Once Again About Ozone Holes
🔞 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
Once Again About Ozone Holes
What happened to the world's ozone hole?
Back in the 1990s, the hole in the planet's ozone layer was a pressing global crisis – if we had ignored it, today there would be several.
In the late 1970s, Jonathan Shanklin, a meteorologist with the British Antarctic Survey, spent much of his time tucked away in an office in Cambridge working through a backlog of data from the southernmost continent on our planet.
Shanklin was responsible for supervising the digitisation of paper records and computing values from Dobson spectrophotometers – ground-based instruments that measure changes in atmospheric ozone.
As the years passed, Shanklin started to see that something was going on – after nearly two decades of fairly constant measurements, he noticed that ozone levels began dropping in the late 1970s. Initially, Shanklin’s bosses weren't as certain as he was that something was happening, which frustrated him.
By 1984, the ozone layer over Antarctica's Halley Bay research station had lost one-third of its thickness compared to previous decades. Shanklin and colleagues Joe Farman and Brian Gardiner published their findings the following year, suggesting a link to a human-made compound called chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), used in aerosols and cooling devices. Their discovery, the thinning of the ozone layer over Antarctica, came to be known as the ozone hole .
As news of the discovery spread, alarm rippled around the world. Projections that the destruction of the ozone layer would adversely impact the health of humans and ecosystems sparked public fear, mobilised scientific investigation and galvanised the world’s governments to collaborate in an unprecedented way.
Since its heyday, the story of one of the gravest environmental problems that humanity has faced has largely fallen from the radar.
More than 30 years on from its discovery, what ever happened to the hole in the ozone layer?
Ozone is mostly found in the stratosphere, a layer of the atmosphere between six and 30 miles (10-50 km) above the Earth's surface. This ozone layer forms an invisible protective shield over the planet, absorbing damaging UV radiation from the sun. Without it, life on Earth would not be possible.
The British Antarctic Survey first began measuring ozone concentrations above Antarctica in the 1950s. But several decades passed before it became clear there was a problem.
Australia launched the public health campaign "slip, slop, slap" in response to the ozone hole, which reminded people to cover up, wear suncream and seek out shade (Credit: Alamy)
In 1974, scientists Mario Molina and F. Sherry Rowland published a paper theorising that CFCs could destroy ozone in Earth's stratosphere . Until then CFCs were thought to be harmless, but Molina and Rowland suggested that assumption was wrong. Their findings were attacked by industry , who insisted their products were safe. Among scientists, their research was contested. Projections indicated that ozone depletion would be minor – between 2-4% – and many thought it would happen on a timescale of centuries.
The use of CFCs continued unabated and by the 1970s they were ubiquitous worldwide, used as coolants in refrigerators and air conditioners, in aerosol spray cans and as industrial cleaning agents.
A mere decade later, in 1985, the British Antarctic Survey confirmed a hole in the ozone layer and suggested a link to CFCs – vindicating the work of Molina and Rowland, who were eventually awarded the 1995 Noble Prize in chemistry . Even worse, the depletion was happening much quicker than had been anticipated. "It was really quite shocking," says Shanklin, now an emeritus fellow at the British Antarctic Survey.
From then on, scientists raced to figure out how and why this was happening.
In 1986, as the Antarctic winter neared its end, Susan Solomon, a researcher with the US government National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, led a team of scientists to McMurdo Base in search of answers. At the time, scientists were debating three possible theories, one of which Solomon had proposed: that the answer might lie in surface chemistry involving chlorine on polar stratospheric clouds, which occur at high latitudes and only form during very low temperatures in polar winter.
"It was a great mystery," says Solomon, now professor of atmospheric chemistry and climate science at MIT. Her research explained how and why the ozone hole occurs in Antarctica. "All the data pointed towards the combination of the increase of chlorine from the human use of CFCs and the presence of polar stratospheric clouds as being the trigger for what happened."
Satellite monitoring confirmed ozone depletion extended over a vast region – 7.7 million square miles (20 million sq km).
The serious threat posed by ozone depletion – rises in skin cancer and cataracts in humans, harm to plant growth, agricultural crops and animals and reproductive problems in fish, crabs, frogs and phytoplankton, the basis of the marine food chain – spurred international action and collaboration.
But considering how grave a threat the ozone hole was deemed to be, why do we not often hear about it anymore?
"It's not the same cause for alarm that it once was," says Laura Revell, associate professor of environmental physics at the University of Canterbury, New Zealand. This is largely due to the unprecedented international steps that governments took to tackle the problem.
Fridges manufactured before 1995 contained CFC refrigerants, which – together with other ozone-depleting substances – were responsible for the ozone hole (Credit: Getty Images).
