The Dangers of Hegemonic Journalism

The dangers of biased journalism in a hegemonic context, where visible minorities are consistently portrayed negatively is multi-faceted and deeply concerning.

Major and Independent Sports Media outlets (Digital Magazines, YouTube Channels, X/Twitter, Blogs, Newsletters) brazenly flaunt their lack of commitment to objective sports journalism as part of an ongoing campaign to caste successful visible minorities in a negative light whenever the opportunity presents itself and there are no major financial repercussions.

Talking head debates on topics such as who is the greatest Basketball Player, Motorsports Champion Driver, Baseball player, Golfer, Tennis player etc... flourish with misogynistic and racial undertones designed to broadly limit the number of visible minorities that can be considered for a place on the pantheon of European and American sports legends in Western societies.

The overarching sentiment of visible minority's is that "we must work twice as hard to earn half as much" and a learned acceptance of "revised criteria when credentials are evaluated" typifies the lived experience of for those who struggle to exists within a hegemony.

Fortunately, these ill-fated attempts at journalism are easily identifiable by their headlines and bylines expertly crafted to influence society in the following manner:

1. Perpetuation of stereotypes: Hegemonic journalism contributes to the reinforcement of harmful stereotypes towards visible minorities. By consistently presenting them in a negative light, it reinforces biased perceptions in society, leading to discrimination, marginalization, and the perpetuation of inequality.\
2. Amplifies systemic bias: Hegemonic journalism amplifies existing systemic biases within society. It can fuel the narrative that members of visible minorities are inherently less capable, less deserving of praise, or unworthy of significant achievements. This not only undermines their accomplishments but also obstructs opportunities for progress and recognition.
3. Impact on self-perception and identity: Continuously highlighting negative narratives about visible minorities while praising underachievement among the majority can have detrimental effects on the self-perception and identity of individuals belonging to these marginalized communities. It can create feelings of inadequacy, lower self-esteem, and a sense of being undervalued within society.
4. Reinforcement of power imbalances: Hegemonic journalism reinforces power imbalances within a hegemonic structure. By consistently providing preferential treatment and positive coverage to the majority group, it perpetuates and amplifies the existing power dynamics in society. This further marginalizes visible minorities and maintains an unequal distribution of resources, opportunities, and representation.
5. Hinders societal progress: Hegemonic journalism obstructs the path towards societal progress and inclusivity. By failing to provide a fair and balanced representation of different groups, it hampers the potential for understanding, empathy, and unity. It reinforces divisions, prevents meaningful dialogue, and impedes the dismantling of systemic discrimination.

To combat these dangers, it is crucial for journalism to prioritize objectivity, fairness, and inclusivity. Journalists have a responsibility to challenge biases, represent diverse perspectives, and promote equitable narratives in their reporting.

By doing so, media can help create a more inclusive society that values and uplifts all individuals, regardless of their race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation.

We are all teachers. So what lessons will we teach each other today?