Policy where to buy coke
Policy where to buy cokePolicy where to buy coke
__________________________________
Policy where to buy coke
__________________________________
📍 Добро Пожаловать в Проверенный шоп.
📍 Отзывы и Гарантии! Работаем с 2021 года.
__________________________________
✅ ️Наши контакты (Telegram):✅ ️
✅ ️ ▲ ✅ ▲ ️✅ ▲ ️✅ ▲ ️✅ ▲ ✅ ️
__________________________________
⛔ ВНИМАНИЕ! ⛔
📍 ИСПОЛЬЗУЙТЕ ВПН (VPN), ЕСЛИ ССЫЛКА НЕ ОТКРЫВАЕТСЯ!
📍 В Телеграм переходить только по ссылке что выше! В поиске тг фейки!
__________________________________
Policy where to buy coke
This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The authentic versions of the relevant acts, including their preambles, are those published in the Official Journal of the European Union and available in EUR-Lex. Those official texts are directly accessible through the links embedded in this document. OJ L Corrigendum, OJ L , Corrigendum, OJ L , 2. Corrigendum, OJ L , 4. Corrigendum, OJ L , 6. Corrigendum, OJ L , 7. By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of the Member States may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, after having determined that the funds or economic resources concerned are:. By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of the Member States may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, if the following conditions are met:. By way of derogation from Article 2 and provided that a payment by a natural or legal person, entity or body listed in Annex I is due under a contract or agreement that was concluded by, or under an obligation that arose for the natural or legal person, entity or body concerned, before the date on which that natural or legal person, entity or body was included in Annex I, the competent authorities of the Member States may authorise, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, provided that the competent authority concerned has determined that:. By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources to a natural or legal person, entity or body listed in Annex I, after having determined that:. Article 2 shall not apply to funds or economic resources that are strictly necessary for the provision of electronic communication services by Union telecommunication operators, for the provision of associated facilities and services necessary for the operation, maintenance and security of such electronic communication services, in Russia, in Ukraine, in the Union, between Russia and the Union, and between Ukraine and the Union, and for data centre services in the Union. By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may authorise, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, the release of certain frozen economic resources, after having determined that:. Notwithstanding the applicable rules concerning reporting, confidentiality and professional secrecy, natural and legal persons, entities and bodies shall:. Natural or legal persons, entities or bodies listed in Annex I, shall:. No claims in connection with any contract or transaction the performance of which has been affected, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, by the measures imposed under this Regulation, including claims for indemnity or any other claim of this type, such as a claim for compensation or a claim under a guarantee, particularly a claim for extension or payment of a bond, guarantee or indemnity, particularly a financial guarantee or financial indemnity, of whatever form, shall be satisfied, if they are made by:. The Commission and the Member States shall inform each other of the measures taken under this Regulation and share any other relevant information at their disposal in connection with this Regulation, in particular information:. This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. List of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies referred to in Article 2. Member of the Russia State Council. POB: Vladimirovka a. He lobbied actively for the integration of Crimea into the Russian Federation. Berezovskiy was appointed commander of the Ukrainian Navy on 1 March but thereafter swore an oath to the Crimean armed forces, thereby breaking his oath to the Ukrainian Navy. He actively campaigned for Sevastopol to become a separate entity of the Russian Federation following a referendum on 16 March This included information on Euro-Maidan activists and human rights defenders of Crimea. He drew Vladimir Konstantinov into this endeavour, threatening him with dismissal. He publicly recognised that the MPs from Crimea were the initiators of inviting Russian soldiers to take over the Verkhovna Rada of Crimea. He was one of the first Crimean Leaders to ask in public for the annexation of Crimea to Russia. He continued to be a member of the Council and a member of the Committee on internal regulation and parliamentary affairs. On 10 October , by means of decree N SF, Ozerov was included in the temporary commission of the Federation Council on protection of state sovereignty and prevention of interference in the internal affairs of the Russian Federation. His mandate in the Federation Council expired in September Consultant of the Foundation Rospolitika since October Member of the Committee for federal issues, regional politics and the North of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation. Initiator of the bill allowing Russian Federation to admit in its composition, under the pretext of protection of Russian citizens, territories of a foreign country without the consent of that country or an international treaty. He led personally the demonstration in support of the use of Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine. Responsible for commanding Russian forces that have occupied Ukrainian sovereign territory. He was responsible for part of the Russian military presence in Crimea which is undermining the sovereignty of the Ukraine and assisted the Crimean authorities in preventing public demonstrations against moves towards a referendum and incorporation into Russia. SMD forces are deployed in Crimea. He is responsible for part of the Russian military presence in Crimea which is undermining the sovereignty of Ukraine and assisted the Crimean authorities in preventing public demonstrations against moves towards a referendum and incorporation into Russia. Currently employed by the Central apparatus of the Russian Ministry of Defence. Aide to the Minister of Defence since 19 January Publicly called for the annexation of Crimea. Former adviser to the President of the Russian Federation. Speaker of the Federation Council. On 1 March , publicly supported, in the Federation Council, the deployment of Russian forces in Ukraine. Former Speaker of the State Duma. Publicly supported the deployment of Russian forces in Ukraine. Publicly supported the Russia-Crimea reunification treaty and the related federal constitutional law. Central figure of the government propaganda supporting the deployment of Russian forces in Ukraine. On 26 September , with a Decree of the