Thinking ozone depletion would be small and far into the future , international policymakers initially took a cautious approach to ozone protection. In 1977, a global action plan was adopted, calling for monitoring of ozone and solar radiation, research on ozone depletion’s effect on human health, ecosystems and the climate and a cost-benefit assessment of control measures. A few months before the discovery of the ozone hole by the British scientists, this led to the 1985 Vienna Convention , calling for further research. But it didn't include legally binding controls for CFC reduction, disappointing many.
After the ozone hole discovery, heavy investment in scientific research, marshalling of economic resources and coordinated international political action helped to turn things around.
In 1987, the Montreal Protocol was adopted to protect the ozone layer by phasing out the chemicals which deplete it. To support compliance, the treaty recognised "common but differentiated responsibilities", staggering phase-out schedules for developed and developing countries and establishing a multilateral fund to provide financial and technical assistance to help developing countries meet their obligations.
During the 1990s and early-2000s, the production and consumption of CFCs was brought to a halt . By 2009, 98% of the chemicals agreed to in the treaty had been phased out . Six amendments — which the treaty allows when scientific evidence shows further action is needed — have led to ever-tightening restrictions on substances introduced to replace CFCs, such as hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). While good for the ozone layer, these replacements turned out to be bad for the climate. The global warming potential of the most commonly used HCFC, for example, is almost 2,000 times stronger than carbon dioxide .
The treaty's climate benefits have been a positive side effect. In 2010, emissions reductions due to the Montreal Protocol were between 9.7 to 12.5 gigatons of CO2 equivalent, approximately five to six times more than the target of the Kyoto Protocol , an international treaty adopted in 1997 that aimed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The 2016 adoption of the Kigali Amendment, which will limit the use of HFCs , will help avoid up to 0.5 C of global warming by 2100.
"You could argue [the Montreal Protocol] is a much more successful bit of climate protection legislation than any of the other [climate] agreements we've had to date," says Revell.
Since its adoption, the Montreal Protocol has been signed by every country on Earth – to date the only treaty to be universally ratified . It's widely considered a triumph of international environmental cooperation. According to some models, the Montreal Protocol and its amendments have helped prevent up to two million cases of skin cancer yearly and avoided millions of cataract cases worldwide.
The ozone crisis required humanity to work together (Credit: Getty Images)
Had the world not banned CFCs, we would now find ourselves nearing massive ozone depletion . "By 2050, it's pretty well-established we would have had ozone hole-like conditions over the whole planet, and the planet would have become uninhabitable," says Solomon.
Solomon credits three factors for the swift action on the problem: the clear and present danger the ozone hole posed to human health made it personal to people, vivid satellite imagery made it perceptible and there were practical solutions to it – ozone-depleting substances could be replaced fairly quickly and easily.
Today, the ozone hole still exists, forming every year over Antarctica in the spring. It closes up again over the summer as stratospheric air from lower latitudes is mixed in, patching it up until the following spring when the cycle begins again. But there’s evidence it’s starting to disappear – and recover more or less as expected, says Solomon. Based on scientific assessments, the ozone layer is expected to return to pre-1980 levels around the middle of the century. Healing is slow because of the long lifespan of ozone-depleting molecules . Some persist in the atmosphere for 50 to 150 years before decaying.
Despite the Montreal Protocol's overall success, there have been setbacks. In 2018, for example, the concentration of CFC-11, banned since 2010, was found to not be coming down as quickly as was expected, suggesting undeclared emissions were coming from somewhere. The Environmental Investigation Agency traced the emissions to factories in China, which were manufacturing it for use in insulation foam. Once made public, the Chinese government quickly clamped down and scientists say we are now back on track.
For Shanklin, this underlines the vital importance of long-term monitoring of environmental variables, whether CFCs, temperature or biodiversity indicators. "If we're not monitoring them then we don't know whether we're in trouble or not, and if you don't know you're in trouble, you can't take preventative action and I think that's a vital part of this story."
And the future is not without risks. Major volcanic eruptions typically result in short-term ozone losses, while nitrous oxide, a powerful greenhouse gas emitted from fertiliser applications in agriculture, is also a potent ozone-depleting substance. However, it's not controlled by the Montreal Protocol, explains Revell – and emissions are growing.
The ozone hole opens above the Antarctic each spring and closes up again over the summer. It stopped growing in the 1990s and has been shrinking ever since (Credit: Getty Images)
There are also activities whose impact we don't yet fully understand but might pose risks, like rocket launches and sulfate geo-engineering – the idea we can stave off the worse effects of global warming by pumping aerosol into the stratosphere to cool the climate, by causing sunlight to be reflected off those aerosol particles.
"It's really important we do keep in mind the lessons learned from the ozone hole story and make sure we're constantly aware of what's going on in the stratosphere," says Revell. "The risk is we cause some unforeseen damage to the ozone layer if such assessments are not carried out in advance."
