The Virus Misconception

Part 1

Example Measles

by Dr. Stefan Lanka

It is different than most people think: Viruses as pathogens do not exist! The claims about the existence of viruses and diseases are based on historically grown misinterpretations, not on fraud or deliberately wrong actions, as I wrongly assumed in the past. New, better, in a positive sense "scientific" findings and explanations for the origin, therapy and prevention, not only of "viral" diseases, are available.

Also the phenomena of the simultaneous or timely appearance of symptoms, which were previously interpreted as infection and by transmission of pathogens, can be understood through new findings. The result is a view of life and the cosmobiological integration of processes that is new for us, but in reality old.

The "new", i.e. rediscovered perspective could only emerge outside of "science", among other things because those involved in the scientific institutions did not fulfill the first and most important scientific duty, the constant doubting and questioning. Otherwise they would have recognized that the erroneous development had been built up long ago and - with extremely unscientific processes in 1858, 1953 and 1954 - was dogmatized.

But the transition to a new explanation of health, illness and healing will succeed because all the therapists and scientists involved will be able to save face. Out of history and within the new view of biology and life, there are explanations also for emotions, ignorance and behavior of all kinds. This is the second good message. Repentance and forgiveness work the more effectively, the better one can comprehend, understand and learn for the future.

I am aware that it can be difficult for all those directly involved, such as doctors, virologists, people working in the health care system and above all for those affected who suffer from false diagnoses or have lost relatives because of them, to mentally allow the following naming of facts. In order to prevent the self-dynamics of the infection theories from leading to a dangerous self-run or even the collapse of public order, as is the case with AIDS, BSE, SARS, MERS, Corona and the various animal influenza, I ask all those who learn of the facts of the "non-existence" of the alleged viruses to deal with this topic in an emotionally free, consistent and objective manner.

The actual state

All claims about viruses as pathogens are incorrect and based on easily recognizable, comprehensible and verifiable misinterpretations. The real causes of the diseases and phenomena attributed to viruses have been researched and applied in the meantime. Instead of using viruses, all scientists work in the laboratory with typical components of dying, very special tissues or cells. They believe that the tissues and cells die because they are infected with a virus. In reality, these laboratory tissues and cells die because they starve and are poisoned as a result of methodical experimental conditions.

Virologists believe in viruses because they infect the tissues and cells - after withdrawal of the nutrient solution and after the start of poisoning with toxic antibiotics - with supposedly infected blood, infected saliva or other supposedly infected body fluids. They believe that the death is caused by viruses. However, the death of the tissues and cells happens all by itself, without the addition of "infected" materials. The virologists have not noticed this! According to scientific logic and obligation, control experiments should have been carried out. In order to control the newly invented method of the alleged multiplication of viruses, whether the method itself does not produce or falsify the results, one would have had to add sterile substances or substances from perfectly healthy humans and animals to the starving tissues and cells in additional experiments, the control experiments.

These control experiments have never been performed in "science" until today! As part of the measles virus process, I commissioned these control experiments in an independent laboratory, with the result that the tissues and cells die in exactly the same way as if they came into contact with supposedly infected materials.

The task of control experiments is to exclude that the method or technique used does not produce the result. Control experiments are the highest duty and exclusive basis for being allowed to call a result scientific. As we will see, during the measles virus trial, the court-appointed expert witness determined that those publications that are fundamental to the whole of virology do not contain any control experiments. We learn from this that the scientists involved are acting in an extremely unscientific manner without realizing it.

The explanation for this unscientific action, which is incompatible with scientific claims, has a historical starting point: In June 1954 an unscientific and contradictory speculation was published, where the dying of tissues in the test tube is possibly an indication of the presence of a virus. Six months later, the first author of these speculations received the Nobel Prize for Medicine on December 10, 1954. For a different and equally speculative cause. By this honor ¹, the speculation of June 1954 was elevated to a scientific fact, which is still not questioned today. Since that time, the death of tissues and cells in the test tube has been regarded as proof of the existence of viruses.

The apparent proof of existence of viruses

Not only that. The dying of tissues/cells is also called isolation of the virus, because supposedly something was brought into the laboratory from outside, from an organism, although a virus was never isolated in the sense of the word isolation, represented as a whole and biochemically characterized. The electron microscopic photos of the alleged viruses actually show normal cell components of dying tissues and cells and mostly only models. Since the people involved only BELIEVE that the tissues and cells are completely transformed into viruses when they die, dying is also called reproduction of the viruses

The participants still believe this today, because the inventor of this method created this article of faith, which still serves as a model today due to its Nobel Prize. More about this below.

Without purifying this mixture, which consists of dying tissue and cells from monkeys, bovine foetuses and toxic antibiotics, this mixture is used as a "living" vaccine, since it is now supposed to consist of attenuated viruses. This is because the dying of the tissues and cells - because of starvation and poisoning and not because of an alleged "infection" - was and still is misinterpreted as proof of the existence of viruses, as proof of their isolation and as proof of their reproduction.

