Sierre-Zinal buying hash

__________________________

📍 Verified store!

📍 Guarantees! Quality! Reviews!

__________________________

▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼

▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲

Sierre-Zinal buying hash

Concerned athletes, organizations, and events are finally throwing down the gauntlet—drug testing has arrived and will be coming to more races near you. Spurred by ever-increasing popularity, large prize purses, salaried sponsorships, and the reality that known drug cheats are racing, the trail and ultrarunning community has taken a big step in legitimatizing itself as a professional sport. Rest assured that as soon as we have something to share, we will. The lack of drug testing, bio passports blood-work history , and out-of-season testing in MUT running is a huge barrier that we must address in the future. The newly approved and resolute Performance Rule 18 now reads:. Any athlete who refuses to submit to anti-doping controls, if selected for testing, shall be disqualified and subject to a lifetime ban from the Western States Endurance Run. Other events tied closely to Western States followed suit. Rainshadow Running , the organization that manages the Gorge Waterfalls k , a Altra Golden Ticket Race and Western States qualifier, adopted similar policies in Firming up their commitment to clean sport and avoiding further controversy, The North Face ECS issued its own statement in August of Anti-Doping Agency USADA , any national sports federation, or a similar organization identified by The North Face, for a violation of applicable anti-doping rules or policies, are prohibited from competing at any ECS event while the ban is effective. Unlike the regulations adopted by Western States, Lake Sonoma, and Rainshadow Running, the ECS policy does allow some leniency by allowing those who have served their ban to participate. However, they are ineligible for prize money, podium recognition, and awards, and cannot compete as an elite. Skyrunner Series. We want to have all the data we need for comparing the best-case scenarios for an active anti-doping program. The idea is to keep everyone guessing with no safe place to hide. We want to put social pressure on brands to sponsor only clean athletes and build systems that foster the human athlete by creating a company culture that believes how you compete is just as important as the results you achieve. We would pay a third party to facilitate or give the event the funds to pay for the testing. We have been working with Adam and Ethan to implement more testing in trail racing, and we will help raise funds for their organization through ATRA. However, enough funding still must be secured. Brian Beckstead , President and Co-Founder of Altra , has no qualms about ponying up cash for anti-doping analyses. Altra has a strong sense of purpose in keeping this sport as clean as possible. However, even though NATHAN would likely monetarily support anti-doping measures, Hollowell voices concern when the conversation turns to sponsors pitching in for testing. Which athletes pay? Which sponsors should pay the most into the system? Is it based on the size of their company or the number of sponsored athletes they have in the race? Hollowell is also quick to point out the elephant in the room. Gear sponsorships, books deals, etc. There is the opportunity to do it. This is twofold. Second, the drugs are readily available. The only missing piece is the rationalization. This is very personal, of course. But there are plenty of people who could easily rationalize it. I can say without hesitation that there is currently an issue with doping in ultrarunning. How did Johnston circumvent the enormous cost? The owners came to Fellin Park an hour before the award ceremony. Each athlete was observed giving a urine sample. DTI kept a portion of the sample to serve as a backup. The remainder was sent to Medtox Laboratories Inc. Paul, MN, for testing. DTI emailed us the negative results… and we forwarded them on to the athletes. In the event of a positive result, we would have privately contacted the athlete and agreed on a second, different lab to test the B sample. Johnston, like Hollowell, acknowledges the fact that out-of-competition testing is paramount. In , he has plans to implement testing perhaps 16 weeks before race day. Think of all the incredible ultrarunning performances and broken records that are not supported by testing. We tend to think of testing as a way to prevent cheating. But equally important, testing protects the clean runners by validating their wins and records. Elite athletes racing clean are currently without that protection. The International Trail Running Association ITRA , a non-profit organization whose mission is to promote worldwide trail running values, diversity, safety, and athlete health, collaborates with member organizations, including UTMB, across countries. In July we disqualified Calisto. This is a sign. So, in , UTMB tested elite athletes before the start and, of those that completed the race, again at the finish line. That cost was about 3, Euros but we had many nurse and doctor volunteers. Those tests fell under the ITRA health policy. We collaborate, of course, but these two kinds of tests