Tilburg buying Ecstasy

__________________________

📍 Verified store!

📍 Guarantees! Quality! Reviews!

__________________________

▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼

▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲

Tilburg buying Ecstasy

Voices from society to review the Dutch ecstasy policy are getting louder and louder. But is legalizing the famous party drug really such a good idea? The national cannabis experiment is barely underway when appeals are already made for another change in national drug policy. Subject of discussion this time: the popular drug ecstasy. The debate was revived in the early s when a Drug Manifesto Dutch only called for a regulated drugs market. According to the authors of the manifesto including two D66 MPs , the current fight against drugs—and the crimes that are inextricably linked to it—is one that cannot be won with repression alone. Regulations would therefore offer a solution. Last October, a proposal was made as to how these regulations should be shaped. A think tank consisting of various experts—ranging from lawyers to neuroscientists—published a report Dutch only that specifically examines the policy regarding MDMA the active ingredient in ecstasy. With the report, the experts involved want to stimulate thinking about an effective MDMA policy, which will benefit both the user and society. Dike van de Mheen, the Chair of Tranzo, the scientific center for care and well-being at Tilburg University, believes it is advisable to first wait for the results of the cannabis experiment. At the same time, she considers regulating the stimulant to be beneficial. This is a misunderstanding since regulations mean allowing production and trade subject to conditions. It is precisely because of these additional conditions and rules that Van de Mheen thinks that regulations for MDMA are a useful step in the long run. By subjecting the production and trade of ecstasy to standards as a government, it gains control over the quality of the pills. In this way, users run fewer risks. Moreover, such a test is done after the fact and you have to be alert enough to have your pill tested. In an X-shop your drugs are tested beforehand and you immediately receive a leaflet with information. A common criticism of regulating ecstasy is that it lowers the threshold: it is more readily available, which increases demand and use, which, in turn, results in more damage to health. The people who are not interested now will not be interested later. In regulating ecstasy, the focus is on harm reduction, which means that the damage to the user and to society must be minimized. This means that the harmfulness of ecstasy is not denied but rather recognized; after all, drugs are not innocent. Yet MDMA is less dangerous than is often thought. For example, in the RIVM conducted research Dutch only into the harmfulness of various drugs, which showed that ecstasy is one of the least harmful drugs. All types of damage were taken into account: toxicity, addiction potential, and social damage. It is striking that alcohol and tobacco score very high on these three criteria; after heroin and crack, they are relatively the most harmful. Because it is a relatively young drug, we have not yet been able to follow a generation for a long time. This does not apply to ecstasy. Basically, you can do it for a while and then quit. No dependence occurs. So from a public health perspective, it is at least remarkable that ecstasy is illegal while more harmful substances like alcohol and tobacco are not. Add to this the considerable social damage caused by alcohol and tobacco—consider additional healthcare costs, traffic accidents, or an increase in violent crime—and it becomes clear that current policy lacks logic. Ecstasy may cause little inconvenience or traffic casualties, but because it is illegal, there is another major social problem attached to it, namely the organized crime behind it. Besides causing environmental damage, it also has a dangerous undermining effect. So criminals do not live on a different planet, but are part of society. Whether this crime can be reduced by regulating ecstasy, Spapens is not so sure. Despite the fact that the Dutch demand for illegal pills will decrease, the foreign demand will continue to exist. As a result, the ecstasy market remains largely intact. Also, according to Spapens, it remains to be seen to what extent the Dutch need for illegal pills will decrease. This results in certain niches always remaining for criminals. An additional risk associated with regulating ecstasy is that the Netherlands will suffer serious damage to its image on the international stage. Unlike with cannabis, there is no broader international movement towards regulations; MDMA is still strictly forbidden abroad. A change in Dutch policy would therefore go against the grain of other countries. Regulations can have serious repercussions for the international trade position of the Netherlands. For example, in the late s the Netherlands was threatened with being blacklisted by the United States. This would make it more difficult for Dutch companies to do business in that country. Because the Netherlands lacks international muscle, it seems that sufficient support for regulating ecstasy must first be created worldwide. Whether this will happen through a large global movement or because one or two powerful countries are driving it, that remains to be seen. Until then it is important to keep the pressure on and prevent ecstasy crime from developing into a power factor. According to Spapens, it is like mowing the lawn: you know it will keep growing, but if you want to keep the garden manageable, you have to mow. Will an ecstasy pill soon be as legal as a beer? Neem contact op. Sebas van Aert. Image: Sjeffker. Quality control With the report, the experts involved want to stimulate thinking about an effective MDMA policy, which will benefit both the user and society. Beeld Maurice van den Bosch. Beeld Toine Spapens. Lees ook. Bekijk meer recent nieuws. Schrijf je in voor onze nieuwsbrief Blijf op de hoogte. Meld je aan voor de nieuwsbrief van Univers.

