Реферат: Pragmatism Vs Idealism A Man For All
👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻 ВСЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ДОСТУПНА ЗДЕСЬ ЖМИТЕ 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
Pragmatism Vs. Idealism (A Man For All Seasons) Essay, Research Paper
Morality is often overpowered by materialistic pursuits. In A Man for All Seasons ,Robert Bolt shows the corruption of those who put self interest above all other values. His use of such characters as Thomas Cromwell, Richard Rich, Chapuys and Wolsey help convey this
corruption. There is yet another character who is a pragmatist that Bolt successfully represents. Thomas More is an idealist as well as a pragmatist, for he is prepared to give up everything for his beliefs and takes all precautions possible to make his case watertight . It is through this pragmatism and idealism that Robert Bolt shows the corruption of the times.
Thomas More believed in his ideals to such an extent that he was prepared to sacrifice his life for them, if the need arrived. He was a firm believer in the separation of Church and State. When the King tried to start the reformation of England and the Church by a simple Act of Parliament called the Act of Supremacy, Thomas refused to sign it. He believed that the indictment of the King was grounded in an Act of Parliament which is directly repugnant to law
of God. The King in Parliament cannot bestow he Supremacy of the Church because it is a Spiritual Supremacy! And more to this the immunity of the Church is promised both in Magna Carta and the Kings own Coronation Oath! (Bolt, p. 92) The marriage was yet another reason why More refused to sign the Act. He knew that if he signed it then he would accept the King as the Supreme Head of Church and thus give the King the power to dispense with the dispensation which to him was against his morals and religion. Of course the marriage was associated with other things -attack on the abbeys, the whole Reformation policy-to which More was violently opposed. When told by Norfolk that his parish attire is a disrespect to the King
and his office. More replies that the service of God is not a dishonor to any office (Bolt, p.26) Even though he loves the King to death as proved by Mores loyalty towards him, he values his
morality and religion more. For his conscience is a little area where I must rule myself (Bolt,p.34). His position is perfectly described in his belief that when statesmen forsake their own
private conscience for the sake of their public duties… they lead their country by a short route to chaos. His idealism is clearly shown in his refusal to take the oath for the oath to him was an
invitation to God to act as a witness as well as a judge and the consequence of a perjury was damnation. He is a man who is anchored to his principles (Bolt, p.36). The issue is not about what other people see his beliefs as but not that I believe it, but that I believe it… (Bolt, p.53). He needs to be true to his conscience and cannot let other people interfere with these decisions, for when he faces his creator it is he alone who will answer Him. In matters of conscience, the loyal subject is more bounded to be loyal to his conscience than to any other thing (Bolt, p.89) Even towards his tragic end he is so sure of his righteousness that he advises the headsman to be not afraid of your office. You send me to God. He will not refuse one who is to blithe to go to him (Bolt, p.94) Thus, it becomes clear that Thomas alone possess the moral squint that no other character possesses in the play.
