Reddit Instagram Models Nude

Reddit Instagram Models Nude

*First Published: Aug 8, 2012, 3:52 pm CDT

Posted on Aug 8, 2012 Updated on Jun 2, 2021, 1:09 pm CDT

Have you ever uploaded a nudie shot to Photobucket — one of the web’s largest, and oldest, image-hosting sites? If you did, you probably kept it private, right? So only its intended recipient could see it, and it wouldn’t get found and spread all over the internet?

Yeah, there’s a good chance some 8,000 creeps have seen your naked photo on Reddit.

Yesterday, inspired by the “hackers” who were able to access Wired writer Mat Honan’s online accounts and fully wipe his MacBook, BuzzFeed’s Katie Notopoulos took a look at “fusking,” the not-actually-hacking technique of finding private—and often nude—pictures on Photobucket by exploiting its privacy settings:

[I]f I put photos in a private or password-protected album, I can still send a direct link to an individual photo to my friend, and she won’t need a password to view that photo. If she wants, she can pass along that link to any of her other friends and they can also view over the Photobucket site, no problem, regardless of how I set the privacy level on the album. […] Problem is, the URLs Photobucket uses for these pictures use the photos’ actual file names, and file names aren’t that hard to guess. […] That’s where “fusking” programs come – you just enter the username and album name, and the fusking program will run through likely guesses and pull up any images it can find.

Notopoulos mentions having seen evidence of fusking on 4chan and other message boards where people discussed “hacking” or “stealing” finding Photobucket images. But you don’t even need to go as deep as 4chan: there’s a whole section on Reddit, with nearly 8,000 subscribers, dedicated to fusking — and another for people to make requests .

“r/photobucketplunder,” (NSFW) as the subreddit is known, stands in the long and proud tradition of creepy and popular Reddit subsections like “r/jailbait” (which was finally taken down , over loud objections of “free speech,” when it came out that child porn had appeared on the subreddit) and “ creepshots .” Every day, its most dedicated users (it has 7,808 subscribers, though readership is likely higher) post new albums of nude and otherwise sexual photographs found on women’s Photobucket accounts, re-uploading the photos to image-hosting site Imgur in case the women figure out what happened and take theirs down. Many of the accounts are discovered by people trawling Photobucket for cute girls; others are posted in r/requestaplunder , a subreddit where anyone can ask r/photobucketplunder’s fuskers to work their magic.

Mecesh, one of the subreddit’s moderators, says he’d take down the photos immediately if someone complained (“We don’t want to be malicious. Most people here like the voyeuristic nature of it,” he told me over email). But no one ever has. The rules — posted on the page’s sidebar — warn users against alerting the photographs’ subjects that they’ve become unwitting pinup models for a few thousand Redditors: “Do not follow the usernames of the girls submitted to this subreddit. When you follow them it sends an e-mail to them notifying them they’re being followed. This usually either makes them cancel their photobucket or make the album private which in turn makes it so we no longer get any pictures from them.”

While making albums private doesn’t prevent all fuskers, it does mean that your shots won’t show up on Reddit. r/photobucketplunder doesn’t allow its users to post photos from albums set to “private” — only the albums of women who don’t realize or understand that anything they put on Photobucket is visible to anyone. This helps Mecesh (and, one imagines, other users) rationalize the whole endeavor: “We only allow submissions that are publicly accessible. We don’t allow or encourage the hacking of private accounts. Everything posted here is available for public view, just not all of the women may realize that. If someone doesn’t know by now that if they upload naked pictures to the internet that they are there forever does that make it wrong?”

Well, yes: setting up a forum to find, trade, and save on new servers private photographs that were mistakenly made public is wrong, even if it isn’t illegal. “Don’t share or steal people’s private things” may be anathema to the internet, but it asks people to be decent, rather than paranoid. “Don’t put private things in public places,” as a moral imperative, blames victims and excuses the behavior of thieves and creeps.

