Порно Teen Pussy Lips
🛑 👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻 ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ДОСТУПНА ЗДЕСЬ ЖМИТЕ 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
Порно Teen Pussy Lips
*First Published: Jul 24, 2015, 10:05 pm CDT
More stories to check out before you go
Posted on Jul 24, 2015 Updated on May 28, 2021, 7:13 am CDT
Following rigorous competition and more than 130,000 voters, the World’s Most Beautiful Vagina Contest anointed a champion this week. It was a strange, difficult-to-gauge event—but that’s why organizers turned to scientists to tell us what it all means.
U.K. resident Nell, 27, won first place and $5,000 in the pageant with a vulva beauty ranking of 7.7 out of 10. Jenny, 23, of Bavaria, Germany, took second place with a 7.3; and Anita, 20, from Hungary, came in third. They each earned $2,500 and $1,250, respectively.
The contest was sponsored by Brian Sloan, who is also the manufacturer of the Autoblow 2 . It’s known as “the first truly realistic alternative to traditional pleasure products for men,” according to the its website .
These winners will also be flown out to Los Angeles, where their vulvas will be 3D-scanned to later be reproduced for the Autoblow device.
Sloan contracted a group of data scientists to analyze the contest’s findings for their scientific implications. The data was then compiled in “ The Vulva Paper .”
If you’re a visual learner, you can view photo examples of each class here .
The Vulva Paper’s website says scientists “used the contest data to assess the diversity in vulval morphology and voters’ preference for different morphologies.” A total of 182 women participated in the contest; 110 entries were examined for the study (if measurements could not be taken from the photo, the entry was not considered).
The scientists viewed each entry on a 15-inch computer screen, zooming in “until the genitalia were easily measured using a screen ruler,” read the paper .
They measured labia majora length, labia minora length, and clitoral hood length.
Finally, the scientists rated the complexity of the labia minora; they used the three categories of rugosity (smooth, moderate, marked) to do so. To prevent vaginal bias, the same person also conducted all of these measurements. The scientists later used this research to classify the contest’s entries into six different categories of “vulval morphology.”
A chart detailing the six classes is included below:
As far as methodology is concerned, a random assortment of entries was sent to each voter, who was then asked to rate the vulva pictured on a scale from 1 to 10. These voters were only able to rank one photo at a time, but could also vote on an unlimited number of entries. The scientists compiled 2,766,671 ratings from 134,707 contest voters.
“To reduce individual biases, we centered each voter’s ratings using their mean and standard deviation. This allowed us to reflect the preferences of voters on the same scale,” read the study .
According to the paper , each voter rated 21 photos, on average. Each vulva also received 15,285 votes, on average.
The study also found that “roughly 51% of voters preferred the first two classes of non-protruding, simple labia. The other 49% favored the four more complex vulva classes.”
“As expected from the rankings that we saw at the country and local levels, Class 1 vulvas are preferred over the others more often. But the combined percentages of voters who preferred more complex classes of vulvas far outweighed those who preferred the simplest style.”
The winners’ photos, however, were not included in the study—having been among the participants whose photos were not able to be considered. Moreover, the “doggy style” posture featured in these entries made it difficult for the scientists to complete the necessary measurements.
“Indeed, pictures depicting contest entrants in a doggy style position obtained ratings 2 points higher on average (p <0.001) than others. Other features, like piercings in the clitoral hood, didn’t affect the ratings,” read the study .
So basically, the “doggy style” photos generated “influential excitement” among the contest’s voters—an important competitive advantage for all future entrants to consider.
Photo via mislav-marohnic /Flickr (CC BY-ND 2.0)
‘Why does a website get more time off than me’: Social security website has business hours, sparking debate
‘House could have been full of roaches’: TikToker warns against buying used furniture, shows roach infestation in chair
‘A cashier leaked he was going to be buying people’s groceries and they all just showed’: Rumors of MrBeast showing up at grocery store lead to chaos
‘My luck right?’: Server accidentally charges her own card instead of customer’s card via tap to pay
*First Published: Jul 24, 2015, 10:05 pm CDT
More stories to check out before you go
Posted on Jul 24, 2015 Updated on May 28, 2021, 7:13 am CDT
Following rigorous competition and more than 130,000 voters, the World’s Most Beautiful Vagina Contest anointed a champion this week. It was a strange, difficult-to-gauge event—but that’s why organizers turned to scientists to tell us what it all means.
U.K. resident Nell, 27, won first place and $5,000 in the pageant with a vulva beauty ranking of 7.7 out of 10. Jenny, 23, of Bavaria, Germany, took second place with a 7.3; and Anita, 20, from Hungary, came in third. They each earned $2,500 and $1,250, respectively.
The contest was sponsored by Brian Sloan, who is also the manufacturer of the Autoblow 2 . It’s known as “the first truly realistic alternative to traditional pleasure products for men,” according to the its website .
These winners will also be flown out to Los Angeles, where their vulvas will be 3D-scanned to later be reproduced for the Autoblow device.
Sloan contracted a group of data scientists to analyze the contest’s findings for their scientific implications. The data was then compiled in “ The Vulva Paper .”
If you’re a visual learner, you can view photo examples of each class here .
The Vulva Paper’s website says scientists “used the contest data to assess the diversity in vulval morphology and voters’ preference for different morphologies.” A total of 182 women participated in the contest; 110 entries were examined for the study (if measurements could not be taken from the photo, the entry was not considered).