Thomas More is a pragmatist with a lawyers mind and a loyal heart. He was able to foresee the future and knew exactly what could be used against him later on. When Thomas More realized that the silver goblet that he received from the woman was a bribe he immediately got rid of it. He gave it to Rich, for he knew the type of person Rich was, and gave the woman an impeccably correct judgment. Not surprisingly, the goblet was later used against him but due to More s actions, it held little substance. More s trust in the law was his trust in society; his desperate sheltering beneath the forms of the law was his determination to remain in the shelter
of society. To him the law was a forest in which he could hide and never be found; it was a causeway upon which, so long as he keeps to it, a citizen may walk safely (Bolt, p. 89) Thus, with this belief More took every action to not to trap himself but rather be protected by the law. He avoided all events that may be misinterpreted as treason. When Signor Chapuys came to More to inform him that the people in Yorkshire were ready for resistance by force of arms,
More deliberately misinterpreted it as Metaphorical arms. The breastplate of righteousness and the helmet of salvation. (Bolt, p. 51) He is able to see right through people and he knows he has
spies in the house such as the steward looking for some evidence against him and thus he protects himself quit cleverly. Also, as soon as Norfolk arrives, More warns him of the rising in
Yorkshire, thus proving his loyalty to the King and protecting himself. On Chapuys second arrival, he offers More a letter from the King of Spain, he doesn t lay a finger on it, for then he
will be allying with the enemy. He further goes on to show it to Alice and everyone else that the seal has not been broken, thus showing that he has not read the letter. Even in the case of the
Maid of Kent, More writes to her advising her to abstain from meddling with the affairs of Princes and the State (Bolt, p. 67). As a precaution, More gets it notarized and thus it is evidence in favor of him, not against him. Other then refusing every possible way of being disloyal, More uses silence as his main strategy. He was a man with a firm sense of his own self. He knew where he began and left off, what area of himself he could reveal to the encroachments of his enemies, and what to the encroachments of those he loved. He refuses to talk to anyone or declare his position on the Kings divorce. He knows that anything he says canbe used against him as treason and thus repeatedly says that he will answer to the King alone. The corruption of the times is evident when, after failing to find anything on More, Cromwell decides to put something in the cupboard (Bolt, p. 69). The laws that More hid behind are
now twisted in such a way that he is charged with ingratitude and sentenced to death and it is
this single event that Thomas More fails to foresee.
Richard Rich, Thomas Cromwell, Chapuys, and Wolsey are other pragmatist who use
their foresight of the future for personal power and advancement. Richard Rich is a very sneaky
and ambitious man. He wants to be popular for when he is offered the teachers job he comments
who would know it? (Bolt, p.6) It is evident that Richard is capable of bribery when he says
But every man has his price (Bolt, p. 4) Later on during the play, due to his hunger for fame
and money, he sells out to Cromwell and lies about More under oath. Richard climbs on other
people to get to where he wants to be. Every step that Richard goes up, Thomas goes a step
down. At the end, Richard gets what he wants. He wanted a gown like Thomas and now he has
it, symbolically meaning his status and position. Cromwell is another scavenger who is a
pragmatist. He knows exactly how to get what he wants. He is like the Kings ears, very cruel
and dangerous. He is a man for whom the ends justify the means and thus he feels no regret in
having More destroyed. He knows that in dark corners can lie ears waiting to hear, thus he is
very careful in planning his conspiracy. In the trial, Cromwell rewards Rich for lying about the
More and sends away the only two people that would be able to save the More. Chapuys is a
mirror image of Cromwell. Just like Cromwell is King Henry s ears, Chapuys is those of the
King of Spain. He hunts around for information by paying the steward and tries his best to get
More on his side, so later he himself may be rewarded. Last but not least, Wolsey is another
pragmatist who is a self serving man. Even though he is a churchman he has no moral
conscience. He wants to be the pope only for the materialistic rather than spiritual reasons. He
is supposed to be a holy man yet he speaks vulgarity. When talking about Queen Catherine he
calls her as barren as a brick and when addressing Anne he refers to her as a fertile thing
(Bolt, p. 12) He even sacrifices his conscience for the sake of loyalty to the King and says that
good statesmen shouldn t possess that horrible moral squint (Bolt, p. 11) and thus, through this
it is evident that Wolsey is morally corrupt. Thus, Richard Rich, Thomas Cromwell, Chapuys,
and Wolsey are like jackals who follow the King because he is their lion, and so they could
pick up the left over pieces from him.
The Common Man is the supreme pragmatist throughout the play. He functions as a one
man Greek chorus who is an outside observer as well as a commentator. As the steward, the
common man spies on his master for the sake of money. He is a pragmatist for he only tells
them things that are common knowledge! But now they ve given money for it and everyone
wants value for his money . When he realizes that his position may be in trouble he will go
deaf,, blind, and dumb . This shows his realism for he knows exactly what he wants, as well as,
his limitations and parameters. He will not leak any information that may get him into trouble.
The steward can also see through people. When introducing characters he comments on them.