But it is good practical advice. “You would be amazed at some of the information we come across here,” mecesh writes. “We have found accounts where people have uploaded pics of personal checks, drivers licenses, credit cards, social security cards. It is unreal.” I asked him what he thought people should do to prevent their photos from showing up on r/photobucket plunder. “If you care about your info getting out there, make your account private,” he said, but acknowledged that not even that is foolproof. “To protect photos and info the number one suggested is don’t upload them to the internet.”
Newsletter: Meet the ‘Gentleminions’
‘Ms. Marvel’s penultimate episode puts a twist on a familiar format
Everyone hates this DIY saran wrap treehouse video
‘Just take your L and leave it alone’: Customer films self returning ‘disgusting’ Costco cake, sparking debate

27 Perfect Gifts For a "Stranger Things" Fan
Black-Owned Fashion Brands to Buy From
27 Best Plus-Size Swimsuits, According to Reviews
The Best Pride Gear From LGBTQ-Friendly Companies
You Can Shop Early Prime Day Deals, Right Now (!!)
Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Drake Bell/Instagram via Josh Peck/YouTube

Neilson Barnard/Getty Images for Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week

Jason Derulo/Instagram via Strahan Sara and Keke/YouTube
Stacey Grant
Snapchat Editor
Stacey Grant is a senior editor at Seventeen who runs the brand's Snapchat Discover channel.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
Kendall and Devin Are Reportedly in A "Good Place"
Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
Travis Shared an Adorable Photo of His Son's Toys
Megan Fox Asked MGK if He Was Breastfed as a Baby
Noah and Dixie Spend 4th of July Together
Bella Hadid Shares Sweet Couple Pics
Kourt & Trav Open Up About His Hospitalization
Justin and Hailey Bieber's Cute Date Night in WeHo
Lindsay Lohan Marries Fiancé Bader Shammas
JoJo and Kylie Are “Setting New Boundaries”

Seventeen picks products that we think you'll love the most. We may earn commission from the links on this page.

Unsurprisingly, most involve nudity so expect some NSFW shots.
To gram or not to gram, that is the question.
Instagram isn't exactly known for being the land of nudity like Twitter can be, but celebrities still love pushing the boundaries are far as they can. So, while a bunch of celebs clearly enjoy posting their nude pics on the gram , that doesn't mean all of them got away with it. Just think of Instagram as Mystery, Inc. from Scooby-Doo and celebs as the people being unmasked: They would've gotten away with it, too, had it not been for those meddling kids community guidelines.
After you finish cringing over celebs using Instagram and other social media platforms to call out their exes , check out which of your faves poked the Instagram bear with their ~risqué~ photos.
Remember when Drake shared his own nude pic in 2018? Apparently, Instagram wasn't pleased.
In February 2019, Drake sat down with his Drake & Josh co-star, Josh Peck, to film a fun video for Josh's YouTube channel . According to Drake, IG called the photo "obscene."
"I posted it early, like when I first took it, and then I reposted it," Drake explained, "and I got a notice [from Instagram], and it was like, 'This obscene....'" He couldn't even finish his sentence because he was laughing too hard.
"I wouldn't call that obscene," Josh said. "I can't stop looking at it."
In 2014, Kendall 'grammed a pic of herself walking down the runway at Marc Jacobs' New York Fashion Week show. You could see her breasts in the photo, thanks to the sheer top.
Both Khloé and Kim Kardashian shared a pic of their sister during the show. IG deleted all of them. Kim also tweeted her frustration on behalf of her sister: "Ughhhh can Instagram just delete your photos? Maybe @KendallJenner was too hot for [Instagram]!!!" MORE: Every (Amazing) Time Kendall Jenner Has Showed Off Her Boobs In Public
In late 2019, Jason's super sexy underwear pic was deleted from Instagram. He later talked about the incident on Strahan, Sara and Keke .
"When I posted this, it was early in the morning and I was like, 'This is a good photo of myself, I'm going to post it,'" Jason said. "Never in a million years did I think it was going to be my most-liked photo in an afternoon."
After the pic was taken down, Jason shared a screenshot of IG's removal notice, writing, "F*k u [ sic ] mean? I have underwear on....I can’t help my size....”
After RiRi posted her Lui magazine cover that showed some nipple in 2014, Instagram censored the image. However, the photo is still up on her Twitter, as are several naked pics from the magazine.
According to TMZ , Rihanna received an email that allegedly said she needed to cover up, or risk losing her account entirely. In response, she 'grammed this meme, simply captioning it, ":(".
Technically, this photo from 2019 is still up on Instagram, but even Miley thought IG would ban it. Her caption included, "PS this is getting removed soon!"
When it still hadn't been taken down, Miley added to her caption, "PPS I f**king love you instagram! Thank you for stanning the Nips! Respect."
In 2013, the singer posted a screenshot of Instagram's message of her "violating" their guidelines.
It's unclear which of the pics Madonna posted after joining IG was considered "mature," but one of her drinking a martini while showing off her cleavage could be the culprit.

