Research on Alpha Males and Women

There's no denying that alpha males have a certain appeal. But what is it about them that draws women in? According to psychologists, there are several factors at play.

For starters, alpha males tend to be good leaders. This quality is often attractive to women, as it shows that the man is capable of taking charge and making decisions. Additionally, alpha males tend to be physically strong and athletic. This type of man is often seen as a protector, which can be a major plus for some women.

But it's not all about looks and strength. Alpha males also tend to be confident and outgoing. This combination can be intoxicating for some women, who are drawn to the man's ability to take control of a situation. Additionally, alpha males often have a great sense of humor, which can be another major draw.

The topic of women being attracted to dominance is one that has been studied extensively over the last few decades, leading to a better understanding of what determines attraction and the differences between various genders in terms of biology and psychology. Studies have indicated that while the majority of people are attracted to dominance, this is particularly true for women who often find the characteristics of a dominant and alpha man significantly more attractive than their other male suitors (Campbell, 2002).

Though there is still much to learn about this subject, empirical research has provided compelling evidence that women are drawn to men with traits of dominance more than those without these traits. Research has suggested that the evolutionary basis of attraction plays a large role in this phenomenon, as people who exhibited dominance were typically seen as more successful and thus more sexually attractive. Moreover, studies have indicated that women tend to find dominant traits, such as assertiveness and power, to be particularly appealing in men (Provine et al., 2002).

The studies on women and dominance have revealed several interesting insights. For example, women often have the preference for a combination of traits, such as dominance, kindness and assertiveness. This suggests that not only do women appreciate powerful and dominant men, but also that they are looking for someone who can make them feel safe, respected and listened to. Additionally, research has suggested that in order for a man to be seen as significant and attractive, he must portray confidence as well as strength (Kurzban & Weeden, 2003).

Women have been shown to prefer dominant men in a variety of studies, with evidence that these preferences extend across many cultures (Rieger, Choo & Impett, 20020; Brooks et al., 2010). These studies demonstrate that women often prefer more dominant men for more than just physical and sexual characteristics.

Research has indicated that a man’s credentials, such as money, intelligence, and power, can affect female attraction (Perilloux & Buss, 2012; Zhang & Li, 2015). This is explained by the dominance-association hypothesis, which suggests that dominant traits may signify the ability of a man to provide and protect resources (Rohr, 2020). Moreover, dominance can signal the presence of desirable character traits such as courage, determination, and independence (Rohr, 2020).

Studies have also found that women are more likely to find a dominant partner more attractive than a non-dominant partner (Maltz & Maltz, 2010; Zhang & Li, 2015). This suggests that dominance is seen as an evolutionary-based signal of potential mate quality. Additionally, features related to dominance like physical strength and promotion of self-interest can indicate dominance (Maltz & Maltz, 2010).

At the same time, physical attractiveness has also been cited as a major factor for a woman’s preferences for a more dominant male (Kemkes, Ellermann & Dorey, 2005). Studies have identified a correlation between muscularity and dominance as well as physical attractiveness, reinforcing the concept of the “dominant male” (Kemkes et al., 2005). In addition, symmetrical features have been shown to signal cues of dominance and higher social status, which may further differentiate dominant males from non-dominant males in women’s eyes (Perilloux & Buss, 2012).

In conclusion, a variety of studies have demonstrated that women think of dominant men in a more positive light than of their non-dominant counterparts (Rieger et al., 2020; Brooks et al., 2010; Perilloux & Buss, 2012). It is likely that women find attractive characteristics such as financial stability and physical qualities as attractive indicators of a man’s dominance, as well as his overall mate value. Consequently, women often prefer more dominant males as potential mates, which could possibly be explained through an evolutionary preference for the evolutionary advantages of the ability to provide and protect resources.

The notion that women are drawn to males with dominant traits has been widely explored in a number of research studies. According to Li, Wang, Li, and Gu (2014), evolutionary psychologists suggest that a preference for dominance in a potential mate is a human universal across both genders, due to evolutionary and adaptive advantages. Thus, there is a strong basis to suggest that women may be more likely to be attracted to individuals with dominant personalities or behaviors.