Thus, the resulting toxic mixture full of foreign proteins, foreign nucleic acids (DNA/RNA), cytotoxic antibiotics, microbes and spores of all kinds is issued as a "live vaccine". It is implanted mainly into the muscles of the children during the vaccination process, in an amount that, if injected into the vein, would cause certain death immediately. Only with absolute ignorance and blind trust in the state authorities who "test" and approve the vaccines can this be called "a small, harmless prick". These verifiable facts prove the dangerousness and negligence of those scientists and politicians who claim that the vaccines are safe, have few to no side effects and protect against disease. None of this is true and verifiable, on the contrary: on closer, scientifically verifiable scrutiny, one finds no benefit, but admissions of the absence of any evidence. ²

From the components of the dead tissues and cells, individual components are removed, misinterpreted as components of a virus and mentally combined to form a virus model. A real and complete virus does not appear in the entire "scientific" literature. The consensus-building process, in which the participants argued about what belongs to the virus and what does not, took decades with the measles virus. With the alleged new China Coronavirus-2019 (2019-nCoV, meanwhile renamed), this consensus-finding process took only a few mouse clicks.

With just a few mouse clicks, a program that used the molecular sequence of short pieces of the nucleic acids of the dead tissues and cells, whose composition had been determined biochemically, to construct, depending on the specifications, the much longer, now supposedly complete and presumed genetic material of a certain old or even a new virus. In reality, not even these manipulations, called "alignment", result in a "complete" genetic material of a virus, which is called its genome.

During the process of mental construction of the "viral genome strand", sequences that do not fit are "smoothed" and missing sequences are added. In this way, a "genetic material sequence" is invented that does not exist, that has never been discovered and proven as a whole. Summarized: From short pieces, mentally and aligned with a model of a viral genome strand, a larger piece is mentally constructed, which does not exist in reality. For example, in the only "mental" construction of the measles virus genome strand, far more than half of the molecular sequences that are supposed to represent a whole virus are missing in the short fragments of the cell's own molecules that are actually present. These are partly artificially biochemically produced and the rest are simply freely invented. ³

Those Chinese scientists who now claim that the nucleic acids from which the genome of the new China Corona Virus 2019 was thought to have been constructed ⁴ mostly come from poisonous snakes are victims, like all of us, of a now global misguided development. The more "viral" genetic material strands are invented, the more similarities with everything that exists are "discovered". This maniac has method. Large parts of our academic science work like this: One invents a theory, moves within that theory, calls it science and claims that doing it would reflect reality. In reality, it only represents what was previously thought. ⁵

The Virus Tests

Due to the lack of control experiments, those involved have not noticed to date that all test procedures for "viruses" always test a certain number of people "positively", depending on how sensitive the test procedure is set. The templates required for the alleged detection of "viruses" do not originate from "viruses", but from the tissues, cells and foetal serum (blood without solid components) of animals, mainly monkeys and cattle. Since these animals are biochemically very similar to us humans, it is clear that their components, which are misinterpreted as components of viruses, can be detected in all humans by means of "virus test procedures". Some "viruses" and their "vaccines" - not the "measles virus" ... are actually derived from aborted human fetuses. Here it is particularly striking that the test procedures detect molecules that are present in every human being and that the vaccines can trigger particularly dangerous allergic reactions, which are defined as "autoimmune diseases".

Especially the fetal serum, without which the tissues and cells in the laboratory do not grow or do not grow fast enough, which is taken in an extremely cruel way from unanaesthetised fetuses and their unanaesthetised dam, is highly contaminated. It contains all conceivable, known and unknown microbes, their spores and a multitude of unknown proteins. Also from it - beside e.g. monkey kidney tissue - the components are won, which are mentally assigned to a virus model, which does not exist in reality and which was never proven as a whole "virus" in the entire "scientific" literature.

Since from these substances also exclusively the vaccines are won, becomes understandable, why particularly inoculated humans are tested "positively" for all "viruses", which were only invented in thought and from which "vaccines" were and are manufactured. The test procedures only detect the animal components of the alleged "viruses", animal proteins and nucleic acids, which are often identical or very similar to human proteins and nucleic acids. The virus test procedures therefore do not detect anything specific, let alone "viral", and therefore have no significance whatsoever. What they do is, as in the case of Ebola, HIV, influenza & Co., a paralyzing, sometimes fatal, state of shock and a more or less dangerous, sometimes fatal, medical treatment.

It is important to note that all so-called virus test procedures never say "yes" or "no", but are set up in such a way that they are only evaluated as "positive" above a certain concentration threshold. Thus one can test few, many, none or all humans and animals, depending upon attitude of the test procedures, at will "positively". The extent of this self-deception and deception becomes clear to everyone when one realizes that otherwise "normal" symptoms are only referred to as AIDS, BSE, flu, SARS, measles, etc., when a "positive" test is available. 