are separate. To be clear, only official tests are able to effect official penalties and only official agencies like AFLD and WADA are able to proceed with these anti-doping tests. Health policy and anti-doping converge often, but the spirit is not exactly the same. When SHOL is used in tandem with onsite blood and urine collections and analyses, event medical counsel can holistically interpret abnormal results. This could lead to notifying an athlete of their poor health or excluding a runner from a race on medical grounds. This information could be shared publicly if the athlete so desired. Like the health policy, the QUARTZ program will never be a substitute for regulatory agency testing, but it does allow for improved elite athlete transparency and periodic health evaluations. Enter What might we see in the U. Details forthcoming. In the end, these actions will advance what we all want and deserve—a respectable, healthy, and fair sport. Call for Comments from Meghan Obviously this is a sensitive topic. We believe that civil conversation by the community can play a large and important part of minimizing cheating—including doping—in trail and ultrarunning by creating a culture that is intolerant of it. In advance, thank you. Ian Torrence has more than 12 years of experience coaching runners of all levels. Ian and his wife, Emily, are online coaches at Sundog Running. Information about his coaching services can be found at SundogRunning. Your Ultra-Training Bag of Tricks. An examination of anti-doping efforts made during in the trail and ultrarunning community. By Ian Torrence on February 7, Comments. Support us! Learn more. Tagged: Performance Enhancing Drugs. View all posts by Ian Torrence.

Rando-Fondue

Sierre-Zinal buying hash

Elisa in recent years has performed exceptionally well in Skyrunning and in was crowned Skyrunning World Champion for the SKY distance in Chamonix. Many a long night talking with Marco discussing the positive test. I would like to be clear here and state that I am being as impartial as I possible can. One that he eventually had to give up on. He wrote an article in on his own website. I provide a Google translation of that article, obviously this is not a perfect translation but you get the gist! From a USA perspective, Facebook exploded with a series of very angry posts. Ethan Veneklasen in particular commented on multiple channels:. For the last several years, we have speculated about whether dop ing has arrived in our beloved sport. If there was any question before, let me be clear…that day has arrived! On a related note, I am delighted to see that US Skyrunning is taking proactive steps to move the International Skyrunning Federation toward enforcing lifetime ban for convicted dopers. The can of worms was well and truly opened. No bad thing! The facts are when Elisa tested positive, no lifetime ban existed for doping. She was sentenced for 2-years, she did her time and she is now back. Elisa has been drug tested 2-times in the last months maybe more and both tests were clean. To clarify, one of those tests were made at the Skyrunning World Championships in Chamonix where she was crowned world champion. Of course, Lance did the same and look how good a liar he was. Should athletes receive lifetime bans? I am not sure that is always the case and this has been discussed elsewhere. This is not a post to fight for Elisa, not at all. Powerful headline and some of the contents in the article make for interesting reading. Thanks to all who have contributed to helping get this discussion going. I agree. This is a discussion that almost certainly needs to take place. Elisa unfortunately is now at the centre of this debate. This debate and all the negativity will have a huge impact on her and many reading this will say; good! I often tell a story, when I was cycling at elite level. Caffeine was a banned substance. If I had too many espressos or too much Coke, I could run the risk of being positive in a test so I had to be careful. Now caffeine is okay and even gels are rammed with the stuff. You can take as much as you like and it does boost performance. What is okay and what is not ok becomes cloudy; my advice is stick to the rules. I just want that advantage to be a legal one. It would require planning, deception and money. Ultimately this is a completely different story and I firmly believe why the reaction has been so severe. I told them they were wrong in no uncertain terms. With drugs in sport and PEDS it may well be a ruined career and life ban. Ian Sharman, race director for the U. There is a general consensus that we want a clean sport — on this we agree. But there is also a general consensus that those who have cheated, who have stolen prize money and results from other athletes, have had their opportunity to be a part of our sport, of our family, and have crapped with contempt on that opportunity. They are no longer welcome. The term witch hunt refers to the guessing of guilt. Guilt has been proven. As I said, my vent is with TNF. In allowing her to race they have misunderstood our sport, our family and our values. They need to educate themselves. And people need to stop buying their stuff until they do. The above is a powerful statement and one that I get. It is very much the