Pussy Mound Panty

Pussy Mound Panty




🛑 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻

































Pussy Mound Panty
Edition US UK Australia Brasil Canada Deutschland India Japan Latam
California residents can opt out of "sales" of personal data.







1.



A pair of fruity laser-cut hipsters for anyone who is in the mood to ignite some passion (fruit).











3.



A pair of mesh floral panties so that your face isn't the only place with some cute rosy cheeks.











5.



A pair of Wonder Woman undies darling enough you'll ~wonder~ how these haven't been flying off the shelves.











6.



A teeny piece with that sexy sweet undie vibe you've been searching for for such a ~thong~ time.











7.



A pack of patterned panties so you can have enough for every day of the week (and a bonus few that can help out when you procrastinate doing laundry).











9.



A cheeky pair of lace panties for anyone who knows life would be a bum mer in uncomfortable underwear.











12.



A low rise cotton bottom for people who are happy when their undies are strappy.











14.



A pair of floral panties so comfy and cute they are sure to make your self love ~bloom~.











15.



A funny pack of pregnancy undies for expecting moms who know how to keep a smile on their face (and their stomachs).











16.



A pair of sexy lace undies that are gonna look ~sew~ nice when you wear them.











18.



A velvet high rise bottom for when you're feeling like a real softy.











21.



A pair of embroidered undies your buns are gonna love.











23.



A pack of breathable sporty thongs , because you deserve to ~exercise~ your right to use functional and beautiful underwear when you work out.











25.



A huggable pair of hipsters you will be completely heart eyes over.















Tap to play GIF
Tap to play GIF











Score buzz-worthy products, shopping advice, and deals delivered to your inbox!
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, BuzzFeed may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.
Get them from Urban Outfitters for $8 (available in 27 colors and sizes S–XL).
Get them from Asos for $11 (available in sizes 0–14).
Get them from Torrid for $12.28 (available in sizes 14–30).
Get them from Urban Outfitters for $8 (available in six colors and sizes S–XL).
Get them from Torrid for $10.98 (available in sizes 10–30).
Get it from Urban Outfitters for $8 (available in three colors and sizes S–XL).
Get a pack of 12 from Amazon for $21.17 (available in sizes S–XL).
Get them from Urban Outfitters for $8 (available in three colors and sizes S–XL).
Get them from Aerie for $12.50 (available in seven colors and sizes XXS–XXL).
Get them from Two Jays Creative on Etsy for $10 (available in sizes 5–10) or get a similar pair from Amazon for $14.99 (available in five colors and sizes S–XL).
Get them from Asos for $26 (available in sizes 8–14).
Get them from Urban Outfitters for $8 (available in five colors and sizes S–XL).
Get it from Torrid for $10.98 (available in sizes 10-24).
Get them from Urban Outfitters for $2.99 (available in three colors and sizes S–XL).
Get a pack of three from Amazon for $16.99 .
Get them from Free People for $30 (available in eight colors and sizes XS–L).
Get them from Aerie for $12.50 (available in two colors and sizes XXS–XXL).
Get them from Free People for $118 (available in sizes S–L).
Get it from Hot Topic for $5.52 (available in sizes S–L).
Get it from Asos for $16 (available in sizes 0–10).
Get them from Free People for $32 (available in eight colors and sizes XS–L).
Get them from Free People for $24 (available in two colors and sizes XS–L).
Get a pack of six from Amazon for $14.99+ (available in eight styles and sizes S–XXL).
Get them from Amazon for $5.89+ (available in 13 styles and sizes M–L).
Get it from Free People for $48 (available in three colors and sizes S–L).
Get it from Amazon for $14.99+ (available in six colors and sizes S–XL).