Decisive details

Until 1952, virologists believed that a virus was a toxic protein or enzyme that was directly toxic and somehow replicated by the body and spread within the body, between people, between animals. Medicine and science abandoned this idea in 1951 because the suspected viruses were never seen under an electron microscope and, above all, no control experiments were carried out. It was recognized that the decomposition of perfectly healthy animals, organs and tissues would also produce the same decomposition products that had previously been passed off as "virus". Virology had disproved itself and given up. ⁶

For 2000 years they have been teaching: because they do not know what they are doing. Since 1995, since we have asked the question of proof and published the answers, there is a clear addition: Because they cannot admit to themselves that what they have learned and practiced is not true and, moreover, is dangerous or even life-threatening. Because no one has yet had the overview and the courage to speak the truths, more and more evil ghosts and auxiliary hypotheses à la "immune system" or "epigenetics" are developing - freely according to Goethe - in order to be able to maintain the once invented theories that are far from reality.

Thus, the idea of undefined viruses was first derived from the forced logic of the disease causing toxin - (lat. virus) - cell theory, which was elevated to a dogma in 1858. Then the idea of pathogenic bacteria, then of bacterial toxins, then of toxin viruses until the abandonment of this idea in 1952. From 1953 onwards, Virchow's idea of a disease causing toxin became the idea of gene viruses, from this the idea of cancer genes, the "war against cancer", founded in the Nixon era and later the idea of genes for all possible characteristics. All gene ideas were completely and comprehensively refuted in 2000, the publication of the contradictory data of the so-called Human Genome Project, the embarrassing claim that the entire human genome had been read although more than half had to be invented. ⁷

To this day, the population is not aware that it is very difficult for the academics involved to admit their own involvement in such momentous misdevelopments. 

The only apparent bacteria eaters

The model for the idea of genetic viruses in humans, animals and plants, which developed from 1953 onwards, was the so-called bacteria-eaters, called phages, which became known from 1915 onwards. From 1938 on, when commercially available electron microscopes were used in research, these phages could be photographed, isolated as whole particles and all their components could be biochemically determined and characterized at one go. The isolation, i.e. to concentrate the particles and separate them from all other components (=isolation), to photograph them immediately afterwards in the isolated state and to characterize all their components biochemically at one go, has never happened with the alleged human, animal and plant viruses, because they do not exist.

The bacteria and phage researchers, who on the other hand work with actually existing structures, provided the model of what human, animal and plant viruses could look like. When interpreting the phages as bacteria-eaters, however, the "phage specialists" overlooked the fact that the phenomenon of the formation of these particles is an effect of extreme inbreeding in bacteria. This effect of the formation and release of phages (bacteria-eaters, alias viruses of bacteria) does not exist in real bacteria, which are freshly extracted from organisms or the environment. Normal, inbred bacteria form the known forms of survival, the spores, which can survive for a long time or even "forever" if the bacteria are slowly deprived of the nutrient solution or their living conditions become impossible. New bacteria automatically emerge from spores when the living conditions are restored.

If, on the other hand, bacteria that were previously isolated are constantly multiplying, they gradually lose all their properties and abilities. However, many of them do not die off automatically as a result of this inbreeding, but suddenly and completely transform into particles that are misinterpreted as bacteria-eaters within the perspective of the good-evil theory. In reality, however, bacteria have evolved from these "phages" and transform back into this life form when the living conditions are no longer given. Günther Enderlein (1872-1968) described exactly these processes of the emergence of bacteria from invisible structures, their further development into more complex forms and back again. For these reasons he rejected the cell theory according to which life originates only from cells and is organized in a cellular way. ⁸ As a young student I isolated such a "phage" structure from an algae from the sea and believed at that time that I had discovered the first harmless virus, the first stable "virus-host system". ⁹

The idea that bacteria exist as single, viable organisms that can exist alone, without other living beings, is not correct. In isolated form they die automatically after a certain time. Those involved have not noticed this because after successful "isolation" of a bacterium, a part of it is frozen and can be worked with for decades. The species concept of bacteria, the idea that they are viable and independent living beings on their own, is a laboratory artefact, a misinterpretation.

The claim based on this that bacteria are immortal is therefore untrue. Bacteria are immortal only in symbiosis with many other bacteria, fungi and probably many more unknown, difficult or even impossible to characterize life forms, such as amoebae. Amoebae, bacteria and fungi form spores as soon as the living conditions are no longer given and awaken again as soon as the living conditions return. If one compares this with humans, the same view results: Without a living environment, from and with which we live, nothing works.

But it goes even deeper. Not only the art concept sees itself in dissolution, but also the idea and the assertion of the seemingly proven fact of an inanimate, dead matter. Observations and conclusions about an animated, "active matter" (as physicists call it) are dismissed as unscientific vitalism. But there is much to suggest that all elements to which the "prevailing opinion" of "science" does not concede any vitality, develop from the membrane substance of water, the primordial substance ¹⁰ of life. From the elements the nucleic acids develop and around the nucleic acids the biological life, in the form of amoebae, bacteria, tardigrades and more and more complex living beings. There are two very clear insights for this view. One of them can be observed by everyone in himself and others, namely that biological life in the form of our body is a materialization of consciousness units.

