Reconsidering Public Policy Defense in International 🌐 Arbitral Awards
👓 Boisov Sardor,Nurmukhamedov Oybek![](https://cdn1.ozone.ru/s3/multimedia-6/6000933846.jpg)
Reconsidering Public Policy Defense in International 🌐 Arbitral Awards
✅ A judicial interference in the enforcement of arbitral awards is required in a case of non-compliance with the award by any relevant party 🎉. From the both practical and ➕ theoretical viewpoint courts 🏛️ of all jurisdictions may refuse to enforce arbitral awards if such enforcement would be contrary to the public policy of their countries. This is known 💡 as the public policy defense to the enforcement of arbitral awards. The legal rationale for the public policy defense is established in the New 🆕 York Convention on the Recognition the Recognition and ➕ Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1️⃣9️⃣5️⃣8️⃣ and ➕ the UNCITRAL Model Law on International 🌐 Commercial Arbitration 1️⃣9️⃣8️⃣5️⃣, which are two 2️⃣ of the most important international 🌐 legal documents 📃 in promoting and ➕ regulating international 🌐 commercial arbitration. The public policy defense is one 1️⃣ of the most controversial exceptions to the enforcement of arbitral awards, causing judicial inconsistency, therefore unpredictability in its implementation. The present 🎁 research paper 📜 explores the main controversies and ➕ complexities in the judicial implementation of the public policy defense from comparative perspective of both developed 👨💻️ and ➕ developing 👨💻️ countries.
Также:
Sarah Roja Azimi «Kaufvertragsstorungen aus Sicht des BGB und des iranischen Rechts. Das Wirtschaftsembargo gegen den Iran 🇮🇷»![](https://cdn1.ozone.ru/s3/multimedia-p/6001030345.jpg)
![](https://cdn1.ozone.ru/s3/multimedia-6/6000916926.jpg)
![](https://cdn1.ozone.ru/multimedia/1030370063.jpg)
![](https://cdn1.ozone.ru/s3/multimedia-h/6001683737.jpg)
![](https://cdn1.ozone.ru/multimedia/1030266446.jpg)