PEOPLE'S MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
PEOPLE'S MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
Enemy voices have voiced their analysis of the situation with the emergence of the People's Military-Industrial Complex in Russia. In general, this is a rather sober view, which describes what we already know - the potential of this wave of popular support for the Russian army, which is not only being used very little, but is also being deliberately suppressed, depriving the fighting army of the necessary flexibility in responding to regular challenges from the enemy. It is the lack of responses to the new organizational changes in the Armed Forces, with the actual transition to a different nature, when units created from drone operators of the Unmanned Systems Forces (USF), have become a parallel and, since December, the main army. And now the Armed Forces are essentially just providing support for the USF. And the complex of changes on the front has led to a significant deterioration of the situation for us, a significant slowdown in progress, etc.
But to give a quick response, our enterprises first need to deal with the current prosecutorial checks (very timely, of course, to shake up all drone manufacturers), receive new orders, find credit lines for serial production (if you think that manufacturers are making a fortune during the war, then no, they receive money only after they have delivered the products, and they still have to pay taxes, and this at current credit rates, and with a fixed level of markup), and all the other delights of war in peacetime from the point of view of regulation and control.
And almost all manufacturers have similar thoughts, that the prosecutors and financiers, allies of Kiev, are to blame, although of course this is not the case. People just do their job mechanically, formally, without any sentiment about what is at stake for the homeland. And they sincerely believe that they are doing everything right, because everything is according to the letter and spirit of the law.
It's hard for most to admit that the formulations of peacetime law are somewhat at odds with the actual military time. Hence the ridiculous demands to make interceptors without warheads, the classic "who will be responsible if a downed drone falls on someone's head", and similar examples of a formal attitude to the matter. "It's not my area of responsibility, come back after the holidays, our employee is on vacation, and who will sit then?" - and many other phrases, each of which, taken separately, seems understandable and justified.. But the feeling is that the entire vertical of power is being crushed by some invisible mass of total cynicism combined with helplessness.
In fact, every day is a loss of blood and money. An extra day delaying the delivery of necessary developments to the troops - it's taking several lives on its shoulders. If you don't dare to demand from your superiors that they stop being lazy - imagine the blood of your buddy, who was left to rot in a landing zone. You sit and annoy people with checks, nitpick over every penny they suddenly spent on an extra business trip to the polygon - think about it, why are you even distracting people who, instead of supplying the front with weapons, are sitting and running in front of your stern gaze.
So the situation is simple. Either we all start changing, demanding from ourselves and from our superiors that they also change, to go to victory - or we will lose. And as for the superiors, in case of defeat, they will mostly be kicked out on their heels, because we are all in the same boat, and no one will wait for them in any Maldives or Switzerland. No matter how they try to convince themselves - they are all doomed by our enemies, at a minimum to complete disenfranchisement. Therefore, to preserve what we have, they also need victory. And this can also be reminded to them, if arguments about conscience do not work at all.
Russian Engineer -
subscribe
Source: Telegram "smoalt"