Sance de cunnilingus la clinique

Sance de cunnilingus la clinique




🛑 TOUTES LES INFORMATIONS CLIQUEZ ICI đŸ‘ˆđŸ»đŸ‘ˆđŸ»đŸ‘ˆđŸ»

































Sance de cunnilingus la clinique
Volume 64, Issue 1 , January–March 1999 , Pages 43-60
Author links open overlay panel É. Loonis *
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
2017, Constructing Transgressive Sexuality in Screenwriting: The Feiticeiro/a as Character
Toxicologie Analytique et Clinique, Volume 29, Issue 4, 2017, pp. 418-440
L'Évolution Psychiatrique, Volume 77, Issue 3, 2012, pp. 385-402
L'Évolution Psychiatrique, Volume 87, Issue 2, 2022, pp. 189-192
Sexologies, Volume 22, Issue 4, 2013, pp. e81-e87
Sages-Femmes, Volume 21, Issue 3, 2022, pp. 21-23
L'Évolution Psychiatrique, Volume 78, Issue 3, 2013, pp. 373-385
Copyright © 1999 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS
L'objet de la recherche dont rend compte cet article est le fantasme Ă©rotique, sans qu'il ne soit question de ses auteurs, ni de ce qu'ils en font. L'objectif de cette Ă©tude se dĂ©finit Ă  partir d'une double problĂ©matique contradictoire : 1) la prĂ©sence d'un sexuel qui parasite le champ social ; 2) la difficultĂ© d'aborder sereinement et, partant, scientifiquement, ce sexuel. Comme passage Ă  l'acte dans le champ social, le sexuel se joue dans les contextes de pouvoir instituĂ©s (famille, Ă©cole, entreprise
). De son cĂŽtĂ©, la difficultĂ© d'aborder le sexuel concerne ce « quelque chosequi le motive et qui relĂšve du fantasme. Il y a lĂ  le refus d'une pragmatique du fantasme Ă©rotique, dont les effets incitateurs sont troublants pour tous ceux qui sont amenĂ©s Ă  en traiter pour prĂ©venir, guĂ©rir ou juger. Le fantasme est toujours derriĂšre le sexuel, comme scĂ©nario qui parasite l'ordre social et qui se rĂ©vĂšle au cƓur des passages Ă  l'acte, mĂȘme s'il fait l'objet d'un dĂ©ni.
Dans le cadre d'une pratique de consultation psychothérapeutique de ville, nous avons travaillé avec 29 adultes non pervers dont nous avons recueilli un matériel consistant en 25 fantasmes érotiques sur lesquels nous avons entrepris une analyse structurale. AprÚs avoir défini le concept de fantasme érotique, au résultat nous avons découvert quatre groupes de structures de base aux fantasmes érotiques : temporelles (phase de mise en scÚne, phase d'action, onanorythmie et phases finales déclenchante et défantasmante), logiques (fractalisations verticale et horizontale, et l'emboßtement de contextes), de rÎles (tripartite : instances du désir, de l'interdit et de la diversion) et thématiques (la transgression, l'exhibition phallique, la contrainte et l'humiliation). Les fantasmes érotiques ne sont donc pas des phénomÚnes psychiques secondaires, mais ils occupent une place centrale dans l'économie et la dynamique du psychisme. Approfondir leur étude à l'aide d'outils appropriés ne pourra que renforcer notre maßtrise des phénomÚnes pervers.
This study aims at understanding erotic fantasies without proposing treatment or taking into account the way individuals deal with these fantasies. The objective of this study arose from two contradictory concerns: 1) sexual reaction causing interference in the social field and 2) difficulty in addressing serenely and therefore ‘scientifically’ this problem. As concerns taking action in the social field, sexual reaction occurs within contexts in which the protagonist holds power (family, school, occupation
). Furthermore, difficulty in addressing this problem concerns ‘the little something’ that has a triggering role and falls within the province of fantasy. There is definitely a refusal of erotic fantasy pragmatics whose incentives disturb people involved in treatment to either prevent, cure or judge. Fantasy is always behind sexual reaction, as a script that would paratize social order and be at the core of action, even though it is denied. Within the context of a private practice, we collected 25 erotic fantasies from 29 adult ‘non pervert’ patients and analyzed their structure. The concept of erotic fantasy was first defined. Four basic structural groups were then evidenced including: temporal erotic fantasies (with build-up to make believe, action, oneiric rhythms, and final triggering phases relieving the erotic fantasy); logical (vertical and horizontal fractal structures and contexts fitting into each other); roles (with three entreaties including desire, taboos and diversion); and sets of themes (disobedience, phallic exhibitionism, restraint and humiliation). Therefore, erotic fantasies are not secondary psychic phenomena, but are at the core of psychism economy and dynamics. Further study using suitable tools will help us understand perverse phenomena.
