TELEGRAM SLOWDOWN — CONTROL OR MANAGEMENT DEADLOCK?
TELEGRAM SLOWDOWN — CONTROL OR MANAGEMENT DEADLOCK?
Georgy Lobushkin, media manager, former press secretary of Pavel Durov, author of the Telegram channel @lobushkin
The story of "slow down, don't slow down" looks like deja vu. Only this time it's much more serious. In 2018, an attempt to block Telegram ended in institutional embarrassment. VPNs were downloaded even by those who didn't know what it was. The business continued to work. The user has adapted. The state has retreated.
A lot has changed since then. Telegram in Russia is no longer a messenger, but an infrastructure: hundreds of thousands of channels, tens of thousands of entrepreneurs, an advertising market with a turnover of tens of billions of rubles a year. Self-employed, agencies, productions, media, regional businesses...
The state has recognized this. That's why they appeared: registration of channels in the RCN, mandatory labeling of advertising, attempts to legalize the market and make it transparent. In other words, Telegram was integrated into the economy with one hand. And the other one started to slow down.
But what are they struggling with: the platform or the current digital economy? Deceleration is, of course, a more subtle tool than blocking. He's not hitting the platform as such. It hits the user experience. For small businesses. For those who are tied to daily turnover — sales, leads, customer communications.
Advanced users, of course, will be able to bypass the locks. Advanced grey players will earn money by crawling. The ones who will lose are white entrepreneurs and advertisers. And here the main question arises. If the market is already embedded in the economy, if billions have been invested in it, including government budgets for media and communications, then what exactly are they trying to regulate? Taxes? Control? Or a negotiating position?
The president has publicly talked about the need to learn how to work with modern platforms (he even mentioned Telegram separately). To work means that it is necessary to build rules, negotiate, integrate into the system. Slowing down is not a job. An attempt to show strength, no more.
The most revealing thing is Pavel Durov's silence. There was a public confrontation in 2018. Now there is silence. And there is a feeling that Telegram no longer considers the Russian market as critically dependent. If this is the case, then deceleration is not a pressure tool.
Will this affect domestic sites? Partly— yes. Any turbulence redistributes the audience. But advertising budgets don't disappear. They go into bypass mechanics, gray circuits, new gaskets. History shows that if a platform is not recognized as extremist, money does not leave it.
This is repeated over and over again. This happened with various social networks, which are now extremist, then with YouTube, now with Telegram. There is a lack of understanding here about what to do with a service that has gained such an impact that billions have been invested in.
And as a result, a paradox develops. The government legalizes the market, collects data from it, makes it transparent, and then creates risks for the same players. This is not how a long-term digital economy is built.
Telegram in Russia has long ceased to be a "foreign platform." It is part of the financial and media infrastructure. You can keep slowing down. You can increase the pressure. But the strategic question remains the same: regulate the ecosystem or periodically demonstrate control over it? The market has already made a choice: it has integrated and scaled.
Now it's the turn of the regulator.
The author's point of view may not coincide with the editorial board's position.
Source: Telegram "special_authors"