The scientists viewed each entry on a 15-inch computer screen, zooming in “until the genitalia were easily measured using a screen ruler,” read the paper .
They measured labia majora length, labia minora length, and clitoral hood length.
Finally, the scientists rated the complexity of the labia minora; they used the three categories of rugosity (smooth, moderate, marked) to do so. To prevent vaginal bias, the same person also conducted all of these measurements. The scientists later used this research to classify the contest’s entries into six different categories of “vulval morphology.”
A chart detailing the six classes is included below:
As far as methodology is concerned, a random assortment of entries was sent to each voter, who was then asked to rate the vulva pictured on a scale from 1 to 10. These voters were only able to rank one photo at a time, but could also vote on an unlimited number of entries. The scientists compiled 2,766,671 ratings from 134,707 contest voters.
“To reduce individual biases, we centered each voter’s ratings using their mean and standard deviation. This allowed us to reflect the preferences of voters on the same scale,” read the study .
According to the paper , each voter rated 21 photos, on average. Each vulva also received 15,285 votes, on average.
The study also found that “roughly 51% of voters preferred the first two classes of non-protruding, simple labia. The other 49% favored the four more complex vulva classes.”
“As expected from the rankings that we saw at the country and local levels, Class 1 vulvas are preferred over the others more often. But the combined percentages of voters who preferred more complex classes of vulvas far outweighed those who preferred the simplest style.”
The winners’ photos, however, were not included in the study—having been among the participants whose photos were not able to be considered. Moreover, the “doggy style” posture featured in these entries made it difficult for the scientists to complete the necessary measurements.
“Indeed, pictures depicting contest entrants in a doggy style position obtained ratings 2 points higher on average (p <0.001) than others. Other features, like piercings in the clitoral hood, didn’t affect the ratings,” read the study .
So basically, the “doggy style” photos generated “influential excitement” among the contest’s voters—an important competitive advantage for all future entrants to consider.
Photo via mislav-marohnic /Flickr (CC BY-ND 2.0)
‘Why does a website get more time off than me’: Social security website has business hours, sparking debate
‘House could have been full of roaches’: TikToker warns against buying used furniture, shows roach infestation in chair
‘A cashier leaked he was going to be buying people’s groceries and they all just showed’: Rumors of MrBeast showing up at grocery store lead to chaos
‘My luck right?’: Server accidentally charges her own card instead of customer’s card via tap to pay
By Yasmin Vought | 5:00am Jan 21, 2014
The Future Can’t Feed on Wonder Bread
Donald Earl Collins
Published on Oct 26, 2022 10:15PM EDT
Zero-Sum Covid
JiaJing Liu
Published on Oct 26, 2022 8:55PM EDT
I shyly sidled up to a pair of little Shih-Tzus
Kaitlin Chan
Published on Oct 26, 2022 11:20AM EDT
Homemade Infographic: A Two-Axis Analysis of Crime
Tom Scocca
Published on Oct 25, 2022 10:02PM EDT
No Princesses: Reflections On The Passing Of Sacheen Littlefeather
Myriam Gurba
Published on Oct 25, 2022 8:15PM EDT
What Are You Rehearsing in Your Dreams?
Tom Scocca
Published on Oct 24, 2022 11:33PM EDT
Those Who Refuse to Give Up the Night
Ken Layne
Published on Oct 24, 2022 11:21PM EDT
Every half block, there was another leftist marching band
Bill Lattanzi
Published on Oct 24, 2022 4:42PM EDT
Wordle Postgame Report
Tom Scocca
Published on Oct 24, 2022 4:40PM EDT
Thought of the Week
Thought of the Week
Published on Oct 21, 2022 6:17PM EDT
Tags:
body image
christianity
comics
discussion
masturbation
nuns
obscenity
private parts
sexuality
shame
Ulli Lust
youth
Comics
Tempo
Popula is a journalist-owned, journalist-run, ad-free publication with stories sourced from writers all over the world.
Receive weekly word of new stories, comics, and surprises from the Popula Publishing Partners!
Support Popula and HELP KEEP US FREE!
Email • RSS • Twitter • Join Us Email
RSS
Twitter
Join
Ulli Lust was born in 1967 in Vienna; moved to Berlin in 1995, where she now lives as a cartoonist. Her published work includes pieces of comics journalism featuring pointed observations on modern life as well as erotic-mythological poems. She runs the online publishing company www.electrocomics.com , which publishes e-books and online comics by an ever-increasing group of international cartoonists.
Ulli Lust, comics, Pussy and the Private Parts
Ulli Lust was born in 1967 in Vienna; moved to Berlin in 1995, where she now lives as a cartoonist. Her published work includes pieces of comics journalism featuring pointed observations on modern life as well as erotic-mythological poems. She runs the online publishing company www.electrocomics.com , which publishes e-books and online comics by an ever-increasing group of international cartoonists.
Popula is 100% ad-free, reader-supported journalism accountable only to you. Every dollar of your subscription goes straight to our work. Thank you for supporting Popula.
What made an 11-year-old child become a government storm-watcher?
Cate Blanchett conducts herself [ruthlessly]
Being a good child meant pledging allegiance to the flag, not laughing about a presidential chest wound.
Порно Теенс Хд
Порно Видео Оттрахал Зрелую Женщину Жестко
Смотреть Порно Видео Онлайн Бесплатно 2022