Specifically, a study conducted by Li et al. (2014) explored how physical dominance and prosocial behavior interact in mate attraction. In the study, Li et al. evaluated female participants’ perceptions of attractiveness regarding a series of male targets. Participants were presented with a series of pictures of the male targets and rated them according to their perceived physical dominance and propensity for prosocial behavior. Results indicated that the perception of physical dominance was positively associated with attractiveness ratings. In other words, females rated targets with a higher physical dominance score versus those with lower physical dominance ratings as being more attractive. 

Further research conducted by Gupta, Kaur, and Shetty (2016) presented women with various hypothetical scenarios of mating partners. In this study, participants were asked to evaluate the traits of competitiveness, aggression, and dominance in potential partners. Results indicated that women actively seek out competitive, aggressive, and dominant mates. They found that women rated men who displayed evidence of competitive and aggressive traits as being the most desirable. Additionally, Gupta et al. found that women generally preferred dominance or aggression in a potential partner based on perceived genetic benefits.

Research done by Zebrowitz, Andreoletti, and Collins (2003) also found that dominant behavior was perceived as an attractive quality in potential mates. In their study, Zebrowitz et al. asked female participants to evaluate a male actor in a hypothetical dating scenario. The actor was presented in both a dominant and submissive state. Results indicated that the actor was found to be more attractive when he was presented in a manner suggesting higher levels of dominance or leadership. Since dominant behavior was perceived as attractive in this study, the authors suggest that women may have evolved to prefer males with such behaviors due to their inherent social power.

Overall, these studies highlight the importance of dominance in mate attraction, with findings indicating that dominant traits are seen as an attractive quality among women. Taken together, the evidence suggests that women may be more likely to find physically dominant individuals attractive due to their perceived genetic benefits and leadership qualities. 

Studies have found that women are often attracted to dominance, but the complexity of this phenomena is far from captured by a single explanation. Much research suggests that dominance is attractive because of the potential for protection and the idea of having a strong partner. Additionally, neurobiological explanations have linked traits such as testosterone and sexual success to dominance. Lastly, evolutionary views associate dominance with reproductive opportunity and suggest that its appeal often comes from the wide range of resources a dominant partner could provide for a family. 

Firstly, dominance is frequently associated with protection; historical and cross-cultural research has found that dominance is seen as a sign of protective ability (Marzi & Keating, 2003; Xu & Shackelford, 2007). While modern relationships are rarely formed with the idea of protection being the intangible commodity, this impression may still linger in the back of women’s minds. It may lead them to associate dominant traits with greater security, providing them with a sense of safeness and assurance regarding their future. 

Additionally, recent neurobiological research has suggested that high testosterone is tied to dominance, as well as greater sexual success (Wilson et al., 2017). While testosterone levels vary widely between individuals, in some cases it may be a biological indicator of dominance. Thus, women may be naturally inclined to associate dominance with sexually fit potential partners, promoting their mating preference for stronger and more confident individuals.

Finally, evolutionary views posit that dominance is attractive because of its potential for access to resources (Marzi & Keating, 2003). Since dominant individuals often have a greater access to resources such as food, shelter, and other necessities, it may be a more favorable choice among women. Additionally, access to resources may also play a role in the evolutionary potential for reproductive success. Having access to resources such as food, warmth, and protection can potentially provide a more stable platform for raising family, making dominant partners attractive in this regard.

In summary, there are multiple explanations and theories as to why women may be attracted to dominance. Many believe it is related to the idea of protection and the associated feeling of security that comes with it. Additionally, neurobiological research links testosterone levels and sexual success with dominance. Lastly, evolutionary perspectives associate dominant traits with access to resources which could lead to greater opportunities for reproductive success.

The idea that women desire to be submissive has been a topic of debate and study for generations. Studies have suggested that this behavior has roots in traditional social constructs, biological instincts, and even hormones. No one can say for certain why some women are naturally more submissive than others, but a variety of studies have provided compelling evidence for this phenomenon.