 These can be named concretely and the very concrete interactions and changes of our organs and psyche, even on the basis of pure information, such as a hurtful or redemptive word, are comprehensible, verifiable in themselves and others and allow for predictability. Thus the three criteria of scientificity are fulfilled. ¹¹ These insights, the knowledge of the connections free us from the fear-filled and fear-inducing good-evil thinking and the patterns of action fed by it. With these brightening scientific findings, the phenomena of illness, recovery, healing crises, healing blockages and the phenomena of successive (resulting) illnesses, alias infection in the old world view, are also clarified. Virus, you can go. ¹²

The nightmare of the materialistic scientists seems to come true that even the apparently inanimate matter is animated, vital. Vitalism, according to which there is an inherent vital force in everything, was, however, fought by the post-Socratic Greek philosophers Democritus and Epicurus and the Enlightenment (Aufklärung), which expressly appealed to them and legitimized itself. With the explicit justification to scourge the given abuse of faith in all times and to avoid its repetition. So far so good. In doing so, however, the enlightened have overlooked the fact that, by blanking out and denying that consciousness, spirit, and their levels of action are not measurable, they have unintentionally become destroyers of life themselves and the mortal enemy of mankind. They have adopted the historically grown good-evil interpretations of philosophers, teachers of state and religions one-to-one into their materialistic world view.

These good-evil-interpretations are constantly and automatically increased, because of the compulsion for profit and its fatal consequences, which Silvio Gesell ¹³ in general and Ivan Illich ¹⁴ in medicine have discovered and described. ¹⁵ The consequences of the compulsion inherent in our monetary system to ever more, to constant growth, which generates cyclical catastrophes, ever more powerful winners and at the same time causes ever increasing impoverishment and impoverishment, are interpreted by all those involved, who are not familiar with the mathematically conditioned, stubborn mechanisms of the monetary system, as proof of the existence of an independent principle of evil. Thus also the ethically pure people, who are on the winning side, see the mathematically inevitably generated profit as proof of their God-willingness or chosenness. This not only became the basis of Manichaeism (Mani=Babylonian founder of religion, whose followers=Manichaeans), but was and is the driving force behind the dangerous aspects and effects of industrialization, as Max Weber and others have also recognized.

Revival of virology abandoned in 1951/52 by Nobel Prize winner John Franklin Enders

The larger framework of the misguided development of biology and medicine, the unfounded dogma of the so-called cell theory, according to which the body would develop from cells and not from tissues, has been presented in several articles in the magazine WissenschafftPlus from 2014. The cell theory of life, the "cellular pathology", which was freely invented in 1858 and is still the exclusive basis of biology and medicine today, states that all diseases (just like all life) originate from a single cell by degenerating it and forming a disease causing toxin, lat. virus. Two decisive things were the prerequisite and basis of today's global acceptance of cellular pathology, from which the infection theories, the gene theories, the immune and cancer theories have inevitably developed:

a. The cell theory could only prevail because of the suppression of decisive findings on tissues by Rudolf Virchow. The findings and insights into the structure, function and central importance of tissues in the development and manifestation of life, known in 1858, fundamentally refute the cell theories and the gene, immune and cancer theories that emerged from them. ¹⁶

b. Theories of infection could only establish themselves as a global dogma through the concrete politics and eugenics of the Third Reich. Before 1933, scientists dared to contradict these theories; after 1933 these critical scientists were eliminated. ¹⁷

In order to work with "viruses" and carry out apparent infection experiments, the "virologists" were forced to liquefy and filter "sick" and decaying tissue until the abandonment of virology in 1952. The concentrated filtrate, they believed, contained a disease toxin, a toxin that was constantly produced by affected cells. Until 1952, "virus" was defined as a disease toxin in the form of a protein, which, as an enzyme, causes damage in an unknown way by which disease can be caused and transmitted. The idea of a virus after 1953, the year in which an alleged hereditary substance in the form of an alleged alpha helix was proclaimed, was a malignant hereditary substance surrounded by a shell of proteins. Thus, between 1952 and 1954, a change of ideas, a paradigm shift, took place as to how a virus should now be imagined. 

The filtered fluids of decomposing organs or fluids that allegedly contained the proteins/enzymes that were supposed to represent the virus were used in "infection experiments" with animals. The results were intended to prove that a virus was present and caused the disease that was attributed to it. However, what is never mentioned in public is that the symptoms attributed to the virus could never be produced in humans, in animal experiments, but always only "similar" symptoms. These similar symptoms are equated with the disease in humans. Nothing has been proven in the sense of science, on the contrary.

In "infection experiments" there is still a lack of control experiments, i.e. evidence that the symptoms produced are not caused by the "treatment" in the so-called "infection experiment", but by a virus. In order to rule out that the symptoms are not caused by the fluid of decaying tissue in animal experiments, one would have had to do exactly the same thing, only with other or sterilized fluids. But this has never happened. To this day, extremely cruel animal experiments are carried out in which - in order to prove the transmissibility of measles, for example - monkeys painfully fixed and shaved in a vacuum chamber through a tube in the nose introduce the supposedly infected fluids into the trachea and lungs. Even with sterile saline, sterilized blood, pus or saliva, exactly the same damage would be caused. The resulting symptoms, which are only "similar" to measles, are equated with measles. 