scenario, one strike and you are out! On a final note to add fuel to the fire. Read the article HERE. He nails it for me! We also need to have a sense of what is going on in the wider world of sport: athletics is now a mess with institutionalised doping suggested at national levels, Arse Wenger is suggesting widespread and whitewashed activity in football, and whatever happened to the tennis players suspected in Operation Puerto. How can an governing body presume to take the high moral ground over athletes, until its own house is in order? Finally, whilst I neither respect nor like Floyd Landis, there are important issues around the testing procedure and its independence and robustness that do need to be addressed. We engage in a sport which is reasonable accessible and democratic in the sense of access — I cal run the same courses on the same day as an elite. How would testing be managed in this environment? Our sport is about freedom, spaces, nature and the environment, not about massive winnders purses. And this can only begin with truth and reconciliation — lifetime and retrospective bands, scapegoating, and self-righteous athlete-shaming will only slow us from getting there. Good points. I am divorced, I feel as though I let me son down and so on. But my son forgives me, I have done my time and tried to put it right. I am over simplifying I know. But are we all perfect? Should we be allowed a 2nd chance, to put it right…? Maybe deep down I think the best and I am deluded? The only thing i will address is the positive test and subsequent ban. I totally understand that people can make mistakes and whilst it is great that she passed two recent doping tests, i , in my heart of hearts feel that if someone is taking performance enhancing drugs such as epo that they should be banned for life — no ifs or no buts. She was bound to know the seriousness of taking something like this. I think that it has gotten to the point that a clear message needs to be sent out to those who cheat across all the various IAAF disciplines that it is now a zero tolerance approach. It probably wont happen, especially with that clown Coe at the helm, nevertheless that is my opinion. This is two separate issues. My post relates to TNF50 and what I consider to be retrospective justice. To clarify. Desco was found guilty, given a 2-year ban in and she served that ban to After this she was cleared to race. She has done her time as the rules were applied and that is it. Yes, the mob can influence new procedures and protocols. To clarify again: 1. Desco has done her time, paid the price. End of the story. However, that has to be something that is brought in with a set of rules and procedures. I dont think you have sympathy with epo users at all. As regards her treatment at TNF 50 all i can say is what did she expect when people would find out that she had used epo?? You are right that she now cant be given a lifetime ban as what she did is in the past. I think the only point that really matters is what the rule was, was the punishment given, was the sentence applied? Which they are likely not. Yes the system might be flawed, but tar and feathers is no better deal. No way. Ian, this is not a witch hunt by any meaning of the word, and it is not about Elisa as a person. I firmly believe everyone deserves a second chance in life — just not in professional sports. Well said, Hendrik! Well said! Desco was found guilty in Marco her husband tried to prove her innocence. In after a year of legal Elisa was given a 2-year ban, the maximum at the time. A ban was only applied for 2 positive tests. Elisa served that ban to After this she was cleared to race as per the rules and regulations, like it or not. She has done her time as the rules were applied at the time and that is it. Of course she is tainted. Great, I agree. But hold on, rules are rules. Yes, the mob can influence new procedures and protocols and I hope that is what comes out of TNF However, that has to be something that is brought in NOW with a set of rules and procedures. For sure, if a race has prize money; drug testing should be in place as standard. For me, the treatment of Elisa at TNF is sad. I get peoples frustration, anger and desire for a clean sport but using Elisa in this way has been a negative, not a positive. Chris, you are confusing your moral standpoint with the rules. The rules say that Elisa served her ban and therefore she is clear to race. From a moral perspective, I understand your point of view. It is this point of view that will influence the change in our sport that we obviously need. I agree with all the above. I think we all agree on this. Thanks for your clarifications, Ian. I think we all agree on those two points! PS: I did not mean to imply that you were looking away. But you and I both know that there are brands, race directors and media who do. A lifetime ban is the only answer. The threat of a lifetime should be enough to deter all but the incorrigible. It also protects the clean athletes from those that doped and may now benefit from the carry over effect of their doping e. For those caught but feel wronged, challenges can be made through CAS the independent body, there is always the right of appeal. She was clean in all three tests. I only want to mention that as I