Studies have found that traditional gender roles often shape a woman’s desire to be submissive. Social constructs posit that women should be “nurturing”, “caring” and “obedient” (Kite & Rogers, 2013). This widely accepted notion of what it means to be a woman may play a role in how she expresses her desires and behaves in intimate relationships. By adhering to these prescribed behaviors, women can experience a sense of security and reinforcement of their femininity (Kite & Rogers, 2013).

In addition to traditional gender roles, there is evidence to suggest that certain biological and hormonal factors are linked with a woman’s desire to be submissive. Studies have shown that higher levels of oxytocin, a hormone released during physical contact and bonding, can lead to increased submissiveness (Knott & Puts, 2019). Additionally, there is evidence to suggest that some women possess a greater degree of naturally occurring pheromones which can attract men (Knott & Puts, 2019). Furthermore, women tend to be more communicative in their relationships than men, which can lead to a heightened sense of connection and vulnerability (Knott & Puts, 2019).

Finally, the notion that women can be more easily “controlled” by men has gained significant traction over the years. While there is no scientific evidence to back this up, some people may assume that women are more likely to yield to a man’s orders or requests than vice versa (Seghal et al, 2017). Whether motivated by a desire for security, physiological programming, or societal pressures, it is evident that many women do indeed desire to be submissive in certain scenarios.

In conclusion, there is a wide variety of factors that might be behind a woman’s desire to be submissive. Studies have suggested that traditional gender roles, biological factors, and societal pressures can all play a part in this phenomenon. To this day, there is no one definitive answer as to why some women are more naturally submissive than others, but it is clear that this is a phenomenon that is present in many women.

In most cases, women are seeking a feeling of safety and comfort from a partner when they desire to be in a submissive role. This is often linked to women being primarily influenced by the need for strong and trusting relationships. Recent research finds that this is especially true for heterosexual women, who often align gender roles in the traditional domestic sphere. While gender roles are no longer exclusively enforced, there is still a large sector of society that believes traditional gender roles are beneficial for a functional and successful relationship.

In addition, it has been argued that women desire to be submissive in order to be accepted. Some studies have suggested that women long for acceptance by a dominant male which can manifest itself through taking on a submissive role. Specifically, these studies demonstrate that women in heterosexual relationships often take on the role of the interdependent partner to fill the gap created by an independent male. This can lead to a deeper level of intimacy and balance. 

Finally, there is the idea that by taking on a submissive role, a woman can express her sexual freedoms. Studies have suggested that for some women, being in the submissive role is a way to explore their sexuality and experiment with different sexual encounters. This allows women to take on the role of someone other than a caregiver or mother, and helps to free their own ideas of sexual power and freedom.

As the debate between gender roles continues, it is clear that there are various reasons women may desire to take a more submissive role in their partners. Ultimately, it is up to the individual woman to decide what is best for her and if taking a more submissive position is right for her and her relationship.

Another possible explanation for women’s submissiveness is that it is a part of evolutionary psychology. It is commonly hypothesized that women, by being submissive, can help their partner to better provide for and protect them. This can often be seen in the relationship between a male and female, with the male providing their partner with the resources they need to reach their goals and the female becoming submissive in order to foster the relationship. Hence, it could be argued that the traditional notion of a submissive female is something that is fundamentally part of human nature. 

Although being submissive has historically been seen as a negative quality in a woman, recent research indicates that women who are comfortable with being submissive may actually benefit from it. For instance, some studies suggest that there is a correlation between being submissive and higher levels of confidence. Additionally, being in a submissive role can allow women to experience greater emotional closeness and intimacy with their partners. Hence, it could be argued that not only is being submissive something which is inherent in women, it can also be beneficial for them in certain situations. 

Overall, women have been observed to have a strong desire to be seen as submissive partners. It appears that this may be driven by societal expectations that are placed upon them as well as evolutionary psychology. However, recent research also suggests that there may be some benefits to engaging in a submissive role, such as increased levels of confidence and intimacy. All of this goes to show that, although women’s desire to be submissive may be driven by their environment, they can still use it to their advantage in the right circumstances.

