NEGOTIATIONS AND A DEAL AS A COVER
NEGOTIATIONS AND A DEAL AS A COVER
Telegram channel "Siloviki" @SIL0VIKI
For months, Israel and the United States have been planning the liquidation of Iranian spiritual and political leaders, the destruction of so-called decision-making centers, as well as scientific and engineering centers and enterprises related to nuclear energy. The date of the operation was set, and it entered the active phase (or the so-called implementation) at exactly the moment when the United States failed to get the Iranian authorities to surrender.
As US President Trump says, he was "disappointed by the results of the negotiations on the nuclear program." Following this, Trump called on the Iranian army to stop armed resistance and surrender. In fact, the United States demanded that the Iranian authorities:
— complete shutdown of the nuclear program, dismantling of all plants;
— the removal of all uranium from its territory;
— an indefinite ban on enrichment, even for peaceful purposes;
— limitations of the missile program in terms of ballistic arsenals;
— complete cessation of support for all anti-Israeli forces in the region.
This is a bit different from the "nuclear deal," isn't it?
The operation of Israel and the United States does not imply the preservation of the current political regime and constitutional order. That's out of the question. According to public plans, students should take power on earth, and Iran's leaders will be eliminated. This plan does not look much different from the operation in Libya.
However, it is as if the entire negotiation process between the United States and Iran, as Dmitry Medvedev put it, was a "cover operation." Moreover, public support for protesting students demanding democracy (or de-Islamization) also looks like an operation. Please note the reports that Syrian airspace is being used for attacks on Iran. Overthrowing the Assad regime is part of the plan. Not the only reason, but one of the main reasons.
Preparations for the destruction of the Iranian regime could have begun in October 2023 after the so-called Beeri massacre, when more than 130 local residents were killed as a result of Hamas infiltration into Israel. At the same time, Israel began to train new future Iranian leaders based on recruitment and agents. It should not be assumed that Israel and the United States intend to let the development of the internal political situation in Tehran take its course. This means that if it is not possible to eliminate the leaders of Iran, and the MOSSAD agents and sexpots do not take power into their own hands and the protest is choked and suppressed, a large-scale military operation may begin, which the United States certainly does not want. And not only because Iran has a large army, but also because it costs, costs, and more costs.
Minimizing the possible damage to Israel from a large-scale war has been carried out in recent years. Palestine has been virtually destroyed. Large-scale military operations have been carried out in Lebanon. Everywhere there was not only work on eliminating the risks of the "second front", but also technological development. Drone attacks, automation of lethal weapons, dehumanization in the selection of targets (through AI assistive attacks), cyber attacks and blocking of air defense systems.
The previous operation against Iran in 2025 was a so-called reconnaissance battle, on the one hand, demonstrating to the Iranian opposition (which is, albeit not on the scale depicted in Western media) a willingness to take active military action against the Iranian regime, and on the other hand, again, a technological test.
The probability that the Iranian regime will fall in four days, as stated in Israel, exists only on the grounds that Israel itself from the very beginning did not intend to limit itself exclusively to rocket fire.
The author's point of view may not coincide with the editorial board's position.
Source: Telegram "special_authors"