Nasty Ferr

Nasty Ferr
Your browser isn’t supported anymore. Update it to get the best YouTube experience and our latest features. Learn more

This website no longer supports Internet Explorer, which is now an outdated browser. For the best experience and your security, please visit
us using a different browser.

Social Links for Asia Grace

View Author Archive

email the author

Get author RSS feed

captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected
Error Code: MEDIA_ERR_SRC_NOT_SUPPORTED
No compatible source was found for this media.
Session ID: 2022-09-06:812aebd03bed2083a6029b8a Player Element ID: nyp-brightcove-player-1
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset restore all settings to the default values Done

Filed under

cleaning

instagram

life hacks

twitter

viral videos

9/6/22

This story has been shared 199,328 times.
199,328

This story has been shared 118,210 times.
118,210

This story has been shared 98,244 times.
98,244

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

LinkedIn

Email

YouTube

Thanks for contacting us. We've received your submission.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
This toilet “cleaning” trick is sick — and not in a good way.
Potty-mouthed social media critics are threatening “violence” over a newly viral “cleaning hack” video.
The clip, which has racked up 3.5 million views on Instagram, features an unidentifiable woman removing a toilet seat to wash it in the dishwasher along with drinking cups, food bowls and other eating utensils.
“Y’all I’m about to get violent cuz WTF,” exclaimed an outraged Twitter user alongside visuals of the hack.
“If you invite me over for dinner and I see your toilet seat in the dishwasher I’m turning around and never coming back,” vowed another .
“Putting your toilet seat in the dishwasher is diabolical behavior. Do better,” another scolded.
The clip — which was originally shared by Instagram influencers Janelle Flom and Kate Heintzelman — racked up more than 10,000 comments from equally grossed-out onlookers who flooded their post with rebuking remarks and the “vomit” emoji.
“No. The water [in a dishwasher] doesn’t get anywhere near hot enough to sterilize it, or the dishwasher afterward,” penned a perturbed scolder.
“Nasty AF,” wrote another, who added a series of emojis spewing green chunks.
“This is why I don’t eat at everyone’s home,” said another.
Flom and Heintzelman did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment.
However, despite the stomach-churning thought of co-mingling the germs from a pooper-topper with a dinner plate, in 2016, microbiologist David Coil from the University of California at Davis found that a spoonful of dirt consists of “more bacteria” than a toilet seat.
Coil has swabbed toilet seats “on multiple occasions,” he told the Washington Post . “And I’ve found nothing too exciting.”
And Australia-based leading consumer advocacy group, Choice , conducted a 2021 study on items that should and should not be scrubbed in the dishwasher — including computer keyboards, Lego pieces, fish and, of course, toilet seats.
“While we definitely don’t recommend cleaning your toilet seat in the dishwasher, if you absolutely must, then you’ll want to load it correctly to make sure it gets clean,” the analysts advised .
However, while the sanitary properties of their hack remain questionable, some online allies revealed that they, too, don’t see the harm in cleaning the crapper and cutlery together.
“Knowing how often I clean my bathroom I wouldn’t mind doing this. I’d still clean it before putting it in there. I also don’t use my dishwasher, I hand wash mine so I really don’t see a problem. If yall dirty asf just say that,” tweeted a supporter of the movement.
“Throw a tide pod in there and it’s ALL fine,” said another.

