The measles virus trial is getting more and more exciting

Review of the first of the 6 publications 

Author Dr. Stefan Lanka - April 30, 2015

What has happened so far

On November 24, 2011, I published a competition on the Internet in which I offered 100,000 euros to anyone who submitted an original scientific paper from the National Reference Center for Measles at the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin (RKI), in which the existence of the measles virus was claimed, proven and its diameter determined. A young doctor sent me not ONE original paper of the RKI, but six publications from abroad. Among them a review paper summarizing claims from 98 publications on the measles virus, without any proof of the existence of the measles virus.

I informed him that none of the 6 publications contained a virus and that the publications were unscientific. In reality, the 6 publications are extremely unscientific and prove the opposite of a virus: typical components and properties of cells in the test tube were misinterpreted as a measles virus.

By circumventing the clearly defined rules of the competition, the physician sued for payment of the 100,000 Euros at the Regional Court of Ravensburg in 2013 and was awarded the 100,000 Euros in the first instance with a misjudgement on March 12, 2015. In order to be able to prove the young doctor right, the court struck three of the four specifications of my competition in the " Reference and Evidence Order" of April 24, 2014, with which the expert was commissioned. In the hearing on 3/12/2015, the court tolerated the violation of the fourth guideline of the competition, the annulment of the clear scientific rules by the expert and ignored the unexpected refutation of the measles virus by the expert.

At the hearing on March 12, 2015, the expert witness stated on record that the strict rules of science did not apply in the underlying case. By suspending the clearly defined rules of scientific work, he was able to call the six publications submitted scientific, which, in his opinion, would also provide proof of the existence of the virus, not individually but in combination. The court ignored the fact that the statements from each of the six individual publications refuted the statements of the other five publications, even in the case of something as simple as the diameter specification of the alleged measles virus.

The court also ignored the expert's statement on record that the measles virus is refuted if it contains "ribosomes", typical cell components. The court was and is aware that the Federal Health Authority RKI testifies that ribosomes occur in the so-called "measles virus". In the meantime, the verdict has been served and we have appealed.

What is written in the six publications

In the following and in the coming issues of "WissenschafftPlus" I will publish the short analyses of the six publications. This makes it clear that in each of the six publications no virus was detected, but typical components and properties of cells in the test tube. The detailed analysis of the six publications, the applicable scientific rules and their significance can be found in my statement of February 2, 2015 on the expert opinion of Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Podbielski of November 17, 2014 (1|2).

What measles physicians do and why, if they believe they have detected, isolated, photographed and determined the components of the claimed measles virus, is always the same as with all so-called "disease-causing viruses". Cells in the test tube are killed in order to pass off the dying cells as proof of the existence of disease-causing viruses, without the medical profession being aware of it. Physicians and those guided by them do this for three reasons:

1. As early as the 19th century, cells were used in the test tube to study diseases, their causes, course, diagnosis and treatment. This happened because the founder of western university medicine, Rudolf Virchow, published that all diseases would develop in cells (3), due to the theft of ideas (plagiarism) and the suppression of important findings of the robbed and other researchers from 1856 and especially in 1858.
2. Virchow suppressed the realization that the same "diseases" always manifest themselves in the same tissue types. Against his better judgment, he claimed that diseases are caused by the degeneration of individual cells and spread in the body in a random and undirected manner through self-proliferating disease juices. The old idea of infection by disease toxins (Latin virus) was thus transferred 1:1 into the apparently scientific new medicine. Virchow thus also became the forerunner of the infection theories, the current form of vaccination, and the immune theories that are needed as auxiliary hypotheses to bridge the contradictions between infection theories and vaccination.
3. Although "disease-causing viruses" have never been seen in a human being and his bodily fluids, isolated, photographed and biochemically determined, physicians believe that typical structures in cells in the test tube and those artificially produced by pressing or pelleting are disease-causing viruses. They firmly believe that there must be disease-causing viruses. Only when physicians are forced to carry out control experiments in infectious diseases, which are clearly and centrally prescribed in science, something that has never happened before, they will realize that cells in the test tube do exactly the same thing and look exactly the same, even if they are not treated with "infected" fluids.

The first of 6 publications: Enders and Peebles, 1954 Nobel Prize winner John Franklin Enders and his colleague Thomas Chalmers Peebles published in June 1954 in the journal "Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine" No. 86(2), pages 277-286, a report on their work with the alleged measles virus entitled "Propagation in tissue cultures of cytopathogenic agents from patients with measles". They did exactly the same thing for which Enders received the Nobel Prize for Medicine in the same year: Killing cells in the test tube to claim that the death of cells in the test tube was caused by the alleged polio virus.

