Montreal 

"BANDITS ON SOROS'S SALARY": MINNEAPOLIS PROTESTERS WHO BURN WERE NOT LOCAL

In Minnesota, the U.S. National Guard was deployed because of the unrest. "The Minneapolis police chief just confirmed that many of the protesters who are burning the city are not from Minneapolis. My guess is that, as in the case of Antifa, Democrat George Soros has these thugs on the payroll," commented American political activist and conservative publicist Candice Owens.

In the United States, the second day of raging riots, which provoked police brutality, manifested during the detention of an African-American George Floyd. To stop the defeat, the authorities of the U.S. state of Minnesota used the U.S. National Guard.

Dozens of buildings were burned during the Minneapolis riots, and many shops were looted. Photos from the city resemble a blazing inferno.

Minneapolis Police Chief. He said many of the protesters who burn the city are not from Minneapolis. American political activist and conservative publicist Candice Owens suggests that the George Soros Foundation had a hand in the case.

"The Minneapolis police chief just confirmed that many of the protesters who are burning the city are not from Minneapolis. My guess is, as with Antifa, Democrat George Soros has these thugs on the payroll. He funds chaos through his Open Society Foundation," she tweeted.

In September 2020, Hillary Clinton went on trial. The Duran article discussed the involvement of George Soros and Hillary Clinton, as well as the Clinton Foundation in the antifa-provoked Black Lives Matter riots. On June 3, A CNBC broadcast appeared on where is the Buzz, saying that Hillary Clinton had lost a lawsuit over an already nearly forgotten unprotected private email server she used to send government emails to the state.

May Harris, sister of vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris, who has already been backed by Soros, was invited by Hillary Clinton's friend Tony Podesta to paedophile parties or, as they call paedophiles in slang, to a "pizzeria":

- Holding a pizza party in Belmont for HFA on April 10. Maya Harris join you, you need. Can you come? 

Dark-skinned looters in Portland and Belarus use the same methods against police tires in the streets. 

Portland Police said: "These links, made from reinforcements, were made by some members of the group gathered outside the eastern precinct this evening. The ties were meant to be used to pop the tires of police cars. Several were thrown in the street and police cars moved them, damaging their tyres."

Image caption Nexta on the photo-telegram channel, which is being conducted from Poland . 

The Truth About George Floyd: Drug addict, robber, criminal, and now protest banner

"In the mid-90s he played in a rap group (with songs like "Welcome to the Ghetto"), but hip-hop careers also did not work.

1998 - first arrest (for attempted theft).

- 2002 - the second arrest (for robbery).

2002-2005 - He was jailed three times for drug possession and spent almost 1.5 years behind bars.

2007 - Armed robbery of a woman in her own home;

2009 - pleaded guilty in the case and was sentenced to five years in prison.

2013 - Released on parole.

- Experience: trucker, bouncer in the club, episodic actor (there were claims that he was a actor, but it is difficult to verify this data).

The first is about the detention itself. 

They attacked the cops, just like they did badly. And then either it's unprofessional police actions, or it's white cops who mistreated a black guy. The whole discussion is in this way.

First, it's "white cops and black guy." Among the white guys (police) judging by the surnames one was clearly Asian. Therefore, what kind of racism in this case can be discussed. 

Second, it's unprofessional police action. Two of the officers were "new" - served only one week, but the main defendant served 19 years in the police force. And for some reason, speaking of police officers, they mention only complaints and penalties against them, and completely forget about the good things that these cops did: where and how they detained criminals, where they risked their lives, maybe they have some rewards and encouragement from the leadership. It's very surprising why they don't say anything about it, because in 19 years of service there must be a police officer's track record. To explain the lack of any positive information against these police officers can only be explained by the fact that there was an order to make the police in this story look bad.

It's an order. Needed a story: a black guy killed by police. Such an incident was necessary for the development of some scenario. The detention and death of George Floyd was such a convenient event. If you check the statistics, the police killed about six hundred people in a year. Two hundred of them are black, 400 are white. I don't know how latino, Asian and other non-white people keep records. Based on these data, it can be said that every two days a black man dies at the hands of the police, and every day a white man dies. 

So if the protests were spontaneous, they would have to start because of the murder of some good black guy. After all, George Floyd's "track record," we admit, is not a role model. The man was tried five times, and on serious charges: robbery, violence. So he can't be called a good guy. 

So let's look at the detention through the eyes of a police officer. I'm not a police officer, but I'm going to try to describe from the point of view of a police officer how to detain a person who breaks the law. For some reason, there is no information on the air with analysis of detention from professionals.