The SNP ferries fiasco has taken another nasty turn
The ferries fiasco has so far wasted at least £140 million
Topics in this article Scotland Politics
It started as farce but is quickly turning into something more ugly, perhaps even sinister. When Audit Scotland last week released a report shining a light on the SNP's costly ferries fiasco, all the talk was of painted on windows and a comical 'launch' event for an unfinished ship. It was Carry on Up the Clyde but with a rather dull cast of characters.
This week the story has taken a different turn. Jim McColl, the Scottish billionaire who took over the shipyard at the centre of the controversy, has come out fighting. He gave an interview to the Sunday Times in which he accused Nicola Sturgeon's administration of hastily pushing through the contract for the new boats so the deal could be announced at the party's autumn conference in 2015.
'The audit report has revealed we were given the contract for political purposes. Everything was about the optics and timing the announcements for political gain,' he told the paper.
McColl said he had made it clear to the government and CMAL, the state body in charge of ship procurement, that his company could not provide the usual standard refund guarantee on the contract (such contracts are usually signed on a 'no financial risk to the buyer' basis). He said there was no question that the decision to overrule CMAL, which was against awarding the contract without the guarantee, was made by Nicola Sturgeon along with Derek Mackay, a now disgraced former transport minister.
Now, McColl has given an interview to BBC Radio Scotland in which he accused the SNP Scottish government of engaging in a 'fabulous propaganda exercise' aimed at putting 'the blame of this onto the previous management at Ferguson's'. His case was not helped by claiming he did not sign the contract on behalf of his company when it
later transpired he did.
On the SNP side, they went straight for a full frontal attack. When Sturgeon was asked by the BBC if McColl was right to suggest the contract awarded to his company, Ferguson Marine Engineering Ltd (FMEL), was rushed for her political advantage, she said:
'No, he's not right. In fact, he's flatly wrong to say that.'
Scottish government finance minister Kate Forbes then went in even harder in the Scottish parliament. She said of McColl:
'This is a man with a clear interest in shifting the blame on others when the root cause, ultimately, to the delays of these important vessels, was the construction under FMEL.'
The viscousness of the attack on a non-politician is notable but not surprising in Nationalist-run Scotland. But perhaps more disquieting is the SNP's shameless attempt to spin their way out of trouble by misleading the public. When she spoke in parliament, Forbes said the contract was awarded 'in line with all of the procurement rules and practices in the normal way, as the Audit Scotland report confirms'. Similarly, Sturgeon, in her BBC interview, said:
'But as I think the Audit Scotland report said, there was nothing untoward in the procurement of the contract at the time.'
Nothing could be further from the truth. Audit Scotland did not say these things. Forbes and Sturgeon are in fact selectively referring to a part of the report that summarises the outcome of a Scottish government review of CMAL's procurement process which, not surprisingly, found no major issues. In other words, the Scottish government marked its own homework and is now trying to use that homework, which has nothing to do with Audit Scotland, as a get-out-of-jail-free card in the name of the independent auditor.
It stinks. And the twisting of the report to the point of engaging in flagrant misinformation is an outrage, especially when Audit Scotland is so clear on the deficiencies in the process, most notably on Sturgeon's government overriding its own expert procurement agency's advice and ignoring standard procurement specifications on financial guarantees.
The ferries fiasco has so far wasted at least £140 million, with nothing to show for it but a handful of cringeworthy photographs of SNP ministers cosplaying as old-school leaders of a Glasgow workers' movement. The Scottish government is quick to say lessons will be learned. Perhaps the first lesson is for businesspeople not to cosy up to a cause that loves its believers but ruthlessly pursues those it perceives as a threat.
In his BBC Radio Scotland interview, McColl revealed how he has become a dissenter on independence. 'With hindsight,' he said, 'I wouldn't support that (independence) now.'
A determined individual who poses a threat to Sturgeon's administration, who is an old chum of Salmond's and is now a deserter from the cause: it's no wonder the SNP top brass are giving it to McColl with both barrels.
Calls are now being made for a public inquiry. This story will not go away, and there will be more opportunities for McColl to defend his reputation. As he told the BBC: 'There's more work needs to be done because this is the tip of the iceberg.'
The ferries fiasco might well get bloodier yet.
John Ferry is a contributing editor for the think tank These Islands and a former financial journalist

