Private Api Windows

Private Api Windows
Use generated iOS SDK (Swift) to call API
Private APIs are accessible only from within your VPCs, and the resource
policies must allow access from the VPCs and VPC endpoints you have configured.
How you access your private API will depend upon whether or not you have enabled private
DNS on the VPC endpoint. For example, while accessing private API from on-premises
network via AWS Direct Connect, you will have private DNS enabled on the VPC endpoint.
In such a case, follow the steps outlined in Invoking Your Private API Using Endpoint-Specific Public DNS Hostnames .
Once you have deployed a private API ,
you can access it via private DNS (if you've enabled private DNS naming) and via public
DNS.
To get the DNS names for your private API, do the following:
Sign in to the AWS Management Console and open the Amazon VPC console at
https://console.aws.amazon.com/vpc/ .
In the left navigation pane, choose Endpoints and then
choose your interface VPC endpoint for API Gateway.
In the Details pane, you'll see 5 values in the
DNS names field. The first 3 are the public DNS names
for your API. The other 2 are the private DNS names for it.
When you select the Enable Private DNS Name option while creating an interface
VPC endpoint for API Gateway, the VPC where the VPC Endpoint is present won't be able to access public (edge-optimized and regional) APIs. For more information, see
Why can't I connect to my public API from an API Gateway VPC endpoint? .
If you've enabled private DNS, you can access your private API using the private
DNS names as follows:
The base URL to invoke the API is in the following format:
For example, assuming you set up the GET /pets and GET
/pets/ { petId} methods in this example, and assuming that your rest API ID
was 01234567ab and your region was us-west-2 , you could
test your API by typing the following URLs in a browser:
Alternatively, you could use the following cURL commands:
You can also use AWS Direct Connect to establish a dedicated private connection from an
on-premises network to Amazon VPC and access your private API endpoint over that
connection by using public DNS names.
You can also use private DNS names to access your private API from an on-premises network by setting
up an Amazon Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoint and forwarding it all DNS queries of the private DNS from your remote network.
For more information, see Forwarding inbound DNS queries to
your VPCs in the Amazon Route 53 Developer Guide .
You can associate or disassociate a VPC endpoint with your private API by using the procedure outlined in Associate or Disassociate a VPC Endpoint with a Private REST API .
Once you associate your private API's REST API ID with the VPC endpoints you'll be calling your REST API from, you can use the following format base URL to invoke the API using a Route53 alias.
The generated base URL is in the following format:
For example, assuming you set up the GET /pets and GET /pets/ { petId} methods in this example, and assuming that your API's API ID was 01234567ab, VPC Endpoint ID was vpce-01234567abcdef012, and your region was us-west-2, you can invoke your API as:
You can access your private API using endpoint-specific DNS hostnames. These are
public DNS hostnames containing the VPC endpoint ID or API ID for your private
API.
The generated base URL is in the following format:
For example, assuming you set up the GET /pets and GET
/pets/ { petId} methods in this example, and assuming that your API's API
ID was 01234567ab , its public DNS hostname was
vpce-01234567abcdef012-01234567 , and your region was
us-west-2 , you could test your API via its VPCE ID by using the
Host header in a cURL command, as in the following example:
Alternatively, you can access your private API via its API ID by using the
x-apigw-api-id header in a cURL command in the following
format:
Thanks for letting us know we're doing a good job!
If you've got a moment, please tell us what we did right so we can do more of it.
Thanks for letting us know this page needs work. We're sorry we let you down.
If you've got a moment, please tell us how we can make the documentation better.

Books

Book Reviews

Book Watch

Programmer's Bookshelf

Bargain Computer Books

Articles

The Core

Python

Javascript

WPF Workings

Joomla

PHP

Theory

Silverlight

C#

Artifical Intelligence

Other Languages

Visual Basic

C/C++

Mobile

Database

ASP .NET

Hardware/IoT

Graphics/Imaging

UI/UX

Perl

WinRT

HTML/CSS

jQuery

Ruby

Android

Security

Methodology & Testing

Cloud

Babbage's Bag

Projects

Programmer Puzzles

C#

C++

Java

JavaScript

Python

PHP

Sharpen Your Coding Skills

History

Machines

People

Software & computer languages

Swift's Spreadsheets

Finance

Personal

General

Professional Programmer

Accreditation & Training

I Programmer

Resources and Tools

I Programmer Weekly

eBooks

Stone Tapes

CodeBin

News

Register

Change Region

About Us

<a href="https://effectus.nui.media/pipeline/674044/0/cc?z=effectus">
<img src="https://effectus.nui.media/pipeline/674044/0/vc?z=effectus&dim=602465&kw=&click=&abr=$imginiframe" width="160" height="600" alt="" border="0">
</a>

<a href="https://effectus.nui.media/pipeline/674043/0/cc?z=effectus">
<img src="https://effectus.nui.media/pipeline/674043/0/vc?z=effectus&dim=602457&kw=&click=&abr=$imginiframe" width="300" height="250" alt="" border="0">
</a>

Copyright © 2009-2022 i-programmer.info. All Rights Reserved.