Since the allegedly infected fluids were pressed through supposedly bacteria-proof filters and/or heated slightly, the scientists claimed that the suffering and death of the animals in the infection experiment could not be caused by bacteria, but by smaller pathogens, the viruses. In doing so, the participants ignored the already known facts that there are extremely many more unknown bacteria than known ones, that very many bacteria are heat-resistant and that they form spores that cannot be filtered. It is important to mention that there is also no evidence that bacteria cause diseases. They are often involved in disease processes, such as the fire department putting out a fire. They are not the cause, but biologically useful processes of repair. As apparent proof of the alleged negative role of bacteria, there is only - as with viruses - senseless, extremely cruel animal experiments, which all have in common that control experiments are lacking.

Enders and Polio

Until 1949, "virologists" multiplied their suspected protein viruses by placing a piece of decomposing material taken from "virus-infected" tissue on a slice of "healthy" tissue of the same type. The visible spread of the decomposition, which passed from the "sick" tissue to the "healthy" tissue, was misinterpreted as the multiplication and spread of the virus, the disease causing toxin. Through the control experiments carried out for the first time in 1951, the virologists of the time recognized that these were completely normal processes of decomposition and not a virus that would only occur in the "sick" tissue.

In 1949, by chance, Enders "discovered" - because he had no fresh, "healthy" nerve tissue in stock - that tissue other than just nerve tissue also decomposed when a piece of the brain of a person who had died of "polio" was placed on it. Until then, virologists believed that any virus could only reproduce in exactly the same material that would damage it. For the supposed discovery that "viruses" could also multiply in other tissues that they did not damage in living humans, Enders and the other scholars involved were awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine on June 10, 1954.

From then on, the alleged "polio virus" was multiplied by mixing fetal human skin and fetal human muscle tissue with pieces of brains of people who had died of "polio" and decomposed together. The resulting filtrate was considered to contain the virus. The famous Jonas Salk adopted exactly this idea without naming the inventors of the idea. The filtrate of decomposed fetal human skin and muscle used Salk as a polio vaccine, the New York Times claimed that the vaccine was effective and safe, and Salk generated millions of dollars in profits with the polio vaccine. Without involving the inventors of the idea of decomposing human fetuses. ¹⁸

For these reasons, Enders worked hard to develop another technique for which he could claim the rights from the beginning. In the process, he threw himself into the second most lucrative area of infection theory, namely the symptomatology defined as measles. Enders thereby transferred the idea and methods from bacteriology (where he did his doctorate) and believed that phages were the viruses of bacteria.

Analogous to the technique of demonstrating the apparent bactericidal effect of phages on a bacterial lawn (Petri dish: a gelatine coated with bacteria and containing bacterial nutrients), he developed a tissue smear onto which a supposedly infected fluid was applied. Analogous to the death of the bacteria, the death of the tissue smear was equated with the presence of the suspected measles virus, its proof of existence, its isolation, its reproduction. Exactly this protocol is still used today for measles and in only minor modification for the "detection" of all pathogenic viruses. ¹⁹ The mixture of dead tissue/cells is called a live vaccine. If individual components of dead tissue or synthetically produced molecules are always used as a vaccine, the guild speaks of dead vaccines.

Since Enders attributed the conspicuously higher number of deaths and injuries caused by the Salk polio vaccine to contamination of the polio vaccine with unknown human viruses - to which the equally factual, alternaive good-evil conjurors still refer in their claims of allegedly cultured viruses and biological weapons - he worked with tissue from monkey kidneys and fetal serum (blood without solid components) from horse and cattle fetuses.

There are four striking and decisive differences in the detection of the real existing phages of the bacteria and the alleged Ender's detection of the only suspected "viruses" of humans and animals. These differences illustrate the misconceptions of Enders, who, due to his Nobel Prize, despite his own, very clearly formulated doubts, has been the victim of the whole guild and, as a result, the whole world (see Corona Panic) ... except for a very beautifully situated, pretty but unbending Swabian village on Lake Constance (home of the author):

1. The phages of the bacteria are actually isolated using standard methods (density-gradient centrifugation) in the sense of the word "isolation". Immediately after isolation, they are photographed under the electron microscope, their purity is determined and their components, the manageable number of proteins and the genetic material contained in the phage are biochemically represented in one step and all together.
2. With all the "viruses" of humans, animals and plants, no virus has ever been isolated, photographed in isolated form and its components biochemically represented all at once, out of the "isolate". What happened is that in a process of consensus over years, individual components of the dead cells were only mentally assigned to a virus model. In this interpretation process the phages, demonstrably and recognizably at the first "virus" drawings stood model.
3. The tissues and cells used for the "detection and multiplication" of the "viruses" are pre-treated in a very special way before the act of the alleged "infection". They are deprived of 80% of their nutrients so that they become hungry and absorb the viruses. They are treated with antibiotics to rule out that bacteria, which are always and everywhere present in all tissues and sera, cause the expected death of the cells. It was not until 1972 that biochemists realized that the antibiotics used were independently damaging and killing cells without this being noticed and taken into account by virologists. It is exactly the factors "starvation" and "poisoning" that lead to the visible death of the cells, which was and is misinterpreted as the presence, isolation, effect and reproduction of the only suspected viruses.
4. The control experiments, which are mandatory in science and which rule out that instead of a virus only typical cell components have been misinterpreted as viruses, have not been carried out until today. These control experiments were performed with detection, isolation, biochemical and electron microscopic characterization of the phages.

