The New York Times and Pfizer's joint owners drive vaccine propaganda

The New York Times and Pfizer's joint owners drive vaccine propaganda


Why does the press continue to push the same narrative about the "miracle vaccine", when the Covid-19 crisis has now turned out to be the biggest medical scandal of all time? Why is there no debate and scrutiny of the ownership structures of leading mainstream media that only continue to push the vaccine agenda? Now the focus is monkeypox (“money-pox”).

Billionaire Laurence D. Fink, CEO of BlackRock. Photo from video: Credit Suisse


The New York Times (NYT) is considered one of the "finest" and most serious newspapers in the West, but the newspaper is largely owned by the same companies (Vanguard and BlackRock) that own Pfizer, one of the biggest vaccine pushers in the world.

BlackRock is the largest money management firm in the world with more than $10 trillion in assets under management, giving the company enormous power over the global financial system. As of April 2022, Laurence Fink's net worth was estimated at $1 billion according to Forbes Magazine. Fink is CEO at BlackRock.

New York Times and Pfizer joint owners: Blackrock and Vanguard. Source CNN Business.

Vaccine propaganda

The NYT publishes so-called "hit pieces" on a continuous basis that humiliate vaccine critics and at the same time, the NYT publishes policy texts that hold vaccines and vaccine advocates in high esteem.

“Hit piece, noun an article, a documentary, etc. that deliberately tries to make somebody/something look bad by presenting information about them that appears to be true and accurate but actually is not.” - Oxford Learner's Dictionaries

Examples of agenda-driven vaccine propaganda in the NYT:

The New York Times, like most other agenda-driven major media, never respects individuals who oppose the vaccine propaganda and they no longer expose the dark sides of the pharmaceutical industry, the corruption, and the unscientific nature of the industry. Instead, most of the mainstream media today are strictly business-oriented channels for the industries' profit maximization and associated mass formation control.

Are people just plain lazy? Does the common man and woman prefer to hang on the powerful gangster side out of pure convenience or has it become downright "cool" to be a "bad guy"?

By Torbjörn Sassersson, editor, NewsVoice.se, an independent News and Debate Channel


Report Page