Private Var Mobile
🛑 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
Private Var Mobile
sraka1 opened this issue
Nov 18, 2019
· 3 comments
nullpixel
closed this
Nov 18, 2019
Siguza
added
the
status-wontfix
label
Nov 30, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub .
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
© 2021 GitHub, Inc.
Terms
Privacy
Security
Status
Docs
Contact GitHub
Pricing
API
Training
Blog
About
What device + iOS version are you on?
iPhone 6S, 12.4.1
Darwin Kernel Version 18.7.0: Mon Aug 19 22:24:08 PDT 2019; root:xnu-4903.272.1~1/RELEASE_ARM64_S8000 iPhone8,1
What checkra1n version are you using?
What are the steps to reproduce the issue?
What do you expect, and what is happening instead?
I expect to receive/be able to read the file, but it looks like some sort of FS security layer prevents files from being accessed.
The use case is a broken phone (broken screen), which is now jailbreakable (thanks! 👍 ) and has some photos I'd like to recover.
Any other info, error logs, screenshots, ...?
I am unaware of the state of the phone due to broken screen, however the broken digitizer made it "auto-press" buttons all the time (you can hear the clicks), so it's likely to be in a disabled state (if lock screen PIN was pressed too many times).
you need to unlock the phone due to data protection, sorry :/
@nullpixel is this an iOS limitation or an intentional safety check by checkra1n?
iOS limitation, enforced by the SEP. Absolutely nothing you can do about it, sorry.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
ios - Access files in / var / mobile /Containers/Data/Application without...
Files in / private / var / mobile not readable via SSH · Issue #458...
What is / private / var /db/dyld? - Apple Community
[Question] Failed to verify code signature of / private / var ...
Checkra1n Era - Ep 4 - Analyzing extractions "Before First Unlock"
Sign in
Sign in
Sign in corporate
... And why are dyld
shared_cache i386; and dyld
shared_cache rosetta over 125 megabytes each? Are they safe to delete? I have searched google, and other than telling me it's something to do with prebinding, I am clueless.
I am kind of a disk space freak, and keep my system clean. I'd like to delete these if possible, but not if there's a deleterious effect.
Thanks in advance.
That directory has to do with prebinding and shared caches (relevant to application launches). And no, it is not safe to delete (I'm not sure what would happen, but I know it would not be a simple fix.)
Don't go deleting stuff around the system, especially in hidden directories.
Helpful answers
Drop Down menu
If Cocktail didn't touch these files you shouldn't either, in my humble opinion. Major applications that require Rosetta are Office X, Office 2004, Quicken, older versions of Photoshop. You can find out if an application uses Rosetta by performing a Get Info on the app. Under Kind look for Kind:Application (Power PC). That means it needs Rosetta to run on an Intel Mac.
first
Page 1 of 1
Page 1/1
last
Well, Rosetta is the OS X emulation engine that allows older Power PC (PPC) based software to run on Intel based Macs. Being a disk space freak can get you into serious trouble with OS X. It's a Unix variant and various caches are important to its proper operation. I would suggest you download one of the cache utility programs like Leopard Cache Cleaner, Tiger Cache Cleaner, Onyx, Cocktail. Use them to clean your caches instead of doing it yourself. They were written to use built in Unix commands to do their thing.
Thread reply - more options
Link to this Post
I've had Cocktail for years, and just did a full cleaning. These files were not touched.
So, since I don't know which of my third party apps. need Rosetta, I guess I should leave these alone, right?
Thread reply - more options
Link to this Post
Since you don't know, it's best you stay out of any hidden folder, /System, and usually /Library.
See these for things you can do:
Freeing space on your Mac OS X startup disk
Freeing Up Hard Disk Space
Running maintenance routines is critical to keeping the drive clear of unneccesary files:
http://www.macworld.com/2005/01/features/preventmacdisasters/index.php
http://www.thexlab.com/faqs/maintscripts.html
Thread reply - more options
Link to this Post
That directory has to do with prebinding and shared caches (relevant to application launches). And no, it is not safe to delete (I'm not sure what would happen, but I know it would not be a simple fix.)
Don't go deleting stuff around the system, especially in hidden directories.
Thread reply - more options
Link to this Post
If Cocktail didn't touch these files you shouldn't either, in my humble opinion. Major applications that require Rosetta are Office X, Office 2004, Quicken, older versions of Photoshop. You can find out if an application uses Rosetta by performing a Get Info on the app. Under Kind look for Kind:Application (Power PC). That means it needs Rosetta to run on an Intel Mac.
Thread reply - more options
Link to this Post
Thanks, all. I'll leave them alone. I just don't remember seeing them before while scanning OmniDisksweeper, which I do frequently. Perhaps I just overlooked it.
Thread reply - more options
Link to this Post
first
Page 1 of 1
Page 1/1
last
Support
Communities
More ways to shop: Visit an Apple Store , call 1-800-MY-APPLE, or find a reseller .
Copyright © 2021 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Sales and Refunds
Legal
Site Map
Looks like no one’s replied in a while.
To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.
iMac,
Mac OS X (10.5.8),
1GB RAM
Lingerie Shopping
Double Penetration 24video Xxx
Www Nudist Ru
Blacked Hardcore Sex
Granny Taboo
.jpg)