have read in some other places which I think was the result of people not understanding an article written in Italian that they saw their names in the article so they thought they were charged and not cleared. Failing a drug test is almost like an intelligence test. Look how many times Lance, Marion, and the others have passed tests. This is why out of season testing is necessary and evading the testing is considered a ban. Frankly, 2 passed tests in 18 months should not be held up as evidence of being clean. I want to be compassionate, I really do, but these similar arguments have been laid out some many times in so many sports that it makes it hard to have sympathy for someone that failed a drug test that is easy to beat. I actually think that whether Elisa was positive or not counts. She was found guilty, I accept that. No question. From my perspective, the rules for Elisa as stipulated by the governing body in was a 2yr ban. Elisa has done that. Therefore she is clear to race. As it currently stands the rules say she can race and therefore her treatment as TNF is inappropriate in my opinion. Lets be clear, moving forward, clear rules with no ambiguity:. In and out of competition testing. Implementing it and financing it is something quite different. You keep saying that the rules say she can compete. A number of Diamond League events and others in track and field have already banned past convicted drug cheats. Even Lance has been banned from competing in events that are not under the jurisdiction of the banning organization. Is TNF even obligated to abide by sanctions? Think about other professional athletes that get banned due to criminal justice issues that are beyond the scope of the sports league. You make it seem like there is no precedent for external pressures to play a role in who is in and who is out. Say nothing and nothing will get done. Your comment is a dodge to the true issue. This is what the community is advocating for and while perhaps unfortunate for Elisa that she is the example here perhaps she never should have put herself in that position in the first place. I have also yet to see any apology or admittance of wrong doing. Ian, if you add it up it is not a person that we want to see at our events and we have the right to express our disgust that such people are allowed to compete with the hope that TNF will adopt stricter rules in the future. This TNF example is just the can of worms to encourage such policies. I would be saying exactly the same if it was Ellie, Megan, Jo, Aliza or any of the runners, male or female in this situation. So Elisa ran the race; fact! But once again I come back to the facts and the rules. Elisa was positive, sentenced, done her time and is clear to run at TNF What happened in my opinion was unacceptable and I stand by that… This is not about if am I in favour of drugs. Until those rules change, the current rules stand and this was the case at TNF You are a scientist Matt yes? I am not. I am pretty sure we may have a great deal of PED talk on the coming shows. Ian, sorry for the somewhat aggressive tone. I actually think that we agree. Lance could have run, Elisa even when banned could have run, because of the lack of rules put forth by TNF or a majority of other ultras. In fact, if she had finished and podiumed that may have provided even more impetus for races to have much clearer guidelines. I hope that ultra races will establish clear rules that essentially provides lifetime bans. The science says that there might be lifetime benefits from PEDs and we need a strong disincentive to keep our sport clean. Convicted dopers might be welcomed back at IAAF events, but we as a community can keep them from racing at our marquee events. Matt, I welcome the debate. Ultimately, I think you and I agree… 1. Positive test? Athlete must be allowed to appeal — always difficult one but we need to be fair. I think this is what you, iRunFar, Ian Sharman and so on want and hope for. This for me is where the issues and problems rose as Elisa was entitled to run… if it was a good idea, ethical, or whatever is irrelevant because the rules said she could as per her conviction and sentencing via WADA. I think that process is now happening at pace… Thanks for the input and thoughts, I welcome them! And I frankly believe it remains extremely rare today. I know I may just have chosen to bury my head in the sand because I view my sport as one in which my fellow competitors and I share a common passion which unites us in a culture of extreme physical challenge, a love of running, and a love of one of the purest forms of competition in all of sport. However, doping clearly does occur to at least some extent in our sport, and this fact erodes the purity of what is otherwise a simple test of one human against others on the same course, in the same weather, on the same day, with only food, water and shoes to aid the athletes in their quests. I do not know what the solution is. Testing is expensive, and may well be behind the most recent doping technology out there. Basically the existence of PEDs simply ensures that everyone loses to some extent: legitimate performances are questioned, great athletes lose to athletes who cheat, money which could fund athletes, events or research must be redirected