President of Russian Federation, he was dismissed from this post and from military service. Former Aide to the President of the Russian Federation. He was an organiser of the process in Crimea by which local Crimean communities were mobilised to stage actions undermining the Ukrainian authorities in Crimea. Chair of the Crimea Electoral Commission. Responsible under the Russian system for signing referendum results. In the capacity of Chair of the Crimea Electoral Commission he participated in the organization of the Russian presidential elections of 18 March and the regional and local elections of 8 September in the illegally annexed Crimea and Sevastopol, and thereby actively supported and implemented policies that undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Former Deputy in the State Duma. Former Deputy Prime Minister. Former non-permanent member of the Russian Security Council. Remains active in supporting separatist actions or policies. Honorary Consul of Nicaragua in Crimea since October Former Minister for Crimean Affairs. Member of the Security Council of the Russian Federation. Former Deputy Chairman of State Duma. Member of the Duma, head of the United Russia faction. Responsible for the massive deployment of Russian troops along the border with Ukraine and lack of de-escalation of the situation. Took part in the seizure of the building of the Luhansk regional office of the Security Service. Participated in the seizure and occupation of the regional administration in Donetsk in He took active part in the seizure of a number of State buildings in the Donetsk region. He was involved in incidents in Sloviansk. Organised, on 4 November , a Russian March in Moscow for Russian nationalists who support the separatists in eastern Ukraine. Responsible for overseeing the political integration of the annexed Ukrainian region of Crimea into the Russian Federation. In his senior position, holds responsibility for the deployment of Russian airborne forces in Crimea. Responsible for facilitating the adoption of legislation on the annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol into the Russian Federation. Former member of the Supreme Council of the United Russia party. Advisor to the Speaker of the Duma, Volodin. Former head of the Federal Migration Service office for Crimea. Responsible for the systematic and expedited issuance of Russian passports for the residents of Crimea. Responsible for the systematic and expedited issuance of Russian passports for the residents of Sevastopol. Ponomariov called on Vladimir Putin to send in Russian troops to protect the city and later asked him to supply weapons. One of the former leaders of the self-proclaimed militia of Horlivka. Former Deputy Chairperson of the Committee for International affairs, member of the Commission on the investigation on foreign interference in the internal affairs of the Russian Federation, member of the Committee for security and countering corruption of the State Duma of the Russian Federation. Former Ambassador in the diplomatic corps of the Russian Federation. Chairman of the Board of the Union of Volunteers of Donbas. Member of the State Duma since September He voted in favour of resolution No. Therefore, he is responsible for actions which undermine and threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Continues active support to the separatist actions in Eastern Ukraine. Responsible for commanding separatists in Eastern Ukraine fighting against the Ukrainian government forces. As a member of the Security Council, which provides advice on and coordinates national security affairs, he was involved in shaping the policy of the Russian Government threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Former permanent member of the Security Council of the Russian Federation. He remains chairman of the Supreme Council of the United Russia party and plenipotentiary representative of the Russian Federation in the Contact Group on settling the situation in Ukraine. He holds the position of Ambassador in the diplomatic corps of the Russian Federation. As a senior FSB officer Colonel-General , he heads a service responsible for overseeing intelligence operations and international activity. President of the Republic of Chechnya. Kadyrov made statements in support of the illegal annexation of Crimea and in support of the armed insurgency in Ukraine. In addition, on 1 June he expressed his readiness to send 74 Chechen volunteers to Ukraine if requested to do so. He requested Russian intervention in eastern Ukraine, including through the deployment of Russian peacekeeping forces. Gubarev was responsible for recruiting people for armed forces of separatists. Despite being arrested for threatening the territorial integrity of Ukraine, and subsequently released, he has continued to play a prominent role in separatist activities, thus undermining the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. In taking on and acting in this capacity she has therefore supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. In taking on and acting in this capacity, Berezin has therefore supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. In taking on and acting in this capacity he has therefore supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. In taking on and acting in this capacity, Zdriliuk has therefore supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. As first Deputy Chief of Staff of the Presidential Administration, he is responsible for instructing Russian media outlets to take a line favourable with the separatists in Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea, therefore supporting the destabilisation of Eastern Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea. Arkady Rotenberg is a prominent Russian businessman who has close personal ties to President Putin. In , Rotenberg led the annual list of government contracts in terms of value, after being awarded contracts worth RUB billion from the Russian Government. Many of these contracts were awarded without formal competitive processes. Similarly, in January , Stroygazmontazh was awarded the State contract worth RUB 17 billion for the construction of a railway line on the Kerch bridge, which again further undermines the territorial integrity of Ukraine. Owner of two companies, Mostotrest and Stroygazmontazh-Most, designated for their activities undermining Ukrainian sovereignty entities No 43 and 46 in this Annex. The Ukrainian Government has opened a criminal investigation into his alleged material and financial support to separatists. Therefore, Mr Malofeev is acting in support of the destabilisation of Eastern Ukraine. Mr Kovalchuk is a long-time acquaintance of President Putin. He is a co-founder of the so-called Ozero Dacha, a cooperative society bringing together an influential group of individuals around President Putin. He is benefiting from his links with Russian decision-makers. Since the illegal annexation of Crimea, Bank Rossiya has opened branches across Crimea and