Trekking, hiking and mountaineering
Alex TrubachevMountain trekking programs of MCS AlexClimb
What is trekking and hiking? What are the similarities and differences between these types of outdoor activities?
Which mountain programs from the MCS AlexClimb collection relate to the trekking category?
In mountaineering terminology, trekking usually refers to mountain walking routes of varying difficulty, lasting more than 1 day. The main difference between trekking and mountaineering is that the goal of the trekking route is not always to climb to the summit.
Trekking is the most accessible form of mountain travel that does not require special training.
To avoid misunderstanding, I will define another term that is often confused with the concept of trekking - although this is not exactly the same thing. Hiking - that is walking on a short, uncomplicated routes lasting no more than 1 day, it is not associated with the need to organize overnight stays or cover significant distances.
This type of outdoor activity appeared in Europe in the 18th century and was positioned as a “pleasant walk in nature.” We use numerous variations of hiking routes in our active programs in the European Alps, the Caucasus, Armenia, Mallorca, Tenerife, etc. Hiking routes are not of interest as independent full time activities.
In addition, many entry-level mountain routes are formally classified as trekking routes, since they do not present any technical difficulties for climbing. However, when using the term “trekking” in relation to a mountaineering route, it should be understood that this is just an assessment of the low technical complexity of the mountaineering route.
In addition to technical difficulties, climbing summit may have other difficulties and dangers inherent in mountaineering. “Trekking” mountaineering routes include many routes of initial difficulty category - Mount Elbrus, Mount Kilimanjaro, Peak Kosciuszko, Cerro Aconcagua, Nevado Ojos del Salado, Mount Bazarduzu, Mount Ararat, Teide Volcano and many other peaks, for which no equipment is required for climbing, or just a minimal set of climbing gear is used.
Mountain programs in the trekking category are not included in the main thematic group of the mountain travel, which is carried out by the MCS AlexClimb School. Our specialization for many years has been focused on the technical programs in mountaineering, rockclimbing and iceclimbing.
However, in some cases it becomes necessary to conduct easy trekking programs in the mountains. In particular, this may be due to the need for high-altitude acclimatization, splitting the group (if not all participants are ready for difficult climbs), adding extra 2-3-day activities in rockclimbing or iceclimbing programs in order to diversify the daily training routine.
Thus, we have naturally formed a small set of interesting, non-trivial trekking routes that are related with activity in the mountains, but are not associated with climbing summits. We have placed these programs in a separate category “Mountain Trekking”.
Programs in this Trekking category are divided into two groups – “serviced” and “unserviced” trekking.
“Serviced” trekking routes are the most relaxed and most comfortable form of mountain travel. Pack animals or porters are used to transport cargo; food preparation, setting up camps and other group duties are performed by the personnel accompanying the group.
This is the most comfortable and safe format of travel in the mountains, physical activity on these routes is minimal, the level of comfort is the highest possible in the format of a mountain travel. A good example of this category is our 11-day circular trekking route in Cordillera Huayhuash, Peru.
Or the shorter Santa Cruz trekking route. Participation in the “serviced” trekking programs is available without restrictions on age or skill level. (children can only participate if accompanied by their parents)
The category of “unserviced” treks includes routes on which it is impossible or difficult to organize support for the group by additional personnel.
On such a route, participants are required to independently carry personal belongings, equipment and food, independently prepare food and perform other communal duties. As a rule, this is a more intense and physically demanding format of mountain travel.
An example is our trekking program “Autumn Kamchatka”, the “Traverse of Ishinca” in Peru, the 8-day trekking program to the Antarctic Ice Sheet in Patagonia and similar (often quite hard) routes.
If we would to explain the concept of “trekking” in Russian terms, then the English word “trekking” roughly corresponds to Russian concept of mountain tourism, with some historical clarifications.
During the Soviet era, mountain tourism, as a type of outdoor activity, was developed into independent sport and deliberately separated from mountaineering. In the Soviet format (which has no analogues in the global outdoor activity industry), mountain tourism has become a full-fledged sport, with its own Federation, a system of categories and titles, and a classification of routes. Various championships and competitions were held in mountain tourism, including “international” ones - with the participation of teams from different Soviet republics.
At the same time, the routes of highest categories of difficulty in the mountain tourism, were connected with the need to overcome obstacles of a purely mountaineering nature, characteristic of high-category mountaineering routes both in technical and altitude class.
The line dividing two types of mountain activities was the need or possibility of climbing the summit. If for mountaineering teams the main goal of the route was to climb to just the top, then mountain tourist groups were straightly prohibited from going to the summits. (Senseless prohibitions were a normal thing in the over formalized soviet system as a declaration of productive government activity)
This division of outdoor activities and their formalization was a consequence of excessive bureaucratization in all spheres of life and leisure of USSR citizens. The formal separation of two very similar activities gave to the Soviet officials the opportunity to form extra bureaucratic structures, receive social bonuses and additional funding.
In practice, such formalization did not benefit any of both activities - the development of mountaineering and sports mountain tourism was slowed down by unnecessary formal complications and inevitable competition between artificially separated directions within the same sphere of mountain travel.
The consequences of this period in the history of Russia are still felt in the form of distorted motivation in mountaineering and numerous formalities that have no connection with the real level of development of modern international mountaineering as an important element of the global tourism industry.
The author of the text and photos - Alex Trubachev
Your mountaineering, iceclimbing and rockclimbing guide
MCS EDIT 2023