to testing, and the list goes on. The only thing I can write with certainty is that, painful as it is, open discourse on the problem is imperative if we are to have any hope of regaining the purity of ultramarathon, and helping athletes and fans to recover from the damage the use of PEDs has inflicted and continues to inflict on sport. Great, I can agree to the above. I believe in 2nd chances and in the last 3 tests Elisa has been found clean. These are facts. What I have seen at TNF50 is regrettable. Instead she has been alienated, the mob has gained momentum and it has got ugly. Many have said that Elisa is the first convicted doper to run trails in the US… this is not true! Their is somebody we both know, who is high profile, who has raced in the US and is in a position of influence. I wonder what will happen when that information gets public knowledge? It was tweeted yesterday…. Lets move forward from here. Set guidelines and then those guidelines can be applied. TNF50, Run Rabbit Run and Speedgoat 50k in many respects should lead the way… the big bucks are available at these races. Ian, I totally agree. I think it is unfortunate that one athlete is receiving so much negative press from this issue. I do not believe in retroactive justice, and I do feel she has served her time as was the stated punishment for the violation at the time. She does not deserve to be vilified. My main point is that the good coming out of this is the discourse it sparked. I think also that discussions over the internet can become heated in a way that would not occur were we able to discuss the same issue in person. Unfortunately that often results in insults intended or not to specific people or points of view. In any of my comments regarding PEDs, my intent is to discuss the presence of PEDs in sport and what can be done to curb it. It is not my intent to vilify any individual. Doping is deeply multi-faceted issue and, though I can judge the use of PEDs as bad, I am in no place to judge a convicted athlete beyond that. In fact there are otherwise great people who have cheated using PEDs. I recommend The Secret Race, by Tyler Hamilton Athens Olympics gold medalist later convicted of doping , to anyone who is willing to dismiss Elise or any other athlete as simply a bad person. Tyler was a high school cycling and skiing teammate of mine, and throughout my years riding with him, he showed nothing but care for fellow riders and good sportsmanship. He later made a very big mistake. And now he is doing what he can to clean up a sport he loves. I know that some people would totally disagree with my defense of Tyler, but I stand by him. I do not stand by the blood doping he did, but I absolutely stand by the person he is. I do not know Elise, so all can can say is that I disagree with her choice to use EPO, but I have no negative or positive opinion about her personally. And I fully agree with you that she does not deserve to bear the entire weight of this issue. That is a great post Nikki. He made a mistake, we all do and who are we to judge personal mistakes. Enough of those cheaters. The questions is : Do we want to end up with a sports like cycling? She was banned, she got caught, OUT! Frederic, she was caught and banned for 2-years. She served that ban and is now cleared to run! That was the rules applied at the time and Elisa adhered to those rules. We can use this scenario as a catalyst for change. But this retrospective bullying is wrong. The sport should use this moment to move forward and set rules for the future which all the runners MUST adhere too. I understand that she served her ban…. Best, Frederic. For Elisa, she was tested, found guilty, did the time and is now clear. What happened at TNF was not appropriate. Dear Ian, thanks for your work. Skyrunning now has a major opportunity to lead the way and bring in a set of rules which deal with doping effectively. They should take the opportunity with both hands and show the IAAF how to do it because that organisation has no clue and there will be no serious reform whilst theu current leadership remain in place. Dave, the ISF have been testing for years. But do you have any idea how much it costs? It needs financing and then needs a commitment from all the brands, sponsors, teams and so on. Key is out of competition testing not just in competition. Fair enough but what im saying is that they should implement a much stricter set of rules regarding what happens when someone is caught — lifetime ban in other words. Yes the brands etc should get on board as they have the revenue streams to do this. Ian, thanks for your efforts to keep a balanced dialogue going. I am just a simple mid-pack runner that goes out and tries his best, loves the vibe and community. However what I have read here and elsewhere is simply shocking- this is an irresponsible and scary mob mentality that does not back down from self-righteously maligning a cleared athlete as stipulated by the rules at the time! This is all the more incredible as very little testing if any? Ian- Thanks for the lively conversation. Yes or no? At the time of her registration, there was nothing disallowing her entry. Again, I think we agree there. I saw it. Others saw it. Race management saw it, and it was clear what was going on. There