Реферат: The Micmac VS The Iroquois Essay Research
👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻 ВСЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ДОСТУПНА ЗДЕСЬ ЖМИТЕ 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
The Micmac V.S. The Iroquois Essay, Research Paper
Although the Micmac and the Iroquois Confederacy are both Aboriginal
groups, they have many differences as well as similarities. One area of such, is
their traditional justice systems. Their governments and laws are in some ways
similar, but in many ways different.
The Micmac reside in what is now Nova Scotia, eastern New Brunswick,
Prince Edward Island, and southern Gaspe. The territory was subdivided in to
seven districts. Each of these districts contained family groupings in small
settlements based on hunting and fishing. Those from P.E.I. held more territory
in common than any other Micmac district. Their land was allotted by family.
The Iroquois were a agricultural people. They lived in permanent
villages in a domain now called southern Ontario, southern Quebec, and
northeastern United States. Indian Nations living here formed a formal and
lasting confederacy by 1450. Their members were called ?Ho-De-No-Sau-Nee’. The
league was called ?Kanonsionni’, meaning EXTENDED HOUSE. The first five nations
to join the confederacy were Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca.
Tuscaroras migrated from Carolina and joined the confederacy in 1722. The
Iroquois are bound in a treaty of friendship with the Ojibway to the North.
The Micmac government was three-tiered, with local, district, and
national chiefs, or ?Sagamores’. Each settlement’s council of elders chose a
local chief. The chief was the focus of power in the settlement. The local chief
attained position through both hereditary right and meritorious behavior. The
oldest son of a dead chief was usually given first consideration as a successor.
If he was found unfit for office, despite special training, others in family
and/or others in the community were considered. These chiefs usually had two
assistants or captains. These were called second and third watchers. They would
assume command from a sick or incompetent chief. The local chiefs would convene
in a district council and select one of their numbers to preside over their
meetings and represent the regions’ interests. Councils usually met in the
spring or fall, and all decisions were based on unanimity.
District Sagamores made up the governing body of the Micmac nation. One
district chief would act as Grand Chief. All three of these types of
chieftainship followed bloodlines as a natural course of leadership ascendency.
The people expected their chief to be a man of intelligence, knowledge, dignity,
courage, generosity, an able hunter, and fearless warrior. Leaders ruled through
The Iroquois confederacy was formalized by a constitution, recorded on
wampum belts to preserve the understanding for all generations to follow. Each
nation retained its own council and managed its own local affairs. General
control was to be lodged in a federal senate, composed of representatives
elected by each nation, holding office during good behavior, and acknowledged as
ruling chiefs throughout the whole confederacy. Every nation was further
subdivided into clans. Each clan discussed a matter to be brought before the
federal council, followed by unanimous agreement between clans. The head chief
would then announce the vote of his nation in the league council.
In the Iroquois society, fifty “sachem ships” were created, these men
represented their nation’s interests on the general council, while continuing to
exercise leadership at the local level. Together they formed the executive,
legislative, and judicial authority of the league. Although each nation
possessed unique responsibility in the confederacy, no sachem had greater rights
than another. Onondaga had 14 representatives; the Cayuga, 10; the Mohawk and
Oneida, nine; and the Seneca, eight. All council decisions were unanimous.
Onondaga as the fire-keepers (chairman) and the Mohawks as the founders of the
league , had the special duty and right of preventing a decision from passing if
it was harmful to the people. The two head Seneca chiefs were stationed at the
door of the council room, to prevent any unwanted motion from proceeding.
Iroquois women held other powers in their communities. All member
nations were matriarchal. All goods, titles, and rights followed the female line
of descent. The elder women were the heads of the families. The women had
orators representing them at council meetings, or they spoke directly through a
chief. In times of war, women were peace makes by right and duty.
A distinction existed between Iroquois leaders in times of peace and
during wars. A sachem could not participate in a battle in his official capacity.