Sevastopol, thereby consolidating their integration into the Russian Federation. Through Bank Rossiya, Mr Kovalchuk also took control of Crimean wineries, vineyards and distilleries. Mr Shamalov is a long-time acquaintance of President Putin. He benefits from his links with Russian decision-makers. Kononov has therefore supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. He has, inter alia, stated that they will continue their fighting in the rest of the country. Rudenko has therefore supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. He has therefore supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Muradov has played an important role in consolidating Russian institutional control over Crimea since the illegal annexation. Sheremet played a key role in the organisation and implementation of the 16 March referendum in Crimea on unification with Russia. Elected on 18 September as a Duma deputy from the illegally annexed Crimean Peninsula and on 19 September as a Member of the State Duma, elected from the illegally annexed Autonomous Republic of Crimea. He subsequently voted in favour of the related decree. Former Deputy Speaker of the State Duma. Former head of the Republic of Dagestan. Former Advisor to the President of the Russian Federation. Thereby he has actively supported actions and implemented policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine. Member of the State Duma. He supported the annexation of Crimea and admitted that Russian Cossacks were actively engaged in the Ukrainian conflict on the side of the Moscow-backed separatists. He therefore supports actions and policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. First Deputy Speaker, State Duma. Former member of the State Duma. Former Deputy Speaker, State Duma. Major-general of the Russian Army. Former commander of the 76th airborne division which has been involved in the Russian military presence on the territory of Ukraine, notably during the illegal annexation of Crimea. He is benefiting from his links with the Russian President by being promoted to senior positions in State-controlled firms. Further to a decision of the Russian government, Technopromexport, a subsidiary of Rostec, is planning to build energy plants in Crimea thereby supporting its integration into the Russian Federation. Former member of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation. Member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs. Thereby, he has actively supported actions and implemented policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine. Continues to support and legitimise separatist policies in cooperation with separatist authorities. Supports actively actions or policies undermining the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. These elections were in breach of Ukrainian law and therefore illegal. In taking on and acting in this capacity, he has therefore actively supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine. In taking on and acting in this capacity, has actively supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine. In taking on and acting in this capacity, she has therefore actively supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine. Снежное, Донецкой области, Украина. In taking on and acting in this capacity, he has actively undermined the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. In this capacity, he has actively supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine. Former Deputy Minister of Defence and, in that capacity, involved in supporting the deployment of Russian troops in Ukraine. According to the present Russian Ministry of Defence structure, in that capacity he participated in shaping and implementing the policy of the Russian Government. These policies threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Holds a position of an Ambassador in the diplomatic corps of the Russian Federation. Former First Deputy Minister of Defence until 17 November and was, in that capacity, involved in supporting the deployment of Russian troops in Ukraine. According to the present Russian Ministry of Defence structure, in that capacity he participates in shaping and implementing the policy of the Russian Government. Former Commander of the Western Military District. Actively involved in shaping and implementing the military campaign of the Russian forces in Ukraine. According to the stated activities of the general staff, by exercising operational control over the armed forces, he was actively involved in shaping and implementing the Russian government policy threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. He has supported the annexation of Crimea in public statements, including on his profile on the United Russia Crimean branch website and a press article published on NTV website on 3 July He has admitted his personal involvement in the events of that led to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol, which he publicly supported, including in an interview published on gazetakrimea. Member of the State Duma, elected from the illegally annexed city of Sevastopol. He has publicly admitted his involvement in the events of that led to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol, which he publicly defended, including on his personal website and in an interview published on 21 February on nation-news. He has publicly admitted his involvement in the events of that led to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol, which he has publicly defended, including in an interview published on the gazetacrimea. She has been a member of the Supreme Council of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea since and as of March supported the integration of the illegally annexed Crimea and Sevastopol into the Russian Federation. She has defended the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol on numerous occasions in public statements, including interviews published on the c-pravda. He has publicly admitted, including in an interview published on ldpr-rk. This decision contributes to establishing an independent power supply for Crimea and Sevastopol as a means of supporting their separation from Ukraine, and undermines the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Former Head of Department in the Energy Ministry of the Russian Federation and responsible within the Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation for the development of electro-energetic projects in Crimea. These projects contribute to establishing an independent power supply for Crimea and Sevastopol as a means of supporting their separation from Ukraine, and undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. This contributes to establishing an independent power supply for Crimea and Sevastopol as a means of supporting their separation from Ukraine, and undermines the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. In this capacity, he has worked for further integration of the illegally annexed Crimean peninsula into the Russian