceed a ninety-day supply: Tier I of med. Are there restrictions on how I can consume marijuana? T he language from the initiative provides additional detail: Section Establishment and authority of division of cannabis control; adoption of rules. C The division of cannabis control shall adopt, and as advisable and necessary shall amend or repeal, rules on the following: 21 Establishing a tetrahydrocannabinol content limit for adult use cannabis, which for plant material the content limit shall be no less than thirty-five per cent and for extracts the content limit shall be no less than ninety per cent, but that such content limits may be increased or eliminated by the division of cannabis control. Are there employment and other protections for marijuana users? Medical Marijuana Patients. Will there be separate modes of production and sales for patients? Will patients be excluded from excise tax? Will patients have access to higher THC content marijuana? How many licenses will be issued and how long will it take? Each medical dispensary will be issued one dual-use dispensary license and one additional adult-use dispensary license for a different location if dispensary does not have common ownership or control of any Level I, II, or processor license. As of August , there were medical dispensaries with a certificate to operate and additional 15 provisional medical dispensary licenses issued. Level I Cultivator shall be issued three adult use dispensary licenses and one Level I Adult use cultivator license. As of August , there were 22 operational Level I medical cultivators in the state and one additional provisional license for Level I cultivator. Level II Cultivator shall be issued one adult use dispensary and one level II adult use cultivator license. As of August , there were 14 Level II medical cultivators in the state. Processor shall be issued one adult use processor license. As of August , there were 46 medical processors in the state, with 45 of them receiving a certificate of operations. Testing lab shall be issued one adult use laboratory license. There are currently 10 medical testing labs in the state with eight of them receiving a certificate of operations. How much will licenses cost? Licensing fee schedule for medical and adult-use marijuana licensees:. Will existing medical marijuana operators get a preference? YES Each medical dispensary will be issued one adult-use dispensary license Level I Cultivator shall be issued three adult use dispensary licenses and one Level I Adult use cultivator license Level II Cultivator shall be issued one adult use dispensary and one level II adult use cultivator license Each dispensary shall be issued one adult use dispensary license at different location if dispensary does not have common ownership or control of any Level I, II, or processor license Processor shall be issued one adult use processor license Testing lab shall be issued one adult use laboratory license. Pros: Shorter implementation timeline due to already established growers and retailers Smoother start of adult-use regime due to greater levels of familiarity with marijuana regulations and established record of compliance Increases perceived legitimacy of the new industry as existing medical participants have already undergone public scrutiny Cons: Limits the ability of new entrepreneurs to get involved in the industry, possibly limiting involvement of underrepresented communities Possibility of greater concentration of the industry in fewer hands, limiting competitiveness of the market. Will there be any preference for in-state businesses? Pros: Can limit the ability of out-of-state investors to enter the market Protects existing small businesses from capture by large players Provides opportunity for state residents Eliminates a potential red flag that could trigger federal enforcement action Cons: Limits the amount of capital available to the industry Can delay the growth of the industry in localities that lack sufficient capital Could expose states to legal challenges from out-of-state business owners. General Questions. How much will the state tax marijuana? How much tax revenue would Ohio collect from adult-use marijuana? How will money be spent? What social equity provisions are incorporated? Will my locality be able to prohibit marijuana businesses? Public Safety and Public Health Marijuana reform, especially legalization for recreational purposes, raises important questions about how such policy change might impact public safety and public health. Will we see an increase in traffic accidents? Will we see an increase in crime rates? Will we see an impact on arrest rates? Will we see an increase in youth consumption of marijuana? Will we see an increase in emergency room visits? Impact on the Workplace The connection between marijuana legalization and the labor market is of great interest to employers and policymakers alike, prompting questions about changes to the prevalence of workplace incidents, changes in productivity and labor participation, and impact on worker compensation costs. We break down the sometimes complex and always interesting stories behind today's drug law landscape.