Les Ă©thers de glycol entrent dans la composition de trĂšs nombreux produits industriels, domestiques, cosmĂ©tiques ou mĂ©dicamenteux. Les acides alcoxycarboxyliques, mĂ©tabolites urinaires incriminĂ©s dans la toxicitĂ©, notamment la reprotoxicitĂ© sont de bons indicateurs d’exposition. Cette Ă©tude visait Ă  dĂ©crire le profil d’imprĂ©gnation aux Ă©thers de glycol de la population gĂ©nĂ©rale et les facteurs de variation, par le dosage dans les urines de 8 mĂ©tabolites (acides mĂ©thoxyacĂ©tique = MAA, Ă©thoxyacĂ©tique = EAA, 2-mĂ©thoxypropionique = 2-MPA, propoxyacĂ©tique = PAA, butoxyacĂ©tique = BAA, phĂ©noxyacĂ©tique = PhAA, 2,2-mĂ©thoxyethoxyacĂ©tique = MEAA, 2,2 éthoxyĂ©thoxyacĂ©tique = EEAA) sur 120 personnes de 20 à 59 ans, recrutĂ©es dans les centres d’examens de santĂ© du Nord et du Pas-de-Calais. Des traces de chaque mĂ©tabolite Ă©taient dĂ©tectables (> 0,01 mg/L) dans plus de 90 % des Ă©chantillons Ă  l’exception du 2-MPA (70 %). Les mĂ©tabolites urinaires le plus souvent quantifiĂ©s (> 0,05 mg/L) Ă©taient le PhAA (85,7 %), le MAA (54,4 %), le EEAA (46,1 %), le BAA (13,6 %) ; le 2-MPA et le PAA ne l’étaient jamais. Les niveaux restaient cependant faibles. Des liens ont Ă©tĂ© mis en Ă©vidence entre le BAA urinaire et l’exposition rapportĂ©e aux peintures et solvants (exposition rĂ©guliĂšre) et Ă  la colle et aux solvants (dans les 24 heures prĂ©cĂ©dentes), ainsi qu’entre l’EEAA et le PhAA et les cosmĂ©tiques utilisĂ©s dans les 24 heures prĂ©cĂ©dentes. Cette Ă©tude descriptive transversale apporte des informations sur le profil d’exposition aux Ă©thers de glycol dans la population gĂ©nĂ©rale. Ces donnĂ©es sont utiles pour l’interprĂ©tation des suivis biomĂ©trologiques.
Glycol ethers are used in a wide range of industrial, domestic, cosmetic and medicinal products. Alkoxycarboxylic acids are their main urinary metabolites and are mainly responsible for their toxicity, including reprotoxic effects. They are also good indicators of exposure. This study aims to characterize the exposure profile to glycol ethers of the general population and its main determinants through the measurement of 8 urinary metabolites (methoxyacetic acid = MAA, ethoxyacetic acid = EAA, 2-methoxypropionic = 2-MPA, propoxyacetic acid = PAA, butoxyacetic acid = BAA, phenoxyacetic acid = PhAA, 2,2-methoxyethoxyacetic acid = MEAA, 2,2-ethoxyethoxyacetic acid = EEAA) in 120 people aged 20–59 recruited from the Nord and Pas-de-Calais Health Examination Centers. Traces of all metabolites were detectable (> 0.01 mg/L) in more than 90% of samples except for 2-MPA (70%). The most commonly quantified metabolites (> 0.05 mg/L) were PhAA (85.7%), MAA (54.4%), EEAA (46.1%); 2-MPA and PAA were never quantified. In all cases, levels were low. Urine BAA level was associated with regular exposure to paints and solvents, and with exposure within the previous 24 hours to glue or solvents. Urine EEAA and PhAA levels were associated with cosmetic use in the previous 24 hours. This cross-sectional descriptive study provides information on the exposure to glycol ethers in the general population. These data are useful for the interpretation of biomonitoring follow-up.
Les questions liĂ©es Ă  la prise en charge des auteurs d’infractions Ă  caractĂšre sexuel sont complexes et interrogent les intrications entre les logiques de soins et de contrĂŽle. Les aspects de maladie, de rĂ©cidive sont au centre de l’accompagnement thĂ©rapeutique de ces patients hors du champ commun de la SantĂ© Mentale. À partir de ces interrogations, l’article prĂ©sente un modĂšle original de prise en charge associant rencontre Ă  visĂ©e sociale, thĂ©rapie individuelle et thĂ©rapie de groupe. Les rĂ©fĂ©rences analytique et systĂ©mique se veulent complĂ©mentaires, rencontrant le sujet d’une part dans ses conflits intrapsychiques et d’autre part dans ses souffrances relationnelles, avec ses pairs et ses proches. La thĂ©rapie de groupe fait l’objet d’un dĂ©veloppement particulier en montrant l’intĂ©rĂȘt de l’épistĂ©mologie systĂ©mique dans cette clinique spĂ©cifique. L’accent est Ă©galement mis sur l’histoire des premiers liens ainsi que sur le processus de mise en rĂ©cit, distinguant l’acte des circonstances de l’acte. Tout en prĂ©sentant le processus de la dĂ©marche thĂ©orico-clinique, l’auteur reprend quelques paroles Ă©noncĂ©es par les patients eux-mĂȘmes en lien avec les questions abordĂ©es.
The questions bound to the care of the authors of sexual offenses are complex and question the intrication between the logics of care and control. The aspects of disease and recurrence are in the center of the therapeutic accompaniment of these patients outside the common fields of the mental health. From these questionings, the article presents an original model of care associating social meeting, individual therapy and group therapy. The analytical and systematical references want to be complementary, meeting the subject on the one hand in its conflicts intrapsychic and on the other hand in its relational sufferings with its pairs and its family. The group therapy is the particular development by showing the interest of systemic epistemology in this specific private clinic. We stress also the history of the first bonds and the process of setting in account distinguishing the act from the circumstances from the act. While presenting the process of the theorico-clinical approach, the author emphasizes some words expressed by the patients themselves in bond with the discussed question.
