Reddit Mobile Incest Porn

🔞 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻

Reddit Mobile Incest Porn
Share this Story: Mother raises alarm on explicit Reddit posts featuring underage Sask. girls Copy Link Email Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Share this Story: Mother raises alarm on explicit Reddit posts featuring underage Sask. girls Copy Link Email Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
We apologize, but this video has failed to load.
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Share this Story: Mother raises alarm on explicit Reddit posts featuring underage Sask. girls Copy Link Email Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
There was an error, please provide a valid email address.
The woman said she visited the subreddit and saw pictures of "several dozen" young girls, many of them Indigenous.
A Saskatchewan mother is asking for authorities and companies to do more to combat the sexual exploitation of minors online after she discovered her daughter’s name was published on a section of the website Reddit that appeared to show naked photos of underage girls from this province.
The Leader-Post spoke with the woman, who lives in a small community in the north. She recently found out her 16-year-old daughter’s name was attached to an explicit photo that was posted on the website. The woman’s name and her location are known to the Leader-Post, but the paper is choosing not to publish that information to protect the identity of the girl.
The woman said she’d been fighting an uphill battle trying to get the subreddit taken down by the company. She called the experience “horrifying.”
“It’s incredibly vulnerable. And not only that, but the fact that there doesn’t appear to be any means of ending it is almost unfathomable,” she said.
Reddit is a popular American-based website where users can form communities called subreddits and share posts, images and videos.
The woman said she visited the subreddit and saw pictures of “several dozen” young girls, many of them Indigenous. Not only that, but the girls were identified by name and location.
“There are men who were actually going on there and specifically requesting girls and then others are providing naked pictures of the girls that are being requested,” said the woman.
The woman has a background in education, and recognized many of the girls as members of her community from northern Saskatchewan. She said one photo is of a girl, who is now an adult, that has had an explicit photo of her being shared online since she was 14.
“I can say with a lot of confidence that these are underage girls,” said the woman.
The woman attempted to report the photo with her daughter’s name to Reddit through the website’s reporting tools, but found it difficult to add comments to explain what she was seeing.
“There’s literally no way of contacting this company to say, ‘Hi, by the way, you have naked children on your site,'” she said.
She said after filing the report she received a notification from Reddit saying there were no issues with the photo she reported. She then filed a report with the U.S. Department of Justice, called the FBI and then her local RCMP detachment.
The Leader-Post contacted Reddit for comment, and was told by a spokesperson that the subreddit has now been banned.
“Our sitewide policies prohibit any intimate or sexually explicit media of someone without their consent. In line with these policies, the subreddit in question has been banned.”
Reddit declined to answer any further questions, such as how the subreddit got past its moderation systems and for how long it was online.
Staff Sgt. Shawn Stubbs, the co-ordinator of the province’s Internet Child Exploitation Unit (ICE), said he was not aware of the subreddit but would have a member of his team look into it. Stubbs said the action police take would depend on wether the people publishing the content are based out of the province.
“Depending who put it on there, we may send it to the States and they would work on it. Or if it’s a Saskatchewan-based person that put it on, then we would go and we would work on it,” said Stubbs.
This is sadly not the first time the woman’s daughter has been victimized online. The same explicit photo was circulated through cell phone messages last year.
The woman reported the explicit photo to the RCMP, which sent the file to ICE, which then contacted law enforcement in the U.S. Several months later, the woman was told by police that nothing could be done.
Previous to the photo, both the woman and her daughter were receiving sexually explicit messages on Facebook. The accounts were fake, but the woman said she the names on the accounts were local to her community. The woman said she was told by the RCMP that the messages likely came from outside Canada, but she suspects they came from someone local to the area who knows her family, at least by reputation.
“I worry about when does this end? At what point do do adults actually start stepping up and putting an end to the sexual exploitation of minors online? Like this is a common problem,” she said.
Sign up to receive daily headline news from Regina Leader-Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Regina Leader Post Headline News will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.
365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4
© 2022 Regina Leader Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.
This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here . By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy .

The Washington Post Democracy Dies in Darkness
Does Reddit still have a child porn problem?
September 3, 2014 at 12:54 p.m. EDT
Stay up to date on the news from Silicon Valley, and how to take back control of your data and devices.
Married and on your parents’ cell plans
Inflation is helping gig companies like Uber — and hurting their workers
How to make sure people see your digital party invite
Sign in or create a free account to save your preferences
washingtonpost.com © 1996-2022 The Washington Post
This article was published more than 8 years ago
Of all the disturbing revelations to come out in the aftermath of last weekend’s “Celebgate” spectacle , perhaps none was more shocking — or more gross — than the fact that Olympic gymnast McKayla Maroney says she was underage when her photos were taken.