*First Published: Jul 24, 2015, 10:05 pm CDT
More stories to check out before you go

Posted on Jul 24, 2015   Updated on May 28, 2021, 7:13 am CDT
Following rigorous competition and more than 130,000 voters, the World’s Most Beautiful Vagina Contest anointed a champion this week. It was a strange, difficult-to-gauge event—but that’s why organizers turned to scientists to tell us what it all means.
U.K. resident Nell, 27, won first place and $5,000 in the pageant with a vulva beauty ranking of 7.7 out of 10. Jenny, 23, of Bavaria, Germany, took second place with a 7.3; and Anita, 20, from Hungary, came in third. They each earned $2,500 and $1,250, respectively.
The contest was sponsored by Brian Sloan, who is also the manufacturer of the Autoblow 2 . It’s known as “the first truly realistic alternative to traditional pleasure products for men,” according to the its website .
These winners will also be flown out to Los Angeles, where their vulvas will be 3D-scanned to later be reproduced for the Autoblow device.
Sloan contracted a group of data scientists to analyze the contest’s findings for their scientific implications. The data was then compiled in “ The Vulva Paper .”
If you’re a visual learner, you can view photo examples of each class here . 
The Vulva Paper’s website says scientists “used the contest data to assess the diversity in vulval morphology and voters’ preference for different morphologies.” A total of 182 women participated in the contest; 110 entries were examined for the study (if measurements could not be taken from the photo, the entry was not considered).
The scientists viewed each entry on a 15-inch computer screen, zooming in “until the genitalia were easily measured using a screen ruler,” read the paper .
They measured labia majora length, labia minora length, and clitoral hood length. 
Finally, the scientists rated the complexity of the labia minora; they used the three categories of rugosity (smooth, moderate, marked) to do so. To prevent vaginal bias, the same person also conducted all of these measurements. The scientists later used this research to classify the contest’s entries into six different categories of “vulval morphology.”
A chart detailing the six classes is included below:
As far as methodology is concerned, a random assortment of entries was sent to each voter, who was then asked to rate the vulva pictured on a scale from 1 to 10. These voters were only able to rank one photo at a time, but could also vote on an unlimited number of entries. The scientists compiled 2,766,671 ratings from 134,707 contest voters.
“To reduce individual biases, we centered each voter’s ratings using their mean and standard deviation. This allowed us to reflect the preferences of voters on the same scale,” read the study .
According to the paper , each voter rated 21 photos, on average. Each vulva also received 15,285 votes, on average.
The study also found that “roughly 51% of voters preferred the first two classes of non-protruding, simple labia. The other 49% favored the four more complex vulva classes.” 
“As expected from the rankings that we saw at the country and local levels, Class 1 vulvas are preferred over the others more often. But the combined percentages of voters who preferred more complex classes of vulvas far outweighed those who preferred the simplest style.”
The winners’ photos, however, were not included in the study—having been among the participants whose photos were not able to be considered. Moreover, the “doggy style” posture featured in these entries made it difficult for the scientists to complete the necessary measurements.
“Indeed, pictures depicting contest entrants in a doggy style position obtained ratings 2 points higher on average (p <0.001) than others. Other features, like piercings in the clitoral hood, didn’t affect the ratings,” read the study .
So basically, the “doggy style” photos generated “influential excitement” among the contest’s voters—an important competitive advantage for all future entrants to consider.
Photo via mislav-marohnic /Flickr (CC BY-ND 2.0)
Newsletter: Dr. Oz’s history of poop tweets
‘First time ordering a drink?’: Customer complains about size of ice cube in $18 drink, sparking debate
‘Should I call my mom and tell her to drive 2 hours to come pick me up’: Woman films date talking about Andrew Tate
‘No one was gonna tell me how awkward it is’: Worker makes video on what it’s like to work after putting in 2-weeks’ notice, sparking debate


*First Published: Jul 24, 2015, 10:05 pm CDT
More stories to check out before you go

