Nudist Children Pictures

Nudist Children Pictures
Please note that low-quality images with no realistic educational use nor a purpose within the Wikimedia projects may be deleted . For further information, see Commons:Nudity .

A boy body.jpg
1,740 × 2,943; 846 KB

Child playing in sand.jpg
1,944 × 2,592; 1.36 MB

Harddick.jpg
2,518 × 3,582; 2.03 MB

Swim naked.jpg
4,032 × 3,024; 3.16 MB

Teenage small penis 2.jpg
3,024 × 4,032; 3.07 MB

Teenage small penis.jpg
4,032 × 3,024; 2.81 MB

Thamizhar.jpg
3,008 × 2,000; 3.44 MB

Woman with her kids.jpg
3,264 × 1,836; 1.38 MB

Qafár af Аҧсшәа bahasa ambon Acèh адыгабзэ адыгабзэ تونسي/Tûnsî تونسي Tûnsî Afrikaans Akan Gegë Alemannisch тÿштÿк алтай тил አማርኛ Pangcah aragonés Ænglisc अङ्गिका العربية ܐܪܡܝܐ mapudungun جازايرية الدارجة مصرى অসমীয়া American sign language asturianu Atikamekw авар Kotava अवधी Aymar aru azərbaycanca تۆرکجه башҡортса Bali Boarisch žemaitėška Batak Toba Batak Toba جهلسری بلوچی Bikol Central беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ български روچ کپتین بلوچی भोजपुरी भोजपुरी Bislama Banjar bamanankan বাংলা བོད་ཡིག বিষ্ণুপ্রিয়া মণিপুরী بختیاری brezhoneg Bráhuí bosanski Batak Mandailing Iriga Bicolano ᨅᨔ ᨕᨘᨁᨗ буряад català Chavacano de Zamboanga Mìng-dĕ̤ng-ngṳ̄ нохчийн Cebuano Chamoru Choctaw ᏣᎳᎩ Tsetsêhestâhese کوردی corsu Capiceño Nēhiyawēwin / ᓀᐦᐃᔭᐍᐏᐣ qırımtatarca къырымтатарджа (Кирилл)‎ qırımtatarca (Latin)‎ čeština kaszëbsczi словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ Чӑвашла Cymraeg dansk Deutsch Österreichisches Deutsch Schweizer Hochdeutsch Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ Thuɔŋjäŋ Zazaki dolnoserbski Dusun Bundu-liwan डोटेली ދިވެހިބަސް ཇོང་ཁ eʋegbe Emiliàn Ελληνικά emiliàn e rumagnòl English Canadian English British English Esperanto español español de América Latina español (formal)‎ eesti euskara estremeñu فارسی Fulfulde suomi meänkieli Võro Na Vosa Vakaviti kvääni føroyskt français français cadien arpetan Nordfriisk furlan Frysk Gaeilge Gagauz 贛語赣语（简体）‎ 贛語（繁體）‎ kriyòl gwiyannen Gàidhlig galego گیلکی Avañe'ẽ गोंयची कोंकणी / Gõychi Konknni गोंयची कोंकणी Gõychi Konknni Bahasa Hulontalo 𐌲𐌿𐍄𐌹𐍃𐌺 Ἀρχαία ἑλληνικὴ Alemannisch ગુજરાતી Gaelg Hausa 客家語/Hak-kâ-ngî Hawaiʻi עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Fiji Hindi Ilonggo Hiri Motu hrvatski Hunsrik hornjoserbsce Kreyòl ayisyen magyar magyar (formal)‎ հայերեն Արեւմտահայերէն Otsiherero interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Interlingue Igbo ꆇꉙ Iñupiak ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᑦ inuktitut Ilokano ГӀалгӀай Ido íslenska italiano ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᑦ/inuktitut 日本語 Patois la .lojban. jysk Jawa ქართული Qaraqalpaqsha Taqbaylit Адыгэбзэ Адыгэбзэ Kabɩyɛ Kabuverdianu Kongo کھوار Gĩkũyũ Kırmancki Kwanyama ဖၠုံလိက် қазақша قازاقشا (تٴوتە)‏ قازاقشا (جۇنگو)‏ қазақша (кирил)‎ қазақша (Қазақстан)‎ qazaqşa (latın)‎ qazaqşa (Türkïya)‎ kalaallisut ភាសាខ្មែរ ಕನ್ನಡ 한국어 조선말 Перем Коми Kanuri къарачай-малкъар Krio Kinaray-a karjal कॉशुर / کٲشُر کٲشُر कॉशुर Ripoarisch kurdî كوردي (عەرەبی)‏ kurdî (latînî)‎ къумукъ коми kernowek Кыргызча Latina Ladino Lëtzebuergesch лакку лезги Lingua Franca Nova Luganda Limburgs Ligure Līvõ kēļ لەکی Ladin lumbaart lingála ລາວ Silozi لۊری شومالی lietuvių latgaļu Mizo ţawng لئری دوٙمینی latviešu 文言 Lazuri मैथिली Basa Banyumasan мокшень Malagasy Ebon олык марий Māori Minangkabau македонски മലയാളം монгол ꯃꯤꯇꯩ ꯂꯣꯟ ဘာသာ မန် молдовеняскэ मराठी кырык мары Bahasa Melayu Malti Mvskoke Mirandés မြန်မာဘာသာ эрзянь مازِرونی Dorerin Naoero Nāhuatl Bân-lâm-gú Napulitano norsk bokmål Plattdüütsch Nedersaksies नेपाली नेपाल भाषा Oshiwambo Niuē Nederlands Nederlands (informeel)‎ norsk nynorsk norsk ᨣᩴᩤᨾᩮᩥᩬᨦ Novial ߒߞߏ Nouormand Sesotho sa Leboa Diné bizaad Chi-Chewa Nyunga occitan Livvinkarjala Oromoo ଓଡ଼ିଆ Ирон لسان توركى ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Pangasinan Kapampangan Papiamentu Picard Deitsch Plautdietsch Pälzisch पालि Norfuk / Pitkern polski Piemontèis پنجابی Ποντιακά Prūsiskan پښتو português português do Brasil Runa Simi Runa shimi Rumagnôl Tarifit rumantsch kaalengo tšimb romani čhib Kirundi română armãneashti tarandíne русский русиньскый armãneashti Vlăheşte Влахесте Vlăheşte Kinyarwanda मारवाड़ी संस्कृतम् саха тыла ᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲᱤ sardu sicilianu Scots سنڌي Sassaresu کوردی خوارگ davvisámegiella Cmique Itom Koyraboro Senni Sängö žemaitėška srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Tašlḥiyt/ⵜⴰⵛⵍⵃⵉⵜ Tašlḥiyt ⵜⴰⵛⵍⵃⵉⵜ ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး tacawit සිංහල Simple English Кӣллт са̄мь кӣлл bidumsámegiella ubmejesámiengiälla slovenčina سرائیکی سرائیکی slovenščina Schläsch Gagana Samoa åarjelsaemien julevsámegiella anarâškielâ sääʹmǩiõll chiShona Soomaaliga shqip српски / srpski српски (ћирилица)‎ srpski (latinica)‎ Sranantongo mbia cheë SiSwati Sesotho Seeltersk себертатар Sunda svenska Kiswahili ślůnski Sakizaya தமிழ் Tayal ತುಳು తెలుగు tetun тоҷикӣ тоҷикӣ tojikī ไทย ትግርኛ Türkmençe Tagalog толышә зывон Setswana lea faka-Tonga Tok Pisin Türkçe Ṫuroyo Seediq Xitsonga татарча/tatarça татарча tatarça chiTumbuka Twi reo tahiti тыва дыл ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ удмурт ئۇيغۇرچە / Uyghurche ئۇيغۇرچە Uyghurche українська اردو oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ўзбекча oʻzbekcha Tshivenda vèneto vepsän kel’ Tiếng Việt West-Vlams Mainfränkisch Volapük Vaďďa Võro walon Winaray Wolof 吴语 хальмг isiXhosa მარგალური saisiyat ייִדיש Yorùbá 粵語 Vahcuengh Zeêuws ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ ⵜⴰⵏⴰⵡⴰⵢⵜ 中文文言中文（中国大陆）‎ 中文（简体）‎ 中文（繁體）‎ 中文（香港）‎ Bân-lâm-gú 中文（澳門）‎ 中文（马来西亚）‎ 中文（新加坡）‎ 中文（台灣）‎ 粵語 isiZulu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