Thus Ender's windy speculations of June 1, 1954 ²⁰ about possible proof of an "agent" who "could" only "possibly" play a role in measles became the allegedly "scientific" fact and exclusive basis of the entire new, genetic virology after 1952 through his "Human Fetal/Polio-Virus Vaccine" Nobel Prize of December 10, 1954. A few months after his Nobel Prize, he forgot or suppressed the contradictions and doubts presented in his 1954 publication. He claimed - suffering from the theft of polio vaccine ideas by Jonas Salk - that all future developments of a measles vaccine would be based on his technique.

Because Enders, in the unintentional and unnoticed killing (for lack of control experiments; which plays a central role in the defense against the measles vaccination obligation!) of his tissue cultures, stirred a swab from the cold, eleven-year-old boy David Edmonston into the dying tissue, the original model of the measles virus - mentally assembled from the pieces of dead tissue to form a model - is called the "Edmonston strain", as is the measles vaccine, the toxic sum of all dead components, to this day. A part of the mixture of unintentionally and unnoticed killed monkey tissue and foetal bovine serum is frozen in order to repeatedly produce "measles virus" and "live vaccine" by "inoculating" dying tissue/cells.

The importance of the obtained measles virus process

The decisive expert opinions, protocols and verdicts of the measles virus trial (2012-2017), to which I refer in the following, can be found freely on the Internet at www.wissenschafftplus. de/blog/de Further expert opinions and refutations of the measles virus allegations that the courts did not consider are published in the issues of the magazine WissenschafftPlus for the years 2014 to 2017.

The background to the measles virus process, which started in 2011, was to ward off the compulsory measles vaccination, which was already demanded at the time. A former Federal Minister of Justice called me and asked for current evidence that could be used to prevent the planned compulsory measles vaccination. A senior public prosecutor (LOStA) gave us the tip to formulate prize competitions in order to establish in court, in a civil lawsuit, that there is no scientific proof for the existence of the viruses and the alleged safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. This has been achieved in full. One can understand and comprehend this when one knows that and why the publication of John Franklin Enders of June 1, 1954, has become the sole and exclusive basis of the entire new gene-idea virology, the basis of "live virus" vaccine production, after the old toxin-idea virology gave itself up in 1951/1952. 

Since I knew that the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), contrary to its legal obligation, did not publish a single publication on the alleged existence of the measles virus, I requested, in order to receive the prize money of 100,000 €, the submission of a scientific publication of the RKI containing the scientific proof of the existence of the measles virus. A young physician from the Saarland presented me with six publications, but none from the RKI: Enders of June 1, 1954, and five others, all of which refer exclusively to Enders, including the only comprehensive review of the measles virus. This "review" describes in detail the decades-long, laborious consensus-building process, which components of dying tissue are now attributed to the measles virus model and which are not, and how the measles virus model had to be constantly changed.

I answer the young physician, who urgently recommended me to do without the (indeed) laborious "legal dispute" in order to pay him the prize money in the short term, that in all publications no viral structure appears recognizably, but easily recognizable only typically cell-own components and structures. Thereupon he filed a lawsuit at the Regional Court of Ravensburg, but never presented the six publications to the court. The Ravensburg court ruled against me and did not even have the six publications in question in its hands and demonstrably not in the file. Moreover, the conviction by the Ravensburg Regional Court happened under more than unusual circumstances. ²¹

The plaintiff admitted in the appeal hearing at the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court, in the questioning by the presiding judge, that he had not read the six publications himself. He trusted thus alone to eliminate me and thus the central refutation of inoculating by the "laborious legal argument". Perhaps he himself became a victim of the mistaken belief in viruses, probably because he trusted his study colleagues, who did not recognize the misguided development of medicine since 1858, did not want to go back so far in history when checking their assumptions, and therefore became both perpetrator and victim of the fatal belief in the infection theories and trust in the vaccination system.

It is plausible that the plaintiff did not read the six publications submitted to me - and not to the court. At least he did not select them himself, because they are exactly the only publications in the entire field of the approximately 30,000 professional articles on "measles" in which reference is made to the assumed existence of the measles virus. But also all the other publications, this number of publications, which could never be managed by a single person, assume "a priori" the existence of the measles virus and refer to the existence of the measles virus by citing what is quoted, ultimately and exclusively always only to the apparent "proof" of Enders from June 1, 1954.

In 2014, the Regional Court of Ravensburg (RC RV) decided to accept the claim of the now doctor of medicine and decided that the prize money is to be paid out even if no publication from the RKI is submitted. Furthermore, the RC RV decided that it was not necessary for the scientific proof of the existence of the measles virus to be presented in a publication, but that the proof required in the competition could also be provided by summing up a total number of 3366 publications (the sum of the other publications cited in the six submitted publications) from the years 1954 to 2007.

