The product of Fiser, Moderns, and all other manufacturers in any country of the world making mRNA vaccine is not what is called, i.e. it is not a vaccine 💉. It's gene chemo. Not authorized to use in humans for prevention. And this is a violation of U.S. …

The product of Fiser, Moderns, and all other manufacturers in any country of the world making mRNA vaccine is not what is called, i.e. it is not a vaccine 💉. It's gene chemo. Not authorized to use in humans for prevention. And this is a violation of U.S. …

⏳ ተ𐍂𐌉ଓ𐌵𑀉ꤕ Ⴝ𐌳𐍅Ⴝ🎙


         ϮɍϊƀυƖє Ӽ

Final material on 01/03/2021 . 

With spring and freedom you Friends free citizens of the world ! 


So, mRNA injection is a gene therapy that does not meet any criterion or definition of a vaccine. "Vaccines" covid-19 do not give immunity and do not prevent the transmission of the disease. They are designed to reduce the symptoms of infection if you become infected. And it's not the same thing and it can be quite bad.

The "vaccine from covid-19" is a case of false advertising. The company "Faiser" was fined a huge sum not so long ago for false advertising. As part of the pre-trial deal, the fine is more than $2 billion. 


Pfizer fined $2.3 billion for illegal marketing in off-label drug case

By Rita Rubin, USA TODAY

3 September 2009, 06:15

• 4 min read

— -- In the largest health care fraud settlement in history, pharmaceutical giant Pfizer must pay $2.3 billion to resolve criminal and civil allegations that the company illegally promoted uses of four of its drugs, including the painkiller Bextra, the U.S. Department of Justice announced Wednesday.


Besides Bextra, the drugs were Geodon, an antipsychotic; Zyvox, an antibiotic; and Lyrica, an anti-epileptic drug. Once the Food and Drug Administration approves drugs, doctors can prescribe them off-label for any use, but makers can't market them for anything other than approved uses.


Pfizer subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn pleaded guilty to a felony violation for promoting off-label uses of Bextra, such as for pain relief after knee replacement surgery. At the FDA's request, Pfizer pulled Bextra off the market in April 2005 because its risks, including a rare, sometimes fatal, skin reaction, outweighed its benefits. It had been approved only for treating rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and menstrual pain.


As part of the settlement, Pfizer PFE will pay a criminal fine of $1.195 billion, the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the USA for any matter, according to the Justice Department. Pharmacia & Upjohn must pay a $105 million criminal fine.


Pfizer also has agreed to pay $1 billion in civil damages and penalties to compensate federal health-care programs for false claims submitted as a result of its marketing Bextra and the other four drugs for off-label use or at unapproved dosages.


In an interview Wednesday with USA TODAY, former Pfizer sales representative John Kopchinski said he was told to distribute 20-milligram samples to rheumatologists and orthopedists, even though the FDA had approved only 10-milligram doses for arthritis. The 20-milligram doses were approved only for menstrual pain, yet Kopchinski says he never called on gynecologists or other doctors who would treat that complaint.


In 2003, Kopchinski, 45, a West Point graduate, filed the first whistle-blower lawsuit, leading to the Justice Department investigation. Kopchinski says he was inspired by David Franklin, who filed a whistle-blower lawsuit against Pfizer for promoting Neurontin — at the time approved only to control seizures — for unapproved uses such as treating bipolar disorder.


When Kopchinski began questioning Pfizer's marketing of Bextra and sued, Pfizer fired him, a violation of the anti-retaliation provision of the federal False Claims Act, says his attorney, Erika Kelton of the Washington, D.C., firm Phillips & Cohen. At the time, his son was 2 and his wife was pregnant with twins.


Kopchinski, who began working for Pfizer in 1992, says he was the last employee personally hired by former CEO Edward Pratt, with whom he began corresponding while serving in the first Gulf War.


Kopchinski says one night while on guard duty, he saw a photo of Pratt, now deceased, in Reader's Digest and decided to write him to ask if he wanted to "adopt" his platoon. At the time, Kopchinski says, Pfizer owned Coty cosmetics, and Pratt, an assistant secretary of the Army in the Kennedy administration, responded by sending over three cases of cologne.


Although Kopchinski worked three years as a financial adviser after leaving Pfizer, he says, "I pretty much depleted my 401(k)."


Of the $102 million share of the settlement that will be divided among six whistle-blowers, Kopchinski will receive $51.5 million. To celebrate, he and his wife took their three children out of school Wednesday to have a new family portrait taken and to go to Chuck E. Cheese's for pizza. Kopchinski, who now lives in San Antonio, says he and his wife plan to be stay-at-home parents.


Pfizer mentioned the $2.3 billion settlement this past January in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in which it said it was taking a $2.3 billion charge against earnings related to lawsuits, but the lawsuits were sealed and the investigation ongoing at the time, so no details could be released, Justice Department spokesman Charles Miller said Wednesday. Shares of Pfizer closed at $16.28, down 10 cents.


