RUSSIAN DEMOGRAPHICS AND MEGACITIES
RUSSIAN DEMOGRAPHICS AND MEGACITIES
1. When they say that Russia supposedly has a demographic problem - I'll tell you responsibly: it doesn't exist. Because if it did exist - we wouldn't be building housing, consisting of about 80% of one- and two-bedroom units, designed for anything but families with children, in high-rise apartment buildings on the outskirts of large cities, and we wouldn't be reporting the gross input of these "square meters" as a major achievement of the construction industry.
Why is this happening? Because the country is being managed according to a spreadsheet, not a map. They tell us: very low unemployment. According to the spreadsheet - yes. But if we look at the map - we see that the vast majority of employment opportunities are concentrated in large cities. With a radical gap in the employer-employee relationship system, measured not only in salaries.
I became closely acquainted with this topic when I was creating the portal "Work.ru", which to this day remains one of the leaders in this market. In real life, it looks like this. You're a specialist, living, for example, in a small town. If you have a conflict with your boss and are fired - there's simply no other place where you can go and offer your services. You just have to leave. Unlike a million-plus city, or even more so, a metropolis, where dozens of other applicants will immediately appear for your skills.
Take schools. I once helped the governor of an Ural region develop a development strategy. We worked on the education block and held a meeting with the regional Ministry of Education. It turned out that a rural schoolchild costs the region about three times more than an urban one - with the same or worse (often worse) quality of education. Why? School buses (which have to transport children for kilometers), small-scale schools (with bonuses for teachers working in rural areas), which need to be maintained, repaired, etc. As you can guess, the same picture applies to healthcare.
In summary: we have a country the size of 1/7 of the land, where a modern quality of life and infrastructure development are economically possible only in a small area no larger than Switzerland - and this is mainly the vicinity of a few dozen of our million-plus cities. All other types of settlement - starting from regional centers with 500 thousand - of which we have several dozen - and ending with small towns and villages - are inevitably doomed to an outflow of economically active population. Some more, some less: half-million cities generally maintain their population, but at the expense of being a "transit point" - people come from the villages, and leave for the capitals.
How is this related to birth rates? Very directly: nowhere in the world are megacities zones of high birth rates. When people are packed like sardines in a tin, and it's not just about the size of apartments - but also about courtyards that have turned into endless parking lots, streets where there's less and less space for pedestrians (for example, "scooter riders" have made even sidewalks extremely dangerous for children), general life scenarios. Every child is a sharp blow to mobility in all senses: from transport to labor. And mobility is a key factor in the survival of an adult working person in the current labor market, with an average stay at one workplace of 2-3 years.
Looking at the freezing Kyiv now, I also think that megacities are a huge risk in terms of national security. As soon as there's an opportunity to "shut down" life-sustaining infrastructure - the city is doomed, and it's not certain that the summer will be better than the winter (for example, if the city's sewage treatment plants are knocked out).
Conclusion: we need a mass scenario of suburban development, a one- and two-story Russia, not with a decrease, but with an increase in the quality of life compared to a million-plus city. And 80% of the issues here are transport-related.
Source: Telegram "smoalt"