Federation, and is as such responsible for actively supporting or implementing actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty, and independence of Ukraine. Deputy Chair of the Crimea Electoral Commission. In this capacity, she participated in the organisation of the Russian presidential elections of 18 March , regional and local elections of 8 September , and State Duma election in September in the illegally annexed Crimea and Sevastopol, and thereby actively supported and implemented policies that undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Secretary of the Crimea Electoral Commission. Former Chair of the Sevastopol Electoral Commission. In this capacity he participated in the organisation of the Russian presidential elections of 18 March in the illegally annexed Crimea and Sevastopol, and thereby actively supported and implemented policies that undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Head of the internal policy department of the administration of Novorossiysk since March In this capacity she participated in the organisation of the Russian presidential elections of 18 March in the illegally annexed Crimea and Sevastopol, and thereby actively supported and implemented policies that undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. In taking on and acting in this capacity, he actively supported and implemented actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine. In this capacity, he was responsible for actions of the coast guard naval fleet of the Russian Federation against Ukraine on 25 November which prevented access by Ukrainian vessels to their coast on the Sea of Azov, thereby undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine and undermining the security of Ukraine through the disruption of the movements and operability of Ukrainian naval vessels. Those actions also supported the consolidation of the illegal annexation of the Crimean peninsula into the Russian Federation. In this capacity, he participated in operations against Ukrainian ships and their crew during the actions of the Russian Federation against Ukraine on 25 November which prevented access by Ukrainian vessels to their coast on the Sea of Azov, thereby undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine and undermining the security of Ukraine through the disruption of the movements and operability of Ukrainian naval vessels. Those actions prevented access by Ukrainian vessels to their coast on the Sea of Azov, thereby undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine and undermining the security of Ukraine through the disruption of the movements and operability of Ukrainian naval vessels. He was in command of the vessel that actively participated in actions of the Russian Federation against Ukrainian vessels and their crew on 25 November which prevented access by Ukrainian vessels to their coast on the Sea of Azov, thereby undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine and undermining the security of Ukraine through the disruption of the movements and operability of Ukrainian naval vessels. He participated in operations against Ukrainian vessels during the actions of the Russian Federation against Ukrainian vessels and their crews on 25 November which prevented access by Ukrainian vessels to their coast on the Sea of Azov, thereby undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine and undermining the security of Ukraine through the disruption of the movements and operability of Ukrainian naval vessels. In this role, he was responsible for coordinating the actions of Russian Federation forces against Ukrainian vessels and their crews on 25 November which prevented access by Ukrainian vessels to their coast on the Sea of Azov, thereby undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine and undermining the security of Ukraine through the disruption of the movements and operability of Ukrainian naval vessels. Commander of the Southern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces, Army General and responsible for military forces in the region, including illegally annexed Crimea and Sevastopol. In this role, he was responsible for the actions of the Black Sea Fleet and other military forces of the Russian Federation against Ukraine on 25 November which prevented access by Ukrainian vessels to their coast on the Sea of Azov, thereby undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine and undermining the security of Ukraine through the disruption of the movements and operability of Ukrainian naval vessels. Former Head of the Sevastopol Electoral Commission. In that capacity, he participated in the organisation of the local elections in the illegally annexed City of Sevastopol on 8 September and thereby actively supported actions and implemented policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. In this capacity, she participated in the organisation of the local elections in the illegally annexed City of Sevastopol on 8 September and thereby actively supported actions and implemented policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Secretary of the Sevastopol Electoral Commission. In taking on and acting in this capacity, she has worked for further integration of the illegally annexed City of Sevastopol into the Russian Federation and thereby actively supported actions and implemented policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. In taking on and acting in this capacity, he has worked for further integration of the illegally annexed City of Sevastopol into the Russian Federation and thereby actively supported actions and implemented policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Therefore, he supports the consolidation of the illegally annexed Crimean peninsula into the Russian Federation, which in turn further undermines the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Former Deputy General Director for infrastructure projects at Stroigazmontazh SGM who since had supervised the construction of the bridge over the Kerch Strait including the railway part of the bridge connecting Russia and the illegally annexed Crimean peninsula. He took multiple biased decisions in politically motivated cases against opponents of the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol. He thereby actively supported actions and implemented policies that undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. He prosecuted the pro-Ukrainian activists oppressed for opposing the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula by the Russian Federation. He filed charges with a court in the Russian Federation against the Ukrainian citizens who had been forcibly transferred from the occupied Crimean Peninsula. He has been involved in politically motivated criminal investigations against the leaders of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People prosecuted for their active opposition to the illegal annexation of the Crimean Peninsula. He thereby actively supported actions and implemented