Sexual desire dysfunctions are generally considered to be the result of psycho-relational or medical issues. However, various studies suggest that sexual intimacy is linked to conjugal functioning stemming from partners’ social statuses. Based on a representative sample of individuals aged between 25 and 45 years old, this study tests the hypothesis that sexual desire is lower in the case of conjugal interaction styles that depreciate partners’ autonomy and reinforce conjugal closure and gender disparity. Results confirm this hypothesis. Sexual desire varies according to individuals’ autonomy within their partnerships, along with conjugal closure reinforcement and the level of legitimacy conceded to gender inequality. Sexual desire does not have the same importance in every interaction style. This observation has consequences for sexual satisfaction.
Le consentement sexuel est un processus complexe qui nĂ©cessite l’acquisition et la mobilisation d’habiletĂ©s que sont les compĂ©tences psychosociales (CPS). La clinique des auteurs de violences sexuelles confirme l’implication des CPS dans la rĂ©ception et la prise en compte du dĂ©sir de l’autre. La prĂ©vention basĂ©e sur leur dĂ©veloppement est donc essentielle et peut s’appuyer sur des outils.
Sexual consent is a complex process that requires the acquisition and mobilization of psychosocial skills (PSC). The clinical experience of perpetrators of sexual violence confirms the involvement of PSCs in the reception and consideration of the desire of the other. Prevention based on their development is therefore essential and can be supported by tools.
S’il est pertinent de diffĂ©rencier l’alcoolisme chez l’homme et chez la femme au niveau mĂ©dical, comportemental, social et culturel, les auteurs soutiendront dans cet article une approche psychanalytique indĂ©pendante du genre. Ils insisteront sur l’existence d’un fantasme pathogĂšne prĂ©coce d’encombrant construit par l’alcoolique et pour l’alcoolique par l’Autre. L’alcoolique n’aurait pu trouver une lĂ©gitimitĂ© d’existence dans une nomination symbolique le distinguant de son double dans le miroir, il se vivrait comme un encombrant et aurait Ă©tĂ© pensĂ© comme tel par les instances parentales. Dans ce contexte anxiogĂšne, le fantasme d’encombrant conduirait Ă  l’instauration des relations sado-masochistes qui n’aideraient pas l’alcoolique Ă  penser la sĂ©paration puis sa place de sujet sexuĂ©. Il resterait enkystĂ© dans des liens mĂ©tonymiques (pseudo-liens de fraternitĂ© dans l’alcoolisme de comptoir) qui relĂšvent d’une quĂȘte de l’identique ou encore d’une adhĂ©sion plaquĂ©e Ă  des conventions sociales (un homme ça boit). De plus, par cette rĂ©ification du sujet en encombrant, les hommes comme les femmes alcooliques supporteraient mieux leur souffrance. Leur espoir serait d’ĂȘtre enfin un jour reconnus sans avoir Ă  ĂȘtre encombrĂ© par l’Autre ou sans avoir Ă  encombrer l’Autre pour exister.
Although it seems possible to identify some medical, behavioral, social and cultural differences between male and female alcoholics, the authors develop in this article a metapsychological, gender independent approach. They insist on reality of a precocious phantasm of cumbersome object built by the Other. At this stage, certain children would not have got any guaranty for their existence legitimacy through a nomination allowing the distinction from their reflection in the mirror. Thus, the alcoholic could not think his own symbolic division. He would stay trapped in a sexual link that he identified as dangerous which might conduce to the false links of fraternity between alcoholic men. These metonymic links come from an identity quest or an adhesion to social conventions. Furthermore, in female alcoholics, the hidden consummation would be a mean to avoid any sexual encounter and thus any “taking position”. The drunkenness would allow to male as well as female alcoholics to be temporarily protected from their pain and would give them a false hope that one day they finally could be recognized without being obliged to encumber the Other in order to exist.
We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content and ads. By continuing you agree to the use of cookies .
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. or its licensors or contributors. ScienceDirectŸ is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
ScienceDirectÂź is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.





