The Constitution as Junction of Force and ➕ Law

The Constitution as Junction of Force and ➕ Law

👓 R. A. C. E. Achara
The Constitution as Junction of Force and ➕ Law

The Constitution as Junction of Force and ➕ Law

✅ Constitutional law is bedevilled by a crisis of standpoints. Many times ⏱️, this has led to a lack of congruence between theory and ➕ practice. The true nature of the constitution is, for example, a central problem of Constitutional Law. In theory, the constitution is supreme law. But, in practice, most publicists ➕ 🏛️ recognize decrees during 🎖️ rule as different from, yet superior to, the constitution. The true nature of the constitution is, for example, a central problem of Constitutional Law. In theory, the constitution is supreme law. But, in practice, most publicists and courts recognize decrees during military rule as different from, yet superior to, the constitution. The student 👨‍🎓️ is fed these mutually antagonistic propositions, with a consequent loss of faith in the integrity of the subject matter. To make 🛠️ Constitutional Law more coherent, The Constitution as Junction of Force and ➕ Law proposes the unifying doctrine of preponderant force. Because of the ontological nature of the problem, the book 📚️ goes beyond the traditional sources of legal science 🧪. Although it examines constitutions, statutes and ➕ cases as well as 📚️ on these 🖋️ book y lawyers, it has also sought assistance elsewhere. The research reveals that: *️⃣The confusion of standpoints mostly results from an undue reliance upon textual analysis as well as a failure to distinguish Constitutional Law (i.e., the subject of study) from the constitution (i.e., the object studied). *️⃣Nomenclature is irrelevant. Whether it is 📞 a decree, charter, constitution, basic law, etc., if it is the supreme law, then it is the constitution. *️⃣The constitution these written by lawyers, it has also sought assistance elsewhere. The research reveals that: *The confusion of standpoints mostly results from an undue reliance upon textual analysis as well as a failure to distinguish Constitutional Law (i.e., the subject of study) from the constitution (i.e., the object studied). *Nomenclature is irrelevant. Whether it is called a decree, charter, constitution, basic law, etc., if it is the supreme law, then it is the constitution. *The constitution is of two 2️⃣ parts: the written 🖋️, partly written 🖋️, or wholly unwritten, fram...



Также:

Э. Хименес Де Аречага «Современное международное право»
Э. Хименес Де Аречага «Современное международное право»
Markus Hoffmann «The Need for Green 💚 Covenants. Regulating the Green 💚 Bond Market»
Markus Hoffmann «The Need for Green 💚 Covenants. Regulating the Green 💚 Bond Market»
Paul B. Bonn «Die ☠️ Falle der Anrechnung im Dienstvertrag nach Bgb. Und Ges.-O. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Lehre vom Begriff der Anrechnung. Inaugural-Dissertation (Classic Reprint)»
Paul B. Bonn «Die ☠️ Falle der Anrechnung im Dienstvertrag nach Bgb. Und Ges.-O. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Lehre vom Begriff der Anrechnung. Inaugural-Dissertation (Classic Reprint)»
Ibrahim Hiba «Using Water 🌊 with Oil 🛢️ Immersion Lens to Detect 🕵️‍♂️ Malaria 🦟 Parasite in Blood»
Ibrahim Hiba «Using Water 🌊 with Oil 🛢️ Immersion Lens to Detect 🕵️‍♂️ Malaria 🦟 Parasite in Blood»
Domenico Ruiz «Sulle Attribuzioni Giudiziarie del Senato (Classic Reprint)»
Domenico Ruiz «Sulle Attribuzioni Giudiziarie del Senato (Classic Reprint)»

Report Page