policies, which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. He led FSB forces, which have intensified the oppression campaign against the opponents of the illegal occupation of the Crimean Peninsula by the Russian Federation. Address: 35 Marshala Zhukova St, App. She took multiple biased decisions in politically motivated cases against opponents of the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol. She thereby actively supported actions and implemented policies, which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Passport number, national ID number, other numbers of identity documents: 03 01 He has led the work of the criminal investigators, and thereby he actively supported actions and implemented policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Dimitriy Utkin, a former Russian military intelligence GRU officer, is the founder of the Wagner Group and responsible for coordinating and planning operations for the deployment of Wagner Group mercenaries in Ukraine. In his commanding position within the Wagner Group, he was personally present on the combat field in Ukraine coordinating and planning the activities of Wagner members. Given his commanding position, he is thus responsible for and has actively implemented actions which have undermined and threatened the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. He fought in Donbas in the separatist Steppe battalion, where he commanded a portable anti-aircraft missile complex platoon. He admitted that he personally shot down a Ukrainian helicopter and two Su aircraft while in Donbas. Thereby he actively supported actions and implemented policies, which undermine and threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Address: Possibly: Astrakhan, Kirovskiy rayon, Raskolnikova 11 app. He fought in Donbas for the pro-Russian separatist forces as a member of a portable anti-aircraft missile complex military unit within the pro-Russian separatist Steppe battalion which shot down an Ukrainian helicopter and two Su aircraft in Donbas. Furthermore, he voted in favour of resolution No. In taking on and acting in this capacity, she has worked for further integration of the illegally annexed City of Sevastopol into the Russian Federation. Furthermore, she voted in favour of resolution No. Thereby she has actively supported actions and implemented policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine. In taking on and acting in this capacity, she actively supported and implemented actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine. During the presidency of Viktor Yanukovych and thanks to the personal connection with a group of persons close to his father, he assembled an array of business interests and accumulated a great fortune. He still runs his business activities in the Donbass region controlled by the separatists groups, especially in the energy, coal, construction, banking and real estate sectors. Therefore, Oleksandr Yanukovych is responsible for supporting or implementing actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine and he conducted transactions with the separatist groups in the Donbas region of Ukraine. From until , Viktor Yanukovych was President of Ukraine. He pursued a pro-Russian policy when in office. A Ukrainian court found Viktor Yanukovych guilty of treason for having invited the Russian Federation to invade Ukraine. After being removed from power, he relocated to Russia, from where he has continued his activities aimed at destabilising Ukraine. He assisted in the Russian military interference in Ukraine by calling on the President of the Russian Federation to send Russian troops to Ukraine in March Viktor Yanukovych supported pro-Russian politicians who held public offices in occupied Crimea. In , a new pre-trial investigation in Ukraine was opened according to which Mr Viktor Yanukovych, together with two former Ministers of Defence, has purposefully reduced the defence capacity of Ukraine, particularly in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. He considers himself as the legitimate President of Ukraine and has consistently presented a pro-Russian stance in his public interventions. According to different sources, Mr Viktor Yanukovych has been part of a Russian special operation, aimed at replacing the Ukrainian President with him, during the first phases of the unprovoked illegal military aggression against Ukraine. Mr Serhiy Kurchenko is a Ukrainian businessman. With support from pro-Russia separatists, he took control of several large metallurgical, chemical and energy plants in the separatist-held areas of Donbas. He organised and benefitted from the illegal scheme of exporting Donbas coal to Russia and Europe despite EU sanctions. Mr Kurchenko helped large Russian companies and State-owned holdings to bypass EU restrictive measures by acting as their sub-contractor in the Russian-held territories. He has been an intermediary in Russian gas, fuel and electricity exports to the separatist-held parts of Donbas, which strengthened their independent energy supplies and undermined their economic integration with Ukraine. Moreover, he delivered fuel to the illegally occupied Crimean Peninsula. By doing so, he strengthened the independent power supplies of this territory. He also owns the largest oil depot on the Crimean Peninsula. He thereby benefitted from Russian decision-makers responsible for the annexation of Crimea and the destabilisation of Eastern Ukraine, conducted transactions with the separatist groups in the Donbas region of Ukraine, and actively supported actions and policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. He has made public comments about Crimea being and remaining Russian. Under his command and orders, Russian troops have held military drills in the illegally annexed Crimea and have been positioned at the border. He is ultimately responsible for any military action against Ukraine. He is therefore responsible for actively supporting and implementing actions and policies that undermine and threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, as well as stability and security in Ukraine. Anton Vaino also attends meetings on the socio-economic development of Crimea and Sevastopol. He is therefore responsible for actively supporting and implementing actions and policies that undermine and threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine as well as stability and security in Ukraine. In this capacity, he is responsible for Russian governmental policies about occupied Crimea, including providing water to Crimea and Sevastopol. He is therefore responsible for actions and policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, as well as stability and security in Ukraine. In his former capacity of Deputy Director of the Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation, Grigorenko was responsible for setting up new local tax legislation for the territory of Crimea following its annexation in He is therefore responsible for actions and policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, or