Prison Women Sex

Prison Women Sex




🔞 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻

































Prison Women Sex

This website no longer supports Internet Explorer, which is now an outdated browser. For the best experience and your security, please visit
us using a different browser.



Social Links for Lee Brown





View Author Archive





Get author RSS feed











Tina Gonzalez's former boss called for her to get the maximum sentence of three years and eight months in prison.
Fresno County Sheriff's Office




Filed under




california



corrections officers



sex crimes



7/2/21



This story has been shared 68,016 times.
68,016


This story has been shared 63,060 times.
63,060


This story has been shared 58,936 times.
58,936






Facebook





Twitter





Instagram





LinkedIn





Email





YouTube





Thanks for contacting us. We've received your submission.
A female California corrections officer with a “depraved mind” has been jailed for reportedly having sex with an inmate — in full view of 11 other jailbirds.
Tina Gonzalez, 26, even cut a hole in her uniform pants — to make it easier to have sex in Fresno County Jail, her sentencing hearing was told on Tuesday, according to The Fresno Bee .
Her former boss, Assistant Sheriff Steve McComas, told the court that he had witnessed many “pretty disgusting things” during his 26-years on the job — but nothing as shocking as hearing of Gonzalez’s sex session in full view of other inmates.
“That is something only a depraved mind can come up with,” McComas told the court, according to the local paper.
Gonzalez — who quit after being arrested in May last year — also supplied the same inmate with razors, a cell phone and advance warnings when his cell was going to be searched, the reports said.
“She took an oath which she betrayed and in doing so endangered her coworkers’ lives,” McComas said.
“But she has shown no remorse. She continually calls and has sexually explicit conversations with the inmate in question and boasts about the crimes she carried out,” he told the court, according to the Bee.
Gonzalez pleaded no contest in April to sexual activity by a detention facility employee with a consenting inmate, as well as possessing drugs or alcohol, and a cell phone to give to an inmate, the outlet said.
Her former boss called for her to get the maximum sentence of three years and eight months in prison.
But Judge Michael Idiart noted her early plea and lack of criminal history as he sentenced her Tuesday to seven months in the county jail followed by two years of probation.
“I think what you did was terrible, stupid and you have ruined your career,” Idiart told Gonzalez.
“But I also believe that people can redeem themselves and you have the rest of your life to do that. Good luck,” the judge told her.

If playback doesn't begin shortly, try restarting your device.
Videos you watch may be added to the TV's watch history and influence TV recommendations. To avoid this, cancel and sign in to YouTube on your computer.
An error occurred while retrieving sharing information. Please try again later.
0:03 / 6:16 • Watch full video Live
Watch ads now so you can enjoy fewer interruptions