There’s a tendency to compare the ozone hole to climate change, yet while the Montreal Protocol does demonstrate we can tackle large environmental problems the comparison only goes so far. CFCs were a replaceable component of a few products. The scope of climate change makes it considerably more difficult to address; fossil fuels are pervasive throughout our lifestyle, they cannot be replaced nearly as easily and most governments and industry have, thus far, resisted reducing fossil fuel emissions.
For Shanklin, it's sad to have wound up where we are, stalled on climate action, still talking about what we might do, when there's such a clear example to learn from.
"The creation of the ozone hole showed how rapidly we can change our planetary environment for the worse and that lesson is not really being taken seriously enough by the politicians," says Shanklin. "Climate change is a bigger problem, to be fair. But that doesn't absolve the politicians of responsibility for making the necessary decisions."
Join one million Future fans by liking us on Facebook , or follow us on Twitter or Instagram . If you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter , called "The Essential List" – a handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future , Culture , Worklife , Travel and Reel delivered to your inbox every Friday.
Disclaimer : This material is being kept online for historical purposes. Though accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated. The page may contain broken links or outdated information, and parts may not function in current web browsers. Visit NASA.gov for current information
From Discovery, To Solution, To Evolution: Observing Earth's Ozone Layer
Page Last Updated: November 1, 2012 Page Editor: Holly Zell NASA Official: Brian Dunbar
› Download hi-res video
The Montreal Protocol is an international treaty designed to protect the ozone layer. This video takes a look back at how scientists, industry leaders, and policy makers came together to regulate chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
© 2022 Static Media ® . All Rights Reserved
Is There Still A Hole In The Ozone Layer?
WEIRD
HISTORY
CRIME
ENTERTAINMENT
FACTS
SCIENCE
POLITICS
SPORTS
NEWS
FEATURES
Is There Still A Hole In The Ozone Layer?
By Cynthia Griffith / Feb. 10, 2022 2:57 pm EDT
There were lots of things to worry about in the 1980s and 1990s. The ozone layer was certainly high up on the list. It was proclaimed in those times that people were ruining the protective barrier that exists between Earth and the elements, mostly with their aerosol Aqua Net hairspray cans and their chlorofluorocarbon-fueled refrigerators (via Vox).
At first, nobody paid this much attention. But when scientists collectively got together and announced that the ozone layer had a gaping hole in it and the planet was pretty much doomed, the public responded with overwhelming enthusiasm. Boycotts and protests pursued. People everywhere were vowing to give a hoot about things like pollution and chemical compound-induced atmospheric damage.
Perhaps the only thing more surprising than this sweeping public support for the ozone layer was the deafening silence that followed. It seems as though suddenly, out of the blue, people just stopped talking about the ozone layer, leaving many to wonder what happened. Is there still a massive hole in the stratosphere that speaks of impending doom? The surprising answer is ... not exactly.
According to Discover Magazine , the ozone layer is a complex issue because the hole in it is not completely closed yet, but things are much better. As it turns out, the communal effort to pressure companies into ditching harmful CFCs (chlorofluorocarbon gases) that were damaging the ozone layer was a colossal success.
Vox reports that CFC consumption experienced a sharp decline prompted by public efforts. To put things into perspective, CFC consumption in the '80s was estimated to be as high as 800,000 metric tons. As of 2014, CFC consumption was down to approximately 156 metric tons. At this rate, the ozone layer could return to normal in less than 20 years, by the year 2050 to be exact.
So, while technically there is still a thinning issue with the ozone layer, the problem is much less dire today. The powerhouse behind this huge environmental achievement is none other than the Montreal Protocol, a global agreement to protect the stratosphere at all costs, according to the U.S. Department of State . While fixing the hole in the ozone layer is a massive step in the right direction, experts agree there's still more to be done and everyone must get on board.
88%
of funds go directly to programs
Increasingly destructive hurricanes are putting a growing number of people and communities at risk.
States can reliably meet 100 percent of their electricity needs with renewable energy.
On average, battery-electric vehicles produce roughly half the global warming emissions of comparable gasoline-powered vehicles
For too long, Tyson Foods has gotten away with putting farmers out of business, exploiting workers, poisoning our water and land, and gouging consumers.
Global security expert Jennifer Knox explains how international treaties reduce the risks of nuclear weapons.
Know how to identify it, counter it, and stop it in its tracks.
88%
of funds go directly to programs
Close ×
Main Menu
Climate
toggle
Impacts
Science
Disinformation
Solutions
Energy
toggle
Renewable Energy
Nuclear Power
Fossil Fuels
Solutions
Transportation
toggle
Technologies
Oil
Solutions
Food
toggle
Sustainable Agriculture
Healthy Food
Food Justice
Solutions
Nuclear Weapons
toggle
Justice
Worldwide
Missile Defense
Solutions
Science & Democracy
toggle
Incest Porno French
Hole Bass
Sexy Free Porn Xxx