is ZERO defense, as this happened numerous times. Of course muling and doping are on different levels of cheating, but what it shows is a blatant disregard for rules, her competitors, the race, AND common sense. Again thanks for keeping the conversation alive. I was drinking whiskey with Koop last night and arguing the same points. Eric, I wondered how long it would take you… a good debate to hard to resist. I only met her and Marco in So I would have to say having spoken with Marco in-depth no! But the facts say yes, so I will say yes, she did take EPO because that is what the facts and the law says. Agree, if they are currently serving a ban, they should not be allowed to race ANY race. Elisa should be allowed to run TNF She has done the time and was clear to run, the law says this. And I am NOT for retrospective sanctions. To be clear, should we say on the 1st Jan that a positive test equals a ban, great. But that worked from 1st Jan going forward and does not backdate. Actually it is the opposite. I am giving a thoughtful opinion based on the rules as they currently stand not my head or my heart. Unfortunately what I witnessed around TNF50 was the opposite, I saw the head and the hearts of the ultra running community go against the rules and I witnessed the mob bully and isolate someone who in the eyes of the law and TNF50 race rules was allowed to run. My knowing Elisa and Marco just adds an additional dimension to my knowledge. We have a catalyst now which we can all work with but change will not come quickly. Education is as key as testing and banning. As for a beer with you and Koops, that I would have relished. I think we would have had 3 very interesting points and I would really welcome Koops to be vocal and provide a viewpoint. Finally, I love the sport. What I often feel is so different about ultra, trail and Skyrunning to other sports is our my proximity with all the runners. They are my friends. Would I want to hear that one is positive? No, of course not. But if they were, so be it, the law comes in to play and they must pay the price. No ifs or buts. Here is something a bit interesting and may or may not be insight into who Elisa and her husband are. I ran TNF 50 this past weekend and at the end of one of the early downhill sections still dark out, everyone under headlamp I was directly behind two runners, man and woman that appeared to be speaking Italian. The man was clearly muling for her, as I witness him handing her a bottle to take a drink. Could I testify to seeing her do this? But, whoever it was, was defiantly not following the rules of no muling. Like I said, may or may not speak to who they are as people. Jeremiah, this is something that Eric Shranz also commented on. This is something that the race should address and comment on. The alleged muling is a totally separate issue and kind of getting away from the pointof this discussion. I am not surprised that some runners acted in the way they did as they are wanting to protect their sport from doping but what i agree with Ian on is that there is no place for bullying in our sport either and on that front the actions of those involved with the bullying are unacceptable. Dave, thanks for the comment. Yes, it obviously does not relate to EPO use in but does it confirm that what is right and wrong is questionable in the minds of the two? Considering the spotlight that was on Elisa, it certainly does appear to be a crazy thing to happen — not that I am in anyway questioning it did happen. I certainly would not judge either of them based on this muling issue. For me this could be a genuine oversight on their part. I seem to remember a few years ago that Killian cut the switchbacks on the Speedgoat 50k. Everyone took him at face value when it was clear that he did not know this was not allowed in the US race. The athlete will be responsible for paying a large bill if a Search and Rescue team is sent out on their behalf and they are not on the race course. If you or your pacer abandons anything e. Announce your intention to pass by saying, passing on your left or right, if it is unsafe to pass on their left. No physical aids are allowed including ski poles, walking sticks or crampons. Click to access 50Mile-CA. Stan, where is his guide, is this on the website? No problem. Hi Ian, I completely agree with you. Anyone who believes in lifetime bans should lobby the governing bodies for them, rather than trying to whip up antipathy against individual athletes in advance of events they are intending to run. Cheers, Simon. Here is an interesting thought for you. Makes you think huh? In addition, when I asked about his race, Speedboat 50k which has good prize money he said his rules or lack of rules are just like TNF He openly said; if Elisa wanted to run the race she could! Elisa tested positive and served a two year ban under IAAF rules. An analogous situation might be if the United States were to deny a tourist visa to someone convicted of drug trafficking who already served their sentance in Mexico they can, and do. TNF along with Speedgoat and other non-IAAF races are free morally and legally to make their own decisions about who may compete in their races. Given the inability to test in most ultra events, I think strong penalties are necessary. So