^ Jump up to: a b Cite error: The named reference doj1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page ).
^ Barbaree, H. E., and Seto, M. C. (1997). "Pedophilia: Assessment and Treatment. Sexual Deviance: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment." 175-193.

^ Howells, K. (1981). "Adult sexual interest in children: Considerations relevant to theories of aetiology," Adult sexual interest in children. 55-94.

The word('s) 'men' / 'man' are used in this article in places where it should be written 'offenders' 'people' '([child]porn)viewers' etc somebody should change the wording here so this article so it isn't biased against men. 217.132.95.133 ( talk ) 15:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

I'm getting sick and tired of reading this article. We need to kick Jack-a-roe out of here. He has turned this place into nothing but propaganda and a sounding board for his own journalistic opinions. When real examples are given which contradict his editorializing, he marginalized them with his catch-all justification by saying "Oh well that example is such a small percentage. " Jack-a-roe cannot give a single citation to a single legal document making any kind of reference to "a depiction of child abuse". Yet he continues to demand that is how it is defined! There is no academic or legal accuracy to what he posts here.

I think what this article needs to emphasize is that the laws in English-speaking nations (the UK-Australia-USA-Canada nexus) are no longer even considering any kind of abuse whatsoever. And it goes deeper than that now. The legal language defining child pornography no longer even makes references to what actually appears in the material. Rather they are tending towards definitions which are characterized by how the material is consumed by the end-consumer. The current laws in the UK are the most liberal in this extent. What their legal documents are doing now is that they go on for pages trying to build up arguments about how the person in possession of the material is handling it. Just to give an example; a single nude photograph of a child by Sally Mann will not get you charged with a crime. Visiting a website about nudist colonies a single time is not grounds for prosecution. However, if you show regular, repeated visits to a nudist website - that could be used as "evidence" that you were going there for pornographic reasons. Also, if you have 2 gigabytes (or so) of photos of nudist colonies, the court could use the sheer size of your stash as "evidence" that you were accumulating this for pornographic reasons. I could actually give citations to this. One citation I would include is the recent legislation in the UK involving so-called Extreme pornography . I invite anyone to read the legal document defining Extreme Pornography and you will see that my depiction of the laws in the UK above is accurate. paros ( talk ) 16:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

There sould maybe be a special entry for Canada, since there was quite a bit of debate in the country about the tolerance for the practice in BC courts. Some politicians have even been attacked as pro-child pornography, especially members of the NDP and the Liberal Party. [1] [2] ADM ( talk ) 12:06, 18 April 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

I've removed numerous references that implied causality with sex offending, which were not supported by the sources Andrewjlockley ( talk ) 10:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

This is not vandalism. Andrewjlockley ( talk ) 00:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

The maximum penalty in Australia is not 10 years, this refers only to the state of Queensland's laws. In NSW and other states its 5 years for distributions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.137.193 ( talk ) 07:31, 10 June 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Could someone please completely rewrite this article, better still start again from scratch. Wikipedia is NOT a propaganda vehicle. Someone is trying to make it so. If I want to read propaganda I go out and buy a daily newspaper. Get rid of this rubbish. Wikipedia should be setting the standard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.143.61.142 ( talk ) 16:54, 5 April 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Child pornography is both a legal and a social term referring in most incarnations to the visual recording of sexual acts involving children . Most jurisdictions have in some way or another a legal prohibition on either the production or spread of child pornography. The controversial nature of children and sex in most parts of the world make the definition of child pornography vary widely in different jurisdictions, with some holding that child pornography is simply the visual recording of sexual acts involving parties below the age of consent. And others holding different age limits for consent to sexual acts and partaking in pornography.

In both common usage and for research purposes, the word "child" in the phrase "child pornography" refers to prepubescent children, and does not refer to post-puberty teenagers . However, legal definitions of child pornography can refer to a wider range of material, including anyone under the legal age , or fictional images, according to jurisdiction [1] , and enforcement of such can vary even more between jurisdictions. Most possessors of child pornography who are arrested are found to possess images of prepubescent children; possessors of pornographic images of post-puberty minors are less likely to be prosecuted, even though those images also fall within the statutes. [1]

The majority world consensus is that child pornography is a form of sexual abuse of children. However the controversial nature of the subject and the high moral prominence makes a scientific assessment difficult and often researches regarding the effects of various legal definitions of child pornography on the children involved are ultimately contradicting. Child pornography is viewed prominently but not exclusively by those meeting the medical criteria for the paraphilic disorder paedophilia . [2] [3]

It's clear, neutral, all parties had their share, it uses only reliable sources and just shows the facts, not a view. Rajakhr ( talk ) 18:37, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

The goal of prohibition of child porn is ostensibly to protect children. Nobody argues with protecting children, but people argue on and on about what is and isn't child porn. I want something more concrete. I would like to know what the cost of protecting children is. How much is spent? How many children are "saved"? How many adults are culled from civilized population and subjected to imprisonment and civil death in furtherance of this goal? How many children are culled from civilized population and subjected to imprisonment and civil death in furtherance of this goal when the laws are applied to them, like with the recent "sexting" scandals? I suspect that this is turning into a repeat of the war on drugs , with similarly flaccid results, but I wonder if anyone has any facts to show for sure one way or the other? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.169.54.203 ( talk ) 05:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Child porn only applies to images, right? Because I've seen many written stories involving children as young as five. Please cite an actual US law in your answer. 75.118.170.35 ( talk ) 23:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

How does law treat naturist movement in terms of possession and taping of nude male and female children supposedly enjoying nature. They often are found to be in company their parents and other guardians. They regulat picture themselves including children in nude. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.238.79.97 ( talk ) 18:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Would this be a good source for information? Or moreso, the study it is talking about, if there's a copy of said study that could be translated into English? Tyciol ( talk ) 04:59, 18 July 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Please note that the archives of this discussion suddenly jump from Archive_3 to Archive_10. This means that the two latest archives (10 & 11), which contain very valuable discussions, are currently orphaned!