Lady Margaret, my master s daughter; lovely, really lovely (Bolt, p. 7) He also comments that
Richard Rich is not a righteous person. Thus, he is able to see through people into their deeper
characters and can foreshadow later events. When Thomas More says that he will miss the
steward, Matthew is able to look through More and realize that it is a lie for he says what s in
me for him to miss (Bolt, p.56) and thus looks out for himself when he refuses a salary cut. Yet
another example of the common mans realism is his refusal to serve the More anymore. Before,
the boatsman used to give More rides on his boat, but as soon as the King ordered that More not
be served, the boatsman stopped answering to Thomas calls. Even as a jailer, the common man
is able to look into the future and thus save himself from destruction. When he is told that if he
reports any statements made by More, he will be given 50 guineas he is tempted. But later, he
realizes that Fifty guineas isn t tempting; fifty guineas is alarming. If he d left it as swearing…
but fifty- that s serious money. If its worth that much now its worth my neck presently. I want
no part of it. They can sort it out between them. I feel my deafness coming on. (Bolt, pp.
78-79) Here the common man s pragmatism is clearly shown because as soon as he realizes that
he may be putting himself in danger he becomes deaf, blind and dumb , for he says I am a
plain and simple man who just wants to keep out of trouble. (Bolt, p.85) Even as a steward he
sees the future, My master Thomas More would give anything to anyone. Some say that s good
and some say that s bad, but I say he can t help it-and that s bad…because someday someone s
going to ask him for something that he wants to keep; and he ll be out of practice . (Bolt, p.10)
Here he sees how More will be asked to sacrifice his conscience for loyalty to the King and he
wont able to do that and as a result, be terminated. When the common man transforms into the
publican, he only emphasizes his pragmatism. He realizes that anything he says may be used
against him, so he only answers to Cromwell by saying I don t understand, sir. (Bolt, p.40)
The common man would rather be a live rat, than a dead lion. (Bolt, p.73) He is a
representative of us, the people. If we should bump into one another, recognize me. (Bolt,
In conclusion, with the exception of Thomas More, moral corruption is evident
throughout the play. Robert Bolt uses the characters of Richard Rich, Thomas Cromwell,
Chapuys, and Wolsey to portray how corruption comes to those who put self interest above all
values. He uses pragmatism and idealism to show how each character achieves his goals, and
how even though More took all precautions possible, he wasn t able to escape the corruption of
society. He presents Thomas More s idealism as the only admirable quality in that class of
society, for at that time the upper class were extremely corrupt. It is through this idealism that
Thomas more becomes hero and a saint.
Название: Pragmatism Vs Idealism A Man For All
Раздел: Топики по английскому языку
Тип: реферат
Добавлен 21:30:09 06 ноября 2010 Похожие работы
Просмотров: 1
Комментариев: 8
Оценило: 2 человек
Средний балл: 5
Оценка: неизвестно Скачать
Привет студентам) если возникают трудности с любой работой (от реферата и контрольных до диплома), можете обратиться на FAST-REFERAT.RU , я там обычно заказываю, все качественно и в срок) в любом случае попробуйте, за спрос денег не берут)
Да, но только в случае крайней необходимости.
Реферат: Pragmatism Vs Idealism A Man For All
Внешняя Красота Сочинение
Реферат: Over Population Essay Research Paper The population
Контрольная Работа Тригонометрические Уравнения 10 Класс
Контрольная работа: Проектування операційної системи
Реферат По Спортивной Деятельности
Значение строительных материалов
Курсовая Работа На Тему Электропривод С Вентильной Машиной
Реферат Теория Размещения Населенных Пунктов В Кристаллера
Сочинение по теме Александр Блок. Цикл стихотворений «Кармен»
6 Класс Математика Никольский Входная Контрольная Работа
Реферат: 850-е до н. э.
1598 1613 Историческое Сочинение Егэ 11 Баллов
Фаворитизм В Европе Реферат
Технологии Управления Организацией Курсовая
Курсовая Без Плагиата
Реферат: Horizon
Language Эссе
Возрастные Лекарственные Формы Реферат
Реферат: Морфология мёдоносной пчелы
Контрольная работа по теме Жанр детектива в английской неоромантической литературе
Доклад: Гепарды
Реферат: Речная дрейссена
Реферат: Биография Крылова И. А.