stability or security in Ukraine. He is also responsible for providing financial and material support, and benefitting from Russian decision-makers responsible for the annexation of Crimea or the destabilisation of Eastern Ukraine. He has made public statements outlining the plans and priorities of the government of the Russian Federation concerning the economic development of Crimea and Sevastopol. As such, he is responsible for any maritime operation of the Russian navy, including in or to Ukraine. He is therefore responsible for actively supporting and implementing actions and policies that undermine and threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine as well as the stability or security in Ukraine. As such, he is responsible for naval operations in or to Ukraine. As such, he is responsible for any maritime operation in or to Ukraine through the Black Sea and for restricting the freedom of navigation in the Black Sea. He is therefore responsible for actively supporting and implementing actions and policies that undermine and threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, as well as the stability or security in Ukraine. As such, he is responsible for Russian ground operations in or to Ukraine. As such, he is responsible for air operations in or to Ukraine. She is the owner of other companies with links to his son. She is associated with Yevgeny Prigozhin, who is responsible for the deployment of Wagner Group mercenaries in Ukraine and for benefitting from large public contracts with the Russian Ministry of Defence following the illegal annexation of Crimea by Russia and occupation of Eastern Ukraine by Russia-backed separatists. She has therefore supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Denis Bortnikov is the son of, and as such is associated with, Alexander Bortnikov — Director of the Federal Security Service FSB and Permanent member of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, who is involved in shaping the policy of the Russian Government threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. He is therefore also supporting financially Russian decision-makers responsible for the annexation of Crimea and the destabilisation of Eastern Ukraine. He has made public statements supporting the annexation of Crimea and encouraging Russian citizens to vacation in Crimea. He is also associated with, and according to media reports is an owner of, a winery and a luxurious hotel in Crimea. He is therefore supporting actions and policies that undermine the territorial integrity of Ukraine and benefitting from the annexation of Crimea. In this capacity he made remarks stating that Russian would change budget rules to reflect an additional two million in population after the illegal annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation. He is therefore supporting actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Margarita Simonyan is a central figure of the Government propaganda. Through her function, she promoted a positive attitude to the annexation of Crimea and the actions of separatists in Donbas. Therefore, she supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. As a central figure of the government propaganda, she promoted the deployment of Russian forces in Ukraine. Solovyov is known for his extremely hostile attitude towards Ukraine and praise of the Russian government. Therefore, he is responsible for supporting actions or policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. He therefore actively supported and implemented actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine. Address of the reception office in the Russian Federation: 51 Lenina St. Telephone and fax numbers of the reception office in the Russian Federation: He is therefore responsible for supporting actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Central figure of the Government propaganda, he frequently takes position in favour of the annexation of Crimea. Therefore, he is responsible for supporting actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Function: prominent businessman, with close ties to Russian political leadership. He is the funder and unofficial head of the Wagner Group, a Russia-based unincorporated military entity, responsible for the deployment of Wagner Group mercenaries in Ukraine. He is thus responsible for and has actively implemented actions which have undermined and threatened the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. He has also been benefitting from Russian decision-makers responsible for the annexation of Crimea and the destabilisation of Eastern Ukraine. Member of the State Duma who voted in favour of the resolution No. Member of the State Duma since 19 September Propagandist on Russian television. Therefore, he has supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine. All funds and economic resources belonging to, owned, held or controlled by any natural or legal persons, entities or bodies, or natural or legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them, as listed in Annex I, shall be frozen. No funds or economic resources shall be made available, directly or indirectly, to or for the benefit of natural or legal persons, entities or bodies, or natural or legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them, as listed in Annex I. Article 2 2 shall not apply to funds or economic resources made available by organisations and agencies which are pillar-assessed by the Union and with which the Union has signed a financial framework partnership agreement on the basis of which the organisations and agencies act as humanitarian partners of the Union, provided that the provision of such funds or economic resources is necessary for exclusively humanitarian purposes in Ukraine. In cases not covered by paragraph 1 of this Article, and by way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities may grant specific or general authorisations, under such general or specific conditions as they deem appropriate, to release certain frozen funds or economic resources or to make available certain funds or economic resources, provided that the provision of such funds or economic resources is necessary for exclusively humanitarian purposes in Ukraine. In the absence of a negative decision, a request for information or a notification for additional time from the competent authority within 5 working days of the date of receipt of a request for authorisation under paragraph 2, the authorisation shall be considered granted. The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation granted under paragraphs 2 and 3 within 2 weeks of the authorisation. Annex I shall include: a. Annex I shall include the grounds for the listing of natural or legal persons, entities or bodies concerned. Annex I shall include, where available, information necessary to identify the natural or legal persons, entities or bodies concerned. With regard to natural persons, such information may include names including aliases, date and place