Legal casework


Research


Publications


Events


About us


Join


Contact us


 Search



Donate







Home


Our approach


Our work


Our journey


Get involved


News & views




Tagged with



prisoners


prisons


research


sex in prison

























The Howard League for Penal Reform
1 Ardleigh Road
London
N1 4HS


+44 (0)20 7249 7373
+44 (0)20 7249 7788 (fax)
info@howardleague.org





Like us on Facebook →


Follow us on Twitter →


Subscribe to our YouTube channel →


Subscribe to our newsletter →





Less crime, safer communities, fewer people in prison

The Commission on Sex in Prison’s final report, published today (Tuesday 17 March), features accounts from former prisoners speaking for the first time about their experiences of sex behind bars.
Sex in prison: Experiences of former prisoners is the fifth and final briefing paper published by the Commission, which was established by the Howard League for Penal Reform and includes eminent academics, former prison governors and health experts.
Recommendations from the Commission’s two-year inquiry will be presented today (Tuesday 17 March) at a conference in London.
The Commission sought permission to interview current prisoners about their experiences of sex in prison, but this approach was blocked by the Ministry of Justice.
However, Dr Alisa Stevens, Lecturer in Criminology at the University of Southampton, was able to interview 26 former prisoners during the summer of 2014 – 24 men and two women.
Her report concludes that a national survey of both the serving prison population and former prisoners, fully supported by but independent of the National Offender Management Service (NOMS), is “urgently required” to understand better the scale of consensual and coercive sex in prison.
The former prisoners interviewed by Dr Stevens had been jailed for a wide range of offences. Eighteen interviewees self-identified as heterosexual, four as gay, and four as bisexual.
Gay and bisexual men reported that while they were “fairly” or “totally” open about their sexuality on the wing, they were discreet about their sexual activities and relationships.
They usually had sex in the cell of one of the participants or in the showers, during periods of association. Some men who shared cells had sex at night. When asked how many sexual partners interviewees had had in prison, numbers ranged from one to “about 30, 35”.
One heterosexual man said that he had had consensual sex with gay or bisexual prisoners “out of necessity”. He said he had resumed exclusively heterosexual relationships since leaving prison, and he added: “I’m completely straight; what happened then was just about having my sexual needs met, in a particular time and place, where I couldn’t get [heterosexual] sex.”
The research project found that the availability of condoms and dental dams – to minimise prisoners’ risk of exposure to sexually transmitted infections – varied from prison to prison.
Some sexually active men were refused condoms, while others were able to obtain them from healthcare but often in circumstances which did not allow for any privacy.
Sometimes condoms were rationed. At a Category C prison, an interviewee was “shocked, to put it mildly” to be informed in reception that he was entitled to six condoms and a tube of lubricant, but “you had to return the used [condoms] in a bag to healthcare before you could get any more”.
Interviewees who had not personally had sex in prison were sometimes aware of consensual sex taking place among other prisoners.
Neither of the two women interviewed for this research had personal experience of sex in prison, but both confirmed that the formation of supportive, “close friendships” and strong emotional bonds were commonplace among women prisoners, and sometimes became sexual.
“I couldn’t believe how much kissing and cuddling was going on,” said one woman. “It was a big, big shock, a big culture shock. Someone like me, never been in prison before; I didn’t know where to look half the time!”
A national survey of both the serving prison population and former prisoners is “urgently required” to understand better the scale of consensual and coercive sex in prison.
Generally, among the participants in this study, there was a high degree of tolerance towards other prisoners participating in consensual sex. “I think the general attitude,” said one, “certainly among long-termers is, whatever people get up to, behind their door, is up to them.”
A common observation was that prisoners who became indebted to others, typically as a result of drug habits or gambling losses, and/or who had very limited money to buy commodities they desired, would offer “sexual favours” in lieu of payment or in return for “canteen”.
Other interviewees had observed vulnerable individuals, who were socially isolated and lacked external financial support, being targeted or “groomed” for sex. In these circumstances, it is highly problematic to describe the sexual activity as genuinely consensual, because it was only offered as a commercial exchange.
Three male interviewees disclosed that they had been raped in prison, by prisoners. Three others had been threatened with rape by other prisoners.
“Quite simply, what happened ruined my life,” said one. “I’ve wanted to talk about it for a long time, but the means were not there. Because nobody wants to know, nobody wants to hear about this horrendous, horrendous abuse.”
One interviewee had been raped by five assailants in a cell and required in-prison medical treatment. He was encouraged to report the rapes by the nurse who treated him, but when he told a principal officer what had happened, he was dissuaded from making a formal complaint. As a prisoner in the early stages of a long sentence, he was advised that to “grass” upon other prisoners in this way would “mark his cards” for the rest of his time inside and would increase his chances of victimisation in the future.
The research found that there was a tacit acceptance by prison staff of both pornography and masturbation. One interviewee recalled how, feeling “overwhelmed and nervous” on his first night in prison, he asked the night staff for a Bible. After some time, an officer returned and apologetically explained that he could not find a Bible but he could lend instead a selection of pornographic magazines “to help you get to sleep”.
Some interviewees observed that they had known some openly homosexual couples being allowed to share cells in some institutions. NOMS policy, however, is that men who are known, or are discovered, to be in a sexual relationship are not allowed to share a cell and will be separated.
One interviewee reported that a senior officer had moved a young prisoner, who had confided he was “confused” about his sexuality, into the cell of an openly gay, older prisoner, in order to help him “sort himself out”. This action had been perceived at the time as well-intentioned, but it underlines the need for staff to be trained in how to manage discussions around sex and sexuality and how to recognise the potential for grooming and abuse.
Alisa Stevens, Lecturer in Criminology at the University of Southampton and Academic Consultant to the Commission, said: “This research, drawing on the experiences and knowledge of former prisoners, has illustrated the urgent need for coherent and consistently applied policies which recognise and respond to the reality of consensual and coercive sex in prison.”
Chris Sheffield, Chair of the Commission on Sex in Prison, said: “Dr Stevens’s paper gives an important perspective to the subject. It is a great shame that permission was not granted to afford the opportunity for those serving prison sentences to contribute to the research in this matter.”
Frances Crook, Chief Executive of the Howard League for Pena Reform, said: “This final report of the Commission shows that sexual activity is widespread in prisons and must be seen as an urgent health issue. The Commission has conducted the first systematic review of sex in prison and it is clear important lessons must be learned, and fast.”
Rob Preece
Press Officer
Tel: +44 (0)20 7241 7880
Mobile: +44 (0)7714 604955
Email: robert.preece@howardleague.org
For enquiries outside normal office hours, please call +44 (0)7918 681094
ISDN line available on 020 7923 4196 – uses a G722 system
Add your voice to our movement for change. Every voice counts and we hope that you will add yours.
Everything we do is focused on achieving less crime, safer communities, fewer people in prison. We need you to act now for penal reform.
© 2022. The Howard League is a registered charity (No. 251926) and company limited by guarantee (No. 898514).
Charity web design by Fat Beehive