Third party developers face a problem when it comes to Windows 8 on ARM (WOA). The "MetroTop" - part Metro part desktop apps that run on any ARM-based Windows 8 device rely on an API that is available only to Microsoft. Is this deliberate policy and can it be tolerated?
Back in the early days of Windows it was the case that Microsoft gained and advantage over other programmers by making use of internal APIs. Given the size and complexity of an operating system it seems reasonable that there should be undocumented systems, or rather systems that are not publicly documented. However, it is a very different matter if those undocumented APIs suddenly start being used by the Microsoft application developers. When this happens it is clear that the playing field is far from level.
Back in 2000 Microsoft faced an anti-trust case because of its practice of bundling Internet Explorer with Windows. This was said to disadvantage the competing browsers such as Netscape Navigator and Opera. There was also the accusation that Microsoft was using secret APIs to give Internet Explorer an edge over the rest. Microsoft disputed that it was using secret APIs, but nevertheless they were ordered to separate Windows and Internet Explorer and to make the APIs public. The monitoring of Microsoft's behaviour was extended twice but finally came to an end in May of last year (2011). It is argued that this won't make much difference because of the precedent and because Microsoft doesn't want to go though the experience a second time.
But consider the situation with Windows 8 for a moment and things don't seem quite so simple.
First it is important to know that Windows 8 is like two operating systems spliced together at the Start menu. Windows 8 desktop is like Windows 7 and not much has changed.
Windows 8 WinRT/Metro is new and it is the part of the system that is targeting touch platforms. You can create a Windows 8 desktop app using the well-known Win32 API or a WinRT/Metro app using the new API. As long as the hardware you are running things on is x86/64 then everything works. Even on a tablet, as long as it uses an Intel processor, then you get the whole system Desktop and Metro.
The problems start when the hardware is based on an ARM processor - and you can expect most Windows 8 tablets to be based on ARM processors and all Windows Phone 8 systems are going to be ARM-based.
Windows On Arm, or WOA, is different from Windows on x86 in that the traditional Desktop/Win32 environment will not be available - only WinRT/Metro apps will run on WOA and hence on most tablets and phones.
If this is where the story ended there would be no problem. There would be some disappointment that WOA didn't run desktop apps but everything would be simple and on ARM machines Windows 8 would be WinRT/Metro only.
However Microsoft is planning to make a selection of desktop apps available including IE10. These apps will use APIs not available to standard WinRT/Metro apps. Which Win32 API calls are available isn't being made clear and in this sense it is a very non-public API.
Back in the anti-trust days Microsoft denied using secret APIs but now, just a few months after the supervision has ended we have Microsoft making public that its own ARM apps are using secret APIs that aren't available to the rest of us.
Microsoft is also creating Metro apps that run at a different privilege level and can do things that standard Metro style apps can't. For example, Metro IE10 runs at a higher privilege level - the same level that a desktop app runs at - making it a sort of "MetroTop" app.
So when Mozilla, Google and Opera come to port their browsers to WOA they will be disadvantaged because they can only create pure Metro style apps.
Mozilla is already speculating on how to create a more full-functioned browser that can go head to head with Metro IE10 and it is also clear that Microsoft isn't providing any clues.
However, the same argument applies not only to browsers but to all of the other apps that Microsoft might make available in MetroTop form or as WOA desktop apps. For example, will LibreOffice be given details of the secret APIs to port its office suite to compete with Microsoft Office on WOA? And what about the rest of us?
It is bad enough that Microsoft is going to play the role of gatekeeper when it comes to WOA applications - as all WinRT apps have to be installed from the Windows 8 market place - but to keep a whole section of that market for themselves is plain wrong.
There could well be technical reasons why Microsoft isn't keen on allowing the details of the MetroTop or Win32 API out into the wide world. It might well be that converting the Win32 API to ARM is very messy and best kept hidden, but to use it internally and deny others access is a return to the ways of the evil empire, even if unintentionally.
Make a Comment or View Existing Comments Using Disqus
or email your comment to: comments@i-programmer.info
To be informed about new articles on I Programmer, subscribe to the RSS feed , follow us on Google+ , Twitter, Linkedin or Facebook or sign up for our weekly newsletter .

Windows 8's Private API - WOA For Developers

Last Updated ( Friday, 17 February 2012 )

All Engineering Design Finance Projects Product Toptal Insights
Nikolay (MSc) started his career with a Google internship, worked full-stack, built iOS apps, and now loves to help startups launch MVPs.

This changed my life. Thank you so much!
This changed my life. Thank you so much!
Nice post.

I had much better luck doing the same in financial industry which should be more serious industry than traveling around. I needed couple of years (5 if I am not wrong) that someone understands me, but when I got to the right person (who understood what I'm speaking), everything become easy.

I hope you will succeed at the end.
Nice post.

I had much better luck doing the same in financial industry which should be more serious industry than traveling around. I needed couple of years (5 if I am not wrong) that someone understands me, but when I got to the right person (who understood what I'm speaking), everything become easy.

I hope you will succeed at the end.
Nice article! I've never heard about the smali debugging, it's interesting solution!
Nice article! I've never heard about the smali debugging, it's interesting solution!
Awesome writeup. Is that a third-party console application? Love the font and color scheme.
Awesome writeup. Is that a third-party console application? Love the font and color scheme.
Thanks! That's iTerm2 with Solarized Dark color scheme.
Thanks! That's iTerm2 with Solarized Dark color scheme.
Thanks for satisfying my curiosity about how to use a MITM proxy to deconstruct an API. I'm keen to try!
Thanks for satisfying my curiosity about how to use a MITM proxy to deconstruct an API. I'm keen to try!
One thing I've pondered is whether there is some ne
Small Dick Masturbate
Nasty Porn Anal
Stepmom Ass Fucking

Private Api Windows

Report Page