of birth, nationality, passport and ID card numbers, gender, address, if known, and function or profession. With regard to legal persons, entities and bodies, such information may include names, place and date of registration, registration number and place of business. By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of the Member States may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, after having determined that the funds or economic resources concerned are: a. The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation granted under paragraph 1. By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of the Member States may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, if the following conditions are met: a. By way of derogation from Article 2 and provided that a payment by a natural or legal person, entity or body listed in Annex I is due under a contract or agreement that was concluded by, or under an obligation that arose for the natural or legal person, entity or body concerned, before the date on which that natural or legal person, entity or body was included in Annex I, the competent authorities of the Member States may authorise, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, provided that the competent authority concerned has determined that: a. The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation granted under paragraph 1, within two weeks of the authorisation. By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources belonging to the entities listed under entry numbers 79, 80, 81 and 82 in Annex I, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources to those entities, under such conditions as the competent authorities deem appropriate and after having determined that such funds or economic resources are necessary for the termination by 9 October , of operations, contracts, or other agreements, including correspondent banking relations, concluded with those entities before 8 April By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources belonging to the entity listed under entry number in Annex I, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources to that entity, under such conditions as the competent authorities deem appropriate and after having determined that such funds or economic resources are necessary for the termination by 22 August , of operations, contracts, or other agreements, including correspondent banking relations, concluded with that entity before 21 July By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources to the entity listed under entry number in Annex I, after having determined that the funds or economic resources are necessary for the completion, by 31 October , of an ongoing sale and transfer of proprietary rights directly or indirectly owned by that entity in a legal person, entity or body established in the Union. By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources belonging to the entity listed under entry number in Annex I, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources to that entity, under such conditions as the competent authorities deem appropriate and after having determined that such funds or economic resources are necessary for the termination by 7 January of operations, contracts or other agreements concluded with, or otherwise involving, that entity before 3 June The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation granted under this Article within two weeks of the authorisation. By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may authorise, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, the release of certain frozen economic resources, after having determined that: a. By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources belonging to the entities listed under entry numbers 53, 54, 55, 79, 80, 81, 82 and in Annex I, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources to those entities, under such conditions as the competent authorities deem appropriate and after having determined that such funds or economic resources are necessary for the purchase, import or transport of agricultural and food products, including wheat and fertilisers. Article 2 2 shall not prevent the crediting of the frozen accounts by financial or credit institutions that receive funds transferred by third parties onto the account of a listed natural or legal person, entity or body, provided that any additions to such accounts will also be frozen. The financial or credit institution shall inform the relevant competent authority about any such transaction without delay. Article 2 2 shall not apply to the addition to frozen accounts of: a. Notwithstanding the applicable rules concerning reporting, confidentiality and professional secrecy, natural and legal persons, entities and bodies shall: a. Any additional information received directly by the Commission shall be made available to the Member States. Any information provided or received in accordance with this Article shall be used only for the purposes for which it was provided or received. The competent authorities of the Member States, including enforcement authorities and administrators of official registers wherein natural persons, legal persons, entities and bodies as well as immovable or movable property are registered, shall process and exchange information. It shall be prohibited to participate, knowingly and intentionally, in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent the measures referred to in Article 2. Natural or legal persons, entities or bodies listed in Annex I, shall: a. Failure to comply with paragraph 2 shall be considered as participation, as referred to in paragraph 1, in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent the measures referred to in Article 2. The Member State concerned shall inform the Commission within two weeks of the information received pursuant to paragraph 2 a. The obligation in paragraph 2 a shall not apply until 1 January with regard to funds or economic resources located in a Member State that had laid down a similar reporting obligation under national law before 21 July The freezing of funds and economic resources or the refusal to make funds or economic resources available, carried out in good faith on the basis that such action is in accordance with this Regulation, shall not give rise to liability of any kind on the part of the natural or legal person or entity or body implementing it, or its directors or employees, unless it is proved that the funds and economic resources were frozen or withheld as a result of negligence. Actions by natural or legal persons, entities or bodies shall not give rise to any liability of any kind on their part if they did not know, and had no reasonable cause to suspect, that their actions would infringe the measures set out in this Regulation. No claims in connection with any contract or transaction the performance of which has been affected, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, by the measures imposed under this Regulation, including