Maroney, now 18, was one of more than 100 celebrities victimized by a so-called “underground celeb n00d-trading ring,” who strong-armed their way into the women’s Apple iCloud accounts and posted the naked pictures they found there online. The people who hacked the photos already faced theoretical charges ranging from wire fraud to identity theft.
Now they may add a new crime to the list: dissemination of child porn.
Given the seriousness of that allegation (and the legal and PR repercussions it implies), Reddit has been very hasty to address the issue. On Tuesday afternoon, a moderator in the Reddit forum /r/thefappening — the place that arguably did the most to bring the images to a mainstream audience — made a panicked appeal to members to stop posting pictures of Maroney and to delete any existing photos from their hard drives. It also instructs them to stop posting photos of Liz Lee, an MTV star whose underage nude photos were not part of this latest hack but have still been making the Internet rounds.
Which is all well and good for Maroney and Lee, two public figures with publicists and lawyers and a legion of fans on alert for abuse. It doesn’t do much to help other young women whose photos might end up in questionably tasteful forums like /r/randomsexiness or /r/youngporn, where youthful photos are frequent, provenances are unknown and subjects’ ages are rarely disclosed.
“We have very few rules here on reddit; no spamming, no cheating, no personal info, nothing illegal, and no interfering with the site’s functions,” Reddit declared in a 2012 policy change , made in response to a Gawker article that found troves of child porn in forums like /r/jailbait. “Today we are adding another rule: No suggestive or sexual content featuring minors.”
To that effect, Reddit banned a series of forums that explicitly sexualized children in their names or descriptions. But the site did not do anything to root out photos of underage teens in other forums, besides ask that viewers contact the forums’ (unpaid, anonymous and highly political) moderators with specific concerns.
Part of this situation springs from necessity, of course. Reddit is a sprawling beast: In any given month, it can see well over 100 million visitors who view billions of active and inactive pages.
But part of that is also due to the structure of Reddit’s moderation system , a dense hierarchy of volunteers who, for the most part, are accountable to no one besides the people in their forums. Reddit employs only a handful of “community managers” to oversee them, and even they try to stay militantly hands-off. (“We will tirelessly defend the right to freely share information on reddit in any way we can, even if it is offensive,” the 2012 policy change read.) Forum moderators aren’t exactly honor-bound to field complaints, either.
“I emailed an admin about a preteen_girls thread EXPLICITLY showing photos of child porn,” complained one user in 2012. “Nothing was done, NOTHING, which is what I expected.”
And so, Reddit still hosts virtually every kind of filth and depravity you can conceive of — and probably quite a bit that you can’t. There is rape porn. There are collections of dead children. There are many, many nude photographs of women who appear to be just at, if not under, the age of majority.
Are some of them under 18? Probably. Whenever you provide an open, anonymous and unquestioning forum for pornographic images, a few are going to slip below the line unseen.
Reddit did not respond to a request for comment on the issue, and it’s unclear what, exactly, the site could do to better police the issue. It’s impossible — not to mention against Reddit’s core ethos — to pre-screen the millions of links and images that flow through the site daily. It’s also far from fail-safe to slap a warning on a page and hope that users will happily comply.
Perhaps the bottom line is that there’s always a dark side to what Reddit glibly terms “free speech places” online. Maroney, sadly, is not the only victim — nor is her ordeal over. According to the piracy news site TorrentFreak , more than 1 million people have downloaded the #Celebgate photos from PirateBay, where they remain widely available. And Pirate Bay’s policy on child porn makes Reddit’s look strict.
“To report child abuse or other similar unlawful activities, please do so to your local authority,” the site coolly recommends .
The subtext, both there and and on Reddit: Deal with it yourselves.

FBI ran website sharing thousands of child porn images
FBI ran website sharing thousands of child porn images
Share your feedback to help improve our site!
WASHINGTON — For nearly two weeks last year, the FBI operated what it described as one of the Internet’s largest child pornography websites, allowing users to download thousands of illicit images and videos from a government site in the Washington suburbs.
The operation — whose details remain largely secret — was at least the third time in recent years that FBI agents took control of a child pornography site but left it online in an attempt to catch users who officials said would otherwise remain hidden behind an encrypted and anonymous computer network. In each case, the FBI infected the sites with software that punctured that security, allowing agents to identify hundreds of users.
The Justice Department acknowledged in court filings that the FBI operated the site, known as Playpen, from Feb. 20 to March 4, 2015. At the time, the site had more than 215,000 registered users and included links to more than 23,000 sexually explicit images and videos of children, including more than 9,000 files that users could download directly from the FBI. Some of the images described in court filings involved children barely old enough for kindergarten.