The court-appointed expert, Prof. Dr. Dr. Podbielski from Rostock, argued accordingly (or the Regional Court adjusted its opening decision in 2014 in anticipation of the expert opinion): "I must clarify the terminology, that evidence in the classical sense, such as in mathematics or physics, cannot be used in biology. In biology, from the outset, only evidence can be collected that at some point in time becomes practically conclusive in its summary". ²²

Building on this extremely unscientific assertion, which arises from the tension between Podbielski's lack of proof and the contradiction to his faith, but which has become the basis of his being and his justification, something emerges which behavioral researchers define as a leapfrog action. He invents an evasion that arises from his despair, namely that biology and the medicine, vaccination, etc. based on it are per se unscientific and unproven: Only a collection of circumstantial evidence can "at some point" and "somehow" (=practically) gain conclusiveness. A clearer admission of the not only practical but also actual unscientific nature of today's biology and medicine has never been put down on paper with such clarity.

It applies now to let these and further proofs - for the unscientificness and thus illegal statements and interferences in basic rights by the infection and inoculation system - become effective. In order to turn the measles vaccination obligation, which has been legally effective since 13.2.2020 and will come into force on 1.3.2020, into a pleasure. You will find information on this in our newsletter.

Translated Version - Original here

Telegraph main page with overview of all articles: Link

Visit our Telegram Channel for additional news & information: Link

Chat with like-minded in our Telegram Chat Group: Link

Please support to keep this blog alive: paypal

References:

¹ The Nobel Prize is the most embarrassing thing that can happen to a scientist and to society for several reasons: 

• All findings are based on the "prevailing opinion" of the university teaching opinion, with its claim to exclusivity. 
• Almost all previous findings have turned out to be wrong after a short period of a few years to decades. Nobel Prizes thus prevent the progress of scientific findings by dogmatizing assertions. 
• It is only a very small number of extremely elitist, i.e. detached from reality, who determine what is to be considered science. These people dictate the "scientific" fashions and their methods and suppress contradictory findings by excluding from publication, via "peer review", i.e. the review of scientific publications before they are published, unwanted findings that refute one's own ideas and dogmas. See the report on the Nobel Prize in the magazine WissenschafftPlus No. 1/2017, including a sculpture that sums up the problem and says more than all words. 

² In its efforts to prevent compulsory vaccination, Libertas & Sanitas has published comprehensive documentation that represents the existing knowledge of the responsible health authority staff. It is proven in this documentation that there is no data whatsoever in Germany from which one could conclude that vaccinations provide protection and entail few risks. Moreover, no data are collected in Germany that would be required to prove the WHO definition of a measles spread or a halt to its spread. See: www.libertas-sanitas.de, See also the recommended article "Verstand&Logik im Gespräch mit Priorix (Measles-Mumps-Rubella-Life Vaccine) [2020]" on YouTube.

³ Anyone who is fluent in English can directly recognize the fact that the "virus genome" (Complete genome) is constructed only in thought in this publication, in which the RKI was significantly involved: "Complete Genome Sequence of a Wild-Type Measles Virus Isolated during the Spring 2013 Epidemic in Germany", to be found at: https://edoc.rki.de/handle/176904/1876. Prof. Mankertz, co-author of this publication and head of the National Reference Institute for Measles, Mumps and Rubella at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), has claimed in response to inquiries that control experiments were performed for this study to rule out that typical cell components are misinterpreted as virus components. However, she refused to release the documentation of these control experiments. In her complaint, Prof. Mankertz replied that she had no control experiments after all and that her Munich colleagues had certainly carried out and documented these control experiments. I wrote to all authors and their laboratory directors and asked them about the control experiments, which have been mandatory since 1998. None of them replied. The rectors of the institutes I wrote to did not answer either, and so the complaint procedure came to nothing.

⁴ Publikation vom 22.1.2020: Homologous recombination within the spike glycoprotein of the newly identified coronavirus may boost cross‐species transmission from snake to human. Autoren: Wei Ji, Wei Wang, Xiaofang Zhao, Junjie Zai, Xingguang Li. Zu finden über https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25682

⁵ See remarks on this in the magazine WissenschafftPlus No. 2/2019 on the pages 33-36 within the contribution „Eine neue Sichtweise auf das Leben - Teil II. (A new view of life - part II.)." Here an easily comprehensible mechanism is presented, how nearly each form of academic and nationally financed science is missing automatically. This was demonstrated by the legal historian and sociologist Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy in 1956, specifically naming the then already refuted infection and cancer medicine. 

⁶ Karlheinz Lüdtke: Zur Geschichte der frühen Virusforschung. Wie sich mit technischen Fortschritten bei der Untersuchung „filtrierbarer“ infektiöser Agenzien das Verständnis der Virusnatur entwickelt hatte (The history of early virus research. How technical advances in the investigation of "filterable" infectious agents had led to an understanding of the nature of the virus). Reprint No. 125 (1999) of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, 89 pages.