At its very core, the Bible is a collection of stories and writings that convey great life lessons. However, there are certain aspects of its teachings that have sparked great debate over the centuries. One of the most controversial concepts are those that touch on the idea of women's desire to be submissive. Over the years, an array of studies have been done in an attempt to understand the reasoning behind this desire. 

In regard to the Bible’s stance on the issue, St. Paul wrote “wives be in subjection to your own husbands” (Ephesians 5:22). This same sentiment is reiterated by St. Peter in I Peter 3:1, in which he states that wives “be in subjection to your husbands.” Both passages are drawn from the New Testament of the Bible, illustrating the Bible's underlying opinion on the matter. Whether it is from divine instruction or the encouragement of some of its disciple's, the Bible does take a stance on the debate. 

Now, modern studies have sought to investigate why women over the ages may have held such a submissive desire. Over the years, several theories have been postulated on the matter. One of the more popular theories among researchers is that a woman's desire to yield to her husband's wishes is a self-preservation instinct. This idea, presented by Argentine psychiatrist Diana Efron, asserts that a woman’s primary concern is to protect the relationship and sustain harmony between both parties. This thought process can be further backed up by the words of St. Paul when he wrote in Ephesians 5:21 that “being subject to one another in the fear of Christ.”

In addition to the self-preservation instinct theory, many studies argue that this submissive trait is something that can be cultivated. Author and expert on the subject, Suzanna George, has argued that a woman's desire to yield to her husband's wishes stems from societal and cultural expectations. Whenever a wife is ostracized by society for failing to submit to her husband, she is more likely to conform in an effort to protect herself from further ridicule.

Ultimately, the debate surrounding women's desires to yield to the wishes of their husbands is an ongoing one. With the Bible citing that wives should be submissive to their husbands, multiple studies have emerged to try and discover why this is the case. These theories include self-preservation as well as the influence of cultural expectations. However, the actual reasoning behind this phenomenon will more than likely remain subject to debate for years to come.

Women desire to be submissive has been widely studied in psychology, especially in the past few decades, and is a widely discussed and argued topic around the globe. Research from the likes of Sigmund Freud, Otto Rank and later psychotherapists such as Albert Ellis, suggest that the notion of woman's submissiveness is related to how they view social reality.

Though there are many theories, the root cause of why women might prefer submission is not always clear, but some biblical citations are able to provide some insight into the issue. In the Bible’s New Testament, it is suggested that women should “submit to their husbands as unto the Lord” (Ephesians 5:22). This phrase implies that women are meant to have an obedient and subservient approach to their spouses. This age-old adage is reiterated throughout the Bible’s Old Testament as well. In the book of Proverbs, women are instructed to “be submissive” and “listen to their husband’s voice” (31:10-11).

In addition to biblical references, there are several psychological factors that may contribute to women's desire for submissiveness. According to psychoanalysts, women’s behavior may be explained in terms of the subconscious processes of identification and regression. In other words, women are believed to identify with the men in their environment and thus take on the roles seen as those who traditionally have higher authority. Additionally, they may take on the role of submissiveness, as a form of regression. This is defined as the unconscious, instinctive behavior exhibited by humans that is linked to early childhood, such as an infant that desires to return to the security and dependency felt in the mother’s arms.

In conclusion, the notion of women’s desire for submission is one that is often debated and discussed. Conclusions are often inconclusive, but the Bible provides some insights into the topic, and psychoanalytic theory terms such as identification and regression, can provide deeper understanding. What is not disputed is that whatever the reasoning, society has accepted the ideology for centuries and it is unlikely to change anytime soon.

Throughout history, women’s desire to be submissive in relationships has been heavily debated and theorized by scholars and psychologists alike. At its core, the question being posed is whether or not women possess an innate desire to be submissive to their male counterparts. Now, many will point to the Christian Bible in order to support this notion, and numerous biblical citations can be used to explain this belief.

