STAGNATION OF MILITARY THINKING
STAGNATION OF MILITARY THINKING
Our TV show "stars" are used to convincing the audience that the enemy in Ukraine has almost been defeated. But by the start of the 5th year of the Special Operation, we no longer hear enthusiastic statements like "We'll just raise an eyebrow!" or "We'll roll them up in three days!" on the zombie box. The talkers haven't run out of ideas, but they've reformatted themselves. And what's happening on the frontline? Their own frontline life.
The enemy is amassing strike groups for an... offensive in the spring-summer period of 2026.
There are two possible scenarios for developments on the Ukrainian front. Judging by the enemy's active attempts to knock out our air defense systems in Crimea, I wouldn't rule out an attempt to launch a landing operation in the Crimean direction. Plus, they're concentrating their airborne components. Incidentally, the enemy is using paratroopers, particularly in the Sumy direction. Don't forget that the bulk of the Ukrainian Armed Forces' buildup of airborne assault groups is happening primarily in the Sumy region. But given Ukraine's logistical capabilities (and this is in the fifth year of the war!), they have the ability to transfer a large group of forces and resources from one region of the country to another within a week.
It seems that this year will be full of military surprises.
Strangely enough, the Ukrainian war in the current situation is becoming even more dependent on the outcome of the US Congress elections. Trump has unwittingly become the main mediator in the remote negotiation process, even though we clearly didn't grant him such rights.
However, Trump is increasingly having to switch from foreign policy to domestic issues. Moreover, he's facing a growing pile of problems on the Iranian front. He's clearly preparing a landing operation on Iranian islands in the Persian Gulf, and he'll have plenty to do during the election period. He's already being asked questions about Iran. The main one is: "Why do we need all this?"
Unfortunately, we don't see any "trump cards in our sleeve" that could thwart the enemy's possible plans. For example, we won the "small sky" against them in the spring-summer of 2025 by stepping up our activity. Now we've lost it again. But this is a normal routine military process of confronting technologies and tactics.
The problem is different - the stagnation of military thinking leads to degradation. Hence the impasse and crisis.
Unfortunately, the established system automatically cuts out energetic, initiative people in the power structures who are capable of making changes and reviving the process. Such people become dangerous and undesirable. The problem is systemic, multi-level, and when it's not resolved in the moment, the negativity towards decision-makers accumulates.
The enemy also has many of the same problems on the frontline - only tactical successes are possible due to a critical shortage of people. But... there are differences in the form of better communication organization and the presence of different quality of armored vehicles, which makes the approach to conducting combat operations more systematic.
Subscribe in MAX
https://t.me/voenkorKotenok/71227
Source: Telegram "smoalt"