⁷ For the refutation of all past conceptions over a so-called hereditary substance as building and function plan of the life, my contributions are suitable for this in the magazine WissenschafftPlus. The table of contents of all expenditures published so far since 2003 is available via Internet. Likewise and especially the article in "DIE ZEIT" from 12.6.2008 "Erbgut in Auflösung" (genetic material in resolution) is recommended, which can be found freely on the Internet. It summarizes that the "genetic material" is constantly changing, therefore it cannot be a genetic material and the changes are misinterpreted as disease genes.

⁸ A good insight into the work and system of knowledge of Prof. Günter Enderlein can be found in the doctoral thesis of Dr. Elke Krämer "Leben und Werk von Prof. Dr. phil. Günther Enderlein (Life and work of Prof. Dr. phil. Günther Enderlein) (1872- 1968)", which was published as a book in 2012 by Reichl Verlag, St. Goar.

⁹ Riesenviren und die Entstehung des Lebens (Giant viruses and the origin of life). WissenschafftPlus No. 1/2014.

¹⁰ Wasser begreifen, Leben erkennen. PI-Wasser: Mehr als nur energetisiertes H2O (Understanding water, recognizing life. PI water: More than just energized H2O). WissenschafftPlus No. 6/2018 This article can be found freely on our website www.wissenschafftplus.de under the heading "Important texts".

¹¹ See the introduction to a new perspective on life in issues no. 1, 2 and 3/2019 of WissenschafftPlus.

¹² Comprehensive presentation of the measles virus process: go Virus go. Der Bundesgerichtshof lässt den Glauben an Viren untergehen (The Federal Court of Justice destroys the belief in Viruses). WissenschafftPlus No. 2/2017. also freely on the Internet: wissenschafftplus.de. Translated Version can be found here

¹³ Our guest book by Hermann Benjes "Wer hat Angst vor Silvio Gesell (Who is afraid of Silvio Gesell)" (292 pages) is suitable as an introduction to Silvio Gesell's insights and possible solutions for escaping from the destructive mechanisms of the monetary system.

¹⁴ Ivan Illich. The Nemesis of Medicine: The Critique of the Medicalization of Life. 319 pages, 1976 and 1995.

¹⁵ In his book "Can Medicine be cured? The corruption of a profession", the author Seamus O'Mahony, a well-known Irish gastroenterologist, deals with Ivan Illich right at the beginning and disfigures him. In the perversion of medicine he diagnoses, Illich "only" assumes a momentum of his own, which results from the compulsion to make a profit and which is only increased by the pharmaceutical industry. O'Mahony blames the pharmaceutical industry for the corruption of his profession. And: medicine is not curable. He says that medicine can no longer get out of the deadly perversion on its own; only a humanitarian catastrophe or a war could bring about a reset. In doing so, he overlooks the misguided development that was cemented by Virchow from 1858 onwards: The erroneous and already then unjustifiable theory of cellular pathology, from which the wrong and dangerous theories of infection, immune, gene and cancer developed directly. On page 262 of his book, the author O'Mahony admits that there was another school of medicine, according to which health is the result of living in harmony with oneself and one's surroundings, but that this school never had a chance. This was the psychosomatic medicine of Prof. Claus Bahne Bahnson and his international colleagues, but they did not get any further because it got stuck in the wrong biochemistry of the cell theory. Only Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer was able to formulate a (in a positive sense) scientific theory of comprehensive, personalized psychosomatics. 

¹⁶ Rudolf Virchow, ein Stratege der Macht. Teil 1 und Teil  (Rudolf Virchow, a strategist of power. Part 1 and part 2). Siegfried Johann Mohr. WissenschafftPlus No. 5/2015 and No. 6/2015 and Entwicklung von Medizin und Menschheit (Development of Medicine and Humanity) by Stefan Lanka. Wissenschafftplus No. 6/2015.

¹⁷ Annette Hinz-Wessels. Das Robert Koch-Institut im Nationalsozialismus (The Robert Koch Institute under National Socialism) Kulturverlag Kadmos, 192 pages, 2012. The book shows that it was only after those scientists who were critical of the infection theory and disproved it were expelled, imprisoned and killed that infection theories were able to assert themselves globally. 

¹⁸ See the entry on the English Wikipedia page about John Franklin Enders.

¹⁹ The First Measles Virus. Jeffrey P. Baker. Published in Pediatrics magazine, September 2011, 128 (3) 435-437; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-1430

²⁰ Propagation in Tissue Cultures of Cytopathogenic Agents from Patients with Measles. John F. Enders and Thomas C. Peebles. In the magazine „Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine“, Vol. 86, Issue 2 vom 1.6.1954, pages 277-286. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-86-21073 

²¹ see 12

²² Minutes of the court hearing on 12.3.2015 at the Regional Court of Ravensburg, page 7 below. See www.wissenschafftplus.de/blog/de

²³ Minutes of the court hearing on 12.3.2015 at the Regional Court of Ravensburg, page 7 above. See www.wissenschafftplus.de/blog/de

²⁴ To be found on http://lrbw.juris.de or via click on www.wissenschafftplus.de/blog/de