Someone who knows how to fix these, please do it! 94.222.8.151 ( talk ) 03:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

I think a section may be dedicated to the reasons for special emphasis on child porn when pornography itself is not viewed as serious offence especially in the west. The social and legal background for this distinction culled out for child porn as opposed to porn in general.

The article fails to cover the treatment of child porn and porn in the middle east. How is pornography in general in middle east and eastern and non white countries? ANd how is child porn viewed by these countries? Is it viewed at par with porn or is it viewed as a form of aggravated offence and anti social behaviour?

This section important since child porn is a frequent topic in the western world in comparison with non western countries. Child pornography in european countries like france and nordic countries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.238.79.97 ( talk ) 18:28, 23 July 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

The article ought to indicate to what extent the creation of child pornography is motivated by people of a homosexual orientation. Given that gay pornography is a prominent sector in pornography in general, it is quite probable that this causal relation also applies to the criminalized sector of child pornography. ADM ( talk ) 03:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Saw someone got banned few years ago for asking this, but he did seem to be insisting on there being little girls.
How about a picture of an FBI raid or something like that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.103.163.16 ( talk ) 05:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Correct me if im wrong but doesnt legal definition in the US (or some of the states) cover any images depicting nude children with the intent of pornography as child porn, I remember reading about a guy who was put on trial for having two thumbnail images on his computer that showed nude underage persons(his last name was vosbergh or something. Ill check out the five (that many is kind of suspicious to me) sources for this. Scotty Zebulon ( talk ) 20:21, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

In the United Kingdom , it is illegal to take, make, distribute, show or possess an indecent image of a child. Accessing an indecent image is considered to be "making" the image, meaning that a defendant can be charged under the Protection of Children Act if they accessed an image without saving it.
I fail to see how it can be shown that someone accessed an image if they didn't save it. Unless they were "browsing" it in which case their browser automatically saved it. In either case a saved or recovered image has to exist for evidence as isp logs or even surveilance are not enough to convict or even lawfully arrest a person. Biofase flame | stalk 17:27, 14 August 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

i have heard in lectures and read in some texts (mostly non-english) that people battling this issue would prefer a term like "documentation of child sexual abuse" (or similar), can anyone confirm/correct this and if so i think it could be significant enough to mention in the article.. any thoughts? -- vike ( talk ) 05:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

I found myself rewriting the beginning of the simple.wikipedia.org article on the subject - RFC (specifically around the ref:s) and please expand -- vike ( talk ) 08:32, 15 August 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Due to ADM's new flurry of spinoff "in location" articles, I think it would be appropriate to redirect this to Child pornography#Legal status since that's where the list of legal issues is, with links to those regions which have articles at the moment. If anyone seconds that then please take the initiative, as I have agreed not to create them anymore. Tyciol ( talk ) 06:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

The citation ends up leading to a very unreliable Internet Watch Foundation annual report- which actually only says how many more sites were reported to them, which logically would go up rapidly as they grew, rather than the assumption that none of these sites existed in the first place and thus the industry must be expanding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.163.181.104 ( talk ) 21:11, 3 December 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Under the legal status, subsection for Philippines, the description does not follow the convention of explaining the current legal status in that country. Instead it just talks about some incidents in the 1970's by american GI's. Does not seem very precise or on topic for the stated subsection. I'd recommend it be rewritten.-- 68.51.72.144 ( talk ) 01:25, 24 October 2009 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Just because a piece of data appeared in a peer-reviewed journal doesn't mean it's automatically a reliable source. For example, the data that was published saying that post-pubescent children images tend not to be prosecuted is cited by Wells Finkelhor, et al. from a paper published in 1989. It is unacceptable to report in an encyclopedia article information that was gathered twenty years ago. It's obvious child pornography has changed vastly since then. Please delete this statement until you find updated info.

This brings up another point. Yes Final Report said child pornography is child rape and is child sexual abuse. No one has still proved that either Final Report or the statement that child pornography is child rape is an objective point of view. Carbon copying that into an article and slapping on citation marks doesn't make it objective. True it is commonly associated as child sexual abuse and the visual evidence of rape. That is not what either Final Report or Mr. Tate said and the artile makes no mention to either of them. Further, it is already certain that child porn cannot be definitively and only the visual depictions of child rape. Read any legal definition of child porn, nowhere will you find where it says it must include nonconsent or rape of any kind.

Pedophiles are not the only collectors of child pornography. Again with the reliable sources. This is inaccurate. Pedophilia refers to an adult attraction to pre-pubescent children. Child pornography encompasses generally up to adolescence. An adult or middle aged man att
Lil Jon Get Nasty Get Freaky
Nudists Big Tits
Porno Missionary Orgasm

Nudist Children Pictures

Report Page