/
Browsers and spiders that can't read iframe code will see this text instead .





Summer 2012 – “Universalism versus globalization. This at least will be our US chapter – to be read as United Symptoms,” Jacques-Alain Miller

By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)


By admin
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
Comments (0)

© Please respect the fact that this material is copyright. Available here without charge for personal use only. It may not be stored, displayed, published, reproduced or used for any other purpose. Available only through EBSCO Publishing, Inc.
TRANSLATED BY JOSEFINA AYERZA WITH CORY REYNOLDS
Joyce avec Lacan doesn’t mean James Joyce and Jacques Lacan walking arm in arm down rue de Lille as I have often seen Jacques Lacan and Jacques Aubert, when the former brought the latter the most recent books of the third. No, Joyce avec Lacan echoes the singular title of a piece by Lacan, Kant avec Sade , where the already numerous readers of l’Éthique de la psychanalyse could find, if they made the effort of tracing it, the major topic of this seminar, developed, or further illuminated.
Kant avec Sade means for Lacan that the Philosophie dans le boudoir is in accordance with the Critique de la raison pratique , insofar as it completes it and makes it truthful. More precisely it reveals the object that fails to appear against the experience of the moral law. Thus in formulating the principle de Sade “ à la mode du Kant ,” be it the right to jouissance in the way of a universal law, you verify that the will of the-law-for-the-law is homologous to the will of jouissance : both divide the subject, $ to be shared between its well-being and an unpleasing wellness (morality, jouissance ).
This impeccable demonstration does not work; you doubt, without humor—like each time the rational was forced to its extreme consequences without consideration for the reasonable. Everything here is in its place, because the case is the super-ego, Freud in short pointing to this presence in every effect of humor, and because the clinical thesis it discloses may be stated in the simplest terms: the post-Oedipal super-ego that Freud nails is the inheritor of the pre-Oedipal super-ego that Melanie Klein discovers. That is to say: Kant avec Sade packages a more secret Freud avec Klein.
But it’s not less true that a procedure arises, generalizable to X avec Y . This way of reading through interference may well dignify the paranoid critical method of illustrious memory.
I don’t want to say that the essays gathered (in Joyce avec Lacan ) respond or do not respond to the astuteness of this title; I whispered it to Jacques Aubert before reading them, therefore it’s him I call on for its relevance. Without doubt they speak of Joyce in the terms of Lacan more than they talk of Lacan in the mode of Joyce. And I—even if it means patting myself on the back—what else do I do in my courses in the Department of Psychoanalysis but talk of Lacan in the mode of Lacan? This would not make a lot of sense if there were not more than one Lacan.
This line of thought brings us to ponder on how Joyce came to be considered by Lacan (
).
I will go right to that A letter, a litter which he invokes since 1956 in his Seminaire sur la lettre volée [1] to emphasize that there is nothing but signifier in a letter. A letter is a message; but it is also an object.
What in fact is a signifier? It is the w
Une femme géante fait ravage dans la ville
Des amateurs recevant des faciales
Lesbiennes en Latex

Report Page