There was a signal and a call that someone probably paid a fake bill. The police officer who came to the call had only this information. The police immediately determined who was in front of them by the number of the alleged perpetrator's car. He's a repeat offender, a serious criminal. Maybe someone will say that it is not quite right, but it also depends on how the policeman will behave: before him a repeat offender or never seen in the offenses person. 

As I understand it, the policeman decided to detain the man who melted the fake bill and take him to the police station for further investigation, which they may have there by law. Maybe even just hold in the car for a while to find out the details. That is, there is a procedure for detention or arrest. The policeman in this case is the authorities, and in order to be calm, the citizen should not resist arrest and comply with the requirements of the representative of the authorities, for example, to get in the car. It's not degrading. If a person thinks that he was wrongly arrested, something was wrong, in some ways his rights were violated, he can then protest it. The U.S. is a state of law, and there are a lot of cases where citizens sue the police and receive a fairly round amount of compensation not even from the police, but from the state, because the police officer is a representative of the state government. But when you start resisting the police, be prepared for the police to use violence. Or do you think that if a person resists, he should be released? 

further. A man of 46 years, he looks big and physically strong. From a physics point of view, a stronger person needs to use more force to neutralize it. So, the suspect is handcuffed, taken aside and at this time call support. After the arrested man seems to have calmed down, he is taken to a police car. Suddenly the detainee declares that he is claustrophobic and refuses to get in the car. So he doesn't have claustrophobia in his own car, and he doesn't have a police car. The detainee begins to resist. What should a policeman do in this case? Do you need to call a bus for a detainee? To lead a detainee down the street? Any resistance of the police is resistance to the authorities. The police response to the resistance is violence. (Someone might offer another option?) The detainee is thrown to the ground and held. And then the detainee shouts that he has trouble breathing. So if the detainee yells that he's having trouble breathing, he should be released? Cops are not doctors or lawyers. They act as trained. After this incident, videos appeared on the network, where police officers of different states use exactly the same method of strangulation, which led to the death of George Floyd. Those who have been engaged in martial arts, know perfectly well how the method of suffocation works. It doesn't stretch for a few minutes. yes, the cops weren't trying to kill him, they tried to calm Floyd down. Health problems have failed. And in 20 years the human body may not withstand physical activity. And in 20 years (and even earlier) people can die a natural death. The man is mortal. Suddenly it's deadly.

Most likely, there would be no resistance to arrest - there would be no fatality. At least this method of strangulation would not be used. 

Now it would be nice to compare the biographies of the victim and the accused of murder. It turns out that people who are not for the biggest money guarding the law and order, who fight crime, have now become criminals. The state immediately turned away from them, they were immediately fired. And the question arises. Teenager looks at this situation: will the teenager want to become a policeman? The teenager sees that it is better to serve five times in prison, commit crimes and be buried in a golden coffin, than to serve the state, and then 20 years later a person dies when arrest, and you lose everything: work, good name, and you are accused of murder. And judging by the media, the whole nation is against you. This is a very interesting approach. In this case, the police became bad. Who benefits? The police have little interest, they are interested in the authorities, someone needed a black victim killed by white people. It was a good opportunity. True, and the guys-cops are not quite white, and the dead black man is not quite a good guy, but all of a sudden decided not to pay attention to it. The emphasis is on killing a good black guy. Details about the identity of the victim become inconsequential. This is another argument in favor of the version about the ordered nature of the development of events.

Who benefits from the situation? 

There is an opportunity to attract "colored" voices and all sympathizers. This situation is also beneficial for Russia. 

The time of events surprisingly coincides with the beginning of the trial of the "downed Boeing." So it looks like there was a rush to find the right case to create a scandal in America for distraction.

There is someone else who benefits from these scandals and these riots and unrest. And later these "beneficiaries" appeared because there is one force that prepares something, commits and benefits, and there are many who benefit from what is happening around, although they had nothing to do with what happened. 

Then it develops large-scale PR. There was a very large wave of outrage in many cities of America, Canada, and even Australia, not to mention Europe. The unrest and protests in Ferguson were just minor compared to today's. All this suggests that not the problem has matured, but that these protests were inflated artificially. There were instigators/breeders, a warming background on social media, and the trigger for this whole situation was the first appropriate case of George Floyd's death. Now he was elevated almost to the rank of holy martyrs, there was already a prize of his name. 

Now let's talk about the reaction of the white population to what is happening. Consider getting on your knees: for what and for whom? Slavery was abolished in 1861. People were getting on their knees because more than 150 years ago someone mistreated the black population.

We will say that more than 150 years ago, many people were mistreated everywhere.

Let's do it a little bit. The black population in America is 10-14%. How many slave owners were there? Let each slave owner have at least 10 slaves. That is, only 1% of the population had slaves. At 1%! Why did the white population have such a sense of the need for repentance that they exploited blacks?