Toleration policy regarding soft drugs and coffee shops

Tilburg buying Ecstasy

Tops has been researching undermining crime in the Netherlands for years. He published, in collaboration with several other researchers, the report 'What a small country can be great at'. Marle de Jonge of Studium Generale described it beautifully in the announcement as 'a small Breaking Bad in the polder'. De Gelderlander Dutch newspaper recently published an article stating that chemistry students are massively recruited to make drugs in ecstasy labs. There even seem to be criminals who register for such courses in order to get in touch with the students more easily. According to Tops, these rumors are not logical: 'Everyone can make synthetic drugs. The recipes are easily found online on the darkweb. The difference between an amateur and a real laboratory technician is that the latter gets more results from the same raw materials. But the production costs are so low, that is really not worth the effort. The question was also posed in the hall: are there any chemistry students who have been approached to abuse their knowledge? It remained silent; no such students were present in the Blauwe Zaal. Or at least they did not dare to speak up about this. There is an estimated 19 billion euros in the trade of synthetic drugs. Much of the earned money eventually goes into the legitimate world. Sometimes via no longer traceable funds or brokering, sometimes directly. Think of the latter at places where you can pay with cash, like expensive restaurants or clubs. But also in the retail trade people often pay with money of which the origin is dubious. In this way, ordinary entrepreneurs are also partly dependent on the drug trade as the criminal underworld and legitimate world mix. There are roughly three reasons why the Netherlands is so attractive as a drug nation:. The proper infrastructure does not only concern our smooth asphalt. The digital network also offers opportunities. The darkweb functions as an excellent marketplace for the purchase of raw materials, as well as the possibility of distribution and sale of illegal drugs. Therefore it remains attractive to keep the production here. Because we think it is important in the Netherlands to hinder economic traffic as little as possible, parcel post is a beloved distribution way for drug criminals. But a proper criminal now simply sends his drugs from Germany or Belgium,' Tops knows. Is legalization a solution? Tops does not think so. At least, not for now. And if only the Netherlands would legalize, it would not be enough. You have to start partnerships in Europe with other countries to stand together. If the Dutch police are trying to catch a criminal around the border area and he moves to Belgium, the Dutch police cannot just arrest him. To do so, a request for legal assistance must first be submitted. Customize the tags according to your taste and preference. Make sure your favorite tags are always loaded first on the homepage! Nederlands Tags. Lucrative business There is an estimated 19 billion euros in the trade of synthetic drugs. There are roughly three reasons why the Netherlands is so attractive as a drug nation: 1: The gateway: we are the gateway to Europe with, among other things, the port of Rotterdam 2: Excellent infrastructure 3 : Low chance of being caught and low punishments The proper infrastructure does not only concern our smooth asphalt. Photos Kevin Tatar. Fighting it or legalizing it? Share this article. Tags Customize the tags according to your taste and preference. Clicking a tag will bring you to the summary page of the tagged articles. Enter a keyword to search for.

Tilburg buying Ecstasy