claims for indemnity or any other claim of this type, such as a claim for compensation or a claim under a guarantee, particularly a claim for extension or payment of a bond, guarantee or indemnity, particularly a financial guarantee or financial indemnity, of whatever form, shall be satisfied, if they are made by: a. In any proceedings for the enforcement of a claim, the onus of proving that satisfying the claim is not prohibited by paragraph 1 shall be on the natural or legal person, entity or body seeking the enforcement of that claim. This Article is without prejudice to the right of natural or legal persons, entities or bodies referred to in paragraph 1 to judicial review of the legality of the non-performance of contractual obligations in accordance with this Regulation. The Member States shall immediately inform each other and the Commission of any other relevant information at their disposal which might affect the effective implementation of this Regulation. Where the Council decides to subject a natural or legal person, entity or body to the measures referred to in Article 2, it shall amend Annex I accordingly. The Council shall communicate its decision, including the grounds for listing, to the natural or legal person, entity or body referred to in paragraph 1, either directly, if the address is known, or through the publication of a notice, providing such natural or legal person, entity or body with an opportunity to present observations. Where observations are submitted, or where substantial new evidence is presented, the Council shall review its decision and inform the natural or legal person, entity or body accordingly. The list in Annex I shall be reviewed at regular intervals and at least every 12 months. Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties, including as appropriate criminal penalties, applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Member States shall also provide for appropriate measures of confiscation of the proceeds of such infringements. Member States shall notify the rules referred to in paragraph 1 to the Commission without delay after the entry into force of this Regulation and shall notify it of any subsequent amendment. Member States shall designate the competent authorities referred to in this Regulation and identify them on the websites listed in Annex II. Member States shall notify the Commission of any changes in the addresses of their websites listed in Annex II. Member States shall notify the Commission of their competent authorities, including the contact details of those competent authorities, without delay after the entry into force of this Regulation, and shall notify it of any subsequent amendment. Where this Regulation sets out a requirement to notify, inform or otherwise communicate with the Commission, the address and other contact details to be used for such communication shall be those indicated in Annex II. Identifying information. Date of listing. Gender: male DOB: Gender: male DOB: 5. Gender: male DOB: 9. Gender: male DOB: 3. Gender: male DOB: 4. Gender: male DOB: 2. Since holds the position of General Director in a State corporation. Gender: male DOB: 1. Gender: female DOB: 7. Gender: female DOB: 9. Gender: male DOB: 7. Former Governor of the Ukrainian annexed city of Sevastopol. Head of Northern Ossetia since 19 September Gender: male DOB: 8. Gender: male DOB: 6. Remains an active military fighter of the LNR. Remains active in supporting separatist activity in eastern Ukraine. Advisor to the Governor of Sevastopol. Subject to criminal proceedings in Ukraine. Remains active in supporting separatist policies. Gender: female DOB: Prosecutor of the Republic of Adygea. Commander of Cossack forces. Former Member of the State Duma. Since 19 September , Governor of Khabarovsk Krai. Former Governor of the Krasnodar Krai. Former Minister of Agriculture of the Russian Federation. Gender: female DOB: 5. Gender: female DOB: possibly Petersburg, Russian Federation. Gender: male Possible DOB: Currently a member of the Central Election Commission. Listed as notary in city of Luhansk. Chairman of the Board of the Union of Compatriots. Gender: male; DOB: 1. Remains active in supporting LNR separatist structures. Registered as a notary in Luhansk. Continues to support and legitimise separatist policies. Бараниковка Беловодского района Луганской области, Украина. Currently employed by Rosatom. Former Deputy Minister of Defence. Former Deputy Chairperson of the Duma Committee on ethnic affairs. Member of the Duma Committee on international affairs. Former Member of the Duma Committee on Culture. Vice-Minister for Energy of the Russian Federation. Gender: male; DOB: Chief Federal Inspector of the Moscow region. Gender: female DOB: possibly: 21 April. Gender: Male DOB: Judge in the Kievskiy District Court in Simferopol. Chairman of the Kievskiy District Court in Simferopol. Gender: Male DOB: 6. Gender: Male DOB: 5. Gender: Male DOB: 1. Franko blvd. Gender: Female DOB: Judge of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Crimea. Member of the ruling United Russia party. Gender: female DOB: 8. DOB: DOB: 9. DOB: 2. DOB: 6. DOB: 4. DOB: 1. DOB: 7. DOB: 8. DOB: 5. DOB: 3.
Orange Soda
Амфетамина и метамфетамина при онкологических заболеваниях
Policy where to buy coke
Policy where to buy coke
Перевод «Coke» в англо-русском словаре
Италия Фоджа Купить онлайн закладку Кокс
Policy where to buy coke
Кокаин Италия Ливорно купить телеграм
Перевод «Coke» в англо-русском словаре
Policy where to buy coke
Соление грибов на зиму рецепты способы
Policy where to buy coke
Перевод «Coke» в англо-русском словаре
In accordance with the passport of production, approved The performance of each unit is determined depending on loading of raw materials and assortment, processed oil. Technical specifications'. Technical Specifications'. Unleaded gasoline. Domestic heating fuel TS Vacuum gas oil of the brand A type 1 TS 'Vacuum gas oil. Hydrocarbon gas GOST 'Gases hydrocarbon liquefied fuel for communal and domestic consumption. Total petroleum coke for aluminum industry TS 'Total petroleum coke for aluminum industry. Additional materials:. Product The list of services for refining of crude oil and or gas condensate In accordance with the passport of production, approved Technical Specifications' Quality specification 3. Technical specifications' Quality specification 5. Diesel fuel Technical specifications' 6. Technical specifications' Quality specification 9. Technical specifications' Technical specifications' Quality specification Fuel oil. Technical specifications' Quality specification Planned oil products: Benzene Paraxylene Additional materials: Application for the provision of services for refining of crude oil and or gas condensate. Unclaimed liquid and illiquid reserves. Keep up with the latest news. Subscribe newsletter! Newsletter subscribtion. Log in to profile. Password Forgot your password? Password recovery.
Policy where to buy coke
Orange Soda
Кокаин Лисаковск купить телеграм
Policy where to buy coke