Tout.

"MimirsBrunnr distinguishes four "worlds" in the tree of Life Yggdrasil - the divine world "Asgard", from which "emanates" the world of energy (or "world of creation", Mitgard), from which "emanates" the intelligible world (or "world of forms", Nilfhem), from which "emanates" the material world (Erda). 

This pattern, this sequence (divine -> subconscious -> conscious -> action), is found in all natural religions, and gives meaning, by analogy, to the tribulations of man, which are considered to reflect, on the earthly plane, a momentary disagreement between the different gods - Homer's work is the classic example of the sacred narrative interpreting a temporal conflict as the clash of contradictory human neuroses, due, in reality, to antagonisms, quarrels and divine stratagems. 

"Our acts (Erda), I say, are the result of our thinking (Nilfhem), which expresses our subconscious tendencies (Mitgard), which are shaped by influences inaccessible to our reason and which, therefore, we can only describe by means of myth (Asgard). 

"Thus, let's say that a young man called Mike has the rage of the blonde bimbos with big breasts, that he needs them all, that they are all crazy about him, but that his Don Juan exploits cause him a lot of problems with the fathers of his conquests, their husbands, the civil authorities, etc. 

"The shaman, "from Asgard," will explain it this way: "Freyja fell madly in love with the mortal Mike, and this love inflamed Frey's jealousy, who is known to have an extreme, almost incestuous affection for his sister."

"The shrink will say, "from Mitgard": "young Mike, who masks and perpetuates his desire for the mother by negating the women's inner self in favour of his own, is felt by men socially invested with paternal authority as a symbolic challenge to their manhood, which they reaffirm by sanctioning and castigating Mike".

 "The common man will say, "from Nilfhem": "Mike is an inveterate Rocco! He's sick, this guy! If he keeps it up, something will happen to him!..." 

"The non-white scum, finally, will be content, like all animals, to be jealous, "from Erda", of Mike's alpha-male rank, the number of females he has access to, and to gloat when the official Dominants come to bang their chests in front of Mike. »

- Why then do we stop, nowadays, at the level of Mitgard, that is to say, on the couch of the psychoanalyst, and no longer ascend to the eternal, epic dimension of our destinies?

- Because, the Jews reserve the eternal and epic dimension for themselves. Look at the mythology they embroider on that poor idiot Gilad Shalit soldier of tsahal !

 Psychoanalytical science has been systematized in the West for the sole purpose of preventing us from having a divine reading of our journeys - for the sole purpose of stopping us in Mitgard. 

Loki occupies the Bifrost... — assassinates Heimdall.

I don't blame the Muspellheimers for having their own mythology, but for forbidding us to have recourse to ours. Having said that, would they be Muspellheimers if they acted differently? 

At the time of Christianity, they told us that believing in our gods was "paganism" and witchcraft, liable to be burned at the stake - at the time of communism, that the very existence of these gods did not withstand the most elementary Marxist-Leninist analysis, and would earn us a visit to a camp for re-education labor, under charges of obscurantism - today, they show us that we are obviously too "rational", too "adult", to have not yet "give up " this "tribal survival", which is only one of the countless "manifestations of a collective superego", an "obsessive neurosis", a "defence of the tribe against the desire of murder against the father", etc. 

"Thus, the white Aryan, very adult, very rational, very devoid of tribal survival, now unable to see his gods at work in the world, marvels at any Papuan tribe living naked in the forest. "

So, a man's psychology is determined by the loves, fights, rivalries of the gods around his Fate... 

If all the gods were in perfect agreement about him, "the Two would have become Zero", and this man would not exist.

To be able to poeticize his life in this way... to integrate it into myths... it's fabulous... but isn't it also completely archaic... infantile... prelogical?

And to what do we owe the modern, adult, rational vision of existence? The implantation of electronic surveillance chips in human beings? Or mass poisoning by compulsory vaccination? Their "archaic" thinking did not do too badly for our ancestors in the North, Greece and Egypt... If it is archaic to attribute the origin of the various energies that animate my subconscious to the whims of Asgard's gods, my thinking to the influence of my subconscious, and my actions to the influence of my thinking - then, yes: I am archaic. 

"The real problem comes from the so-called confusion of planes - the application to a given 'world' of language that belongs to another plane: the Boomer who analyses social relationships in Freudian terms is a boring idiot like death - but the man who approaches psychoanalysis at the level of social discourse ("He said I want to fuck my mother, that pig!") is a boring idiot, - as for the man who speaks as a psychoanalyst of the divine plan, and denies its existence outside of the human brain, he is very exactly comparable to someone who would believe that what he sees on TV takes place inside his TV. »