Ryle 34

Ryle 34
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gabriela Capello Julia Murat Rafael Lessa Roberto Winter

Sol Miranda
Lucas Andrade
Lorena Comparato
Isabela Mariotto

Beatriz Pomar Julia Murat Mair Tavares

August 10, 2022 ( 2022-08-10 ) ( Locarno )

^ Jump up to: a b c d Young, Neil (August 14, 2022). " 'Rule 34': Locarno Review" . Screen Daily . Retrieved August 17, 2022 .

^ "Regra 34; Júlia Murat" [Rule 34; Julia Murat]. Imovision (in Portuguese) . Retrieved August 17, 2022 .

^ "Concorso internazionale: Regra 34 (Rule 34)" . Locarno Festival . Retrieved August 17, 2022 .

^ Jump up to: a b c Blaney, Martin (August 13, 2022). "Brazil's 'Rule 34' wins top prize at Locarno Film Festival" . Screen Daily . Retrieved August 17, 2022 .

^ Jump up to: a b Sennhauser, Michael (August 13, 2022). "REGRA 34 von Júlia Murat" [REGRA 34 by Julia Murat]. Sennhauser's Film Blog (in German) . Retrieved August 17, 2022 .

^ Marie de la Fuente, Anna (August 1, 2022). "Brazil's 'Rule 34' Drops Trailer Before Locarno Main International Competition Bow (EXCLUSIVE)" . Variety . Retrieved August 17, 2022 .

^ Lodge, Guy (August 13, 2022). "Provocative Brazilian Film 'Rule 34' Wins the Top Prize at Locarno Film Festival" . Variety . Retrieved August 17, 2022 .

^ Ntim, Zac (August 13, 2022). "Locarno Film Festival Winners: 'Rule 34' Takes Golden Leopard" . Deadline . Retrieved August 17, 2022 .

Welcome to a sneak preview of the new design for Wikipedia!
We would love your feedback on our changes
Rule 34 ( Portuguese : Regra 34 ) is a 2022 Brazil and France co-produced drama film directed by Julia Murat and starring Sol Miranda . The title of the film is based on the Internet phenomenon Rule 34 . Structured as a series of short episodes, it follows a young law student who develops a passion for defending women in abuse cases. At the same time, her own sexual interests lead her into a world dominated by violence and eroticism. [1]

The co-production between Brazil and France, distributed by Imovision [2] premiered at the 75th Locarno Film Festival on 10 August 2022, [3] where it won the Golden Leopard for best film. [4]

Rule 34 is the third feature film by Brazilian director and screenwriter Julia Murat. The film's title refers to the so-called Rule 34 . It is an internet maxim which asserts that Internet pornography exists concerning every conceivable topic. [5] The project was part of the 2019 Berlinale Co-Production Market. [4] Murat wrote the screenplay together with Gabriela Capello, Rafael Lessa and Roberto Winter. [1]

Filming took place in 2020. Having lacked the money to complete the film, Murat received a € 35,000 grant in July 2021 as part of the Gothenburg Film Festival. [4] The money came from the festival's Audiovisual Fund, set up at the initiative of the Swedish government to protect democracy around the world. [1] [6]

Independent Swiss journalist Michael Sennhauser saw a playful, cleverly argued film "with a clear provocative twist". As with the competition entry Tengo sueños eléctricos , which received three awards in Locarno, it “clearly plays a role” that there is a female director behind the work. "Precisely because it [the film] moves in this area where personal freedom only works as long as they mutually agree that encroachment is negotiable," stated Sennhauser. [5] Neil Young writing in Screen Daily also saw a "surprise winner". It is "a fascinating and ambitious third feature film" and "a sensual, intimate character study" by Murat. Newcomer Sol Miranda put on a "strong central performance" by a "multifaceted black woman [...] in bustling Rio de Janeiro." With her play, she penetrates the didactic tendencies of the screenplay and the theoretical treatises disguised as dialogue. Young, however, criticized the "stylistically conventional" images by cameraman Leo Bittencourt in comparison to the red-hot topics dealt with, which are kept "pervasively flat in TV style" and would therefore hardly lose their impact on the small screen. The climax of the film is the final 75-second shot of Simona's real-life meeting with her online follower. Lead actress Miranda shows a "convincing range of emotions" and the close-up is reminiscent of Greta Garbo in Queen Christine (1933), Bob Hoskins in The Long Good Friday (1980) and Mia Farrow in The Purple Rose of Cairo (1985). [1]

Возможно, сайт временно недоступен или перегружен запросами. Подождите некоторое время и попробуйте снова.
Если вы не можете загрузить ни одну страницу – проверьте настройки соединения с Интернетом.
Если ваш компьютер или сеть защищены межсетевым экраном или прокси-сервером – убедитесь, что Firefox разрешён выход в Интернет.

Firefox не может установить соединение с сервером rule34.paheal.net.

Отправка сообщений о подобных ошибках поможет Mozilla обнаружить и заблокировать вредоносные сайты

Сообщить
Попробовать снова
Отправка сообщения
Сообщение отправлено

использует защитную технологию, которая является устаревшей и уязвимой для атаки. Злоумышленник может легко выявить информацию, которая, как вы думали, находится в безопасности.