Posted on Jul 24, 2015   Updated on May 28, 2021, 7:13 am CDT
Following rigorous competition and more than 130,000 voters, the World’s Most Beautiful Vagina Contest anointed a champion this week. It was a strange, difficult-to-gauge event—but that’s why organizers turned to scientists to tell us what it all means.
U.K. resident Nell, 27, won first place and $5,000 in the pageant with a vulva beauty ranking of 7.7 out of 10. Jenny, 23, of Bavaria, Germany, took second place with a 7.3; and Anita, 20, from Hungary, came in third. They each earned $2,500 and $1,250, respectively.
The contest was sponsored by Brian Sloan, who is also the manufacturer of the Autoblow 2 . It’s known as “the first truly realistic alternative to traditional pleasure products for men,” according to the its website .
These winners will also be flown out to Los Angeles, where their vulvas will be 3D-scanned to later be reproduced for the Autoblow device.
Sloan contracted a group of data scientists to analyze the contest’s findings for their scientific implications. The data was then compiled in “ The Vulva Paper .”
If you’re a visual learner, you can view photo examples of each class here . 
The Vulva Paper’s website says scientists “used the contest data to assess the diversity in vulval morphology and voters’ preference for different morphologies.” A total of 182 women participated in the contest; 110 entries were examined for the study (if measurements could not be taken from the photo, the entry was not considered).
The scientists viewed each entry on a 15-inch computer screen, zooming in “until the genitalia were easily measured using a screen ruler,” read the paper .
They measured labia majora length, labia minora length, and clitoral hood length. 
Finally, the scientists rated the complexity of the labia minora; they used the three categories of rugosity (smooth, moderate, marked) to do so. To prevent vaginal bias, the same person also conducted all of these measurements. The scientists later used this research to classify the contest’s entries into six different categories of “vulval morphology.”
A chart detailing the six classes is included below:
As far as methodology is concerned, a random assortment of entries was sent to each voter, who was then asked to rate the vulva pictured on a scale from 1 to 10. These voters were only able to rank one photo at a time, but could also vote on an unlimited number of entries. The scientists compiled 2,766,671 ratings from 134,707 contest voters.
“To reduce individual biases, we centered each voter’s ratings using their mean and standard deviation. This allowed us to reflect the preferences of voters on the same scale,” read the study .
According to the paper , each voter rated 21 photos, on average. Each vulva also received 15,285 votes, on average.
The study also found that “roughly 51% of voters preferred the first two classes of non-protruding, simple labia. The other 49% favored the four more complex vulva classes.” 
“As expected from the rankings that we saw at the country and local levels, Class 1 vulvas are preferred over the others more often. But the combined percentages of voters who preferred more complex classes of vulvas far outweighed those who preferred the simplest style.”
The winners’ photos, however, were not included in the study—having been among the participants whose photos were not able to be considered. Moreover, the “doggy style” posture featured in these entries made it difficult for the scientists to complete the necessary measurements.
“Indeed, pictures depicting contest entrants in a doggy style position obtained ratings 2 points higher on average (p <0.001) than others. Other features, like piercings in the clitoral hood, didn’t affect the ratings,” read the study .
So basically, the “doggy style” photos generated “influential excitement” among the contest’s voters—an important competitive advantage for all future entrants to consider.
Photo via mislav-marohnic /Flickr (CC BY-ND 2.0)
Newsletter: Dr. Oz’s history of poop tweets
‘First time ordering a drink?’: Customer complains about size of ice cube in $18 drink, sparking debate
‘Should I call my mom and tell her to drive 2 hours to come pick me up’: Woman films date talking about Andrew Tate
‘No one was gonna tell me how awkward it is’: Worker makes video on what it’s like to work after putting in 2-weeks’ notice, sparking debate