In a statement, Pfizer senior vice president and general counsel Amy Schulman said: "We regret certain actions taken in the past, but are proud of the action we've taken to strengthen our internal controls and pioneer new procedures."


Only under two conditions is there a benefit to society from vaccination: 

1. Vaccinated person has immunity to disease

2. The vaccine inhibits transmission of the disease.

Prevention of symptoms is not the same as immunity. 

Cowid's disease is determined by a series of clinical symptoms, but since most people with a positive PCR test do not have these symptoms, there is no proven link between the "virus" and the set of symptoms known as Covid-19. The vaccine is immunity and reduced transmission. Neither was measured in the tests. This is a direct violation of the U.S. code, which requires competent, scientific and reliable evidence to prove that the allegations are true. The Covid-19 state of emergency permits PCR tests and "vaccines" for emergency use: there is no financial responsibility for any damage, but there is a frenzied profit. Politicians and the media are involved in this by upholding the illusion that Covid is an emergency. 

Both the "vaccine" and the PCR test are in violation of 15 FTC law because they are not approved by the Federal Trade Commission. Only an emergency permit because of the illusion. However, even an emergency and state of emergency will not save if the deception is proven.

In their patents, Faiser and Moderna call their product gene therapy. 

3. Why the "Global Trade Control Act" act , U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulations - is specified in paragraph 1.2 of the Global Trade Control Act. "Vaccines" Faiser weapon?

4. Interesting are some of the points in section 4 "term and termination": 


That's actually the whole criminal base 2019-2021, as I promised in the first material. If someone could follow the chronology of the events proposed in my materials, understand the semantic message of these materials. The pandemic of lies can be ended by making official statements to the law enforcement agencies of their countries and sending claims to the courts in their locality. Perhaps, when combining civil claims in class action, it is worth sending to the supreme courts of their countries of residence and the international court of the United Nations in GAAGA. There is nothing to argue with the police and the authorities. They totally violate the law of their countries. The man said and the man did, these are two different men, as you could understand, if you read all my materials from the letter A to the letter I.

Marle bandages from coronavirus can not protect


We are in great material we have sorted out with you the causes of wigs in the world because of the committed standard and usual seasonal ARVI . It may have been slightly above the norm for months, although there is no reliable information on this. This is a real elite conspiracy, let the investigators deal with the criminals, for what purpose they ruined people and businesses. What other goals, except madness and profit pursued? Why is it so easy to deceive entire nations and why are heads of state so obediently involved in this operation of lies?


We are talking at the end of gauze bandages and other personal protective equipment against various viruses and bacteria. These bandages cannot protect against viruses and are completely useless. They play the role of scenery, at best a placebo.


In the photo: in the spring of 2020, gauze bandages came into fashion. Nothing in the world is being bought more than them. 

And they wear almost all of them.


The fact that the usual gauze bandages absolutely do not protect from viruses and bacteria, from the word at all. Because the virus is hundreds of times smaller than the distance between the gauze threads. The size of the virus is 70 to 160 nm. In one millimeter - 1.000.000 nanometers. This means that the virus is 100,000 times smaller than one millimeter. Conventional gauze bandages are made in four layers, that is, they are able to hold only 0.004-0.008% of viruses at best, if with cotton wool, then 0.02-0.03%. Which means they don't protect them from viruses.


That is, the gauze bandage protects against the virus, like a mesh slave from the wind. In comparison to Mikhail Sadornov: "Virus and mask, like a mosquito and a window!"


Of course, I might argue that gauze bandages delay saliva and runny nose droplets. Yes, they hold up moisture, but not viruses. Most of the viruses they isolate are unable to isolate.


There are these masks and a second flaw, they do not protect the eyes. Through which it is also easy to get infected. In addition, the infection can enter the body through the hands.


And what protects against the virus? Mask! 


And a strong immunity.


What else can be reliably protected from the virus? In the set to the gas mask suit chemical protection. They are now in vogue, especially in those who are more suggestive, and therefore more prone to panic. 


Seriously, a reliable virus protection tool is the 3rd class of protection respirators (marked FFP3). Conventional building respirators, as well as 2nd class respirators from viruses and bacteria will not be able to protect, as well as gauze bandages. 


And why are people told that gauze bandages help?


1) 


(a) The incompetence of so many doctors. 


c) They're human beings too. and also easily amenable to suggestion. They may understand that gauze bandages are useless, but they will wear them themselves.


2) In order to avoid panic, to calm the population with this form of deception. 


3) Show that they (doctors and officials) are working. A form of imitation of violent activity. And the money 💰, they are sawing the budgets of countries. Someone manufactures and sells masks 

Business. The gauze bandage is worth off... and above, in many pharmacies already on .... , behind them large queues, and they are advised to change every 4 hours. That's billions of dollars in profits.


And one last thing. Once again!! Don't hurt everyone! And no panic ! Just understand that this is a scam of a grand scale, which has never been the case in the history of mankind. 


About the goals I seem to have written almost everyone available for general understanding. There are still some goals, but it's like something then....


Happiness to all and freedom!! And don't get seasonal flu friends!! Good luck 🍀 



Report Page