Adult-Use Marijuana in Ohio: What You Need to Know

Trujillo buying ganja

Please purchase a subscription to read our premium content. If you have a subscription, please log in or sign up for an account on our website to continue. Please log in, or sign up for a new account to continue reading. Thank you for reading! On your next view you will be asked to log in to your subscriber account or create an account and subscribe purchase a subscription to continue reading. Unlimited access to the Taos News website for a full year! Plan includes access to our e-edition print replica online. Your auto pay plan will be conveniently renewed at the end of the subscription period. You may cancel at anytime. Unlimited access to the Taos News website for 30 days. This is a one-time purchase. Your subscription will not renew. We offer home delivery of the Taos News in selected areas within Taos. Click Here to See if you Qualify Shaded area on map only. The Taos News delivered to your Taos County address every week for a full year! We offer our lowest mail rates to zip codes in the county. Click Here to See if you Qualify. Plan includes unlimited website access and e-edition print replica online. The Taos News delivered to your Taos County address every week for 26 weeks! The Taos News mailed to your New Mexico state residence every week for a full year! For readers who live in New Mexico but outside of Taos County. The Taos News mailed to your New Mexico state residence every week for 26 weeks! The Taos News mailed to your New Mexico state residence every week for 13 weeks! The Taos News mailed to your out of state residence every week for a full year! The Taos News mailed to your out of state residence every week for 26 weeks! The Taos News mailed to your out of state residence every week for 13 weeks! Updated: October 21, pm. The store is family-owned and operated. Autumn Trujillo organizes products on Tuesday Jan. Some products sit on display at G's Ganja, a new dispensary near Albertsons in Taos. Some products, like the ones pictured, have designs created by Autumn Trujillo, the business manager of G's Ganja. These products, called 'boob boxes' contain THC chocolates, and their proceeds go toward breast cancer research. The business is …. The business is planning a grand opening for Jan. At most times, the two employees present in the store are owner Geno Trujillo and his daughter and business manager, Autumn Trujillo. After cannabis was legalized, Autumn said their family set out to get into the new industry for themselves. It was really fun and kinda stressful, but you know what? Opening the shop came with other challenges, too, especially with the length of time it took to take their business from concept to reality. In Taos, businesses often experience delays obtaining proper licensing to start operating. Geno Trujillo said that the G's Ganja license, for example, took six months to finalize. In the meantime, Autumn and other friends and family put their blood, sweat and tears into assembling display cases and beautifying the shop. At the store, there are pages of information detailing each available strain, highlighting its most noteworthy functions and benefits. Autumn decided to add variety to the store's color palette. Most dispensaries use the signature green color liberally to signify their purpose. Outside of the dispensary, Trujillo is a small-time contractor in Taos. Like other families with Spanish heritage in Northern New Mexico, he said his family has an extensive lineage in Taos, contributing to his local focus. He hopes being local, both in ownership and in the products they source from Taos growers, will give them an edge. As the business continues, Autumn said she hopes to watch the store grow to include more products, a wider clientele and local art decorating the walls. Should they succeed, he claims they would be the first dispensary in the state to utilize acequias to grow their product. Since recreational cannabis was legalized in New Mexico on April 1, , Taos has seen a plethora of dispensaries open, and even one closure. The fastest-growing business in Taos, cannabis has raised lots of money in taxes for the town, and Taos Mayor Pascual Maestas even announced virtually in a community schools meeting on Oct. The store offers a percent discount to locals. Purchase a Subscription. Sign Up. Log In. We hope that you continue to enjoy our free content. We hope that you enjoy our free content. Since you viewed this item previously you can read it again. Your current subscription does not provide access to this content. Unlimited Website Access annual. Get Started. Unlimited Website Access monthly. Unlimited Website Access 30 days. Home Delivery Plan annual. Mail Delivery: Within Taos County 52 weeks. Mail Delivery: Within Taos County 26 weeks. Mail Delivery: Out of State 52 weeks. Mail Delivery: Out of State 26 weeks. Mail Delivery: Out of State 26 wks. Mail Delivery: Out of State 13 weeks. Mail Delivery: Out of State 13 wks. Mail Delivery: Within Taos County 26 wks. Have a promo code? Find Offers. Sorry , no promotional deals were found matching that code. Promotional Rates were found for your code. Edit Close. Weekly E-Edition. Low 31F. Winds ESE at 10 to 15 mph.. Tonight A clear sky. Winds ESE at 10 to 15 mph. Sign Up Log In. Dashboard Logout. Site search Search. If you're interested in submitting a Letter to the Editor, click here. Gas station development fuels debate: Are there too many places to fill up? New med spa opening in Taos New vintage clothing store on Kit Carson Road combines classic, fun styles Taos home goods retailer to begin offering appliances Red River Oktoberfest: 'The celebration continues'. Subscribe to Our Free Newsletters! Former Taos News business manager, NM newspaper publisher remembered for dedication. Wilfred Leroy Santistevan. Trinidad Rudy Martinez. Sarah A. Ilse Mayer-Gulz. Tyree Goodwin Minton, EdD. Dora Lou Hickam. Jose Daniel Ruben Abeyta. Karlis Margers Liepins. Maxine Martinez. John E. Elijah John Larson. Charles A. David Samuel Fischer. Colleen Giron Faurie. Taos Talking Pictures founder Joshua Bryant dies. Anthony G. Arts advocate and innovator Janet Webb Bell dies. Chris Schafer. Lucia Trujillo. Maria Corelia Cordova Sanchez. Mary Elva Roybal. Julia Vargas. Anna Rael Rascon. Mabel Dora Gonzales. Click below to support our sponsors.

Trujillo buying ganja