Mass.gov

Menu

Close

Access to search

Health & Social Services

Families & Children

Housing & Property

Transportation

Legal & Justice

Public Safety

Energy

Environment

Taxes

Unclaimed Property

Vital & Public Records

Voting

See all topics under
Living

Business Resources

Professional Licenses & Permits

Unemployment

Finding a Job

Taxes

Workers' Rights & Safety

Industry Regulations

For State Employees

See all topics under
Working

Early Childhood Education & Care

Elementary & Secondary Schools

Higher Education

Continuing Education

For Educators & Administrators

See all topics under
Learning

Parks & Recreation

Fishing & Hunting

Historic Sites

Arts

Family Fun

Travel Options

Seasonal Activities

See all topics under
Visiting & Exploring

Executive

Constitutionals & Independents

Legislative

Judicial

Cities & Towns

State Offices & Courts A-Z

See all topics under
Your Government

Laws by Source

Massachusetts rules of court and standing orders

Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure

Civil Procedure Rule 34: Producing documents, electronically stored information, and tangible things, or entering onto land, for inspection and other purposes

This page, Civil Procedure Rule 34: Producing documents, electronically stored information, and tangible things, or entering onto land, for inspection and other purposes, is
offered by

Trial Court Law Libraries

show more

Massachusetts Court System

This is a part of:

Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure

+

This is a part of:

Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure

×

Amended June 29, 2016, effective August 1, 2016

Show more updates Show fewer updates

Law library locations and phone numbers

Library locations

Reference librarians online

Chat with a law librarian

Reference librarians via email

Email Trial Court Law Libraries at masslawlib@gmail.com

Table of Contents Hide Table of contents x

Law library locations and phone numbers

Library locations

Reference librarians online

Chat with a law librarian

Reference librarians via email

Email Trial Court Law Libraries at masslawlib@gmail.com

Amended June 29, 2016, effective August 1, 2016

Show more updates Show fewer updates

Law library locations and phone numbers

Library locations

Reference librarians online

Chat with a law librarian

Reference librarians via email

Email Trial Court Law Libraries at masslawlib@gmail.com

This is part of:

Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure

Your feedback will not receive a response.
Why?

1 Strongly Disagree

2

3

4

5 Strongly Agree

1 Strongly Disagree

2

3 3

4

5 Strongly Agree

1 Strongly Disagree

2

3

4

5 Strongly Agree

© 2022 Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
A .mass.gov website belongs to an official government organization in Massachusetts.

Secure websites use HTTPS certificate
A lock icon (

) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the official website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Top-requested sites to log in to services provided by the state

Top-requested sites to log in to services provided by the state

A party may serve on any other party a request within the scope of Rule 26(b) :
to produce and permit the requesting party or its representative to inspect, copy, test, or sample the following items in the responding party's possession, custody, or control:
(A) any designated documents or electronically stored information - including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, sound recordings, images and other data or data compilations - stored in any medium from which information can be obtained either directly or, if necessary, after translation by the responding party into a reasonably usable form; or
(B) any designated tangible things; or
to permit entry onto designated land or other property possessed or controlled by the responding party, so that the requesting party may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the property or any designated object or operation on it.
The request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with or after service of the summons and complaint upon that party. The request shall set forth the items to be inspected either by individual item or by category, and describe each item and category with reasonable particularity. The request shall specify a reasonable time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performing the related acts, and it may specify the form in which electronically stored information is to be produced.
The party upon whom the request is served shall serve a written response within 30 days after the service of the request, except that a defendant may serve a response within 45 days after service of the summons and complaint upon that defendant. The court may allow a shorter or longer time. The response shall state, with respect to each item or category, that inspection and related activities will be permitted as requested, unless the request is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated. If objection is made to part of an item or category, the part shall be specified. The party submitting the request may move for an order under Rule 37(a) with respect to any objection to or other failure to respond to the request or any part thereof, or any failure to permit inspection as requested.
The response may state an objection to a requested form for producing electronically stored information. If the responding party objects to a requested form - or if no form was specified in the request - the party shall state the form or forms it intends to use.
Unless otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, these procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:
(i) A party shall produce documents as they are kept in the usual course of business or shall organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the request;
(ii) The producing party may produce copies of the documents, including by electronic means, provided that, if requested, the producing party affords all parties a fair opportunity to verify the copies by comparison with the originals.
(iii) If a request does not specify a form for producing electronically stored information, a party shall produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms; and
(iv) A party need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.
(1) This rule does not preclude an independent action against a person not a party for production of documents and things and permission to enter upon land.
(2) As provided in Rule 45 , a nonparty may be compelled to produce documents and tangible things or to permit an inspection.
(2016) Rule 34 was amended in 2016 to recognize the common practice of producing copies of documents rather than permitting inspection of the originals (Rule 3
How To Bypass Sad Panda
Tubegalore. Com
Kaley Naked

Ryle 34

Report Page