That approach is a significant departure from the government’s past tactics for battling online child porn, in which agents were instructed that they should not allow images of children being sexually assaulted to become public. The Justice Department has said that children depicted in such images are harmed each time they are viewed, and once those images leave the government’s control, agents have no way to prevent them from being copied and re-copied to other parts of the internet.
Officials acknowledged those risks, but said they had no other way to identify the people accessing the sites.
“We had a window of opportunity to get into one of the darkest places on Earth, and not a lot of other options except to not do it,” said Ron Hosko, a former senior FBI official who was involved in planning one of the agency’s first efforts to take over a child porn site. “There was no other way we could identify as many players.”
Lawyers for child pornography victims expressed surprise that the FBI would agree to such tactics – in part because agents had rejected them in the past – but nonetheless said they approved. “These are places where people know exactly what they’re getting when they arrive,” said James Marsh, who represents some of the children depicted in some of the most widely-circulated images. “It’s not like they’re blasting it out to the world.”
The FBI hacks have drawn repeated – though so far unsuccessful – legal challenges, largely centered on the search warrants agents obtained before agents cracked the computer network.
But they have also prompted a backlash of a different kind. In a court filing, a lawyer for one of the men arrested after the FBI sting charged that “what the government did in this case is comparable to flooding a neighborhood with heroin in the hope of snatching an assortment of low-level drug users.” The defense lawyer, Colin Fieman, asked a federal judge to throw out child pornography charges against his client, former middle school teacher Jay Michaud. A federal judge is scheduled to hear arguments on that request Friday.
Federal agents first noticed Playpen not long after it went online in August, 2014. The site was buried in what is often called the “dark web,” a part of the internet that is accessible to the public only through Tor, network software that bounces users’ internet traffic from one computer to another to make it largely untraceable.
By March of last year, the FBI said, Playpen had grown to become “the largest remaining known child pornography hidden service in the world,” the Justice Department said in a court filing. FBI agents tracked the site to computer servers in North Carolina, and in February seized the site and quietly moved it to its own facility in Newington, Va.
The FBI kept Playpen online for 13 days. During that time, federal prosecutors told defense lawyers that the site included more than 23,000 sexually explicit images and videos of children. Some of those could be downloaded directly from the government’s computers; others were available through links to other hard-to-find locations on the web, Fieman said.
One section of the site was labeled “toddlers,” according to court records. And prosecutors said that some of the images users accessed during the time Playpen was under the government’s control included “prepubescent female” having sexual intercourse with adults.
Fieman said more than 100,000 Playpen registered users visited the site while it was under the FBI’s control. The Justice Department said in court filings that agents had found “true” computer addresses for more than 1,300 of them, and has told defense lawyers that 137 have been charged with a crime, though it has so far declined to publicly identify those cases.
Law enforcement has long complained that online services like Tor create a type of safe haven for criminals because they hide the unique network addresses from which people connect to sites on the internet. Officials said the only way for the government to crack that network was to take over the site and infect it with malware that would trick users’ web browsers into revealing their real internet addresses, which agents could then trace back to the people who were using them.
“The government always considers seizing an illegal child pornography site and removing it from existence immediately and permanently,” Justice Department spokesman Peter Carr said. “While doing so would end the trafficking of child pornography taking place on that one website, it would do nothing to prevent those same users from disseminating child pornography through other means.”
Still, he said, “The decision whether to simply shut down a website or to allow it to continue operating for a brief period for a law enforcement purpose is a difficult one.”
Justice officials said they were unable to discuss details of the investigation because much of it remains under seal, at their request.
The Justice Department said in court filings that agents did not post any child pornography to the site themselves. But it did not dispute that the agents allowed images that were already on the site to remain there, and that it did not block the site’s users from uploading new ones while it was under the government’s control. And the FBI has not said it had any ability to prevent users from circulating the material they downloaded onto other sites.
“At some point, the government investigation becomes indistinguishable from the crime, and we should ask whether that’s OK,” said Elizabeth Joh, a University of California Davis law professor who has studied undercover investigations. “What’s crazy about it is who’s making the cost/benefit analysis on this? Who decides that this is the best method of identifying these people?”
The FBI was first known to have operated a child porn site in 2012, when agents seized control of three sites from their operator in Nebraska. FBI Special Agent Jeff Tarpinian testified that the government “relocated two servers to an FBI facility here in Omaha and we continued to let those child pornography run – websites operate for a short period of time."
That case led to federal child pornography charges against at least 25 people
Ginger Nude Selfies
Teddy Lingerie Pics
Naked Huge Breasts