Inside the Georgia school actively centering queer identity
5 good news stories about climate change
© 2022 BDG Media, Inc. All rights reserved.
On Friday, the fourth season of the prison drama Orange Is The New Black will debut on Netflix. Based on the eponymous memoir by former prison inmate Piper Kerman, the series explores the relationships between a diverse group of inmates at Litchfield Penitentiary in Connecticut, a minimum-security women's prison. It also continuously raises the question: is its depiction of prison life — specifically, same-sex prison relationships — accurate? 
Mic caught up with several American women who've spent time behind bars to hear about their experiences with sex behind bars. Here's what they had to say. 
"Everybody fucks around in prison," 60-year-old Sally* told Mic in a phone interview. "People have more sex in prison than they do on the street." 
Sally was in and out of jail for most of her life, starting with juvenile hall in 1972 and ending with a few hours in county jail in 2005. A former homeless heroin addict and sex worker, she's been arrested for everything from fraud to weapons possession, and she's spent time behind bars in numerous states, including California, Florida, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and New York. Since obtaining a college degree in 2002, she's started a program called Way Pass to help former inmates continue their education at San Francisco City College.
Sex and kissing between inmates is illegal , and is technically referred to as a " low severity prohibited act " regardless of whether it's consensual. Yet Sally said many of the inmates she knew not only had sex with each other, but were also involved in long-term relationships. "They all hooked up inside, had long-term relationships with other women. Some kept them on the outside," Sally said. "I also know women who were gay inside together but just really good friends on the street." 
None of this means that women prisoners are safe from homophobia. Sally said she often saw male guards target openly lesbian women for verbal abuse, punishment and general mistreatment. "I've seen male guards saying 'you dyke bitch whore' and degrading the gay women," she said. "You can get written up for [lesbian sex]. You can get transferred...don't put it in their [guards'] face." 
Maria*, 36, who was convicted of trespassing and possession of a deadly weapon, spent time in a California maximum security prison between 1997 and 1999 when she was just 18 years old. Maria decided to keep her homosexuality a secret behind bars, for fear of abuse from fellow inmates and guards.
"Different prisons in different cities will be different, but I think I was the only lesbian there while I was incarcerated. There's not a high enough population of gay women to be like OITNB. It's completely unrealistic," Maria told Mic in a phone interview. "The one thing that's authentic about the show is when the guards shout 'Inmate, no touching!'" 
She lived with half a dozen women in a room, with just an hour of outdoor time and routine meal breaks. She neither saw nor participated in any sexual activity while incarcerated. 
"I felt more comfortable being out in the world than in prison," Maria said. "Out in the world you can choose who you hang out with. In prison, God forbid it gets used against you...You never know who's going to be homophobic or violent."
Sally mentioned women using tricks to hide their sexual activity, such as dropping a sheet over their bunks. But female inmates' experiences varied drastically depending on what kind of prisons they were in. While Orange Is the New Black is set in a minimum security prison, many maximum security prisons allow far less interaction and privacy for inmates. 
Chandra Bozelko, the 43-year-old blogger behind the site Prison Diaries , had a very different experience from Piper's in a Connecticut high-security women's prison from 2007 to 2014. Since Connecticut has only one women's prison, York Correctional Facility , it has a mix of cells and dorms, the latter of which look more like the set in OITNB , but more crowded. 
Bozelko saw widespread sexual activity between both guards and inmates, although technically even being caught holding hands with another woman could be considered grounds for punishment and solitary confinement. "I would say there's homophobia," Bozelko told Mic in a phone interview. "The guards would say 'That's disgusting' [lesbian romance] and huff at inmate relationships."
The truth is, much inmate sex has an undercurrent of violence, which isn't depicted on OITNB . "Some [inmates] beat their wives. There's a lot of domestic violence between female partners," Sally said. "I've seen women raped [by other women] but most of the inmate experiences I saw were voluntary. Then they fight and brutalize each other...being incarcerated is a violent environment...it comes with racism and homophobia." 
Bozelko agreed intimate partner violence was commonplace in Connecticut prison romances as well. "They would beat each other up routinely," she said. "No one wants to admit to it because you'll be put in solitary confinement while they investigate, even if you didn't do anything wrong...there's a huge disincentive to report anything." 
Sally considers herself heterosexual and avoided what she refers to as the "messy" violence of inmate romance in general, but she did have one prison girlfriend named Elsa with whom she developed an intimate, if not explicitly sexual, relationship. 
"I did have a sort of girlfriend at one point but we didn't have sex or kiss...we were very physically affectionate, sitting together with our arms around each other, showering together," Sally re
Porn Girl Schoolgirl
First Time Anal Young Girls
Porno Oil Explosion 5

Report Page