The F1 (Formula One) Hegemony Explained

The passes given to Red Bull and Verstappen by the FIA, F1 media, retired drivers, and pundits have deep roots. Why was the FIA so eager to usher in a new generation of F1 vehicles? Why doesn't a blatant disregard for the rulebook in Abu Dhabi 2021 matter? Why don't cost cap violations matter? Why are certain FIA stewards whom exhibit clear bias through previous public statements and actions still allowed to officiate races? Why is it possible to reevaluate the F1 2008 championship results but not 2021?

At their core, the old guard despises Lewis Hamilton's success because they fear the prospect of there being even more Hamilton's and drivers from diverse backgrounds, whom if given the proper opportunities, are capable of surpassing even Hamilton's and Schumacher's accomplishments.

 Red Bull Racing recent "questionable" success represents a return to the good ole boys culture and many within the industry would rather see Formula One revert to its roots as a niche event meant for the elite than to evolve into a global sport that is built upon diversity and competition. This is clearly reflected within the paddock of present day teams and organizations.

In order to rationalize Lewis Hamilton's accomplishments, they will claim that he was gifted McLarens support at an early age, gifted fast cars by McLaren and Mercedes, and gifted his prominence in the Sport. "Working twice as hard to earn half as much" never rang truer in modern day sports than in F1.  

How often do we hear any of these experts talk about Lewis's work ethic or his intellect? Rarely. They will never acknowledge those aspects of his abilities because that would shine a spotlight on the lack of opportunities given to individuals within F1 and bring an end to their hegemony. Despite their best efforts to suppress progress, the end is near.