Nationalists vs Nationalists

This article as I mentioned before will deal with events in Ukraine, therefore controversial, especially if you are personally involved in the issue. Well, I don't want to expand too much about my position on the conflict in this article, I will do that in another article, in general, I think it is a multifaceted conflict mainly between nationalists, there are hidden interests and third parties supporting the killing on both sides, in general I would not say it is a pro-white conflict, just nationalist, this is important to understand that from a certain point the interests of nationalists and the pro-white stance diverge.

In general I think the community has done a good job of staying away from supporting one nationalist or another, it's not our conflict so I'm glad to see that the stance of the majority who are not involved in the conflict is "whites killing whites". Yes of course you will see many people including myself posting a lot of content from Ukrainian groups, after all I doubt there is a country today with a greater number of activists and of such high quality with both nationalist and genuinely pro-white stances and quite nice symbology.

Well, having cleared this up, this article will deal with what I have read in many channels and chats on the pro-Ukrainian side, and which has surprised me, after the death of Yegor Prosvirnin, a Russian journalist who apart from being fat was a Russian nationalist. Well, as it is normal after the death of a public figure one has to review his works and statements, what surprised me about all this is not a search for articles about the conflict to criticize his position, but the part where many focused on the Ukrainian side is when the journalist interviewed the Slavist nationalist Alexei Milchakov.

Who is Alexei Milchakov? Well, in a nutshell, he is a pro-Russian Slavic nationalist, an intelligent man with a university education in architecture if I remember correctly, not the typical nationalist gopnik you find in the football stands. About his life before the Ukrainian war it is worth noting that as a young man he ritualistically ate a puppy dog for esoteric pagan reasons or something like that.... Later he has shown regret for doing this. This fact about his "diet" apart from being interesting to say the least in itself is important for what I will elaborate in the article.

When the war started he formed a like-minded group and headed into battle, his group "Rusich" of about twenty members at first, was integrated into the larger Rapid Response Group "Batman", today we can assume that the majority of the group unlike other units were highly trained personnel many of Russian origin, possibly special forces. About Rusich's stance in the war I have to say that it is one of the sanest we have heard from the groups involved, in the fervour of the early days, they went, they did an excellent combat job and when they saw that this conflict was a game between let's say oligarchs and that there was no real intention to create Novorussia, a home for ethnic Russians and Slavs ... they left disgusted with it to have adventures elsewhere.

https://ok.ru/video/6945178927

Well, what is this excellent combat work? One in particular stands out, the destruction of an entire detachment of the Aidar volunteer battalion, 3 or 4 dozen members, as we can see on the video above. Who are Aidar? A battalion of Ukrainian nationalist volunteers that emerged at the beginning of the conflict, to describe them as totally pro-white I think it would be a mistake, yes they have some references to National Socialism, but they are mere references when it comes down to it, they are simply nationalists and the motivation for the use of this aesthetic is in many cases that the NS fought against Russia in the form of the Soviet Union. And this is one of the main points of the article, at the key moment, we will see divisions between what it is to be pro-white and what it is to be nationalist.

In the case of Ukrainian nationalists this is clearly seen in the glorification of the figure of Stepan Bandera, a chauvinist figure if ever there was one, his ideology was Ukraine, he is a perfect Ukrainian nationalist, he massacred civilian Poles in the most brutal ways to expand Ukraine, and he also fought for a while against the NS because Bandera wanted simply pro-Ukrainian policies and the NS had different plans, this fact, that Bandera fought against the National Socialists is a recurrent thing among the Ukrainian nationalist ranks to make a clear difference between the "Nazis" and the brave Ukrainian nationalists, you will see this kind of comments many times, especially when they try to distance themselves from the NS to gain NATO support.

Another issue is for example the glorification of anything that goes against the enemy, this year at the traditional Azov and National Corps march in Mariupol on June 20th we saw Chechen Islamist flags leading the march, well, what about that? Are you genuinely National Socialist or do you just use any symbolism that provokes the Muscovites? The worst thing about this is not the simple symbolism and glorification it is the inviting of Chechen Islamist terrorists, relatives of those who then cut people's heads off in France or kill people in Vienna to fight with you in your own units, yes Putin does, but Putin is just another oligarch, he is not trying to say he is the saviour of the white race or even NS and anyone who believes that is stupid.

Well this is one of the main points I wanted to address with the article the differences between chauvinistic nationalism and pro-white stances.

The other point is the hypocrisy of these same nationalists that when they are in the East of their country they keep calling Russians Mongols despite sharing basically the same DNA, use all the existing chauvinist tactics, then in the centre and west of the country they will go on to glorify the figure of Stepan Bandera, be it his fight against communists or against the wehrmacht, and then when these same nationalists have to deal with the rest of the European nations they will talk about white unity, no to chauvinism and more, just hypocrisy.

Another point and the last one to address is simply a certain disgust I feel for radicalism for radicalism's sake, excessive and senseless misanthropy, glorification of terrorism, death, killing, destruction for destruction's sake.These kinds of people in Eastern Europe have concentrated in Ukraine, some are not Ukrainian, but Russians and Belarusians, that is something important to note and in some cases they are different from the nationalists and sometimes even at odds, but I would not define this group as either pro-white, the fact that they are in Ukraine being Russians or Belarusians is that today it is the place with the least repression for them, after the events of 2014 the persecution against activists not strictly pro-Putin or useful for him has intensified a lot, this also must be said. My disgust with this group comes from the following, you claim to be radical, you take pride in killings and satanism, you criticise Christians but you don't seem to be a believing pagan either, you are just angry at the world and like to provoke, you are a heretic and that's it, you are not a pagan or even an atheist, just heretical and satanist and shit alike because it is the most anti-social and provocative thing to do. And you radical misanthrope cry about how brutal the Rusich boys were for killing Ukrainian nationalists, posing in pictures with their corpses and because Alexei ate a dog when he was a teenager, but hey, weren't you the devil incarnate?

Rusich's boys acted in a war-like action, you play with fire and you can get burned as the saying goes, it could have been the reverse situation. No civilians were hurt, I don't see the problem then and I find it funny that these profiles comment on how terrible and inhumane Rusich was.

The other point is the glorification of war and death that is seen by radical profiles, my channel included maybe sometimes. I have uploaded with this article quite graphic material, as you can see, war is not a nice thing and it is rarely heroic, keep this in mind next time you want it without thinking about consequences and above all, behave rationally and stop praising terrorists of whatever sign they are, killing innocents is never a positive thing, put aside your anti-constructive radicalism of a teenager angry with the world.