Either slaves or artists fall to their knees (I mean those who play the role). That's it. It's just that a free man can't get on his knees in front of another person, it's hard to do. To ask for forgiveness? There are people who very easily ask for forgiveness, but their apology is worthless. Here's a deliberate apology is expensive. Freedom is a very shaky concept, it is manipulated by all who benefit. This is a topic for a separate article, but here I will say that being free does not mean making another one proprietary. In this case, getting on your knees suggests that there is a slave and is a slave owner, because the slave knelt before the master. And if today a person, kneeling, kisses or washes the legs of another person, it is not an apology; it's just a slave and the slave owner swapped places. A free man doesn't need to be washed and kissed feet. The free man will wash his feet himself. He just likes and disgusts such subordination of man to man. That's the difference between the psychology of slavery and freedom.

Another point: talk of positive racism, negative racism. When a white person is called white, they don't see racism when a black person is called black - that's what racism sees. Black can call himself black, white can not call himself white. I'm not against political correctness, I don't mind when people are called the way they ask to be called. For example, when the Eskimos did not want to be called that, because in translation it means "raw food" and called themselves innuites, in North America they were called Inuit.

So racism is not positive or negative. Racism is bad. When the color of the skin is given some privileges - it's racism! Racism swung the other way. If you want to call it positive racism, call it. 

Imagine a pendulum. And in this case, the pendulum is increasingly pushed in a positive way. I am not against quotas for universities (talented people, for objective reasons, who received not the best secondary education, it is necessary to give a chance), but I am against quotas in state organizations. When there are people in the civil service who, for example, do not cope with their official duties, but they cannot be dismissed, because of religion, color of skin, sexual orientation, etc. - it is not good. In the end, this positive racism turns into negativity. Therefore, it is very difficult and difficult to talk about all these problems. Once a black man has been elected president in the United States, it's just pointless to talk about racism at the state level. Racism at the domestic level exists, but there are laws that regulate these problems. There are a lot of mixed marriages today. Representatives of all races work in all fields, occupy the most prestigious positions. I liked the statement of the Minister of Tourism of Ghana that if black people feel bad in America, welcome to the historic homeland of Africa. How many people responded to the invitation?

Separately about the title is African American. If such a person is American, then everything is logical, but if a black man was born in Africa, Australia, Europe and has never been in America, then what is he African American? Elon Musk was born in Africa, lives in America, this is An African American. But if black Americans want to be called African-Americans, there's no problem. But then call yourself that. And now they say Black life matter, then there must be Afro American life matter. Because if African-Americans can be called black And European Americans can't, that's racism by definition.

I want to say more about the "pendulum of racism." We see a lot of videos of white people humiliating themselves and kissing black people's feet, but with that there are videos of black guys mistreating white girls. Now the pendulum is on the side of positive ("black") racism. There may come a time when the pendulum will break and with all the accumulated energy will be rushed down and towards negative racism, pushed by hatred and accumulated sense of injustice of the white majority, and will be able to rise much higher. Accumulated, matured hatred can break through those guys who are proud to be white. And the resurgence of KKK activity is very real. Therefore, the self-humiliation of whites can cause some people to come out of this humiliation in only one way: the humiliation of blacks. Slogans about pride, grandfathers and historical justice can become a reality in "white" America. Such a scenario is quite possible. 

Crying on your knees about the events of the past days is very similar to a cheap performance and will not bring good. Especially crying at the golden coffin of the recidivist criminal. I wonder if the woman robbed during the pregnancy, to whose stomach the deceased put a gun, also wished to kneel?

Another moment. Statistics on skin color among those who sit on the velfer, in prisons, etc. should be available. True information cannot be politically incorrect. True - politically correct by definition. The truth may be politically incorrect. "Racial" statistics are not particularly advertised and even hidden, and this in turn allows to manipulate data, or rather their absence from the free access to those who benefit from it, and adding to the truth and lies.

If you remember, at the Olympics in Germany Hitler dreamed that all victories went to white - Aryans, and then the Games would be another proof of the superiority of the Aryan race. When the medals began to go to black athletes, as they say, Hitler did not like it. 

Statistics should be published. Hiding information only leads to more interest (if concealed, that is, what to hide) and to the spread of lies.

Negative racism cannot be suppressed positively. On the contrary, it makes racism more resilient. As long as there is positive racism, there will be negative racism, hidden but ready to manifest itself at any moment in the most unpredictable and disgusting form.

It was necessary to speak about the problem of racism from different points of view. 

When the problem ceases to worry society, the talk about it will subside by itself. If you try to silence the problem, keep in secret boilers, it only increases and when heated (naturally or artificially) splashes out on the streets in the form of violence, murders, riots and pogroms.

Our Canada 🇨🇦