Sharing Sperm

Sharing Sperm




โšก ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE ๐Ÿ‘ˆ๐Ÿป๐Ÿ‘ˆ๐Ÿป๐Ÿ‘ˆ๐Ÿป

































Sharing Sperm

Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable.



Dashboard
Publications
Account settings
Log out



Advanced



Clipboard




Format


Abstract

PubMed

PMID





Format:


Summary (text)
PubMed
PMID
Abstract (text)
CSV




Subject:

1 selected item: 34992082 - PubMed





Format:


Summary
Summary (text)
Abstract
Abstract (text)







Create a new collection



Add to an existing collection




Name must be less than 100 characters


Unable to load your collection due to an error
Please try again


Unable to load your delegates due to an error
Please try again



Would you like email updates of new search results?


Saved Search Alert Radio Buttons



Yes



No






Frequency:


Monthly
Weekly
Daily




Which day?


The first Sunday
The first Monday
The first Tuesday
The first Wednesday
The first Thursday
The first Friday
The first Saturday
The first day
The first weekday




Which day?


Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday




Report format:


Summary
Summary (text)
Abstract
Abstract (text)
PubMed




Send at most:


1 item
5 items
10 items
20 items
50 items
100 items
200 items





Send even when there aren't any new results




Number of items displayed:


5
10
15
20
50
100




Page navigation











Title & authors












Abstract
















Conflict of interest statement
















Similar articles






























LinkOut - more resources












Affiliation



1 Unit of Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK Nathan.hodson@warwick.ac.uk.







Nathan Hodson .






J Med Ethics .



2022 .







Format


Abstract

PubMed

PMID





Affiliation



1 Unit of Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK Nathan.hodson@warwick.ac.uk.





Ahuja KK, Mostyn BJ, Simons EG.
Ahuja KK, et al.
Hum Reprod. 1997 Dec;12(12):2845-52. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.12.2845.
Hum Reprod. 1997.

PMID: 9455866








Blyth E.
Blyth E.
Hum Reprod. 2002 Dec;17(12):3254-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.12.3254.
Hum Reprod. 2002.

PMID: 12456633








Blyth E.
Blyth E.
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2004 Sep;7(3):157-62. doi: 10.1080/14647270400006879.
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2004.

PMID: 15590568








Marshall LA.
Marshall LA.
Urol Clin North Am. 2002 Nov;29(4):855-61. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(02)00089-7.
Urol Clin North Am. 2002.

PMID: 12516757


Review.





Deech R.
Deech R.
Hum Reprod. 1998 May;13 Suppl 2:80-3; discussion 84-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.80.
Hum Reprod. 1998.

PMID: 9665328


Review.




Format:



AMA



APA



MLA



NLM





Send To


Clipboard

Email
Save

My Bibliography
Collections

Citation Manager

[x]





NLM


NIH


HHS


USA.gov




An official website of the United States government

The .gov means itโ€™s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before
sharing sensitive information, make sure youโ€™re on a federal
government site.


The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the
official website and that any information you provide is encrypted
and transmitted securely.



Sperm sharing arrangements involve a man ('the sharer') allowing his sperm to be used by people seeking donor sperm ('the recipients') in exchange for reduced price in vitro fertilisation. Clinics in the UK have offered egg sharing since the 1990s and the arrangement has been subjected to regulatory oversight and significant ethical analysis. By contrast, until now no published ethical or empirical research has analysed sperm sharing. Moreover the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) does not record the number of sperm sharing arrangements taking place.This paper describes the sperm sharing process providing an analysis of all the UK clinics advertising sperm sharing services. The ethical rationale for egg sharing is described: reducing the number of women exposed to the risks of stimulation and retrieval. This advantage is absent in sperm sharing where donation has no physical drawbacks. The key adverse social and emotional outcome of gamete sharing arises when the sharer's own treatment is unsuccessful and the recipient's is successful. This outcome is more likely in sperm sharing than in egg sharing given sperm from sharers can be used by up to 10 families whereas shared eggs only go to one other family.Given its morally relevant differences from egg sharing, sperm sharing requires its own ethical analysis. The HFEA should begin recording sperm sharing arrangements in order to enable meaningful ethical and policy scrutiny.




Keywords:


feminism; insemination- artificial; reproductive medicine.


ยฉ Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Competing interests: None declared.

MeSH
PMC
Bookshelf
Disclaimer

Help
Accessibility
Careers

Your browser isnโ€™t supported anymore. Update it to get the best YouTube experience and our latest features. Learn more

This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice .
Questions What happens if you eat your own sperm?
Last updated Feb 09, 2015 Originally published Nov 15, 1996
The answer you entered for the CAPTCHA was not correct.
I'm worried. What happens if you eat your own sperm?


When sperm is ingested by swallowing semen, the sperm will be broken down and absorbed into the bloodstream as if consuming water, milk, or gelatin. If it's semen (the liquid that carries the sperm from the penis) that a person is worried about, ingesting one's own semen is safe if that person is free of sexually transmitted infections (STIs).


On the other hand, swallowing one's own semen is unsafe if a person has certain STIs. In this case, the risk depends on what STI a person has, its method of transmission, and the area(s) of infection. With swallowing semen, the primary concern is with infections that localize in the genitals, mouth, and/or throat. If the infection can be transferred through semen, and it can infect different locations independently, then there is a chance that the infection can spread to the mouth or throat. This type of infection includes gonorrhea and chlamydia.


Certain STIs, such as human papillomavirus (HPV, the virus that can cause genital warts), herpes, and syphilis, spread through direct, skin-to-skin or oral-genital contact. Some men can, and do, go down on themselves. If they have HPV, herpes, and/or syphilis, the infection(s) can spread from their penis to their lips, mouth, or throat.


Swallowing one's own semen does not pose health risks with respect to systemic infections (e.g., HIV). These infections are in the bloodstream and their symptoms are present throughout the body.


So if you're STI-free, feel free to indulge yourself! Just be careful you don't spoil your dinner.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Canโ€™t find information on the site about your health concern or issue?
Go Ask Alice! is not an emergency or instant response service.
If you are in an urgent situation, please visit our Emergency page to view a list of 24 hour support services and hotlines.

Please complete the captcha below to prove you're a human and proceed to the page you're trying to reach.
This page requires cookies to be enabled in your browser settings. Please check this setting and enable cookies (if disabled). sid:565

Lingerie Stockings Nylon Panties
Asian Sex Toy
Old Massage Sex

Report Page