Published July 19, 2016 11:13am EDT

By
Diana Falzone , | Fox News
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

Fox News.com Reporter and FOX411 host Diana Falzone covers celebrity news and interviews some of today's top celebrities and newsmakers. You can follow her on Twitter @dianafalzone.

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten,
or redistributed. ©2022 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved.
Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Factset . Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions . Legal Statement . Mutual Fund and ETF data provided by Refinitiv Lipper .

While there are plenty of legitimate models with millions of followers on Instagram (IG), there are also a bevy of “Insta-models" whose glamorous lives sources tell FOX411 are provided not by actual modeling work, but by Johns from whom they solicit sex by using the popular social media app.
Now sites like The Dirty, Tag Your Sponsor, and Tag The Sponsor are being used to out women allegedly using Instagram to secure sex clients.
Nik Richie, founder of The Dirty.com, told FOX411 he began to see call girls using the social media app around three years ago. “I started getting swarms of submissions to TheDirty.com from guys debunking female modeling careers because these women would constantly be flashing cash, private jet flights and exotic trips, but they had no jobs,” Richie told FOX411. “Their IG photos flaunted the ultimate lifestyle only afforded by rich men.”
The blogger, whose site broke the Sydney Leathers and Anthony Weiner sexting scandal story, said he can tell a legitimate working model from an IG call girl based on their app activity.
“For some reason these women need to brag about their façade; posting pictures on their IG of $25,000 dollar purses, red bottom shoes, cash and of course the selfies from a yacht in the South of France or Dubai,” Richie said. “100 percent of their IG postings are fake set up situations to lure more men to ‘like’ their pictures.”
A modeling industry insider explained that these women use social media as a way to attract future clients with seductive photos, noting there is no way selfies can translate into enough money to maintain the luxurious lifestyle they document.
“The sexy photos and videos are always giveaways to lure people in. The vast majority of these women aren’t making money from modeling,” the source said. “Going to a beach in a bikini isn’t a paying job. You get no income for having 30,000 followers on IG. That $1/1K followers [rate] is pretty much the standard for any kind of endorsement deals, should a model secure one.”
Which means sending a pic of oneself modeling a product to 30,000 followers would typically net a model with an endorsement deal around $300.
The site Tag The Sponsor refers to such women as “sponsorettes” whose lifestyle is provided by a “sponsor,” their term for John. A source added that while Instagram is the latest frontier for prostitution, “the buying market hasn’t changed. This is just a recent avenue for the oldest profession.”
A John who asked we not use his name told FOX411 he solicits escorts on Instagram by looking for models who pose alone on yachts, private jets, exotic vacations, and wear luxury items, as well as those who post personal email addresses using domains like Yahoo! or Gmail rather than listing a legitimate modeling agency like Elite or Ford.
“I email her first saying she’s beautiful. Then, I ask how much her time is worth. How much would lunch cost me… $500?” he said. “We go back and forth until we reach an agreement. If she’s meets me in person, then I know she’s willing to do anything for money.”
The John said that IG prostitutes can make a range of money for sexual favors starting at around $500 per hour, and that seasoned escorts can bank over $10,000 for an overnight stay.
Of course Instagram does not approve of such behavior from the Johns or the women, stating in their Terms of Use: “You may not use the Service for any illegal or unauthorized purpose. You agree to comply with all laws, rules and regulations (for example, federal, state, local and provincial) applicable to your use of the Service and your Content (defined below), including but not limited to, copyright laws.”
We reached out to Instagram to see if anyone has been removed from the service for using it to promote prostitution but did not hear back.
As for a woman who might be outed on sites like The Dirty and Tag Your Sponsor, Richie said the publicity can actually help increase their business.
“These women panic at first, threatening legal action against TheDirty.com, but what is better than money is fame," he said. "They instantly become Insta-famous and a sea of men reach out to them ready to open their wallets for sex.”
FOX411 reached out to Tag Your Sponsor and Tag The Sponsor but did not receive comment.
Get the best of Fox News' entertainment coverage, right in your inbox.
You've successfully subscribed to this newsletter!

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2022 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Factset . Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions . Legal Statement . Mutual Fund and ETF data provided by Refinitiv Lipper .

Mia Li Planetsuzy
Hdlove8.Com
Clarababylegs Patreon Pics

Reddit Instagram Models Nude

Report Page