The fact that there were and are dozens of reasons besides the assumption of disease-causing viruses that explain the observed death of cells in the test tube was perhaps overlooked because the U.S. Army, which funded this type of research, was in an alleged competition with the Soviet Union to develop vaccines for all possible and impossible diseases. During and after the Korean War, the U.S. military claimed that the Soviets had developed viruses that rendered U.S. soldiers mindless.

As described on page 278 of this publication, the authors use, among other things, the antibiotic streptomycin to "sterilize" the throat swabs of measles patients before the cells in the test tube are "infected" with the suspected measles virus suspected in them. Today it is known that streptomycin damages and kills cells by killing the vital bacteria in the cells, the mitochondria, which metabolise oxygen, among other things. 

The authors and all the others who have done the same until today have not noticed that their way of treatment kills the cells in the test tube, because they have not carried out the control experiments that are mandatory in science and they still do not do so today. Control experiments are absolutely necessary in order to rule out that the method itself does not produce the result obtained. Although neither the authors nor anyone else has seen a measles or other disease-causing virus in the swabs, the fluids in the test tube or in a human being to date, the killing of cells in the test tube is called virus isolation. 

The authors who invented this kind of "virus isolation" and all imitators firmly believe in pathogenic viruses also because liquids from dying cells, which are added to fresh cells in the test tube, cause the same cell death again. This repetition of the killing of cells, the participants call a passage of the virus. Also for this step no control experiments have been and will be performed. Depending on the amount and composition of the liquids and cells used, cells die more or less quickly in further passages, which is called "attenuation" or "amplification" of the virus.

Virus strains liquids from cells killed in this way, are frozen as various "virus strains" and used for the production of vaccines without ever having seen, photographed or, in the sense of the word "isolation", isolated, photographed and characterized a virus in them, such as pieces of euro from the piggy bank on World Savings Day. Only the death of cells in the test tube is called isolation. The liquid of dead cells is called isolate. Today's measles vaccine is also allegedly obtained using the "Edmonston" measles virus strain produced by Enders. In reality, however, only cells from animals, humans or tumors are killed in the test tube and a mixture of their fragments is given out as a measles vaccine, which allegedly consists of "attenuated" measles viruses.

But what has been suppressed to this day and in the measles trial by the expert witness and the court is the fact, documented in this publication, that cells regularly die in the test tube in exactly the same way, even when nothing is done with them. This refutes the claim that the way the cells die in the test tube, which is presented as a specific "cytopathic effect" (cell destroying effect) of the alleged measles virus, is in fact a perfectly normal death of cells in the test tube under these conditions.

Although the authors of this study pointed out several times (on page 283, left column in the middle and on page 285, right column three times) that cell death is also caused by unknown factors and unknown viruses, the authors claimed two years later that their work from 1954 was fundamental for the production of all future measles vaccines (4). Since the authors pretend to believe in disease-causing viruses, their behavior and that of their imitators is irresponsible, since they assume that there are unknown viruses and factors that kill cells in all cells used to produce vaccines.

Despite these weaknesses and refutations, this study is considered by all measles virus supporters to be the fundamental study that has succeeded in isolating and propagating the measles virus. It is also worth reading this publication for another reason: the authors admit on page 286 in the upper right-hand corner that there is no reason to believe that their observations in the test tube have anything to do with the changes in humans defined as measles. This is still the case today.

In the next issue: The authors of the second of the 6 publications of the measles trial explicitly refute the central statement of the study discussed here, that there is a specific effect caused by the suspected measles virus. 

Translated, adapted & reblogged Version - Original here

Telegraph main page with overview of all articles: Link

Visit our Telegram Channel for additional news & information: Link

Chat with like-minded in our Telegram Chat Group: Link

Please support to keep this blog alive: paypal

References:

(1) The statement of February 2, 2015 (German only)

(2) The report of Prof. Podbielski of November 17, 2014 (German only)

(3) See the article on the measles process in "WissenschafftPlus" No. 2 - 2015 and " „Impfen. Wie es kam. Wie es geht. Was die Menschen wirklich brauchen (Vaccination. How it happened. How it works. What people really need)." in this issue no. 3 - 2015.

(4) Enders et al., Measles Virus: A Summary of Experiments Concerned with Isolation, Properties, and Behavior. Am J Public Health and the Nations Health, 47 (3), 275-282.