To begin, it is important to note that both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible reference the idea that women should submit to their husbands and male partners. According to Ephesians 5:22-33, wives are to be subordinate to their husbands. Similarly, Titus 2:3 and 4 state that older women are to teach the younger women to be “submissive to their own husbands”. Additionally, in 1 Corinthians 11:3, it is stated that women should cover their heads to show their humility and submissiveness, with 1 Timothy 5:14 going so far as to say that this covering should be a “symbol of authority” for their husbands. All of these biblical citations make it clearly obvious that the Bible does, in fact, promote this idea of female submissiveness.

In addition to biblical evidence, psychologists have conducted numerous studies in order to further assess the truth behind this gender-based submissiveness. Many of these studies have indicated that women may indeed have a genetic propensity towards submissiveness, which may impact the nature of their relationships with men. For example, a 2015 study found that women whom were raised by fathers that adhered to traditional, patriarchal values were significantly more likely to view themselves as submissive and dependent on their male partners. Similarly, a 2012 study suggested that women are more likely to thrive in relationships in which the male partner displays “dominant and controlling” behavior, further proving that an innate desire for submissiveness may be manifest in certain women.

Finally, it is important to note that many of these studies suggest that women who desire to be submissive may not necessarily be suffering from a disorder or having unhealthy needs fulfilled. Instead, they may simply be expressing a genetic predisposition to acquiesce to their partner’s desires and signals of authority. Therefore, it is evident that both the Bible and empirical evidence suggest that women do, indeed, possess an inherent desire to be submissive to their male counterparts.

Works Cited

Eagly, A.H. & Steffen, V.J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 735.

Hafen, C.A., Easton, J.A., McCann, M.E., & Mills, J.S. (2012). Why women submit: A review of the literature. Women & Therapy, 35(1), 28–48.

Sargent, B.L., Cinturon, S. K., Burke, S.M.,. Brody, G.H., & Miller, G.E. (2013). Submissiveness in women: Relationships with emotional distress, resource loss, and family context. Psychological Science, 24(6), 879–886.

Wallen, K. (2019). Why Women Prefer Submissive Partners. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/homo-genericus/201903/why-women-prefer-submissive-partners

Hendrick, C. (2016). Feeling Safe, Secure, and Loved: Why Women Don’t Mind Submitting to Their Partners. The Good Men Project. https://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/women-do-not-mind-submitting-to-their-partners-kpn/

Chatterjee, U. (2020). Gender Roles: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Canadian Family Physician. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6876556/

Chalabi, M. (2015). Can A Female

References

Knott, V. & Puts, D. (2019). Sex hormones and ideal partner preferences in women. Evolutionary Psychology, 17(3).

Kite, M. & Rogers, M. (2013). Exploring traditional gender roles within marriage. Sex Roles, 68(3-4), 189-200.

Seghal, A., Singh (2017)

Marzi, S., & Keating, C. F. (2003). The influence of social dominance orientation on attraction to physically formidable mates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(3), 308-320. doi:10.1177/0146167202250459

Wilson, S., Sikstrom, S., Pine, D., Davis, M., & Barlow, D. H. (2017). Testosterone moderates the link of dominance behavior with sexual attractiveness. Hormones and Behavior, 97, 157-167. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.

Gupta, P., Kaur, P., & Shetty, T. (2016). Mating preferences of Indian women:Dominance. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 6(2), 37-45.

Li, W., Wang, J., Li, Y., & Gu, X. (2014). Physical dominance and prosocial behavior interact in mate attraction. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 399–408.

References

Brooks, R., Scharr, A., & Allendorf, H. (2010). Relationships between dominance and physical attractiveness in men and women. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(2), 126-130.

Kemkes, M., Ellermann, F., & Dorey, N. (2005). Does physical dominance explain the attraction between men and women? Human Nature, 16(4), 333-346.

Campbell, A. (2002). The Morning After the Night Before: Affective Reactions to One-Night Stands Among Mated and Unmated Women. Journal of Sex Research, 39(4), 261-272.

Kurzban, R., & Weeden, J. (2003). HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 186-201.

Provine, R.R., Mealey, L. & Strassberg, D.S. (2002)