Wednesday, Aug 24th 2022
9AM
23°C
12PM
29°C

5-Day Forecast


RELATED ARTICLES Previous 1 Next

Embed icon






Embed Most Watched Videos



By embedding this you agree to our terms and conditions


Cancel
Copy code
Tick icon



Code copied



Site
Web


Enter search term:
Search


Olivia Pratt-Korbel: Police call on criminals to 'examine their consciences' and give up gunman who killed nine-year-old
Owami Davies’ family ‘forever grateful’ as missing nurse found after seven weeks
Eurotunnel Le Shuttle: Passengers stuck for hours inside tunnel
Ukraine war: Kyiv counts cost of fragile independence
Liz Truss says no need for ethics adviser because she knows ‘right and wrong’
Duchess of Sussex reveals she had to carry on with royal tour when Archie’s nursery caught fire
Meghan Markle finally releases her new podcast on Spotify
New one-day record as 1,295 asylum-seekers cross the channel
Texas drought uncovers 113 million-year-old dinosaur footprints left by cousin of T-Rex
Glasgow mountain biker Rab Wardell 'dies in his sleep' after major win




Home




News




U.S.




Sport




TV&Showbiz




Australia




Femail




Health




Science




Money




Video




Travel




Best Buys




Discounts




Published: 13:08 BST, 14 January 2019 | Updated: 18:14 BST, 14 January 2019
This is the moment a gymnast scores a perfect 10 after pulling off a painful final move in an incredible routine.
Katelyn Ohashi, 21, a senior at UCLA , performed the funky routine to a medley of hits at the Collegiate Challenge in Anaheim.  
The incredible gymnast wows the audience by doing a triple tumble into a painful split before springing to her feet to the sound of applause as though it was easy.
Katelyn Ohashi, a student at UCLA performed the funky routine to a medley of hits at the Collegiate Challenge in Anaheim
The incredible gymnast wows the audience by doing a triple tumble into a split before springing to her feet to the sound of applause
She smiles throughout the whole routine and breaks into dance between flips to tunes by Michael Jackson and Earth Wind and Fire. 
And her teammates watching in the wings can be seen dancing along to the high-energy performance. 
At the end, the crowd go wild and she runs to high-five her team mates before the judges hold up score with a perfect 10. 
UCLA gymnastics posted the video of the performance on Twitter with the caption: 'A 10 isn't enough for this floor routine'. 
The clip has since gone viral and users on social media were left wincing at her moves and amazed at her incredible skills. 
One user said: 'The power drop into the splits bounce up at the end is mind bending. The power moves in modern floor routines are ridiculous.'
Another wrote: 'I would tear every ligament I didn’t know I even had'.
One wrote: 'I know zero about gymnastics but this is fun to watch. I hurt myself just watching.'
Another said: 'I was a gymnast and still watch a lot, this is the most exciting floor routine I’ve ever seen. So much energy and perfectly executed'.
Katelyn, who has been doing gymnastics for 18 years, has won many national competitions, having spent years training with the US National Women's team. 
This is also not the first time that she has earned viral fame with her sensational skills on floor; last year, Katelyn earned the same global recognition with a Michael Jackson-inspired performance that helped her to rack up multiple perfect 10s throughout the previous season. 
Katelyn's team mates congratulate her after her routine. The clip has since gone viral and users on social media were left wincing at her moves and amazed at her incredible skills
At the end, the crowd go wild. before the judges hold up score with a perfect 10, seen here, alongside former Olympian-turned-UCLA coach Jordyn Wieber
Video of Katelyn performing the routine in February 2018 achieved the same awe and praise from fans around the world, racking up more than 561,000 views after being posted to the NCAA Gymnastics YouTube channel. 
And not long before her viral success, Katelyn's name featured in headlines for a very different reason; early in 2018, she chose to speak out about the different kinds of abuse she suffered at the hands of her coaches throughout her career as an elite level gymnast.
Writing a personal essay for Behind the Madness, Katelyn revealed that that although she loved going to the gym as a young child, as soon as an ‘elite atmosphere’ kicked in, her joy and enthusiasm for her sport were replaced by fear and dread.
‘Elite gymnastics should only be a place where our joy continu
Full Porn Online Free
Schoolgirl Cumshot Pics
Hentai Watch Online

Report Page