Constitution specified that each sachem have a war chief and a runner to bring
tidings; in war, the sachem was to step down and be replaced by the war chief
until hostilities ended. The war chief acted as an advisor to his sachem in
peace, his words carry considerable weight. The lesser chiefs, or captains as
they were occasionally called, existed in Iroquois villages. These chiefs were
intermediaries between the sachems and their people, and grew in influence. Men
were awarded these positions according to merit, family rank being of no
consequence. A warrior who assisted the chiefs capably, and who was trustworthy
and honest, was appointed chief by the others. The lesser chieftainships were
not hereditary. The chiefs were governed by requests to their people, rather
than with orders; it appears that they possessed no powers of force other than
public sentiment and tradition. Leaders were careful to ask nothing that might
likely meet with refusal. Their decisions were, on the whole, willingly carried
out; creating an orderly, but liberal society. They developed a unique system of
government that combined hereditary and elective elements. Principle chiefs were
chosen by the women, who weren’t eligible to become chiefs themselves. They were
likely to select leaders with no other consideration but the good of the nation.
The moral fibre of the Iroquois community was guarded by “keepers of the
faith”, widely respected men and women selected from the populace. On election
as a keeper of the faith, a citizen was duty-bound to accept and adopt a new
name. The office could be relinquished. They reported evil deeds of individuals
to the council, to make them an example by exposure. They sometimes held
consultations to deliberate upon the moral condition of the people.
Both the Iroquois and Micmac cultures honored presents as a form of
reconciliation. They both saw murder as terrible. Although punishment and
reconciliation were the same, Micmac distinguished between murder, manslaughter,
and accidental death. War was different between the cultures. If someone of the
Micmac were killed in war, the opposing could bring presents, be killed, or
sometimes, adopted by the victims family. If someone of the Iroquois was killed
by an opposing tribe, it would start a war. This death could also be reconciled
by the gift of presents, or punishable by death or adoption by the clan mother.
In the Micmac society, trespassing was a serious offence and punishable
by reconciliation by the wronged. The Iroquois had no such thing as trespassing.
Everyone owned everything. Only spiritual articles were personally owned. If
these items were stolen, the punishment was ridicule or anger. New Year’s Eve
was the only time theft was permitted. Both cultures took in and cared for the
poor and unfortunate. Both cultures also killed their old and ill but for
reasons. Iroquois did because of burden, and Micmac did it to relieve pain and
In Micmac society, marriages were preformed in the summer and courtship
was strict. The Iroquois could marry at anytime. Polygamy was okay in Micmac
society and was not in Iroquois society. Adultery was rare in the Iroquois
society and punishable by whipping or mutilization. In Micmac–marriage of an
uncle, cousin, siblings and nieces and nephews, was forbidden. In the Iroquois
society, marriage to anyone within the clan was forbidden.
In Iroquois society, witchcraft was the most serious offence. If the
person could not be reformed, they were put to death. Treason was just as bad
and punishable the same as witchcraft. The clan mother can remove a chief for
violating sacred trust of his people and committed a crime. Small offenses were
punishable by ostracism. Iroquois also believed offenses brought evil, such as
drought, famine, or other scourge upon entire community. The planting festival
was used for all to confess any transgressions that could have angered the Great
Although there are many similarities between both the Micmac and the
Iroquois, there are some differences that make them separate communities. The
government and laws are only a small part of what unites these communities as
Aboriginals, but separates them as communities. The Micmac V.S. The
Although the Micmac and the Iroquois Confederacy are both Aboriginal
groups, they have many differences as well as similarities. One area of such, is
their traditional justice systems. Their governments and laws are in some ways
similar, but in many ways different.
The Micmac reside in what is now Nova Scotia, eastern New Brunswick,
Prince Edward Island, and southern Gaspe. The territory was subdivided in to
seven districts. Each of these districts contained family groupings in small
settlements based on hunting and fishing. Those from P.E.I. held more territory
in common than any other Micmac district. Their land was allotted by family.
The Iroquois were a agricultural people. They lived in permanent
villages in a domain now called southern Ontario, southern Quebec, and
northeastern United States. Indian Nations living here formed a formal and
lasting confederacy by 1450. Their members were called ?Ho-De-No-Sau-Nee’. The
league was called ?Kanonsionni’, meaning EXTENDED HOUSE. The first five nations
to join the confederacy were Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca.