the same Chris carmicheal is training d bo and kaci from ultras and many others in our sport the same as Lance. Yes, he works for Carmichael Coaching that was heavily involved with Lance Armstrong. No athlete coached under the above system has tested positive, no question marks have been raised re Jason Koop and therefore you are just slinging mud based on a past reputation. From an ethical viewpoint, it is wrong to have an unfair advantage in any form in any competitive sport, period. If I may, from the getgo state that my opinion will be unpopular but ultimately fair. I, for one, agree with Ian. I have no ties and do not know the couple in question personally. We have governing bodies for a reason, so that as a society cultured and law abiding , we adhere to said bodies rules and regulations. This is set so that as a participating society we adhere to such policies and adhere to them and not create our own arbitrarily. This logically, means we must communicate directly with said governing body and voice our discontent. I am merely addressing the doping in question. What happened during the race is a matter altogether different, which should be addressed with the TNF organization. The person in question was tested, caught doping, was convicted on a serious charge, and was punished according to the current standing of WADA. She could not compete for two years under such a ban placed by WADA. What she decides to do competitively after those two years is up to her. Publicly shaming someone will not help the issue, unfortunately as a running community we have become a Lets Run forum ourselves with all this. I mean no disrespect to anyone. Let me ask this, and ask yourselves this, has anyone bothered to contact the couple in question? Has anyone talked to them directly? It would be nice to hear both sides of said story. And WADA? Has anyone contacted headquarters, or a representative of WADA? Thats where the real change is made! Contact your local representative and put real pressure on those making the policies, we are better than this. Well said Fernando. Furthermore TNF to my knowledge does no testing, nor is it really financially feasible for most ultra races to do so. That is precisely what racers did. I agree, Ian, we need to move the discussion beyond the people that prompt it. The punishment has been fulfilled. I have a few other thoughts for the future. Focus on recovering past and removing future prize money from convicted dopers rather than the right to participate. The funding for prize money and drug testing can be tied together that way too. In order to instill that kind of systemic integrity, uncovering doping must not be seen as a negative. Everyone fans, participants, coaches, officials, etc should not be afraid of short term negative consequences of catching dopers, even when they are believed to be positive role models. Most importantly, the professional figures in the sport athletes, coaches, and officials need to champion the effort. Chances are for every offender, there are several people around them that sense it happening. What will they make a stand for? The effort to shape that culture must be won in order to win the war on doping. Every person in any role can do something to help. Thanks for the great article s! Related to this: there currently seem to be many rumors flying around of convicted dopers you mention some Twitter posts, Sage Canaday has often talked about how repulsed he is when he has to compete against convicted dopers, etc. The effect of all this is that people start speculating on who those individuals are, and in the process many clean athletes may get suspected of things they are innocent of. This begs the question: is there a particular reason why no ultra running media wants to publish those names? WADA provided a 2-year ban to Elisa and after that ban she is allowed to run. Of course that creates the debate of is this right or wrong? As rules go, Elisa is allowed to compete. To be fair, Skyrunning is far more proactive in testing. For example, Elisa has been tested 3x at Skyrunning events in the last 2-years and each time the results are clear. Yes I am well aware that out of competition testing and blood passports are the way forward but at least Skyrunning have something in place. Would it be totally unreasonable to ask who that one other person is? I think it would be good if the MUT running media that us runners follow would proceed in the matter, maybe jointly, as individual athletes obviously and understandably are reluctant to do it. That said, I do understand the limited resources, etc. Thanks again for your excellent work on this matter. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Like Loading Strict testing. So to conclude, a lifetime ban is the only answer, anything else ruins the spirit of the sport. Lets be clear, moving forward, clear rules with no ambiguity: In and out of competition testing. Well said Nikki. Me and the mob? Test Guilty Sentence Do the sentence. That is how it was for Elisa and how it stands until the rules change. PED Snakes and Ladders. Leave a comment Cancel reply. Comment Reblog Subscribe Subscribed. Sign me up. Already have a WordPress. Log in now. Loading Comments Email Required Name Required Website.

Sierre-Zinal buying hash