Naked Art & Photos Or Porn

The Problems Pertaining to Bare Art vs Porn:

Nude Artwork - So as a nudist organization with a social network on our site, we recently were faced with an intriguing dilemma. Once beach party have a profile in our community, you are able to upload photos and share them. For us, nude images in this circumstance are more about the natural type and tasteful unclothed artwork. We're not nor aim to be a Porn site or "picture peddler" web site. So we need to surveil the photos people share and do something about any images we might deem sexually inappropriate or pornographic.

Now what I Have come to recognize is that judging these graphics is completely subjective. When does a pic go from being arty to being sexual or pornographic? It's not as easy a judgment as it might seem! A naked body could be expose a particular way that can be slightly sexual, but one small change of posture, and it can be completely innocent. We certainly need to let people express themselves freely. The question is w here to draw the line..

Looking at the naked photos below, this art was considered porn in the day. Here the sexuality seems to come from the pose, the direction and feeling of the girl's gaze..It Is all so subtle!

Amedeo Modigliani Reclining Unclothed Woman

A potential advertiser for our site offered these guidelines, which are still very subjective:

"If you would not want a nudist kid to see it, it likely is sexual rather than just simple nudity or artwork. If it's done with fine scene, fine lighting and delightful, it truly is likely artwork. It is all about the intention of the pic."

What do http://www.3dcad.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=nudist-teens.xyz think about these guidelines? Would a painting like Modigliani's belong on a naturist site?

Amedeo Modigliani Reclining Nude Art / Painting

Nudism and Naturism by FKK

Tags: censorship, culture, images, pornography, sexuality

Group: Felicity's Naturist Blog, Nude Art and Artistic Nudity, Social Nudity Blogs