Tuscaroras migrated from Carolina and joined the confederacy in 1722. The
Iroquois are bound in a treaty of friendship with the Ojibway to the North.
The Micmac government was three-tiered, with local, district, and
national chiefs, or ?Sagamores’. Each settlement’s council of elders chose a
local chief. The chief was the focus of power in the settlement. The local chief
attained position through both hereditary right and meritorious behavior. The
oldest son of a dead chief was usually given first consideration as a successor.
If he was found unfit for office, despite special training, others in family
and/or others in the community were considered. These chiefs usually had two
assistants or captains. These were called second and third watchers. They would
assume command from a sick or incompetent chief. The local chiefs would convene
in a district council and select one of their numbers to preside over their
meetings and represent the regions’ interests. Councils usually met in the
spring or fall, and all decisions were based on unanimity.
District Sagamores made up the governing body of the Micmac nation. One
district chief would act as Grand Chief. All three of these types of
chieftainship followed bloodlines as a natural course of leadership ascendency.
The people expected their chief to be a man of intelligence, knowledge, dignity,
courage, generosity, an able hunter, and fearless warrior. Leaders ruled through
The Iroquois confederacy was formalized by a constitution, recorded on
wampum belts to preserve the understanding for all generations to follow. Each
nation retained its own council and managed its own local affairs. General
control was to be lodged in a federal senate, composed of representatives
elected by each nation, holding office during good behavior, and acknowledged as
ruling chiefs throughout the whole confederacy. Every nation was further
subdivided into clans. Each clan discussed a matter to be brought before the
federal council, followed by unanimous agreement between clans. The head chief
would then announce the vote of his nation in the league council.
In the Iroquois society, fifty “sachem ships” were created, these men
represented their nation’s interests on the general council, while continuing to
exercise leadership at the local level. Together they formed the executive,
legislative, and judicial authority of the league. Although each nation
possessed unique responsibility in the confederacy, no sachem had greater rights
than another. Onondaga had 14 representatives; the Cayuga, 10; the Mohawk and
Oneida, nine; and the Seneca, eight. All council decisions were unanimous.
Onondaga as the fire-keepers (chairman) and the Mohawks as the founders of the
league , had the special duty and right of preventing a decision from passing if
it was harmful to the people. The two head Seneca chiefs were stationed at the
door of the council room, to prevent any unwanted motion from proceeding.
Iroquois women held other powers in their communities. All member
nations were matriarchal. All goods, titles, and rights followed the female line
of descent. The elder women were the heads of the families. The women had
orators representing them at council meetings, or they spoke directly through a
chief. In times of war, women were peace makes by right and duty.
A distinction existed between Iroquois leaders in times of peace and
during wars. A sachem could not participate in a battle in his official capacity.
Constitution specified that each sachem have a war chief and a runner to bring
tidings; in war, the sachem was to step down and be replaced by the war chief
until hostilities ended. The war chief acted as an advisor to his sachem in
peace, his words carry considerable weight. The lesser chiefs, or captains as
they were occasionally called, existed in Iroquois villages. These chiefs were
intermediaries between the sachems and their people, and grew in influence. Men
were awarded these positions according to merit, family rank being of no
consequence. A warrior who assisted the chiefs capably, and who was trustworthy
and honest, was appointed chief by the others. The lesser chieftainships were
not hereditary. The chiefs were governed by requests to their people, rather
than with orders; it appears that they possessed no powers of force other than
public sentiment and tradition. Leaders were careful to ask nothing that might
likely meet with refusal. Their decisions were, on the whole, willingly carried
out; creating an orderly, but liberal society. They developed a unique system of
government that combined hereditary and elective elements. Principle chiefs were
chosen by the women, who weren’t eligible to become chiefs themselves. They were
likely to select leaders with no other consideration but the good of the nation.
The moral fibre of the Iroquois community was guarded by “keepers of the
faith”, widely respected men and women selected from the populace. On election
as a keeper of the faith, a citizen was duty-bound to accept and adopt a new
name. The office could be relinquished. They reported evil deeds of individuals
to the council, to make them an example by exposure. They sometimes held
consultations to deliberate upon the moral condition of the people.