12:56AM Wednesday, September 7th, 2022
A NOTE ABOUT RELEVANT ADVERTISING: We collect information about the content (including ads) you use across this site and use it to make both advertising and content more relevant to you on our network and other sites. Find out more about our policy and your choices, including how to opt-out. Sometimes our articles will try to help you find the right product at the right price. We may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for publishing this content or when you make a purchase.
Nationwide News Pty Ltd © 2022. All times AEST (GMT +10). Powered by WordPress.com VIP
More stories to check out before you go
‘ETHICAL’ porn might sound boring, but according to this Aussie performer, it’s actually a whole lot hotter to make. This is the porn you should be watching.
OK, you’re not one of those sex addicts but you do occasionally glance at porn. On Fridays. And maybe Sundays. But it’s all good because the sites you access are free, no one needs to know, and it’s not like you’re supporting that dirty, nasty industry, is it?
Except the reality is that if you’re accessing porn via a free and fast “tube site” like Porn Hub you’re actually more likely to be supporting the “dirtier, nastier” aspects of porn.
According to Australians who work in the porn industry, much of that footage is obtained unethically and without always having consent of the people depicted.
So, how can you feel good about the porn you’re watching? You’re questions answered …
What’s the problem with accessing a free site if I’m only on there for an average of 9.4 minutes?
“Unfortunately, with the growth of the ‘amateur porn’ genre as well as the popularity of free video sharing sites such as PornHub — which aggregate both amateur and copyrighted material — exploitative images proliferate online,” says Rachel Payne, the General Manager of Australia’s leading adult industry body the Eros Association .
“If a video is uploaded online without the consent of performers, it is not porn, it is exploitation material.
“By paying for porn, you are ensuring professionalised production standards are met, including consent by all performers.”
“We’ve hit saturation point with mainstream degrading content on the tube sites,” says porn performer and activist Lucie Bee . “And particularly for sites that post amateur porn, you can’t always be sure it’s not revenge porn. But if you get it directly from the source and pay for it, you can sit back and enjoy it, knowing the performers want to be there.”
“Another problem is that tube sites remove context for the sex. Ethical producers might show something that’s a bit rough but which shows consent, a lot of the so-called ‘free’ content is actually stolen then broken up, so you don’t get the start of scene where performers discuss something rough just being fantasy, for example.”
Come to think of it, sometimes the people on the free sites do look kind of young or uncomfortable. But surely the site wouldn’t be able to post stuff if it was unethical?
“This is essentially why we encourage consumers to buy from official sites and professional production companies, as they have processes in place to ensure that performers are treated professionally, that the relevant physical and psychological screening is carried out, that and age legal requirements are met, and of course that there is a mutual understanding of where the content will go and consent,” says Payne.
“Eros believes adult businesses should be treated like any other business. This includes being held to certain professional standards both on set and off, which is why we’re in the process of forming an Adult Media Code of Ethics.”
Lucie Bee agrees. “A lot of people ask me about getting into porn, and I tell them that once your face is out there, that’s forever,” she says. “I worry that until we have these guidelines and a way to enforce them, we’re enabling people to prey on young potential performers who don’t know any better.”
It’s all a bit smutty — why should I support it?
“How you spend your money reflects the kind of industry you want to see,” says Payne.
“In Australia, porn is a labour of love. Most performers and producers rely on day jobs. So if we want to create a market for great porn we can all feel good about, people have to pay for it so we can make more.”
“We have such a problem in Australia talking about sex in an open and frank way, particularly about porn consumption and how to consume ethically. When we do talk about it, it’s very much the titillation factor,” says Lucie.
“At the moment people feel shame just for watching it in general and that’s a real problem because it’s shutting down conversations we need to have. But as a consumer, it’s a buzzkill if you don’t know if the performer has given consent for it to be put online,” says Lucie.
That’s all great. But ‘Ethical porn’ conjures images of Blundstones and recycling. And that’s not hot.
“I once worked for a company which was all about ‘natural women who don’t shave’,” says Lucie. “But that’s not what ethical porn is about. You can still have great production values but things happen more organically.
“We discuss with the producer what we enjoy and are good at, as opposed to being dictated to act out some cheesy scene.”
“I know fantasy is about looking at someone who doesn’t look like you. But because we’ve always been given this narrow image of what’s attractive, people have a skewed notion of what’s sexy. In ethical porn there’s a lot more diversity and representation.
“Ethical porn says ‘there’s a space for you to look like that.’ So you can watch something powerful and beautiful and say ‘Hey, that’s someone like me, and this is a kind of intimacy that I could enjoy’.”
A lot of the free stuff IS a bit same-same and clinical.
“With ethical porn there’s a lot more communication, and that’s hot. Context is hot. Story is hot. There’s chemistry. You get to know the performers. Some companies include behind the scenes components and blooper reals — it’s fun and authentic,” says Lucie.
“Companies like Light Southern , Velvet Reality and Bright Desire are a good place to start.”
If I pay for porn, won’t it show up on my credit card? And what if I also unwittingly download a bunch of nasty stuff to my computer along with my video?
“Website security and privacy is a paramount concern for adult websites,” says Payne. “You’re more likely to get a virus from downloading free content.
“In terms of discretion, the adult industry generally has generic billing, so a ‘surrogate’ company name is often what appears on your credit card statement.”
“I understand that Ashley Madison was traumatic for people, but anonymity is paramount in our industry,” says Lucie.
“We want to protect your information because we want you to pay for your porn! The last thing we want is anyone feeling ashamed for engaging with their sexuality.”
Alice Williams is a Melbourne author and columnist. Follow her on Twitter and Facebook .
A woman is sharing her tips on how to embark on one controversial occupation – for those willing to take the risks.
A jilted woman is going viral after revealing how she figured out that her boyfriend was cheating: when he unexpectedly got better in bed.
Nadia Bokody has revealed the “anxiety-inducing” five-word phrase that could be “ruining” your sex life.

Lesbian Domination Porn
Naked Czech
Chubby Naked

Nasty Ferr

Report Page