Both the Iroquois and Micmac cultures honored presents as a form of
reconciliation. They both saw murder as terrible. Although punishment and
reconciliation were the same, Micmac distinguished between murder, manslaughter,
and accidental death. War was different between the cultures. If someone of the
Micmac were killed in war, the opposing could bring presents, be killed, or
sometimes, adopted by the victims family. If someone of the Iroquois was killed
by an opposing tribe, it would start a war. This death could also be reconciled
by the gift of presents, or punishable by death or adoption by the clan mother.
In the Micmac society, trespassing was a serious offence and punishable
by reconciliation by the wronged. The Iroquois had no such thing as trespassing.
Everyone owned everything. Only spiritual articles were personally owned. If
these items were stolen, the punishment was ridicule or anger. New Year’s Eve
was the only time theft was permitted. Both cultures took in and cared for the
poor and unfortunate. Both cultures also killed their old and ill but for
reasons. Iroquois did because of burden, and Micmac did it to relieve pain and
In Micmac society, marriages were preformed in the summer and courtship
was strict. The Iroquois could marry at anytime. Polygamy was okay in Micmac
society and was not in Iroquois society. Adultery was rare in the Iroquois
society and punishable by whipping or mutilization. In Micmac–marriage of an
uncle, cousin, siblings and nieces and nephews, was forbidden. In the Iroquois
society, marriage to anyone within the clan was forbidden.
In Iroquois society, witchcraft was the most serious offence. If the
person could not be reformed, they were put to death. Treason was just as bad
and punishable the same as witchcraft. The clan mother can remove a chief for
violating sacred trust of his people and committed a crime. Small offenses were
punishable by ostracism. Iroquois also believed offenses brought evil, such as
drought, famine, or other scourge upon entire community. The planting festival
was used for all to confess any transgressions that could have angered the Great
Although there are many similarities between both the Micmac and the
Iroquois, there are some differences that make them separate communities. The
government and laws are only a small part of what unites these communities as
Aboriginals, but separates them as communities.
Название: The Micmac VS The Iroquois Essay Research
Раздел: Топики по английскому языку
Тип: реферат
Добавлен 16:13:57 16 ноября 2010 Похожие работы
Просмотров: 5
Комментариев: 9
Оценило: 2 человек
Средний балл: 5
Оценка: неизвестно Скачать
Срочная помощь учащимся в написании различных работ. Бесплатные корректировки! Круглосуточная поддержка! Узнай стоимость твоей работы на сайте 64362.ru
Привет студентам) если возникают трудности с любой работой (от реферата и контрольных до диплома), можете обратиться на FAST-REFERAT.RU , я там обычно заказываю, все качественно и в срок) в любом случае попробуйте, за спрос денег не берут)
Да, но только в случае крайней необходимости.
Реферат: The Micmac VS The Iroquois Essay Research
Курсовая работа: Повышение самооценки подростка
Реферат: Dancing At Lughnasa Essay Research Paper How
Курсовая работа по теме Магніто-резонансна томографія
Лабораторная работа: План профессиональной карьеры
Курсовая работа: Пожарная безопасность
Реферат по теме Расчет усилителя звуковой частоты
Реферат: OJ Simpson Guilty Or Not Guilty
Доклад по теме Судебники 1497, 1550. Общая характеристика, система и источники
Пед Диссертации
Курсовая работа по теме Электрооборудование пассажирских лифтов
Реферат по теме Совершенствование памяти
Подготовка К Итоговому Сочинению 2022 2022 Видео
Отчет по практике по теме Технологія виробництва халви
Система Органов Диссертация
Пара Реферат
Курсовая работа по теме Быт и нравы эпохи Возрождения
Реферат: Финансовый менеджмент в некоммерческих организациях
Виды Телескопов Реферат
Реферат: Проблемы развития инфраструктуры ресторанного бизнеса в народнохозяйственном
Контрольная Работа 9 Класс Экзамен
Реферат: Технология производства продукции животноводства растениеводства
Курсовая работа: Выручка от реализации продукции, отражение в учете и в отчетности
Реферат: Заболевания зубов и ротовой полости